<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><FictionBook xmlns="http://www.gribuser.ru/xml/fictionbook/2.0" xmlns:l="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><description><title-info><genre>antique</genre><author><first-name>Andrew</first-name><middle-name>M.</middle-name><last-name>Lobaczewski</last-name></author><book-title>Political Ponerology: A Science on the Nature of Evil Adjusted for Political Purposes</book-title><lang>ru</lang></title-info><document-info><author><first-name>Andrew</first-name><middle-name>M.</middle-name><last-name>Lobaczewski</last-name></author><program-used>calibre 1.47.0, fb2cut 2.5.4, fb2cut 2.6.2</program-used><date>12.9.2014</date><id>e0de6b77-5062-4fae-aec3-260f44e25788</id><version>1.0</version></document-info><publish-info><year>2006</year></publish-info></description><body><section><empty-line/><p><strong>POLITICAL </strong></p><p><strong>PONEROLOGY </strong></p><p><strong/></p><empty-line/><p><strong/></p><p><strong>Andrew M. !obaczewski </strong></p><empty-line/><p>P O L I T I C A L</p><p>P O N E R O L O G Y</p><empty-line/><p><strong>A science on the nature of evil </strong></p><p><strong>adjusted for political purposes </strong></p><p><strong/></p><empty-line/><p>Translated from the original Polish</p><p>by Alexandra Chciuk-Celt, Ph. D.</p><empty-line/><p>Corrected by the author in 1998</p><empty-line/><p>Edited with Notes and Commentary by</p><p>Laura Knight-Jadczyk</p><p>Henri Sy</p><empty-line/><p><strong>Red Pill Press </strong></p><empty-line/><p>First Edition</p><p>First English publication</p><p>� Andrew M. !obaczewski</p><p>Preface, Notes and Commentary � Laura Knight-Jadczyk and Henri Sy</p><empty-line/><p>ISBN 1-897244-18-5</p><empty-line/><p>All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a</p><p>retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic,</p><p>mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the written prior</p><p>permission of the author.</p><empty-line/><p>Translated in 1985 from the original Polish  <emphasis>Ponerologia Polityczna</emphasis></p><p>by Alexandra Chciuk-Celt, Ph. D.</p><p>University of New York, N.Y.</p><p>Corrected by the author in 1998.</p><empty-line/><p><strong>C O N T E N T S </strong></p><empty-line/><p><strong>EDITOR�S PREFACE .........................................................................7</strong></p><p><strong>AUTHOR�S FOREWORD ................................................................27</strong></p><p><strong>PREFACE  TO THE RED PILL PRESS EDITION.....................30</strong></p><p><strong>I. INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................33</strong></p><p><strong>II. SOME INDISPENSABLE CONCEPTS ....................................45</strong></p><p>PSYCHOLOGY .....................................................................................49</p><p>OBJECTIVE LANGUAGE ......................................................................51</p><p>THE HUMAN INDIVIDUAL ..................................................................57</p><p>SOCIETY .............................................................................................70</p><p><strong>III. THE HYSTEROIDAL CYCLE.................................................84</strong></p><p><strong>IV. PONEROLOGY ...........................................................................96</strong></p><p>PATHOLOGICAL FACTORS ...............................................................104</p><p>ACQUIRED DEVIATIONS ..................................................................105</p><p>INHERITED DEVIATIONS ..................................................................120</p><p>PONEROGENIC PHENOMENA AND PROCESSES ................................144</p><p>SPELLBINDERS .................................................................................155</p><p>PONEROGENIC ASSOCIATIONS ........................................................157</p><p>IDEOLOGIES......................................................................................164</p><p>THE PONERIZATION PROCESS .........................................................168</p><p>MACROSOCIAL PHENOMENA...........................................................173</p><p>STATES OF SOCIETAL HYSTERIZATION...........................................175</p><p>PONEROLOGY ...................................................................................178</p><p><strong>V. PATHOCRACY ...........................................................................183</strong></p><p>THE GENESIS OF THE PHENOMENON...............................................183</p><p>MORE ON THE CONTENTS OF THE PHENOMENON...........................194</p><p>PATHOCRACY AND ITS IDEOLOGY ..................................................200</p><p>THE EXPANSION OF THE PATHOCRACY ..........................................206</p><p>PATHOCRACY IMPOSED BY FORCE..................................................213</p><p>ARTIFICALLY INFECTED PATHOCRACY AND PSYCHOLOGICAL</p><p>WARFARE.........................................................................................216</p><p>GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS ...........................................................221</p><empty-line/><p><strong>VI. NORMAL PEOPLE  UNDER PATHOCRATIC RULE.....230</strong></p><p>FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF TIME ...................................................235</p><p>UNDERSTANDING.............................................................................252</p><p><strong>VII. PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY UNDER </strong></p><p><strong>PATHOCRATIC RULE ..................................................................255</strong></p><p><strong>VIII. PATHOCRACY AND RELIGION ......................................267</strong></p><p><strong>IX. THERAPY FOR THE WORLD ..............................................278</strong></p><p>TRUTH IS A HEALER.........................................................................281</p><p>FORGIVENESS...................................................................................289</p><p>IDEOLOGIES......................................................................................296</p><p>IMMUNIZATION ................................................................................299</p><p><strong>X. A VISION OF THE FUTURE ...................................................303</strong></p><p><strong>BIBLIOGRAPHY .............................................................................311</strong></p><p><strong>INDEX.................................................................................................317</strong></p><p>EDITOR�S PREFACE</p><p>�Aspire to be like Mt. Fuji, with such a broad and solid</p><p>foundation that the strongest earthquake cannot move you, and</p><p>so tall that the greatest enterprises of common men seem in-</p><p>significant from your lofty perspective. With your mind as</p><p>high as Mt Fuji you can see all things clearly. And you can see</p><p>all the forces that shape events; not just the things happening</p><p>near to you.�</p><p><emphasis>Miyamoto Musashi </emphasis></p><empty-line/><p>The book you hold in your hand may be the most important</p><p>book you will ever read; in fact, it  <emphasis>will</emphasis> be. No matter who you</p><p>are, what your status in life, what your age or sex or nationality</p><p>or ethnic background, you will, at some point in your life, feel</p><p>the touch or relentless grip of the cold hand of Evil. Bad things</p><p>happen to good people, that�s a fact.</p><p><emphasis>What  is  evil? </emphasis>  Historically,  the  question  of  evil  has  been  a</p><p>theological  one.  Generations  of  theological  apologists  have</p><p>written  entire  libraries  of  books  in  an  attempt  to  certify  the</p><p>existence of a Good God that created an imperfect world. Saint</p><p>Augustine  distinguished  between  two  forms  of  evil:  �moral</p><p>evil�,  the  evil  humans  do,  by  choice,  knowing  that  they  are</p><p>doing wrong; and �natural evil�, the bad things that just happen</p><p>- the storm, the flood, volcanic eruptions, fatal disease.</p><p>And then, there is what Andrew !obaczewski calls Macro-</p><p>social Evil: large scale evil that overtakes whole societies and</p><p>nations, and has done so again and again since time immemo-</p><p>rial. The history of mankind, when considered objectively, is a</p><p>terrible thing.</p><p>8</p><p>EDITOR�S PREFACE</p><p>Death and destruction come to all, both rich and poor, free</p><p>and slave, young and old, good and evil, with an arbitrariness</p><p>and  insouciance  that,  when  contemplated  even  momentarily,</p><p>can destroy a normal person�s ability to function.</p><p>Over and over again, man has seen his fields and cattle laid</p><p>waste  by  drought  and  disease,  his  loved  ones  tormented  and</p><p>decimated by illness or human cruelty, his life�s work reduced</p><p>to nothing in an instant by events over which he has no control</p><p>at all.</p><p>The study of history through its various disciplines offers a</p><p>view  of  mankind  that  is  almost  insupportable.  The  rapacious</p><p>movements  of  hungry  tribes,  invading  and  conquering  and</p><p>destroying in the darkness of prehistory; the barbarian invaders</p><p>of the civilized world during medieval times, the bloodbaths of</p><p>the  crusades  of  Catholic  Europe  against  the  infidels  of  the</p><p>Middle East and then the �infidels� who were their own broth-</p><p>ers:  the  stalking  noonday  terror  of  the  Inquisition  where  mar-</p><p>tyrs  quenched  the  flames  with  their  blood.  Then,  there  is  the</p><p>raging holocaust of modern genocide; wars, famine, and pesti-</p><p>lence  striding  across  the  globe  in  hundred  league  boots;  and</p><p>never more frightening than today.</p><p>All of these things produce an intolerable sense of indefen-</p><p>sibility against what Mircea Eliade calls the Terror of History.</p><p>There are those who will say that  <emphasis>now</emphasis> this is all past; man-</p><p>kind  has  entered  a  new  phase;  science  and  technology  have</p><p>brought us to the brink of ending all this suffering. Many peo-</p><p>ple believe that man is evolving; society is evolving; and that</p><p>we  now  have  control  over  the  arbitrary  evil  of  our  environ-</p><p>ment;  or  at  least  we  will  have  it  after  George  Bush  and  his</p><p>Neocons have about 25 years to fight the Endless War against</p><p>Terror. Anything that does not support this idea is reinterpreted</p><p>or ignored.</p><p>Science has given us many  wonderful gifts: the space pro-</p><p>gram,  laser,  television,  penicillin,  sulfa-drugs,  and  a  host  of</p><p>other  useful  developments  which  should  make  our  lives  more</p><p>tolerable  and  fruitful.  However,  we  can  easily  see  that  this  is</p><p>not the case. It it could be said that never before has man been</p><p>so precariously poised on the brink of such total destruction.</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>9</p><p>On a personal level, our lives are steadily deteriorating. The</p><p>air  we  breathe  and  the  water  we  drink  is  polluted  almost  be-</p><p>yond  endurance.  Our  foods  are  loaded  with  substances  which</p><p>contribute very little to nourishment and may, in fact, be injuri-</p><p>ous to our health. Stress and tension have become an accepted</p><p>part of life and can be shown to have killed more people than</p><p>the  cigarettes  that  some  people  still  smoke  to  relieve  it.  We</p><p>swallow endless quantities of pills to wake up, go to sleep, get</p><p>the job done, calm our nerves and make us feel good. The in-</p><p>habitants of the earth spend more money on recreational drugs</p><p>than  they  spend  on  housing,  clothing,  food,  education  or  any</p><p>other product or service.</p><p>At  the  social  level,  hatred,  envy,  greed  and  strife  multiply</p><p>exponentially.  Crime  increases  faster  than  the  population.</p><p>Combined with wars, insurrections, and political purges, multi-</p><p>plied millions of people across the globe are without adequate</p><p>food or shelter due to political actions.</p><p>And  then,  of  course,  drought,  famine,  plague  and  natural</p><p>disasters  still  take  an  annual  toll  in  lives  and  suffering.  This,</p><p>too, seems to be increasing.</p><p>When man contemplates history,  <emphasis>as it is</emphasis>, he is forced to re-</p><p>alize  that  he  is  in  the  iron  grip  of  an  existence  that  seems  to</p><p>have  no  real  care  or  concern  for  his  pain  and  suffering.  Over</p><p>and  over  again,  the  same  sufferings  fall  upon  mankind  multi-</p><p>plied millions upon millions of times over millennia. The total-</p><p>ity  of  human  suffering  is  a  dreadful  thing.  I  could  write  until</p><p>the end of the  world using oceans of ink and forests of paper</p><p>and  never  fully  convey  this  Terror.  The  beast  of  arbitrary  ca-</p><p>lamity  has  always  been  with  us.  For  as  long  as  human  hearts</p><p>have  pumped  hot  blood  through  their  too-fragile  bodies  and</p><p>glowed  with  the  inexpressible  sweetness  of  life  and  yearning</p><p>for all that is good and right and loving, the sneering, stalking,</p><p>drooling and scheming beast of unconscious evil has licked its</p><p>lips  in  anticipation  of  its  next  feast  of  terror  and  suffering.</p><p>Since the beginning of time, this mystery of the estate of man,</p><p>this Curse of Cain has existed. And, since the Ancient of Days,</p><p>the cry has been: My punishment is greater than I can bear!</p><p>It is conjectured that, in ancient times, when man perceived</p><p>this  intolerable  and  incomprehensible  condition  in  which  he</p><p>10</p><p>EDITOR�S PREFACE</p><p>found his existence, that he created  cosmogonies to justify all</p><p>the  cruelties,  aberrations,  and  tragedies  of  history.  It  is  true</p><p>that, man, as a rule and in general, is powerless against cosmic</p><p>and geological catastrophes, and it has long been said that the</p><p>average man can�t really do anything about military onslaughts,</p><p>social injustice, personal and familial misfortunes, and a host of</p><p>assaults against his existence too numerous to list.</p><p>This is about to change. The book you hold in your hand is</p><p>going to give you answers to many of the questions about Evil</p><p>in our world. This book is not just about macrosocial evil, it is</p><p>also about everyday evil, because, in a very real sense, the two</p><p>are  inseparable.  The  long  term  accumulation  of  everyday  evil</p><p>always  and  inevitably  leads  to  Grand  Systemic  Evil  that  de-</p><p>stroys  more  innocent  people  than  any  other  phenomenon  on</p><p>this planet.</p><p>The  book  you  hold  in  your  hands  is  also  a  survival guide.</p><p>As I said above, this book will be the most important book you</p><p>will ever read. Unless, of course, you are a psychopath.</p><p>�What does psychopathy have to do with personal or social</p><p>evil?� you may ask.</p><p>Absolutely  everything.  Whether  you  know  it  or  not,  each</p><p>and every day your life is touched by the effects of psychopa-</p><p>thy on our world. You are about to learn that even if there isn�t</p><p>much  we  can  do  about  geological  and  cosmological  catastro-</p><p>phe, there is a lot we can do about social and macrosocial evil,</p><p>and the very first thing to do is to learn about it. In the case of</p><p>psychopathy and its effects on our world, what you don�t know</p><p>definitely can and will hurt you.</p><p>Nowadays the word �psychopath� generally evokes images</p><p>of  the  barely  restrained  -  yet  surprisingly  urbane  -  mad-dog</p><p>serial killer, Dr. Hannibal Lecter, of  <emphasis>Silence of the Lambs</emphasis> fame.</p><p>I  will  admit  that  this  was  the  image  that  came  to  my  mind</p><p>whenever I heard the word; almost, that is. The big difference</p><p>was that I never thought of a psychopath as possibly being so</p><p>cultured  or  so  capable  of  passing  as  �normal�.  But  I  was</p><p>wrong, and I was to learn this lesson quite painfully by direct</p><p>experience. The exact details are chronicled elsewhere; what is</p><p>important is that this experience was probably one of the most</p><p>painful and instructive episodes of my life, and it enabled me to</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>11</p><p>overcome a block in my awareness of the world around me and</p><p>those who inhabit it.</p><p>Regarding blocks to awareness, I need to state for the record</p><p>that  I  have  spent  30  years  studying  psychology,  history,  cul-</p><p>ture, religion, myth and the so-called paranormal1. I also have</p><p>worked for many years with hypnotherapy - which gave me a</p><p>very good mechanical knowledge of how the mind/brain of the</p><p>human being operates  at very deep levels.  But even so, I  was</p><p>still  operating  with  certain  beliefs  firmly  in  place  that  were</p><p>shattered by my research into psychopathy. I realized that there</p><p>was  a certain set of ideas that I held about human beings that</p><p>were sacrosanct � and false. I even wrote about this once in the</p><p>following way:</p><p>�my work has shown me that the vast majority of people</p><p>want to do good, to experience good things, think good</p><p>thoughts, and make decisions with good results. And they try</p><p>with all their might to do so! With the majority of people hav-</p><p>ing this internal desire, why the Hell isn't it happening?</p><p>I was na�ve, I admit. There were many things I did not know</p><p>that I have learned since I penned those words. But even at that</p><p>time I was aware of how our own minds can be used to deceive</p><p>us.</p><p>Now,  what  beliefs  did  I  hold  that  made  me  a  victim  of  a</p><p>psychopath? The first and most obvious one is that I truly be-</p><p>lieved that deep inside, all people are basically �good� and that</p><p>they �want to do good, to experience good things, think good</p><p>thoughts,  and  make  decisions  with  good  results.  And  they  try</p><p>with all their might to do so�.�</p><p>As it happens, this is not true as I - and everyone involved</p><p>in our research group - learned to our sorrow, as they say. But</p><p>we  also  learned  to  our  edification.  In  order  to  come  to  some</p><p>understanding  of  exactly  what  kind  of  human  being  could  do</p><p>the things that were done to me (and others close to me), and</p><p>why  they  might  be  motivated  -  even  driven  -  to  behave  this</p><p>way,  we  began  to  research  the  psychology  literature  for  clues</p><p>because we needed to understand for our own peace of mind.</p><empty-line/><p>1 I have never received any academic degrees, so I am not a �professional�, in</p><p>that respect.</p><p>12</p><p>EDITOR�S PREFACE</p><p>If  there  is  a  psychological  theory  that  can  explain  vicious</p><p>and harmful behavior, it helps very much for the victim of such</p><p>acts to have this information so that they do not have to spend</p><p>all their time feeling hurt or angry. And certainly, if there is a</p><p>psychological  theory  that  helps  a  person  to  find  what  kind  of</p><p>words or deeds can bridge the  chasm between people, to heal</p><p>misunderstandings, that is also a worthy goal. It was from such</p><p>a perspective that we began our extensive work on the subjects</p><p>of narcissism, which then led to the study of psychopathy.</p><p>Of course, we didn�t start out with such any such �diagno-</p><p>sis� or label for what we were witnessing. We started out with</p><p>observations and searched the literature for clues, for profiles,</p><p>for anything that would help us to understand the inner  world</p><p>of  a  human  being  -  actually  a  group  of  human  beings  -  who</p><p>seemed to be utterly depraved and unlike anything we had ever</p><p>encountered before. We found that this kind of human is all too</p><p>common,  and  that,  according  to  some  of  the  latest  research,</p><p>they cause more damage in human society than any other sin-</p><p>gle  so-called  �mental  illness�.  Martha  Stout,  who  has  worked</p><p>extensively with victims of psychopaths, writes:</p><p>Imagine - if you can - not having a conscience, none at all,</p><p>no feelings of guilt or remorse no matter what you do, no lim-</p><p>iting sense of concern for the well-being of strangers, friends,</p><p>or even family members. Imagine no struggles with shame,</p><p>not a single one in your whole life, no matter what kind of</p><p>selfish, lazy, harmful, or immoral action you had taken.</p><p>And pretend that the concept of responsibility is unknown</p><p>to you, except as a burden others seem to accept without ques-</p><p>tion, like gullible fool.</p><p>Now add to this strange fantasy the ability to conceal from</p><p>other people that your psychological makeup is radically dif-</p><p>ferent from theirs. Since everyone simply assumes that con-</p><p>science is universal among human beings, hiding the fact that</p><p>you are conscience-free is nearly effortless.</p><p>You are not held back from any of your desires by guilt or</p><p>shame, and you are never confronted by others for your cold-</p><p>bloodedness. The ice water in your veins is so bizarre, so</p><p>completely outside of their personal experience, that they sel-</p><p>dom even guess at your condition.</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>13</p><p>In other words, you are completely free of internal re-</p><p>straints, and your unhampered liberty to do just as you please,</p><p>with no pangs of conscience, is conveniently invisible to the</p><p>world.</p><p>You can do anything at all, and still your strange advan-</p><p>tage over the majority of people, who are kept in line by their</p><p>consciences will most likely remain undiscovered.</p><p>How will you live your life?</p><p>What will you do with your huge and secret advantage,</p><p>and with the corresponding handicap of other people (con-</p><p>science)?</p><p>The answer will depend largely on just what your desires</p><p>happen to be, because people are not all the same. Even the</p><p>profoundly unscrupulous are not all the same. Some people -</p><p>whether they have a conscience or not - favor the ease of iner-</p><p>tia, while others are filled with dreams and wild ambitions.</p><p>Some human beings are brilliant and talented, some are dull-</p><p>witted, and most, conscience or not, are somewhere in be-</p><p>tween. There are violent people and nonviolent ones, indi-</p><p>viduals who are motivated by blood lust and those who have</p><p>no such appetites. [...]</p><p>Provided you are not forcibly stopped, you can do any-</p><p>thing at all.</p><p>If you are born at the right time, with some access to fam-</p><p>ily fortune, and you have a special talent for whipping up</p><p>other people's hatred and sense of deprivation, you can arrange</p><p>to kill large numbers of unsuspecting people. With enough</p><p>money, you can accomplish this from far away, and you can</p><p>sit back safely and watch in satisfaction. [...]</p><p>Crazy and frightening - and real, in about 4 percent of the</p><p>population....</p><p>The prevalence rate for anorexic eating disorders is esti-</p><p>mated a 3.43 percent, deemed to be nearly epidemic, and yet</p><p>this figure is a fraction lower than the rate for antisocial per-</p><p>sonality. The high-profile disorders classed as schizophrenia</p><p>occur in only about 1 percent of [the population] - a mere</p><p>quarter of the rate of antisocial personality - and the Centers</p><p>for Disease Control and Prevention say that the rate of colon</p><p>cancer in the United States, considered �alarmingly high,� is</p><p>14</p><p>EDITOR�S PREFACE</p><p>about 40 per 100,000 - one hundred times lower than the rate</p><p>of antisocial personality.</p><p>The high incidence of sociopathy in human society has a</p><p>profound effect on the rest of us who must live on this planet,</p><p>too, even those of us who have not been clinically trauma-</p><p>tized. The individuals who constitute this 4 percent drain our</p><p>relationships, our bank accounts, our accomplishments, our</p><p>self-esteem, our very peace on earth.</p><p>Yet surprisingly, many people know nothing about this</p><p>disorder, or if they do, they think only in terms of violent psy-</p><p>chopathy - murderers, serial killers, mass murderers - people</p><p>who have conspicuously broken the law many times over, and</p><p>who, if caught, will be imprisoned, maybe even put to death</p><p>by our legal system.</p><p>We are not commonly aware of, nor do we usually iden-</p><p>tify, the larger number of nonviolent sociopaths among us,</p><p>people who often are not blatant lawbreakers, and against</p><p>whom our formal legal system provides little defense.</p><p>Most of us would not imagine any correspondence be-</p><p>tween conceiving an ethnic genocide and, say, guiltlessly ly-</p><p>ing to one's boss about a coworker. But the psychological cor-</p><p>respondence is not only there; it is chilling. Simple and pro-</p><p>found, the link is the absence of the inner mechanism that</p><p>beats up on us, emotionally speaking, when we make a choice</p><p>we view as immoral, unethical, neglectful, or selfish.</p><p>Most of us feel mildly guilty if we eat the last piece of</p><p>cake in the kitchen, let alone what we would feel if we inten-</p><p>tionally and methodically set about to hurt another person.</p><p>Those who have no conscience at all are a group unto</p><p>themselves, whether they be homicidal tyrants or merely ruth-</p><p>less social snipers.</p><p>The presence or absence of conscience is a deep human</p><p>division, arguably more significant than intelligence, race, or</p><p>even gender.</p><p>What differentiates a sociopath who lives off the labors of</p><p>others from one who occasionally robs convenience stores, or</p><p>from one who is a contemporary robber baron - or what makes</p><p>the difference betwen an ordinary bully and a sociopathic</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>15</p><p>murderer - is nothing more than social status, drive, intellect,</p><p>blood lust, or simple opportunity.</p><p>What distinguishes all of these people from the rest of us is</p><p>an utterly empty hole in the psyche, where there should be the</p><p>most evolved of all humanizing functions.2</p><p>We  did  not  have  the  advantage  of  Dr.  Stout�s  book  at  the</p><p>beginning  of  our  research  project.  We  did,  of  course,  have</p><p>Robert  Hare  and  Hervey  Cleckley  and  Guggenbuhl-Craig  and</p><p>others. But they were only approaching the subject of the pos-</p><p>sibly  large  numbers  of  psychopaths  that  live  among  us  who</p><p>never get caught breaking laws, who don�t murder � or if they</p><p>do, they don�t get caught � and who still do untold damage to</p><p>the lives of family, acquaintances, and strangers.</p><p>Most mental health experts, for a very long time, have oper-</p><p>ated on the premise that psychopaths come from impoverished</p><p>backgrounds and have experienced abuse of one sort or another</p><p>in  childhood,  so  it  is  easy  to  spot  them,  or  at  least,  they  cer-</p><p>tainly  don�t  move  in  society  except  as  interlopers.  This  idea</p><p>seems  to  be  coming  under  some  serious  revision  lately.  As</p><p>!obaczewski  points  out  in  this  book,  there  is  some  confusion</p><p>between Psychopathy and  Antisocial Personality Disorder and</p><p>Sociopathy.  As  Robert  Hare  points  out,  yes,  there  are  many</p><p>psychopaths  who  are  also  �anti-socials�,  but  there  seem  to  be</p><p>far more of them that would never be classified as anti-social or</p><p>sociopathic!  In  other  words,  they  can  be  doctors,  lawyers,</p><p>judges,  policemen,  congressmen,  presidents  of  corporations</p><p>that rob from the poor to give to the rich, and even presidents.</p><p>In a recent paper, it is suggested that psychopathy may exist</p><p>in  ordinary  society  in  even  greater  numbers  than  anyone  has</p><p>thus far considered:</p><p>Psychopathy, as originally conceived by Cleckley (1941),</p><p>is not limited to engagement in illegal activities, but rather en-</p><p>compasses such personality characteristics as manipulative-</p><p>ness, insincerity, egocentricity, and lack of guilt - characteris-</p><p>tics clearly present in criminals but also in spouses, parents,</p><p>bosses, attorneys, politicians, and CEOs, to name but a few.</p><p>(Bursten, 1973; Stewart, 1991). Our own examination of the</p><p>prevalence of psychopathy within a university population sug-</p><empty-line/><p>2 Stout, Martha:  <emphasis>The Sociopath Next Door</emphasis>, Broadway. 2005</p><p>16</p><p>EDITOR�S PREFACE</p><p>gested that perhaps 5% or more of this sample might be</p><p>deemed psychopathic, although the vast majority of those will</p><p>be male (more than 1/10 males versus approximately 1/100</p><p>females).</p><p>As such, psychopathy may be characterized ... as involving</p><p>a tendency towards both dominance and coldness. Wiggins</p><p>(1995) in summarizing numerous previous findings... indicates</p><p>that such individuals are prone to anger and irritation and are</p><p>willing to exploit others. They are arrogant, manipulative,</p><p>cynical, exhibitionistic, sensation-seeking, Machiavellian,</p><p>vindictive, and out for their own gain. With respect to their</p><p>patterns of social exchange (Foa &amp; Foa, 1974), they attribute</p><p>love and status to themselves, seeing themselves as highly</p><p>worthy and important, but prescribe neither love nor status to</p><p>others, seeing them as unworthy and insignificant. This char-</p><p>acterization is clearly consistent with the essence of psychopa-</p><p>thy as commonly described.</p><p>The present investigation sought to answer some basic</p><p>questions regarding the construct of psychopathy in non foren-</p><p>sic settings... In so doing we have returned to Cleckley�s</p><p>(1941) original emphasis on psychopathy as a personality style</p><p>not only among criminals, but also among successful indi-</p><p>viduals within the community.</p><p>What is clear from our findings is that (a) psychopathy</p><p>measures have converged on a prototype of psychopathy that</p><p>involves a combination of dominant and cold interpersonal</p><p>characteristics; (b) psychopathy does occur in the community</p><p>and at what might be a higher than expected rate; and (c) psy-</p><p>chopathy appears to have little overlap with personality disor-</p><p>ders aside from Antisocial Personality Disorder. ...</p><p>Clearly, where much more work is needed is in under-</p><p>standing what factors differentiate the abiding (although per-</p><p>haps not moral-abiding) psychopath from the law-breaking</p><p>psychopath; such research surely needs to make greater use of</p><p>non forensic samples than has been customary in the past.3</p><p>!obaczewski discusses the fact that there are different types</p><p>of  psychopaths.  One  type,  in  particular,  is  the  most  deadly  of</p><empty-line/><p>3 Salekin, Trobst, Krioukova: (2001) �Construct Validity of Psychopathy in a</p><p>Community Sample: A Nomological Net Approach� in  <emphasis>Journal of Personal-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>ity Disorders</emphasis>, 15(5), 425-441.</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>17</p><p>all: the Essential Psychopath. He doesn�t give us a �checklist�</p><p>but rather discusses what is inside the psychopath. His descrip-</p><p>tion meshes very well with items in the paper quoted above.</p><p>Martha  Stout  also  discusses  the  fact  that  psychopaths,  like</p><p>anyone else, are born with different basic likes and dislikes and</p><p>desires, which is why some of them are doctors and presidents</p><p>and others are petty thieves or rapists.</p><p>�Likeable�,  �Charming�,  �Intelligent�,  �Alert�,  �Impres-</p><p>sive�,  �Confidence-inspiring,�  and  �A  great  success  with  the</p><p>ladies�.  This  is  how  Hervey  Cleckley  described  most  of  his</p><p>subjects in  <emphasis>The Mask of Sanity</emphasis>. It seems that, in spite of the fact</p><p>that  their  actions  prove  them  to  be  �irresponsible�  and  �self-</p><p>destructive�, psychopaths seem to have in abundance the very</p><p>traits  most  desired  by  normal  persons.  The  smooth  self-</p><p>assurance  acts  as  an  almost  supernatural  magnet  to  normal</p><p>people who have to read self-help books or go to counseling to</p><p>be able to interact with others in an untroubled way. The psy-</p><p>chopath,  on  the  contrary,  never  has  any  neuroses,  no  self-</p><p>doubts, never  experiences angst, and  <emphasis>is</emphasis>  what �normal� people</p><p>seek to be. What�s more, even if they aren�t that attractive, they</p><p>are �babe magnets�.</p><p>Cleckley's seminal hypothesis is that the psychopath suffers</p><p>from profound and incurable  <emphasis>affective</emphasis> deficit. If he really feels</p><p>anything at all, they are emotions of only the shallowest kind.</p><p>He is able to do  whatever he  wants, based on  whatever  whim</p><p>strikes him, because consequences that would fill the ordinary</p><p>man  with  shame,  self-loathing,  and  embarrassment  simply  do</p><p>not  affect  the  psychopath  at  all.  What  to  others  would  be  a</p><p>horror or a disaster is to him merely a fleeting inconvenience.</p><p>Cleckley  posits  that  psychopathy  is  quite  common  in  the</p><p>community at large. His cases include examples of psychopaths</p><p>who  generally  function  normally  in  the  community  as  busi-</p><p>nessmen,  doctors,  and  even  psychiatrists.  Nowadays,  some  of</p><p>the  more  astute  researchers  see  criminal  psychopathy  -  often</p><p>referred to as anti-social personality disorder - as an extreme of</p><p>a particular personality type. I think it is more helpful to char-</p><p>acterize criminal psychopaths as �unsuccessful psychopaths�.</p><p>18</p><p>EDITOR�S PREFACE</p><p>One researcher, Alan Harrington, goes so far as to say that</p><p>the  psychopath  is  the  new  man  being  produced  by  the  evolu-</p><p>tionary pressures of modern life.</p><p>Certainly, there have always been shysters and  crooks, but</p><p>past concern was focused on ferreting out incompetents rather</p><p>than psychopaths. Unfortunately, all that has changed. We now</p><p>need  to  fear  the  super-sophisticated  modern  crook  who  does</p><p>know  what he is doing ... and does it so well that no one else</p><p>knows. Yes, psychopaths love the business world.</p><p>Uninvolved with others, he coolly saw into their fears and</p><p>desires, and maneuvered them as he wished. Such a man</p><p>might not, after all, be doomed to a life of scrapes and esca-</p><p>pades ending ignominiously in the jailhouse. Instead of mur-</p><p>dering others, he might become a corporate raider and murder</p><p>companies, firing people instead of killing them, and chopping</p><p>up their functions rather than their bodies.</p><p>[�T]he consequences to the average citizen from business</p><p>crimes are staggering. As criminologist Georgette Bennett</p><p>says, �They account for nearly 30% of case filings in U.S.</p><p>District Courts - more than any other category of crime. The</p><p>combined burglary, mugging and other property losses in-</p><p>duced by the country�s street punks come to about $4 billion a</p><p>year. However, the seemingly upstanding citizens in our cor-</p><p>porate board rooms and the humble clerks in our retail stores</p><p>bilk us out of between $40 and $200 billion a year.�</p><p>Concern here is that the costume for the new masked san-</p><p>ity of a psychopath is just as likely to be a three-piece suit as a</p><p>ski mask and a gun. As Harrington says, �We also have the</p><p>psychopath in respectable circles, no longer assumed to be a</p><p>loser.� He quotes William Krasner as saying, �They - psycho-</p><p>path and part psychopath - do well in the more unscrupulous</p><p>types of sales work, because they take such delight in �putting</p><p>it over on them�, getting away with it - and have so little con-</p><p>science about defrauding their customers.� Our society is fast</p><p>becoming more materialistic, and success at any cost is the</p><p>credo of many businessmen. The typical psychopath thrives in</p><p>this kind of environment and is seen as a business �hero�.4</p><empty-line/><p>4 Ken Magid and Carole McKelvey:  <emphasis>The Psychopaths Favourite Play-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>ground:Business Relationships. </emphasis></p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>19</p><p>The study of �ambulatory� psychopaths - what we call �The</p><p>Garden  Variety  Psychopath�  -  has,  however,  hardly  begun.</p><p>Very  little  is  known  about  subcriminal  psychopathy.  Some</p><p>researchers have begun to seriously consider the idea that it is</p><p>important to study psychopathy not as a pathological category</p><p>but as a general personality trait in the community at large. In</p><p>other words, psychopathy is being recognized as a more or less</p><p>a different type of human.</p><p>Hervey Cleckly actually comes very close to suggesting that</p><p>psychopaths are human in every respect - but that they lack a</p><p>soul.  This  lack  of  �soul  quality�  makes  them  very  efficient</p><p>�machines�. They can write scholarly works, imitate the words</p><p>of emotion, but over time, it becomes clear that their words do</p><p>not  match  their  actions.  They  are  the  type  of  person  who  can</p><p>claim that they are devastated by grief who then attend a party</p><p>�to forget�. The problem is: they really  <emphasis>do</emphasis> forget.</p><p>Being  very  efficient  machines,  like  a  computer,  they  are</p><p>able  to  execute  very  complex  routines  designed  to  elicit  from</p><p>others support for what they  want. In this way,  many psycho-</p><p>paths  are  able  to  reach  very  high  positions  in  life.  It  is  only</p><p>over  time  that  their  associates  become  aware  of  the  fact  that</p><p>their climb up the ladder of success is predicated on  violating</p><p>the  rights  of  others.  �Even  when  they  are  indifferent  to  the</p><p>rights of their associates, they are often able to inspire feelings</p><p>of trust and confidence.�</p><p>The psychopath recognizes no flaw in his psyche, no  need</p><p>for change.</p><p>Andrew !obaczewski addresses the problem of the psycho-</p><p>path and their extremely significant contribution to our macro-</p><p>social evils, their ability to act as the �minence grise behind the</p><p>very  structure  of  our  society.  It  is  very  important  to  keep  in</p><p>mind that this influence comes from a relatively small segment</p><p>of  humanity.  The  other  90-some  percent  of  human  beings  are</p><p>not psychopaths.</p><p>But that 90-some percent of normal people know that some-</p><p>thing is wrong! They just can�t quite identify it; can�t quite put</p><p>their finger on it; and because they can�t, they tend to think that</p><p>there  is  nothing they  can  do  about  it,  or  maybe  it  is  just  God</p><p>punishing people.</p><p>20</p><p>EDITOR�S PREFACE</p><p>What is actually the case is that when that 90-some percent</p><p>of human beings fall into a  certain state, as  !obaczewski  will</p><p>describe,  the  psychopaths,  like  a  virulent  pathogen  in  a  body,</p><p>strike at the weaknesses, and the entire society is plunged into</p><p>conditions that always and inevitably lead to horror and tragedy</p><p>on a very large scale.</p><p>The movie,  <emphasis>The Matrix</emphasis>, touched a deep chord in society be-</p><p>cause  it  exemplified  this  mechanistic  trap  in  which  so  many</p><p>people find their lives enmeshed, and from which they are un-</p><p>able to extricate themselves because they believe that everyone</p><p>around  them  who  �looks  human�  is,  in  fact,  just  like  them  -</p><p>emotionally, spiritually, and otherwise.</p><p>To give an example of how psychopaths can directly affect</p><p>society at large: the  �legal argument� as  explicated by Robert</p><p>Canup in his work on the  <emphasis>Socially Adept Psychopath</emphasis>. The legal</p><p>argument  seems  to  be  at  the  foundation  of  our  society.  We</p><p>believe  that  the  legal  argument  is  an  advanced  system  of  jus-</p><p>tice. This is a very cunning trick that has been foisted on nor-</p><p>mal people by psychopaths in order to have an advantage over</p><p>them.  Just  think  about  it  for  a  moment:  the  legal  argument</p><p>amounts to little more than the one who is the slickest at using</p><p>the structure for convincing a group of people of something, is</p><p>the one who is believed. Because this �legal argument� system</p><p>has been slowly installed as part of our culture, when it invades</p><p>our  personal  lives,  we  normally  do  not  recognize  it  immedi-</p><p>ately. But here�s how it works.</p><p>Human  beings  have  been  accustomed  to  assume  that  other</p><p>human beings are - at the very least - trying to �do right� and</p><p>�be good� and fair and honest.  And so, very often,  we do not</p><p>take  the  time  to  use  due  diligence  in  order  to  determine  if  a</p><p>person  who  has  entered  our  life  is,  in  fact,  a  �good  person�.</p><p>When  a  conflict  ensues,  we  automatically  fall  into  the  legal</p><p>argument  assumption  that  in  any  conflict,  one  side  is  partly</p><p>right one way, and the other is partly right the other,  and that</p><p>we  can  form  opinions  about  which  side  is  mostly  right  or</p><p>wrong. Because of our exposure to the �legal argument� norms,</p><p>when any dispute arises,  we  automatically think that  the truth</p><p>will lie somewhere between two extremes. In this case, applica-</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>21</p><p>tion  of  a  little  mathematical  logic  to  the  problem  of  the  legal</p><p>argument might be helpful.</p><p>Let us assume that in a dispute, one side is innocent, honest,</p><p>and  tells  the  truth.  It  is  obvious  that  lying  does  an  innocent</p><p>person no good; what lie can he tell? If he is innocent, the only</p><p>lie he can tell is to falsely confess �I did it�. But lying is noth-</p><p>ing but good for the liar.  He can declare that �I didn�t do it�,</p><p>and accuse another of doing it, all the while the innocent per-</p><p>son  he  has  accused  is  saying  �I  didn�t  do  it�  and  is  actually</p><p>telling the truth.</p><p>The truth, when twisted by good liars, can always make an</p><p>innocent  person  look  bad,  especially  if  the  innocent  person  is</p><p>honest and admits his mistakes.</p><p>The  basic  assumption  that  the  truth  lies  between  the  testi-</p><p>mony of the two sides always shifts the advantage to the lying</p><p>side and away from the side telling the truth. Under  most cir-</p><p>cumstances, this shift put together with the fact that the truth is</p><p>going to also be twisted in such a way as to bring detriment to</p><p>the innocent person, results in the advantage  <emphasis>always</emphasis> resting in</p><p>the hands of liars - psychopaths. Even the simple act of giving</p><p>testimony  under  oath  is  a  useless  farce.  If  a  person  is  a  liar,</p><p>swearing  an  oath  means  nothing  to  that  person.  However,</p><p>swearing  an  oath  acts  strongly  on  a  serious,  truthful  witness.</p><p>Again, the advantage is placed on the side of the liar.</p><p>It has often been noted that psychopaths have a distinct ad-</p><p>vantage  over  human  beings  with  conscience  and  feelings  be-</p><p>cause  the  psychopath  does  not  have  conscience  and  feelings.</p><p>What seems to be so is that conscience and feelings are related</p><p>to the abstract concepts of �future� and �others�. It is �spatio-</p><p>temporal�. We can feel fear, sympathy, empathy, sadness, and</p><p>so  on  because  we  can   <emphasis>imagine</emphasis>  in  an  abstract  way,  the  future</p><p>based  on  our  own  experiences  in  the  past,  or  even  just  �con-</p><p>cepts  of  experiences�  in  myriad  variations.  We  can  �see  our-</p><p>selves�  in  them  even  though  they  are  �out  there�  and  this</p><p>evokes feelings in us.  We can�t do something hurtful because</p><p>we can imagine it being done to us and how it  would feel.  In</p><p>other words, we can not only identify with others spatially - so</p><p>to say - but also temporally - in time.</p><p>The psychopath does not seem to have this capacity.</p><p>22</p><p>EDITOR�S PREFACE</p><p>They are unable to �imagine� in the sense of being able to</p><p>really connect to images in a direct �self connecting to another</p><p>self� sort of way.</p><p>Oh, indeed, they can  <emphasis>imitate</emphasis> feelings, but the only real feel-</p><p>ings they seem to have - the thing that drives them and causes</p><p>them  to  act  out  different  dramas  for  the  effect  -  is  a  sort  of</p><p>�predatorial  hunger�  for  what  they  want.  That  is  to  say,  they</p><p>�feel� need/want as love, and not having their needs/wants met</p><p>is described by them as �not being loved�. What is more, this</p><p>�need/want�  perspective  posits  that  only  the  �hunger�  of  the</p><p>psychopath is valid, and anything, and everything �out there�,</p><p>outside of the psychopath, is not real except insofar as it has the</p><p>capability  of  being  assimilated  to  the  psychopath  as  a  sort  of</p><p>�food�.  �Can  it  be  used  or  can  it  provide  something?�  is  the</p><p>only issue about which the psychopath seems to be concerned.</p><p>All else - all activity - is subsumed to this drive.</p><p>In short, the psychopath is a predator. If we think about the</p><p>interactions of predators with their prey in the animal kingdom,</p><p>we can come to some idea of what is behind the �mask of san-</p><p>ity� of the psychopath. Just as an animal predator will adopt all</p><p>kinds of stealthy functions in order to stalk their prey, cut them</p><p>out of the herd, get close to them, and reduce their resistance,</p><p>so does the psychopath construct all kinds of elaborate camou-</p><p>flage composed of words and appearances - lies and manipula-</p><p>tions - in order to �assimilate� their prey.</p><p>This leads us to an important question: what does the psy-</p><p>chopath  <emphasis>really</emphasis> get from their victims? It�s easy to see what they</p><p>are  after  when  they  lie  and  manipulate  for  money  or  material</p><p>goods or power. But in many instances, such as love relation-</p><p>ships or faked friendships, it is not so easy to see what the psy-</p><p>chopath is after. Without wandering too far afield into spiritual</p><p>speculations - a problem Cleckley also faced - we can only say</p><p>that  it  seems  to  be  that  the  psychopath   <emphasis>enjoys</emphasis>  making  others</p><p>suffer. Just as normal humans enjoy seeing other people happy,</p><p>or  doing  things  that  make  other  people  smile,  the  psychopath</p><p>enjoys the exact opposite.</p><p>Anyone who has ever observed a cat playing with a mouse</p><p>before  killing  and  eating  it  has  probably  explained  to  them-</p><p>selves  that  the  cat  is  just  �entertained�  by  the  antics  of  the</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>23</p><p>mouse  and  is  unable  to  conceive  of  the  terror  and  pain  being</p><p>experienced  by  the  mouse.  The  cat,  therefore,  is  innocent  of</p><p>any evil intent. The  mouse dies, the  cat is fed, and that is na-</p><p>ture. Psychopaths don�t generally eat their victims.</p><p>Yes,  in  extreme  cases  of  psychopathy,  the  entire  cat  and</p><p>mouse dynamic  <emphasis>is</emphasis> carried out. Cannibalism has a long history</p><p>wherein it was assumed that certain powers of the victim could</p><p>be  assimilated  by  eating  some  particular  part  of  them.  But  in</p><p>ordinary life, psychopaths don�t normally go all the way, so to</p><p>say. This causes us to look at the cat and mouse scenario again</p><p>with  different  eyes.  Now  we  ask:  is  it  too  simplistic  to  think</p><p>that  the  innocent  cat  is  merely  entertained  by  the  mouse  run-</p><p>ning about and frantically trying to escape? Is there something</p><p>more  to  this  dynamic  than  meets  the  eye?  Is  there  something</p><p>more than being �entertained� by the antics of the mouse trying</p><p>to flee? After all, in terms of evolution, why would such behav-</p><p>ior be hard-wired into the cat? Is the mouse tastier because of</p><p>the chemicals of fear that flood his little body? Is a mouse fro-</p><p>zen with terror more of a �gourmet� meal?</p><p>This suggests that we ought to revisit our ideas about psy-</p><p>chopaths with a slightly different perspective. One thing we do</p><p>know  is  this:  many  people  who  experience  interactions  with</p><p>psychopaths  and  narcissists  report  feeling  �drained�  and  con-</p><p>fused  and  often  subsequently  experience  deteriorating  health.</p><p>Does this mean that part of the dynamic, part of the explanation</p><p>for  why  psychopaths  will  pursue  �love  relationships�  and</p><p>�friendships� that ostensibly can result in no observable mate-</p><p>rial gain, is because there is an actual energy consumption?</p><p>We  do  not  know  the  answer  to  this  question.  We  observe,</p><p>we theorize, we speculate and hypothesize. But in the end, only</p><p>the individual victim can determine what they have lost in the</p><p>dynamic  -  and  it  is  often  far  more  than  material  goods.  In  a</p><p>certain sense, it seems that psychopaths are soul eaters or �Psy-</p><p>chophagic�.</p><p>In the past several years, there are many more psychologists</p><p>and psychiatrists and other mental health workers beginning to</p><p>look  at  these  issues  in  new  ways  in  response  to  the  questions</p><p>about  the  state  of  our  world  and  the  possibility  that  there  is</p><p>24</p><p>EDITOR�S PREFACE</p><p>some  essential  difference  between  such  individuals  as  George</p><p>W. Bush and many so-called Neocons, and the rest of us.</p><p>Dr.  Stout�s  book  has  one  of  the  longest  explanations as  to</p><p>why  none  of  her  examples  resemble  any  actual  persons  that  I</p><p>have ever read. And then, in a very early chapter, she describes</p><p>a �composite� case where the subject spent his childhood blow-</p><p>ing up frogs with fire-crackers. It is widely known that George</p><p>W. Bush did this, so one naturally wonders...</p><p>In any event, even without Dr. Stout�s work, at the time we</p><p>were studying the matter, we realized that what we were learn-</p><p>ing  was  very  important  to  everyone  because  as  the  data  was</p><p>assembled, we saw that the clues, the profiles, revealed that the</p><p>issues  we  were  facing  were  faced  by  everyone  at  one  time  or</p><p>another, to one extent or another. We also began to realize that</p><p>the profiles that emerged also describe rather accurately many</p><p>individuals who seek positions of power in fields of authority,</p><p>most  particularly  politics  and  commerce.  That�s  really  not  so</p><p>surprising  an  idea,  but  it  honestly  hadn�t  occurred  to  us  until</p><p>we  saw  the  patterns  and  recognized  them  in  the  behaviors  of</p><p>numerous  historical  figures  and,  lately,  including  George  W.</p><p>Bush and members of his administration.</p><p>Current day statistics tell us that there are more psychologi-</p><p>cally sick people than healthy ones. If you take a sampling of</p><p>individuals in any given field, you are likely to find that a sig-</p><p>nificant number of them display pathological symptoms to one</p><p>extent or another. Politics is no exception, and, by its very na-</p><p>ture, would tend to attract more of the pathological �dominator</p><p>types� than other fields. That is only logical, and we began to</p><p>realize that it was not only logical, it was horrifyingly accurate;</p><p>horrifying because pathology among people in power can have</p><p>disastrous effects on all of the people under the control of such</p><p>pathological individuals. And so, we decided to write about this</p><p>subject and publish it on the Internet.</p><p>As  the  material  went  up,  letters  from  our  readers  began  to</p><p>come in thanking us for putting a name to what was happening</p><p>to them in their personal lives as well as helping them to under-</p><p>stand what was happening in a world that seems to have gone</p><p>completely  mad.  We  began  to  think  that  it  was  an  epidemic,</p><p>and,  in  a  certain  sense,  we  were  right.  If  an  individual  with  a</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>25</p><p>highly contagious illness works in a job that puts them in con-</p><p>tact with the public, an epidemic is the result. In the same way,</p><p>if an individual in a position of political power is a psychopath,</p><p>he or she can create an epidemic of psychopathology in people</p><p>who are not, essentially, psychopathic. Our ideas along this line</p><p>were soon to receive confirmation from an unexpected source:</p><p>Andrew !obaczewski, the author of the book you are about to</p><p>read. I received an email as follows:</p><p>Dear Ladies and Gentlemen.</p><p>I have got your Special Research Project on psychopathy</p><p>by my computer.  You are doing a most important and valu-</p><p>able work for the future of nations.[�]</p><p>I am a very aged clinical psychologist. Forty years ago I</p><p>took part in a secret investigation of the real nature and psy-</p><p>chopathology of the macro-social phenomenon called �Com-</p><p>munism�. The other researchers were the scientists of the pre-</p><p>vious generation who are now passed away.</p><p>The profound study of the nature of psychopathy, which</p><p>played the essential and inspirational part in this macro-social</p><p>psychopathologic phenomenon, and distinguishing it from</p><p>other mental anomalies, appeared to be the necessary prepara-</p><p>tion for understanding the entire nature of the phenomenon.</p><p>The large part of the work, you are doing now, was done in</p><p>those times. �</p><p>I am able to provide you with a most valuable scientific</p><p>document, useful for your purposes. It is my book �Political</p><p>Ponerology � A science on the nature of evil adjusted for po-</p><p>litical purposes�. You may also find copy of this book in the</p><p>Library of Congress and in some university and public librar-</p><p>ies in the USA.</p><p>Be so kind and contact me so that I may mail a copy to</p><p>you.</p><p>Very truly yours!</p><p>Andrew M. !obaczewski</p><p>I promptly wrote a reply saying yes, I would very much like</p><p>to  read  his  book.  A  couple  of  weeks  later  the  manuscript  ar-</p><p>rived in the mail.</p><p>26</p><p>EDITOR�S PREFACE</p><p>As I read, I realized that what I was holding in my hand was</p><p>essentially  a  chronicle  of  a  descent  into  hell,  transformation,</p><p>and triumphant return to the world with knowledge of that hell</p><p>that was priceless for the rest of us, particularly in this day and</p><p>time when it seems evident that a similar hell is enveloping the</p><p>planet. The risks that were taken by the group of scientists that</p><p>did  the  research  on  which  this  book  is  based  are  beyond  the</p><p>comprehension of most of us.</p><p>Many  of  them  were  young,  just  starting  in  their  careers</p><p>when  the  Nazis  began  to  stride  in  their  hundred  league  jack-</p><p>boots across Europe. These researchers lived through that, and</p><p>then  when  the  Nazis  were  driven  out  and  replaced  by  the</p><p>Communists  under  the  heel  of  Stalin,  they  faced  years  of  op-</p><p>pression the likes of which those of us today who are choosing</p><p>to  take  a  stand  against  the  Bush  Reich  cannot  even  imagine.</p><p>But, based on the syndrome that describes the onset of the dis-</p><p>ease, it seems that the United States, in particular, and perhaps</p><p>the entire world, will soon enter into �bad times� of such horror</p><p>and despair that the Holocaust of World War II will seem like</p><p>just a practice run.</p><p>And so, since they were there, and they lived through it and</p><p>brought back information to the rest of us, it may well save our</p><p>lives to have a map to guide us in the falling darkness.</p><empty-line/><p>Laura Knight-Jadczyk</p><empty-line/><p>AUTHOR�S FOREWORD</p><p>In presenting my honored readers with this volume, which I</p><p>generally  worked  on  during  the  early  hours  before  leaving  to</p><p>make  a  difficult  living,  I  would  first  like  to  apologize  for  the</p><p>defects  which  are  the  result  of  anomalous  circumstances.  I</p><p>readily  admit  that  these  lacunae  should  be  filled,  time-</p><p>consuming  as  that  may  be,  because  the  facts  on  which  this</p><p>book  are  based  are  urgently  needed;  through  no  fault  of  the</p><p>author�s, these data have come too late.</p><p>The  reader is entitled to an explanation of the long history</p><p>and  circumstances  under  which  this  work  was  compiled,  not</p><p>just of the content itself. This is, in fact, the third manuscript I</p><p>have created on this same subject. I threw the first manuscript</p><p>into a central-heating furnace, having been warned just in time</p><p>about an official search, which took place minutes later. I sent</p><p>the second draft to a Church dignitary at the Vatican by means</p><p>of an American tourist and was absolutely unable to obtain any</p><p>kind of information about the fate of the parcel once it was left</p><p>with him.</p><p>This  long  history  of  subject-matter  elaboration  made  work</p><p>on the third version even more laborious. Prior paragraphs and</p><p>former  phrases  from  one  or  both  of  the  first  drafts  haunt  the</p><p>writer�s  mind  and  make  proper  planning  of  the  content  more</p><p>difficult.</p><p>The  two  lost  drafts  were  written  in  very  convoluted  lan-</p><p>guage  for  the  benefit  of  specialists  with  the  necessary  back-</p><p>ground, particularly in the field of psychopathology.  The irre-</p><p>trievable  disappearance  of  the  second  version  also  meant  the</p><p>28</p><p>AUTHOR�S FOREWORD</p><p>loss of the overwhelming majority of statistical data and facts</p><p>which would have been so valuable and conclusive for special-</p><p>ists in the field. Several analyses of individual cases were also</p><p>lost.</p><p>The  present  version  contains  only  such  statistical  data  that</p><p>had been memorized due to frequent use, or that could be re-</p><p>constructed with satisfactory precision. I also added those data,</p><p>particularly the more accessible ones from the field of psycho-</p><p>pathology, which I considered essential in presenting this sub-</p><p>ject to readers with a good general education, and especially to</p><p>representatives of the social and political sciences and to politi-</p><p>cians.  I  also  nurse  the  hope  that  this  work  may  reach  a  wider</p><p>audience and make available some useful scientific data which</p><p>may  serve  as  a  basis  for  comprehension  of  the  contemporary</p><p>world and its history. It may also make it easier for readers to</p><p>understand  themselves,  their  neighbors,  and  other  nations  of</p><p>the world.</p><p>Who  produced  the  knowledge  and  performed  the  work</p><p>summarized  within  the  pages  of  this  book?  It  was  a  joint  en-</p><p>deavor consisting of not only my efforts, but also representing</p><p>the results of many researchers, some of them not known to the</p><p>author.  The  situational  genesis  of  this  book  makes  it virtually</p><p>impossible  to  separate  the  accomplishments  and  give  proper</p><p>credit to every individual for his or her efforts.</p><p>I worked in Poland far away from active political and cul-</p><p>tural centers for many years. That is where I undertook a series</p><p>of detailed tests and observations which  were to be combined</p><p>with the resulting generalizations of various other experiment-</p><p>ers  in  order  to  produce  an  overall  introduction  for  an  under-</p><p>standing  of  the  macrosocial  phenomenon  surrounding  us.  The</p><p>name of the person who was expected to produce the final syn-</p><p>thesis was a secret, as was understandable and necessary given</p><p>the  time  and  the  situation.  I  would  very  occasionally  receive</p><p>anonymous  summaries  of  the  results  of  tests  made  by  other</p><p>researchers in Poland and Hungary; a few data were published,</p><p>as they raised no suspicions that a specialized work was being</p><p>compiled, and these data could still be located today.</p><p>The expected synthesis of this research did not occur. All of</p><p>my contacts became inoperative as a result of the wave of post-</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>29</p><p>Stalin  repression  and  secret  arrests  of  researchers  in  the  early</p><p>sixties.  The  remaining  scientific  data  in  my  possession  were</p><p>very incomplete, albeit priceless in value. It took many years of</p><p>lonely  work  to  weld  these  fragments  into  a  coherent  whole,</p><p>filling the lacunae with my own experience and research.</p><p>My  research  on  essential  psychopathy  and  its  exceptional</p><p>role  in  the  macrosocial  phenomenon,  was  conducted  concur-</p><p>rently  with,  or  shortly  after,  that  of  others.  Their  conclusions</p><p>reached me later and confirmed my own. The most characteris-</p><p>tic item in my work is the general concept for a new scientific</p><p>discipline named �ponerology� . The reader will also find other</p><p>fragments  of  information  based  on  my  own  research.  I  also</p><p>effected an overall synthesis to the best of my ability.</p><p>As the author of the final  work, I hereby express  my  deep</p><p>respect for all those who initiated the research and continued to</p><p>conduct  it  at  the  risk  of  their  careers,  health  and  lives.  I  pay</p><p>homage to those who paid the price through suffering or death.</p><p>May  this  work  constitute  some  compensation  for  their  sacri-</p><p>fices, regardless of where they may be today. Times more con-</p><p>ducive  to  an  understanding  of  this  material  may  recall  their</p><p>names, both those which I never knew and those I have since</p><p>forgotten.</p><empty-line/><p>New York, N.Y. August 1984.</p><p><strong>PREFACE  </strong></p><p>TO THE RED PILL PRESS EDITION</p><p>Twenty years have passed since the  writing of this book. I</p><p>became a very old man. One day, my computer put me in con-</p><p>tact with the Scientists of the Quantum Future Group who con-</p><p>vinced  me  that  the  time  had  matured  for  my  book  to  become</p><p>useful and to serve the future of humanity. They took the trou-</p><p>ble of publishing it.</p><p>The passing of these last twenty years has been fraught with</p><p>political occurrences. Our world has changed in essential ways</p><p>due  to  the  natural  laws  of  the  phenomenon  described  in  this</p><p>book.  Knowledge  has  increased  dramatically  thanks  to  the</p><p>efforts of the people of good will. Nonetheless, our world is not</p><p>yet  restored  to  good  health;  and  the  remainders  of  the  great</p><p>disease are still active. The illness has reappeared connected to</p><p>another ideology. The laws of the genesis of evil are  working</p><p>in millions of individual cases of individuals and families. The</p><p>political phenomena threatening peace are confronted by mili-</p><p>tary  force.  The  small-scale  occurrences  are  condemned  or  re-</p><p>strained by the word of moral science.  The result is that great</p><p>efforts of the past, undertaken without the support of objective</p><p>natural  knowledge  about  the  very  nature  of  evil,  have  been</p><p>insufficient  and  dangerous.  All  these  efforts  have  been  made</p><p>without taking into account that great maxim of medicine that</p><p>serves  as  a  motto  in  this  book:   <emphasis>Ignota  nulla  curatio  morbid.* </emphasis></p><p>The  end  of  Communist  subjugation  has  come  at  a  high  price,</p><empty-line/><p>*  <emphasis>Do not attempt to cure what you do not understand. </emphasis></p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>31</p><p>and  those  nations  that  now  think  they  are  free  will  soon  find</p><p>they are paying still.</p><p>The question must be asked: why was this work, produced</p><p>by eminent researchers and the author for just this purpose � to</p><p>prevent the spread of the disease of macrosocial evil, not able</p><p>to perform its function?</p><p>This is a long story.</p><p>I had been recognized as the bearer of this �dangerous� sci-</p><p>ence  in  Austria  by  a  �friendly�  physician  who  then  was  re-</p><p>vealed  to  be  an  agent  of  Communist  Secret  Services.  All  the</p><p>Red nodes and networks in New York were mobilized to orga-</p><p>nize  a  counteraction  against  the  information  contained  in  this</p><p>book being made publicly and widely available. It was terrible</p><p>to learn that the overt system of suppression I had so recently</p><p>escaped  was  just  as  prevalent,  though  more  covert,  in  the</p><p>United  States.  It  was  demoralizing  to  see  how  the  system  of</p><p>conscious  and  unconscious  pawns  worked;  to  watch  people</p><p>who  trusted  their  conscious  �friends�  �  unknown  to  them  as</p><p>Communist  agents  -  and  performed  the  insinuated  activities</p><p>against me with such patriotic zeal. As a result of these activi-</p><p>ties, I was refused any assistance, and to survive, I had to take</p><p>work as a labourer when already of an age to retire. My health</p><p>collapsed and two years were lost.</p><p>I learned also that I was not the first such emissary who had</p><p>come to America bringing similar knowledge; I was rather the</p><p>third one; the other two had been similarly dealt with.</p><p>In  spite  of  all  these  circumstances,  I  persevered  and  the</p><p>book  was  finally  written  in  1984  and  carefully  translated  into</p><p>English. It  was esteemed by those  who read it as being �very</p><p>informative�,  but  it  was  not  published.  For  the  psychological</p><p>editors it was �too political�; for political editors, it contained</p><p>too much psychology and psychopathology. In some cases, the</p><p>�editorial  deadline  was  already  closed�.  Gradually,  it  became</p><p>clear that the book did not pass the �insider�s� inspections.</p><p>The  time  for  this  book�s  major  political  value  is  not  over;</p><p>it�s scientific essence remains permanently valuable and inspi-</p><p>rational.  It  may  serve  a  great  purpose  in  coming  times,  when</p><p>properly adjusted and expanded. Further investigations in these</p><p>areas  may yield a new understanding of human problems that</p><p>32</p><p><strong>PREFACE </strong></p><p>have plagued humanity for millennia. Ponerology may buttress</p><p>the centuries old moral sciencea by a modern natural approach.</p><p>Thus this  work  may contribute to progress toward  a  universal</p><p>peace.</p><p>That is the reason that I laboured to retype on my computer</p><p>the  whole  already  fading  manuscript  after  twenty  years.  No</p><p>essential changes have been introduced, and it is presented as it</p><p>was  written  in  New  York  all  those  many  years  ago.  So  let  it</p><p>remain  as  a  document  of  a  very  dangerous  work  of  eminent</p><p>scientists and myself, undertaken in dark and tragic times under</p><p>impossible conditions; still a piece of good science.</p><p>The  author�s  desire  is  to  place  this  work  in  the  hands  of</p><p>those who are capable of taking this burden over and progress-</p><p>ing  with  the  theoretical  research  in  ponerology,  enrich  it  with</p><p>detailed data to replace that which has been lost, and put it in</p><p>praxis for various valuable purposes it may serve � for the good</p><p>of individual people and for all nations.</p><p>I am thankful to Madame Laura Knight-Jadczyk and Profes-</p><p>sor  Arkadiusz  Jadczyk,  and  their  Friends  for  their  heartfelt</p><p>encouragement, understanding, and their labour in bringing my</p><p>old work to be published.</p><empty-line/><p><emphasis>Andrew M. !obaczewski. </emphasis></p><p><emphasis/></p><p>Rzesz�w � Poland, December 2005</p><p><strong>CHAPTER IV </strong></p><p><strong>PONEROLOGY </strong></p><p>Ever  since  ancient  times,  philosophers  and  religious  think-</p><p>ers  representing  various  attitudes  in  different  cultures  have</p><p>been searching for the truth regarding moral values, attempting</p><p>to find criteria for what is right, and what constitutes good ad-</p><p>vice.  They  have  described  the  virtues  of  human  character  at</p><p>length  and  suggested  these  be  acquired.  They  have  created  a</p><p>heritage  containing  centuries  of  experience  and  reflection.  In</p><p>spite  of  the  obvious  differences  of  originating  cultures  and</p><p>attitudes,  even  though  they  worked  in  widely  divergent  times</p><p>and  places,  the  similarity,  or  complementary  nature,  of  the</p><p>conclusions reached by famous ancient philosophers are strik-</p><p>ing.  It  demonstrates  that  whatever  is  valuable  is  conditioned</p><p>and caused by the laws of nature acting upon the personalities</p><p>of both individual human beings and collective societies.</p><p>It  is  equally  thought-provoking  to  see  how  relatively  little</p><p>has  been  said  about  the  opposite  side  of  the  coin;  the  nature,</p><p>causes, and genesis of evil.  These  matters are usually cloaked</p><p><emphasis>behind</emphasis>  the  above  generalized  conclusions  with  a  certain</p><p>amount of secrecy. Such a state of affairs  can be partially as-</p><p>cribed  to  the  social  conditions  and  historical  circumstances</p><p>under which these thinkers worked; their modus operandi may</p><p>have  been  dictated  at  least  in  part  by  personal  fate,  inherited</p><p>traditions, or even prudishness. After all, justice and virtue are</p><p>the opposites of force and perversity; the same applies to truth-</p><p>fulness vs. mendacity, similarly like health is the opposite of an</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>97</p><p>illness.  It  is  also  possible  that  whatever  they  thought  or  said</p><p>about the true nature of evil was later expunged and hidden by</p><p>those very forces they sought to expose.</p><p>The  character  and  genesis  of  evil  thus  remained  hidden  in</p><p>discreet shadows, leaving it to literature to deal with the subject</p><p>in highly expressive language. But, expressive though the liter-</p><p>ary language might be, it has never reached the primeval source</p><p>of  the  phenomena.  A  certain  cognitive  space  remained  as  an</p><p>uninvestigated  thicket  of  moral  questions  which  resist  under-</p><p>standing and philosophical generalizations.</p><p>Present-day philosophers developing meta-ethics are trying</p><p>to push on along the elastic space leading to an analysis of the</p><p>language  of  ethics,  contributing  bits  and  pieces  toward  elimi-</p><p>nating  the  imperfections  and  habits  of  natural  conceptual  lan-</p><p>guage.  Penetrating  this  ever-mysterious  nucleus  is  highly</p><p>tempting to a scientist.</p><p>At the same time, active practitioners in social life and nor-</p><p>mal  people  searching  for  their  way  are  significantly  condi-</p><p>tioned  by their  trust  in  certain  authorities.  Eternal  temptations</p><p>such  as  trivializing  insufficiently-proven  moral  values  or  dis-</p><p>loyally taking advantage of naive human respect for them, find</p><p>no  adequate  counterweight  within  a  rational  understanding  of</p><p>reality.</p><p>If  physicians  behaved  like  ethicists,  i.e.  relegated  to  the</p><p>shadow of their personal experience  relatively un-esthetic dis-</p><p>ease  phenomena  because  they  were  primarily  interested  in</p><p>studying questions of physical and mental hygiene, there would</p><p>be  no  such  thing  as  modern  medicine.  Even  the  roots  of  this</p><p>health-maintenance  science  would  be  hidden  in  similar  shad-</p><p>ows.  In  spite  of  the  fact  that  the  theory  of  hygiene  has  been</p><p>linked  to  medicine  since  its  ancient  beginnings,  physicians</p><p>were correct in their emphasis upon studying disease above all.</p><p>They  risked  their  own  health  and  made  sacrifices  in  order  to</p><p>discover  the  causes  and  biological  properties  of  illnesses  and,</p><p>afterwards, to understand the patho-dynamics of the courses of</p><p>these illnesses. A comprehension of the nature of a disease, and</p><p>the course it runs, after all,  enables the proper  curative means</p><p>to be elaborated.</p><p>98</p><p>PONEROLOGY</p><p>While  studying  an  organisms�  ability  to  fight  off  disease,</p><p>scientists  invented  vaccination,  which  allows  organisms  to</p><p>become resistant to an illness without passing through it in its</p><p>full-blown  manifestation.  Thanks  to  this,  medicine  conquers</p><p>and  prevents  phenomena  which,  in  its  scope  of  activity,  are</p><p>considered a type of evil.</p><p>The question thus arises: could some analogous  <emphasis>modus op-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>erandi</emphasis>  not  be  used  to  study  the  causes  and  genesis  of  other</p><p>kinds of evil scourging human individuals, families, and socie-</p><p>ties, in spite of the fact that they appear even more insulting to</p><p>our moral feelings than do diseases? Experience has taught the</p><p>author that evil is similar to disease in nature, although possibly</p><p>more  complex  and  elusive  to  our  understanding.  Its  genesis</p><p>reveals many factors, pathological, especially psychopathologi-</p><p>cal, in character, whose essence medicine and psychology have</p><p>already  studied,  or  whose  understanding  demands  further  in-</p><p>vestigation in these realms.</p><p>Parallel  to  the  traditional  approach,  problems  commonly</p><p>perceived to be moral may also be treated on the basis of data</p><p>provided  by  biology,  medicine,  and  psychology,  as  factors  of</p><p>this kind are simultaneously present in the question as a whole.</p><p>Experience teaches us that a comprehension of the essence and</p><p>genesis  of  evil  generally  makes  use  of  data  from  these  areas.</p><p>Philosophical  reflection  alone  is  insufficient.  Philosophical</p><p>thought may have engendered all the scientific disciplines, but</p><p>the other scientific disciplines did not mature until they became</p><p>independent, based on detailed data and a relationship to other</p><p>disciplines supplying such data.</p><p>Encouraged  by  the  often  �coincidental�  discovery  of  these</p><p>naturalistic aspects of evil, the author has imitated the method-</p><p>ology  of  medicine;  a  clinical  psychologist  and  medical  co-</p><p>worker  by  profession,  he  had  such  tendencies  anyway.  As  is</p><p>the case with physicians and disease, he took the risks of close</p><p>contact  with  evil  and  suffered  the  consequences.  His  purpose</p><p>was to ascertain the possibilities of understanding the nature of</p><p>evil, its etiological factors and to track its pathodynamics.</p><p>The  developments  of  biology,  medicine,  and  psychology</p><p>opened  so  many  avenues  that  the  above  mentioned  behavior</p><p>turned  out  to  be  not  only  feasible,  but  exceptionally  fertile.</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>99</p><p>Personal experience and refined methods in clinical psychology</p><p>permitted reaching ever more accurate conclusions.</p><p>There was a major difficulty: insufficient data, especially in</p><p>the area of the science of psychopathies.  This problem had to</p><p>be  overcome  based  on  my  own  investigations.  This  insuffi-</p><p>ciency  was  caused  by  neglect  of  these  areas,  theoretical  diffi-</p><p>culties  facing  researchers,  and  the  unpopular  nature  of  these</p><p>problems.  This work in general, and this chapter in particular,</p><p>contain references to research conclusions the author was either</p><p>prevented from publishing or unwilling to publish for reasons</p><p>of  personal  safety.  Sadly,  it  is  lost  now  and  age  prevents  any</p><p>attempts at recovery. It is hoped that my descriptions, observa-</p><p>tions, and experience, here condensed from memory, will pro-</p><p>vide a platform for a new effort to produce the data needed to</p><p>confirm again what was confirmed then.</p><p>Nevertheless, based on the work of myself and others in that</p><p>past tragic time, a new discipline arose that became our beacon;</p><p>two Greek philologists - monks baptized it �PONEROLOGY�</p><p>from  the  Greek   <emphasis>poneros</emphasis>  =  evil.  The  process  of  the  genesis  of</p><p>evil was called, correspondingly, �ponerogenesis�. I hope that</p><p>these modest beginnings will grow so as to enable us to over-</p><p>come  evil  through  an  understanding  of  its  nature,  causes,  and</p><p>development.</p><p>~~~</p><p>From among 5000 psychotic, neurotic, and healthy patients,</p><p>the author selected 384 adults who behaved in a manner which</p><p>had seriously hurt others. They came from all circles of Polish</p><p>society, but mostly from a large industrial center characterized</p><p>by poor working conditions and substantial air pollution. They</p><p>represented various moral, social, and political attitudes. Some</p><p>30 of them had been subjected to penal  measures  which  were</p><p>often excessively harsh. Once freed from jail or other penalty,</p><p>these  people  attempted  to  readapt  to  social  life,  which  made</p><p>them  tend  to  be  sincere  in  speaking  to  me  -  the  psychologist.</p><p>Others had escaped punishment; still others had hurt their fel-</p><p>lows in a manner which does not qualify for judicial treatment</p><p>under legal theory or practice. Some were protected by a politi-</p><p>cal system which is in itself a ponerogenic derivate. The author</p><p>100</p><p>PONEROLOGY</p><p>had the further advantage of speaking to persons whose neuro-</p><p>ses were caused by some abuse they had experienced.</p><p>All  the  above-mentioned  people  were  given  psychological</p><p>tests  and  subjected  to  detailed  anamnesis33  so  as  to  determine</p><p>their overall mental skills, thereby either excluding or detecting</p><p>possible brain tissue lesions and evaluating them in relation to</p><p>one  another.34  Other  methods  were  also  used  in  accordance</p><p>with the patient�s actual needs in order to create a sufficiently</p><p>accurate  picture  of  the  psychological  condition.  In  most  of</p><p>these cases the author had access to the results of medical ex-</p><p>aminations and laboratory tests performed in medical facilities.</p><p>A psychologist can glean many valuable observations, such</p><p>as  those  used  in  this  work,  when  he  himself  is  subjected  to</p><p>abuse,  as  long  as  cognitive interest  overcomes  his  natural  hu-</p><p>man emotional reactions. If not, he must utilize his professional</p><p>skills to rescue himself first. The author never lacked for such</p><p>opportunities since his unhappy country is replete  with exam-</p><p>ples of human injustice to which he was, himself, subjected on</p><p>numerous occasions.</p><p>Analysis  of  their  personalities  and  the  genesis  of  their  be-</p><p>havior revealed that only 14 to 16 per cent of the 384 persons</p><p>who  hurt  others   <emphasis>failed</emphasis>  to  exhibit  any  psychopathological  fac-</p><p>tors  which  would  have  influenced  their  behavior.  Regarding</p><p>this statistic, it should be pointed out that a psychologist�s non-</p><p>discovery of such factors does not prove their non-existence. In</p><p>a significant part of this group of cases, the lack of proof was</p><p>rather  the  result  of  insufficient  interview  possibilities,  imper-</p><p>fection of testing methods, and deficiency of skills on the part</p><p>of the tester. Thus, natural reality appeared different in princi-</p><p>ple from everyday attitudes, which interpret evil in a moraliz-</p><p>ing  way,  and  from  juridical  practices,  which  only  in  a  small</p><empty-line/><p>33 Medical history: the case history of a medical patient as recalled by the</p><p>patient. [Editor�s note.]</p><p>34 My basic test battery resembled more those used in Great Britain as op-</p><p>posed to the American versions. I used in addition two tests: one was an old</p><p>British performance test restandarized for clinical purposes. The other was</p><p>completely elaborated by myself. Unfortunately, when I was expelled from</p><p>Poland, it made it impossible for me to transfering any of my many results to</p><p>other psychologists because I was deprived of all my research papers in</p><p>addition to almost everything else.</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>101</p><p>part  of  the  cases  adjudicate  a  commutation  of  a  sentence  by</p><p>taking the criminal�s pathological characteristics into account.</p><p>We  may  often  reason  by  means  of  the  exclusionary  hy-</p><p>pothesis, e.g. pondering what would happen if the genesis of a</p><p>particular wrongdoing did  <emphasis>not</emphasis> have some pathological compo-</p><p>nent. We then usually reach the conclusion that the deed would</p><p>not have taken place either since the pathological factor sealed</p><p>its  occurrence  or  became  an  indispensable  component  in  its</p><p>origin.</p><p>The  hypothesis  thus  suggests  itself  that  such  factors  are</p><p>commonly  active  in  the  genesis  of  evil.  The  conviction  that</p><p>pathological factors generally participate in ponerogenic proc-</p><p>esses appears even more likely if we also take into account the</p><p>conviction  of  many  scholars  in  ethics  that  evil  in  this  world</p><p>represents a kind of web or continuum of  <emphasis>mutual conditioning</emphasis>.</p><p>Within  this  interlocking  structure,  one  kind  of  evil  feeds  and</p><p>opens doors for others regardless of any individual or doctrinal</p><p>motivations.  It  does  not  respect  the  boundaries  of  individual</p><p>cases, social groups, and nations. Since pathological factors are</p><p>present within the synthesis of most instances of evil, they are</p><p>also present in this continuum.</p><p>Further deliberations on the observations thus obtained con-</p><p>sidered  only  a   <emphasis>part</emphasis>  of  the  above-mentioned  variegated  cases,</p><p>especially those which did not generate doubt by colliding with</p><p>natural moral attitudes, and those which did not reveal practical</p><p>difficulties for further analysis (such as absence of further con-</p><p>tact  with  the  patient).  The  statistical  approach  furnished  only</p><p>general  guidelines.  Intuitive  penetration  into  each  individual</p><p>problem, and a similar synthesis of the whole, proved the most</p><p>productive method in this area.</p><p>The role of pathological factors in a process of the origin of</p><p>evil  can  be  played  by  any  known,  or  not  yet  sufficiently  re-</p><p>searched,  psychopathological  phenomenon,  and  also  by  some</p><p>pathological  matters  medical  practice  does  not  include  within</p><p>psychopathology.  However,  their  activity  in  a  ponerogenic</p><p>process is dependent on features  <emphasis>other than the obviousness or </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>intensity of the condition</emphasis>. Quite the contrary, the greatest pon-</p><p>erogenic activity is reached by pathological factors at an inten-</p><p>sity which generally permits detection with the help of clinical</p><p>102</p><p>PONEROLOGY</p><p>methods, although they are  <emphasis>not yet considered pathological by </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>the  opinion  of  the  social  environment</emphasis>.  Such  a  factor  can  then</p><p>covertly  limit  the  bearer�s  ability  to  control  his  conduct,  or</p><p>have an effect upon other persons, traumatizing their psyches,</p><p>fascinating  them,  causing  their  personalities  to  develop  im-</p><p>properly, or inciting vindictive emotions or a lust for punishing.</p><p>A  moralistic  interpretation  of  such  agents  and  their  legacy</p><p>works against humankind�s ability to see the causes of evil and</p><p>to utilize common sense to combat it.  This is why identifying</p><p>such  pathological  factors  and  revealing  their  activities  can  so</p><p>often stifle their ponerogenic functions.</p><p>In the process of the origin of evil, pathological factors can</p><p>act from within an individual who has committed a hurtful act;</p><p>such activity is relatively easily acknowledged by public opin-</p><p>ion and the courts. Consideration is given much less frequently</p><p>to  how  outside  influences  emitted  by  their  carriers  act  upon</p><p>individuals  or  groups.  Such  influences,  however,  play  a  sub-</p><p>stantial  role  in  the  overall  genesis  of  evil.  In  order  for  such</p><p>influence  to  be  active,  the  pathological  characteristic  in  ques-</p><p>tion must be interpreted in a moralistic manner, i.e. differently</p><p>from its true nature.  There are  many possibilities for  such ac-</p><p>tivities. For the moment, let us indicate the most damaging.</p><p>Every person in the span of his life, and particularly during</p><p>childhood  and  youth,  assimilates  psychological  material  from</p><p>others through mental resonance, identification, imitation, and</p><p>other communicative means, thereupon transforming it to build</p><p>his  own  personality  and  world  view.  If  such  material  is  con-</p><p>taminated  by  pathological  factors  and  deformities,  personality</p><p>development  shall  also  be  deformed.  The  product  will  be  a</p><p>person unable to understand correctly either himself and others,</p><p>normal human relations and morals; he develops into a person</p><p>who commits evil acts with a poor feeling of being faulty. Is he</p><p>really at fault?</p><p>Man�s  age-old, familiar  moral  weaknesses and intelligence</p><p>deficiencies,  proper  reasoning,  and  knowledge  combine  with</p><p>the activity of various pathological factors to create a complex</p><p>network of causation which frequently contains feedback rela-</p><p>tionships  or  closed  causal  structures.  Practically  speaking,</p><p>cause  and  effect  are  often  widely  separated  in  time,  which</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>103</p><p>makes it more difficult to track the links. If our scope of obser-</p><p>vation  is  expansive  enough,  the  ponerogenic  processes  are</p><p>reminiscent of complex chemical synthesis, wherein modifying</p><p>a  single  factor  causes  the  entire  process  to  change.  Botanists</p><p>are aware of the law of the minimum, wherein plant growth is</p><p>limited by contents of the component which is in deficiency in</p><p>the soil. Similarly, eliminating (or at least limiting) the activity</p><p>of  one  of  the  above-mentioned  factors  or  deficiencies  should</p><p>cause  a  corresponding  reduction  in  the  entire  process  of  the</p><p>genesis of evil.</p><p>For  centuries,  moralists  have  been  advising  us  to  develop</p><p>ethics  and  human  values;  they  have  been  searching  for  the</p><p>proper  intellectual  criteria.  They  have  also  respected  correct-</p><p>ness  of  reasoning,  whose  value  in  this  area  is  unquestionable.</p><p>In spite of all their efforts, however, they have been  <emphasis>unable to </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>overcome the  many kinds of evil that have scourged humanity </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>for  ages</emphasis>  and  that  are  presently  taking  on  unheard-of  propor-</p><p>tions.</p><p>By no means does a ponerologist wish to belittle the role of</p><p>moral  values  and  knowledge  in  this  area;  rather,  he  wants  to</p><p>buttress  it  with  hitherto-underrated  scientific  knowledge  in</p><p>order to round out the picture as a whole and adapt it better to</p><p>reality, thereby making more effective action possible in moral,</p><p>psychological, social, and political practice.</p><p>This new discipline is thus primarily interested in the role of</p><p>pathological factors in the origin of evil, especially since con-</p><p>scious control and monitoring of them on the scientific, social,</p><p>and  individual  levels  could  effectively  stifle  or  disarm  these</p><p>processes. Something which has been impossible for centuries</p><p>is  now  feasible  in  practice  thanks  to  progress  in  naturalistic</p><p>cognizance.  Methodological  refinements  are  dependent  upon</p><p>further  progress  in  detailed  data  and  upon  the  conviction  that</p><p>such behavior is valuable.</p><p>For  instance,  in  the  course  of  psychotherapy,  we  may  in-</p><p>form a patient that in the genesis of his personality and behav-</p><p>ior  we  find  the  results  of  influences  from  some  person  who</p><p>revealed  psychopathological  characteristics.  We  thereby  carry</p><p>out  an  intervention  that  is  painful  for  the  patient,  which  de-</p><p>mands we proceed with tact and skill. As a result of this inter-</p><p>104</p><p>PONEROLOGY</p><p>action,  however,  the  patient  develops  a  kind  of  self-analysis</p><p>which will liberate him from the results of these influences and</p><p>enable  him  to  develop  some  critical  distance  in  dealing  with</p><p>other factors of a similar nature. Rehabilitation will depend on</p><p>improving his ability to understand himself and others. Thanks</p><p>to  this,  he  will  be  able  to  overcome  his  internal  and  interper-</p><p>sonal difficulties more easily and to avoid mistakes which hurt</p><p>him and his immediate environment.</p><p>Pathological Factors</p><p>Let us now attempt a concise description of some examples</p><p>of those pathological factors which have proved to be the most</p><p>active  in  ponerogenic  processes.  Selection  of  these  examples</p><p>resulted from the author�s own experience, instead of exhaus-</p><p>tive  statistical  tallies,  and  may  thus  differ  from  other  special-</p><p>ists� evaluations. Much depends on particular situation. A small</p><p>amount  of  statistical  data  concerning  these  phenomena  has</p><p>been  borrowed  from  other  works  or  are  approximate  evalua-</p><p>tions elaborated under conditions which did not allow the entire</p><p>front of research to be developed. Again, may the reader please</p><p>consider the conditions under which the author worked, and the</p><p>time and place.</p><p>Mention  should  also  be  made  of  some  historical  figures,</p><p>people  whose  pathological  characteristics  contributed  to  the</p><p>process of the genesis of evil on a large social scale, imprinting</p><p>their  mark  upon  the  fate  of  nations.  It  is  not  an  easy  task  to</p><p>establish  diagnosis  for  people  whose  psychological  anomalies</p><p>and diseases died together with them. The results of such clini-</p><p>cal  analyses  are  open  to  question  even  by  persons  lacking</p><p>knowledge or experience in this area, only because recognizing</p><p>such a state of mind does not correspond to their historical or</p><p>literary way of thought. While this is done on the basis of the</p><p>legacy  of  natural  and  often  moralizing  language,  I  can  only</p><p>assert that I always based my findings on comparisons of data</p><p>acquired  through  numerous  observations  I  made  by  studying</p><p>many similar patients with the help of the objective methods of</p><p>contemporary clinical psychology. I took the critical approach</p><p>herein as far as possible. The opinions of specialists elaborated</p><p>in a similar way nevertheless remain valuable.</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>105</p><p>Acquired Deviations</p><p>Brain tissue is very limited in its regenerative ability. If it is</p><p>damaged and the change subsequently heals, a process of reha-</p><p>bilitation can take place wherein the neighboring healthy tissue</p><p>takes over the function of the damaged portion.  This substitu-</p><p>tion is never quite perfect; thus some deficits in skill and proper</p><p>psychological processes can be detected in even cases of very</p><p>small  damage  by  using  the  appropriate  tests.  Specialists  are</p><p>aware of the variegated causes  for the origin of such  damage,</p><p>including trauma and infections. We should point out here that</p><p>the  psychological  results  of  such  changes,  as  we  can  observe</p><p>many years later, are more heavily dependent upon the  <emphasis>location</emphasis></p><p>of the damage itself in the brain mass, whether on the surface</p><p>or  within,  than  they  are  upon  the  cause  which  brought  them</p><p>about.  The  quality  of  these  consequences  also  depends  upon</p><p><emphasis>when</emphasis> they occurred in the person�s lifetime. Regarding patho-</p><p>logical  factors  of  ponerogenic  processes,  perinatal  or  early</p><p>infant  damages  have  more  active  results  than  damages  which</p><p>occurred later.</p><p>In  societies  with  highly  developed  medical  care,  we  find</p><p>among the lower grades of elementary school (when tests can</p><p>be applied), that 5 to 7 per cent of children have suffered brain</p><p>tissue lesions which cause certain academic or behavioral diffi-</p><p>culties.  This  percentage  increases  with  age.  Modern  medical</p><p>care has contributed to a quantitative decrease in such phenom-</p><p>ena,  but  in  certain  relatively  uncivilized  countries  and  during</p><p>historical  times,  indications  of  difficulties  caused  by  such</p><p>changes are and have been more frequent.</p><p>Epilepsy  and  its  many  variations  constitute  the  oldest</p><p>known  results  of  such  lesions;  it  is  observed  in  a  relatively</p><p>small number of persons suffering such damage. Researchers in</p><p>these  matters  are  more  or  less  unanimous  in  believing  that</p><p>Julius Caesar, and then later Napoleon Bonaparte, had epileptic</p><p>seizures. Those were probably instances of vegetative epilepsy</p><p>caused by lesions lying deep within the brain, near the vegeta-</p><p>tive centers. This variety does not cause subsequent dementia.</p><p>The extent to which these hidden ailments had negative effects</p><p>upon their characters and historical decision-making, or played</p><p>a ponerogenic role, can be the subject of a separate study and</p><p>106</p><p>PONEROLOGY</p><p>evaluation of great interest. In most cases, however, epilepsy is</p><p>an  <emphasis>evident</emphasis> ailment,  which limits its role as a ponerogenic fac-</p><p>tor.</p><p>In a much larger segment of the bearers of brain tissue dam-</p><p>age, the  <emphasis>negative deformation of their characters</emphasis> grows in the</p><p>course of time. It takes on variegated mental pictures, depend-</p><p>ing upon the properties and localization of these changes, their</p><p>time  of  origin,  and  also  the  life  conditions  of  the  individual</p><p>after their occurrence.  We  will call such character disorders �</p><p><emphasis>characteropathies</emphasis>. Some characteropathies play an outstanding</p><p>role  as  pathological  agents  in  the  processes  of  the  genesis  of</p><p>evil. Let us thus characterize these most active ones.</p><p>Characteropathies  reveal  a  certain  similar  quality,  if  the</p><p>clinical picture is not dimmed by the coexistence of other men-</p><p>tal  anomalies  (usually  inherited),  which  sometimes  occur  in</p><p>practice.  Undamaged  brain  tissue  retains  our  species�  natural</p><p>psychological properties. This is particularly evident in instinc-</p><p>tive  and  affective  responses,  which  are  natural,  albeit  often</p><p>insufficiently  controlled.  The  experience  of  people  with  such</p><p>anomalies grows in the medium of the normal human world to</p><p>which they belong by nature. Thus their different way of think-</p><p>ing, their emotional violence, and their egotism find relatively</p><p>easy entry into other people�s minds and are perceived within</p><p>the categories of the everyday world. Such behavior on the part</p><p>of persons with such character disorders traumatizes the minds</p><p>and feelings of normal people, gradually diminishing the ability</p><p>of  the  normal  person  to  use  their  common  sense.  In  spite  of</p><p>their  resistance,  victims  of  the  characteropath  become  used  to</p><p>the  rigid  habits  of  pathological  thinking  and  experiencing.  If</p><p>the victims are young people, the result is that the personality</p><p>suffers  abnormal  development  leading  to  its  malformation.</p><p>Characteropaths  and  their  victims  thus  represent  pathological,</p><p>ponerogenic  factors  which,  by  their  covert  activity,  easily  en-</p><p>gender  new  phases  in  the  eternal  genesis  of  evil,  opening  the</p><p>door to a later activation of other factors which thereupon take</p><p>over the main role.</p><p>A relatively well-documented example of such an influence</p><p>of a characteropathic personality on a macrosocial scale is the</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>107</p><p>last German emperor, Wilhelm II.35 He was subjected to brain</p><p>trauma  at birth.  During and  after his entire reign, his  physical</p><p>and  psychological  handicap  was  hidden  from  public  knowl-</p><p>edge. The motor abilities of the upper left portion of his body</p><p>were handicapped.  As a boy, he had difficulty learning gram-</p><p>mar, geometry, and drawing, which constitute the typical triad</p><p>of academic difficulties caused by minor brain lesions. He de-</p><p>veloped  a  personality  with  infantile  features  and  insufficient</p><p>control over his emotions, and also a somewhat paranoid way</p><p>of thinking which easily sidestepped the heart of some impor-</p><p>tant issues in the process of dodging problems.</p><p>Militaristic poses and a general�s uniform overcompensated</p><p>for his feelings of inferiority and effectively cloaked his short-</p><p>comings.  Politically,  his  insufficient  control  of  emotions  and</p><p>factors of personal rancor came into view. The old Iron Chan-</p><p>cellor had to go, that cunning and ruthless politician who had</p><p>been  loyal  to  the  monarchy  and  had  built  up  Prussian  power.</p><p>After all, he was too knowledgeable about the prince�s defects</p><p>and had worked against his coronation. A similar fate met other</p><p>overly  critical  people,  who  were  replaced  by  persons  with</p><p>lesser brains, more subservience, and, sometimes, discreet psy-</p><p>chological deviations.  <emphasis>Negative selection took place</emphasis>.</p><p>Since the common people are prone to identify with the em-</p><p>peror, and through the emperor, with a system of government,</p><p>the  characteropathic  material  emanating  from  the  Kaiser  re-</p><p>sulted in many Germans being progressively deprived of their</p><p>ability  to  use  their  common  sense.  An  entire  generation  grew</p><p>up with psychological deformities regarding feeling and under-</p><p>standing moral, psychological, social and political realities. It is</p><empty-line/><p>35 The eldest grandchild of Queen Victoria, Wilhelm symbolized his era and</p><p>the nouveaux riche aspects of the German empire. The kaiser suffered from a</p><p>birth defect that left his left arm withered and useless. It was claimed that he</p><p>overcame this handicap, but the effort to do so left its mark, and despite</p><p>efforts of his parents to give him a liberal education, the prince became im-</p><p>bued with religious mysticism, militarism, anti-semitism, the glorification of</p><p>power politics. Some have claimed that his personality displayed elements of</p><p>a narcissistic personality disorder. Bombastic, vain, insensitive, and pos-</p><p>sessed with grandiose notions of divine right rule, his personality traits paral-</p><p>leled those of the new Germany: strong, but off balance; vain, but insecure;</p><p>intelligent, but narrow; self-centered yet longing for acceptance. [Editor�s</p><p>note.]</p><p>108</p><p>PONEROLOGY</p><p>extremely  typical  that  in  many  German  families  having  a</p><p>member who was psychologically not quite normal, it became</p><p>a  matter  of  honor  (even  excusing  nefarious  conduct)  to  hide</p><p>this fact from public opinion, and even from the awareness of</p><p>close  friends  and  relatives.  Large  portions  of  German  society</p><p>ingested psychopathological material, together with that unreal-</p><p>istic  way  of  thinking  wherein  slogans  take  on  the  power  of</p><p>arguments  and  real  data  are  subjected  to  subconscious  selec-</p><p>tion.</p><p>This  occurred  during  a  time  when  a  wave  of  hysteria  was</p><p>growing throughout Europe, including a tendency for emotions</p><p>to dominate and for human behavior to contain an  element of</p><p>histrionics. How individual sober thought can be terrorized by</p><p>a  behavior  colored  with  such  material  was  evidenced  particu-</p><p>larly  by  women.  This  progressively  took  over  three  empires</p><p>and other countries on the mainland.</p><p>To what extent did Wilhelm II contribute to this, along with</p><p>two other emperors whose minds also were incapable of taking</p><p>in the actual facts of history and government?  To  what extent</p><p>were  they  themselves  influenced  by  an  intensification  of  hys-</p><p>teria during their reigns? That would make an interesting topic</p><p>of discussion among historians and ponerologists.</p><p>International  tensions  increased;  Archduke  Ferdinand  was</p><p>assassinated in Sarajevo. Unfortunately, neither the Kaiser nor</p><p>any  other  governmental  authority  in  his  country  were  in  pos-</p><p>session of their reason. What dominated the subsequent events</p><p>was  Wilhelm�s  emotional  attitude  and  the  stereotypes  of</p><p>thought  and  action  inherited  from  the  past.  War  broke  out.</p><p>General  war  plans  that  had  been  prepared  earlier,  and  which</p><p>had  lost  their  relevance  under  the  new  conditions,  unfolded</p><p>more  like  military  maneuvers.  Even  those  historians  familiar</p><p>with the genesis and character of the Prussian state, including</p><p>its  ideological  subjugation  of  individuals  to  the  authority  of</p><p>king  and  emperor,  and  its  tradition  of  bloody  expansionism,</p><p>intuit  that  these  situations  contained  some  activity  of  an   <emphasis>un-</emphasis></p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>109</p><p><emphasis>comprehended  fatality</emphasis>  which  eludes  an  analysis  in  terms  of</p><p>historical causality.36</p><p>Many  thoughtful  persons  keep  asking  the  same  anxious</p><p>question: how could the German nation have chosen for a Fue-</p><p>hrer  a  clownish  psychopath  who  made  no  bones  about  his</p><p>pathological  vision  of  superman  rule?  Under  his  leadership,</p><p>Germany then unleashed a second criminal and politically ab-</p><p>surd  war.  During  the  second  half  of  this  war,  highly-trained</p><p>army  officers  honorably  performed  inhuman  orders,  senseless</p><p>from the political and military point of view, issued by a man</p><p>whose  psychological  state  corresponded  to  the  routine  criteria</p><p>for being forcibly committed to a psychiatric hospital.</p><p>Any  attempt  to  explain  the  things  that occurred  during  the</p><p>first  half  of  our  century  by  means  of  categories  generally  ac-</p><p>cepted in historical thought leaves behind a nagging feeling of</p><p>inadequacy. Only a ponerological approach can compensate for</p><p>this deficit in our comprehension, as it does justice to the role</p><p>of  various  pathological  factors  in  the  genesis  of  evil  at  every</p><p>social level.</p><p>The  German nation, fed for a generation on pathologically</p><p>altered  psychological  material,  fell  into  a  state  comparable  to</p><p>what  we  see  in  certain  individuals  raised  by  persons  who  are</p><p>both characteropathic and hysterical. Psychologists know from</p><p>experience how often such people then let themselves commit</p><p>acts  which  seriously  hurt  others.  A  psychotherapist  needs  a</p><p>good  deal  of  persistent  work,  skill,  and  prudence  in  order  to</p><p>enable such a person to regain his ability to comprehend psy-</p><p>chological problems with more naturalistic realism and to util-</p><p>ize his healthy critical faculties in relation to his own behavior.</p><p>The  Germans inflicted and suffered enormous damage and</p><p>pain  during  the  first  World  War;  they  thus  felt  no  substantial</p><p>guilt  and  even  thought  that  they  were  the  ones  who  had  been</p><p>wronged.  This  is  not  surprising  as  they  were  behaving  in  ac-</p><p>cordance with their customary habit, without being aware of its</p><p>pathological causes.  The need for this pathological state to be</p><p>concealed  in  heroic  garb  after  a  war  in  order  to  avoid  bitter</p><empty-line/><p>36 An interesting comparison is the regime of George W. Bush and the Neo-</p><p>conservatives. It follows, almost point by point, the history of the Kaiser in</p><p>Germany. [Editor�s note.]</p><p>110</p><p>PONEROLOGY</p><p>disintegration  became  all  too  common.  A  mysterious  craving</p><p>arose,  as  if  the  social  organism  had  managed  to  become  ad-</p><p>dicted  to  some  drug.  The  hunger  was  for  more  pathologically</p><p>modified psychological material, a phenomenon known to psy-</p><p>chotherapeutic experience. This hunger could only be satisfied</p><p>by  another  similarly  pathological  personality  and  system  of</p><p>government.  A  characteropathic  personality  opened  the  door</p><p>for  leadership  by  a  psychopathic  individual.  We  shall  return</p><p>later  in  our  deliberations  to  this  pathological  personality  se-</p><p>quence, as it appears a general regularity in ponerogenic proc-</p><p>esses.</p><p>A ponerological approach facilitates our understanding of a</p><p>person  who  succumbs  to  the  influence  of  a  characteropathic</p><p>personality, as well as comprehension of macrosocial phenom-</p><p>ena caused by the contribution of such factors.  Unfortunately,</p><p>relatively  few  such  individuals  can  be  served  by  appropriate</p><p>psychotherapy.  Such  behavior  cannot  be  ascribed  to  nations</p><p>proudly defending their sovereignty without extreme reactions.</p><p>However,  we  may  consider  the  solution  of  such  problems  by</p><p>means of the proper knowledge as a vision for the future.</p><p>~~~</p><p><emphasis>Paranoid  character  disorders</emphasis>:  It  is  characteristic  of  para-</p><p>noid  behavior  for  people  to  be  capable  of  relatively  correct</p><p>reasoning and discussion as long as the conversation  involves</p><p>minor  differences  of  opinion.  This  stops  abruptly  when  the</p><p>partner�s arguments begin to undermine their overvalued ideas,</p><p>crush  their  long-held  stereotypes  of  reasoning,  or  forces  them</p><p>to accept a conclusion they had subconsciously rejected before.</p><p>Such a stimulus unleashes upon the partner a torrent of pseudo-</p><p>logical, largely paramoralistic, often insulting utterances which</p><p>always contain some degree of suggestion.</p><p>Utterances like these inspire aversion among cultivated and</p><p>logical  people,  who  then  tend  to  avoid  the  paranoid  types.</p><p>However,  the  power  of  the  paranoid  lies  in  the  fact  that  they</p><p>easily enslave less critical minds, e.g. people  with other kinds</p><p>of  psychological  deficiencies,  who  have  been  victims  of  the</p><p>egotistical  influence  of  individuals  with  character  disorders,</p><p>and, in particular, a large segment of young people.</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>111</p><p>A  proletarian  may  perceive  this  power  to  enslave  to  be  a</p><p>kind of victory over higher-class people and thus take the para-</p><p>noid  person�s  side.  However,  this  is  not  the  normal  reaction</p><p>among the common people, where perception of psychological</p><p>reality occurs no less often than among intellectuals.</p><p>In sum then, the response of accepting paranoid argumenta-</p><p>tion is qualitatively more frequent in reverse proportion to the</p><p>civilization  level  of  the  community  in  question,  although  it</p><p>never  approaches  the  majority.  Nevertheless,  paranoid  indi-</p><p>viduals  become  aware  of  their  enslaving  influence  through</p><p>experience and attempt to take advantage of it in a pathologi-</p><p>cally egotistic manner.</p><p>We know today that the psychological mechanism of para-</p><p>noid  phenomena  is  twofold:  one  is  caused  by  damage  to  the</p><p>brain  tissue,  the  other  is  functional  or  behavioral.  Within  the</p><p>above-mentioned  process  of  rehabilitation,  any  brain-tissue</p><p>lesion causes a certain slackening of accurate thinking and, as a</p><p>consequence,  of  the  personality  structure.  Most  typical  are</p><p>those  cases  caused  by  an  aggression  in  the  diencephalon37  by</p><p>various  pathological  factors,  resulting  in  its  permanently  de-</p><p>creased tonal ability, and similarly of the tonus of inhibition in</p><p>the  brain  cortex.  Particularly  during  sleepless  nights, runaway</p><p>thoughts give rise to a paranoid changed view of human reality,</p><p>as well as to ideas which can be either gently naive or violently</p><p>revolutionary. Let us call this kind  <emphasis>paranoid characteropathy</emphasis>.</p><p>In  persons  free  of  brain  tissue  lesions,  such  phenomena</p><p>most frequently occur as a result of being reared by people with</p><p>paranoid  characteropathia,  along  with  the  psychological  terror</p><p>of their childhood. Such psychological material is then assimi-</p><p>lated  creating  the  rigid  stereotypes  of  abnormal  experiencing.</p><p>This makes it difficult for thought and  world view to develop</p><p>normally, and the terror-blocked contents become transformed</p><p>into permanent, functional, congestive centers.</p><p>Ivan Pavlov comprehended all kinds of paranoid states in a</p><p>manner similar to this functional model without being aware of</p><p>this basic and primary cause. He nevertheless provided a vivid</p><empty-line/><p>37 The posterior division of the forebrain; connects the cerebral hemispheres</p><p>with the mesencephalon; the region of the brain that includes the epithala-</p><p>mus, thalamus, and hypothalamus. [Editor�s note.]</p><p>112</p><p>PONEROLOGY</p><p>description  of  paranoid  characters  and  the  above-mentioned</p><p>ease with which paranoid individuals suddenly tear away from</p><p>factual discipline and proper thought-processes. Those readers</p><p>of  his  work  on  the  subject  who  are  sufficiently  familiar  with</p><p>Soviet conditions glean yet another historical meaning from his</p><p>little book. Its intent appears obvious. The author dedicated his</p><p>work, with no word of inscription, of course, to the chief model</p><p>of  a  paranoid  personality:  the  revolutionary  leader  Lenin,</p><p>whom the scientist knew well. As a good psychologist, Pavlov</p><p>could predict that he would not be the object of revenge, since</p><p>the  paranoid  mind  will  block  out  the  egocentric  associations.</p><p>He was thus able to die a natural death.</p><p>Lenin  should  nevertheless  be  included  with  the  first  and</p><p>most  characteristic  kind  of  paranoid  personality,  i.e.  most</p><p>probably  due  to  diencephalic  brain  damage.  Vassily  Gross-</p><p>man38 describes him more or less as follows:</p><empty-line/><p><emphasis/></p><p><emphasis>Symptom:</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>Lenin was always tactful, gentle, and </emphasis></p><empty-line/><p><emphasis>polite, but simultaneously characterized </emphasis></p><p>Asthenization.</p><p><emphasis>by an excessively sharp, ruthless, and </emphasis></p><p>Fixation and stereotypia.</p><p><emphasis>brutal attitude to political opponents. He  </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>never allowed any possibility that they </emphasis></p><empty-line/><p>38 Vassily Grossman was a Soviet citizen, a Ukrainian Jew born in 1905. A</p><p>Communist, he became a war correspondent, working for the army paper  <emphasis>Red </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>Star</emphasis> - a job which took him to the front lines of Stalingrad and ultimately to</p><p>Berlin. He was among the first to see the results of the death camps, and</p><p>published the first account of a death camp - Treblinka - in any language.</p><p>After the war, he seems to have lost his faith. He wrote his immense novel,</p><p><emphasis>Life and Fate</emphasis> (Zhizn i Sudba) in the 1950s and - in the period of the Krush-</p><p>chev thaw, which had seen Alexander Solzhenitsyn allowed to publish  <emphasis>A Day </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>on the Life of Ivan Denisovich</emphasis> - he submitted the manuscript to a literary</p><p>journal in 1960 for publication. But Solzhenitsyn was one thing, Grossman</p><p>another: his manuscript was confiscated, as were the sheets of carbon paper</p><p>and typewriter ribbons he had used to write it. Suslov, the Politbureau mem-</p><p>ber in charge of ideology, is reported as having said it could not be published</p><p>for 200 years. However, it was smuggled out on microfilm to the west by</p><p>Vladimir Voinovich, and published, first in France in 1980, then in English in</p><p>1985.</p><p>Why the 200 year ban? Because  <emphasis>Life and Fate</emphasis> commits what was still, in a</p><p>�liberal� environment, the unthinkable sin of arguing for the moral equiva-</p><p>lence of Nazism and Soviet communism. [Editor�s note.]</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>113</p><p><emphasis>might be even minimally right, nor that </emphasis></p><p>Pathological egotism.</p><p><emphasis>he might be even minimally wrong. He </emphasis></p><empty-line/><p><emphasis>would often call his opponents huck-</emphasis></p><p>Paramoralisms.</p><p><emphasis>sters, lackeys, servant-boys, mercenar-</emphasis></p><empty-line/><p><emphasis>ies, agents, or Judases bribed for thirty </emphasis></p><empty-line/><p><emphasis>pieces of silver. He made no attempt to </emphasis></p><empty-line/><p><emphasis>persuade his opponents during a dis-</emphasis></p><empty-line/><p><emphasis>pute. He communicated not with them, </emphasis></p><p>Spellbinding and of con-</p><p><emphasis>but rather with those witnessing the </emphasis></p><p>sciousness and its effects.</p><p><emphasis>dispute, in order to ridicule and com-</emphasis></p><empty-line/><p><emphasis>promise his adversaries. Sometimes </emphasis></p><empty-line/><p><emphasis>such witnesses were just a few people, </emphasis></p><empty-line/><p><emphasis>sometimes thousands of delegates to a </emphasis></p><p>Lack of the self- criticism.  <emphasis/></p><p><emphasis>congress, sometimes millions worth </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>throngs of newspaper readers. </emphasis></p><p>~~~</p><p><emphasis>Frontal  characteropathy</emphasis>:  The  frontal  areas  of  the  cerebral</p><p>cortex (10A and B acc. to the Brodmann division) are virtually</p><p>present  in  no  creature  except  man;  they  are  composed  of  the</p><p>phylogenetically  youngest  nervous  tissue.  Their  cyto-</p><p>architecture is similar to the much older visual projection areas</p><p>on the opposite pole of the brain. This suggests some functional</p><p>similarity.  The  author  has  found  a  relatively  easy  way  to  test</p><p>this psychological function, which enables us to grasp a certain</p><p>number  of  imaginary  elements  in  our  field  of  consciousness</p><p>and subject them to internal contemplation. The capacity of this</p><p>act  of  internal  projection  varies  greatly  from  one  person  to</p><p>another, manifesting a statistical correlation with similar varie-</p><p>gation  in  the  anatomical  extent  of  such  areas.  The  correlation</p><p>between  this  capacity  and  general  intelligence  is  much  lower.</p><p>As  described  by  researchers  (Luria  et  al.),  the  functions  of</p><p>these  areas,  thought-process  acceleration  and  coordination,</p><p>seem to result from this basic function.</p><p>Damage  to  this  area  occurred  rather  frequently:  at  or  near</p><p>birth,  especially  for  premature  infants,  and  later  in  life  as  a</p><p>result  of  various  causes.  The  number  of  such  perinatal  brain</p><p>tissue  lesions  has  been  significantly  reduced  due  to  improved</p><p>medical care for pregnant women and newborns. The spectacu-</p><p>lar  ponerogenic  role  which  results  from  character  disorders</p><p>114</p><p>PONEROLOGY</p><p>caused by this can thus be considered somewhat characteristic</p><p>of past generations and primitive cultures.</p><p>Brain  cortex  damage  in  these  areas  selectively  impairs  the</p><p>above mentioned function without impairing memory, associa-</p><p>tive capacity, or, in particular, such instinct-based feelings and</p><p>functions  as,  for  instance,  the  ability  to  intuit  a  psychological</p><p>situation. The general intelligence of  an individual is thus not</p><p>greatly reduced. Children with such a defect are almost normal</p><p>students; difficulties emerge suddenly in upper grades and af-</p><p>fect principally these parts of the curriculum which place bur-</p><p>den on the above function.</p><p>The  pathological  character  of  such  people,  generally  con-</p><p>taining  a  component  of  hysteria,  develops  through  the  years.</p><p>The  non-damaged  psychological  functions  become  overdevel-</p><p>oped to compensate, which means that instinctive and affective</p><p>reactions predominate. Relatively vital people become belliger-</p><p>ent, risk-happy, and brutal in both word and deed.</p><p>Persons  with  an  innate  talent  for  intuiting  psychological</p><p>situations  tend  to  take  advantage  of  this  gift  in  an  egotistical</p><p>and  ruthless  fashion.  In  the thought  process  of  such  people,  a</p><p>short cut way develops which bypasses the handicapped func-</p><p>tion,  thus  leading  from  associations  directly  to  words,  deeds,</p><p>and  decisions  which  are  not  subject  to  any  dissuasion.  Such</p><p>individuals  interpret  their  talent  for  intuiting  situations  and</p><p>making split-second oversimplified decisions as a sign of their</p><p>superiority compared to normal people,  who need to think for</p><p>long time, experiencing self-doubt and conflicting motivations.</p><p>The  fate  of  such  creatures  does  not  deserve  to  be  pondered</p><p>long.</p><p>Such  �Stalinistic  characters�  traumatize  and  actively   <emphasis>spell-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>bind</emphasis>  others,  and  their  influence  finds  it  exceptionally  easy  to</p><p>bypass  the  controls  of  common  sense.  A  large  proportion  of</p><p>people  tend  to  credit  such  individuals  with  special  powers,</p><p>thereby succumbing to their egotistic beliefs. If a parent mani-</p><p>fests such a defect, no matter how minimal, all the children in</p><p>the family evidence anomalies in personality development.</p><p>The author studied an entire generation of older, educated,</p><p>people  wherein  the  source  of  such  influence  was  the  eldest</p><p>sister  who  suffered  perinatal  damage  of  the  frontal  centers.</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>115</p><p>From  early  childhood,  her  four  younger  brothers  exposed  to</p><p>and  assimilated  pathologically  altered  psychological  material,</p><p>including  their  sister�s  growing  component  of  hysteria.  They</p><p>retained  well  into  their  sixties  the  deformities  of  personality</p><p>and world view, as well as the hysterical features thus caused,</p><p>whose intensity diminished in proportion to the greater differ-</p><p>ence in age.</p><p>Subconscious  selection  of  information  made  it  impossible</p><p>for  these  men  to  apprehend  any  critical  comments  regarding</p><p>their sister�s character; also, any such comments  were consid-</p><p>ered to be an offense to the family honor.</p><p>The brothers accepted as real their sister�s pathological de-</p><p>lusions  and  complaints  about  her  �bad�  husband  (who  was</p><p>actually  a  decent  person)  and  her  son,  in  whom  she  found  a</p><p>scapegoat to avenge her failures. They thereby participated in a</p><p>world  of  vengeful  emotions,  considering  their  sister  a  com-</p><p>pletely normal person  whom they  were prepared to defend by</p><p>the most unsavory methods, if need be, against any suggestion</p><p>of her abnormality. They thought normal woman  were insipid</p><p>and  naive,  good  for  nothing  but  sexual  conquest.  Not  one</p><p>among the brothers ever created a healthy family or developed</p><p>even average wisdom of life.</p><p>The  character  development  of  these  people  also  included</p><p>many  other  factors  that  were  dependent  upon  the  time  and</p><p>place in which they were reared: the turn of the century, with a</p><p>patriotic  Polish  father  and  German  mother  who  obeyed  con-</p><p>temporary custom by formally accepting her husband�s nation-</p><p>ality, but who still remained an advocate of the militarism, and</p><p>customary acceptance of the intensified hysteria which covered</p><p>Europe at the time. That was the Europe of the three Emperors:</p><p>the  splendor  of  three  people  with  limited  intelligence,  two  of</p><p>whom  revealed  pathological  traits.  The  concept  of  �honor�</p><p>sanctified triumph. Staring at someone too long was sufficient</p><p>pretext for a duel. These brothers were thus raised to be valiant</p><p>duelists  covered  with  saber-scars;  however,  the  slashes  they</p><p>inflicted  upon  their  opponents  were  more  frequent  and  much</p><p>worse.</p><p>When people with a humanistic education pondered the per-</p><p>sonalities of this family, they concluded that the causes for this</p><p>116</p><p>PONEROLOGY</p><p>formation should be sought in contemporary time and customs.</p><p>If,  however,  the  sister  had  not  suffered  brain  damage  and  the</p><p>pathological  factor  had  not  existed  (exclusionary  hypothesis),</p><p>their  personalities  would  have  developed  more  normally  even</p><p>during those times. They would have become more critical and</p><p>more amenable to the values of healthy reasoning and humanis-</p><p>tic contents. They  would have founded better families and re-</p><p>ceived  more  sensible  advice  from  wives  more  wisely  chosen.</p><p>As  for  the  evil  they  sowed  too  liberally  during  their  lives,  it</p><p>would  either  not  have  existed  at  all,  or  else  would  have  been</p><p>reduced  to  a  scope  conditioned  by  more  remote  pathological</p><p>factors.</p><p>Comparative considerations also led the author to conclude</p><p>that  Iosif  Vissarionovich  Dzhugashvili,  also  known  as  Stalin,</p><p>should  be  included  in  the  list  of  this  particular  ponerogenic</p><p>characteropathy,  which  developed  against  the  backdrop  of</p><p>perinatal damage to his brain�s prefrontal fields. Literature and</p><p>news  about  him  abounds  in  indications:  brutal,  charismatic,</p><p>snake-charming;  issuing  of  irrevocable  decisions;  inhuman</p><p>ruthlessness, pathologic revengefulness directed at anyone who</p><p>got in his way; and egotistical belief in his own genius on the</p><p>part  of  a  person  whose  mind  was,  in  fact,  only  average.  This</p><p>state explains as  well his psychological dependence on a psy-</p><p>chopath  like  Beria39.  Some  photographs  reveal  the  typical  de-</p><p>formation  of  his  forehead  which  appears  in  people  who  suf-</p><p>fered  very  early  damage  to  the  areas  mentioned  above.  His</p><p>typical irrevocable decisions his daughter describes as follows:</p><p><emphasis>~~~ </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>Whenever  he  threw  out  of  his  heart  someone  whom  he </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>had  known  for  a  long  time,  classifying  him  among  his </emphasis></p><empty-line/><p>39 L.P. Beria (1899�1953), Soviet Communist leader, b. Georgia. He rose to</p><p>prominence in the Cheka (secret police) in Georgia and the Transcaucasus,</p><p>became party secretary in these areas, and in 1938 became head of the secret</p><p>police. As commissar (later minister) of internal affairs, Beria wielded great</p><p>power, and he was the first in this post to become (1946) a member of the</p><p>politburo. After Stalin�s death (Mar., 1953), Beria was made first deputy</p><p>premier under Premier Malenkov, but the alliance was shaky; in the ensuing</p><p>struggle for power Beria was arrested (July) on charges of conspiracy. He and</p><p>six alleged accomplices were tried secretly and shot in Dec., 1953. [Editor�s</p><p>note.]</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>117</p><p><emphasis>�enemies� in his soul, it was impossible to talk to him about </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>that  person.  The  reverse  process  became  impossible  for </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>him, namely persuasion that he was not his enemy, and any </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>attempts in that direction made him fly into a rage. Redens, </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>Uncle Pavlusha, and A.S. Svanidze were incapable of doing </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>anything about it; all they accomplished was to have my fa-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>ther break off contacts and withdraw his trust. After seeing </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>any of them for the last time, he said goodbye as if to a po-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>tential foe, one of his �enemies��40 </emphasis></p><p>~~~</p><p>We know the effect of being �thrown out of his heart�, as it</p><p>is documented by the history of those times.</p><p>When we contemplate the scope of the evil Stalin helped to</p><p>bring  about,  we  should  always  take  this  most  ponerogenic</p><p>characteropathy into account and attribute the proper portion of</p><p>the �blame� to it; unfortunately, it has not yet been sufficiently</p><p>studied. We have to consider many other pathologic deviations</p><p>as they played essential roles in this macrosocial phenomenon.</p><p>Disregarding  the  pathologic  aspects  of  those  occurrences  and</p><p>limiting  interpretation  thereof  by  historiographic  and  moral</p><p>considerations opens the door to an activity of further ponero-</p><p>genic  factors;  such  reasoning  should  be  thus  regarded  as  not</p><p>only scientifically insufficient but immoral as well.</p><p><emphasis>~~~ </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>Drug-induced  characteropathies</emphasis>:  During  the  last  few  dec-</p><p>ades,  medicine has begun using a series of drugs  with serious</p><p>side effects: they attack the nervous system, leaving permanent</p><p>damage behind. These generally discreet handicaps sometimes</p><p>give  rise  to  personality  changes  which  are  often  very  harmful</p><p>socially.  Streptomycin41  proved  a  very  dangerous  drug;  as  a</p><p>result, some countries have limited its use, whereas others have</p><p>taken it off the list of drugs whose use is permitted.</p><empty-line/><p>40 Svetlana Alliluieva -  <emphasis>Twenty Letters to a Friend</emphasis>.</p><p>41  <emphasis>Streptomycin</emphasis> acts by inhibiting protein synthesis and damaging cell mem-</p><p>branes in susceptible microorganisms. Possible side effects include injury to</p><p>the kidneys and nerve damage that can result in dizziness and deafness. [Edi-</p><p>tor�s note.]</p><p>118</p><p>PONEROLOGY</p><p>The cytostatic drugs42 used in treating neoplastic43 diseases</p><p>often  attack  the  phylogenetically  oldest  brain  tissue,  the  pri-</p><p>mary carrier of our instinctive substratum and basic feelings.44</p><p>Persons treated with such drugs progressively tend to lose their</p><p>emotional color and their ability to intuit a psychological situa-</p><p>tion. They retain their intellectual functions but become praise-</p><p>craving egocentrics,  easily ruled by people  who know how to</p><p>take  advantage  of  this.  They  become  indifferent  to  other  peo-</p><p>ple�s feelings and the harm they are inflicting upon them; any</p><p>criticism  of  their  own  person  or  behavior  is  repaid  with  a</p><p>vengeance.  Such  a  change  of  character  in  a  person  who  until</p><p>recently  enjoyed  respect  on  the  part  of  his  environment  or</p><p>community,  which  perseveres  in  human  minds,  becomes  a</p><p>pathological phenomenon causing often tragic results.</p><p>Could  this  have  been  a  factor  in  the  case  of  the  Shah  of</p><p>Iran?  Again,  diagnosing  dead  people  is  problematic,  and  the</p><p>author lacks detailed data. However, this possibility should be</p><p>accepted as a probability. The genesis of that county�s present</p><empty-line/><p>42 Most drugs that are used to treat cancer kill the cancer cells. The word</p><p><emphasis>cytotoxic</emphasis> means toxic to cells, or cell-killing. Chemotherapy is properly</p><p>called �cytotoxic therapy�. There are other treatments that do not kill cancer</p><p>cells. They work by stopping the cancer cells from multiplying. These treat-</p><p>ments are called �cytostatic�. The hormone therapies used to treat breast</p><p>cancer could be called cytostatic therapy. [Editor�s note.]</p><p>43  <emphasis>Neoplasia</emphasis> (literally: new growth) is abnormal, disorganized growth in a</p><p>tissue or organ, usually forming a distinct mass. Such a growth is called a</p><p>neoplasm, also known as a tumor. Neoplasia refers to both benign and malig-</p><p>nant growths, while �cancer� refers specifically to malignant neoplasia.</p><p>[Editor�s note.]</p><p>44 Chemo Head is the name given by cancer patients to one of the side-effects</p><p>of chemotherapy. It has been described as an inability to concentrate, reduced</p><p>memory, or finding it difficult to think clearly. This could be simply attrib-</p><p>uted to general fatigue, however it seems that there are some very specific</p><p>triggers and results. Some people get flustered by loud noises and activity</p><p>around them. Others find that they cannot find the right words to express</p><p>themselves. One patient described the feeling as �everything seems distant ...</p><p>it takes me a few seconds longer to think or answer questions. The mental</p><p>process slows down tremendously.� The symptoms are similar to those of</p><p>Attention Deficit Disorder. New research concludes �chemo head� continued</p><p>in up to 50% of survivors as long as 10 years following the end of systemic</p><p>chemotherapy treatment. [Editor�s note.]</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>119</p><p>tragedy also doubtless contains pathological factors which play</p><p>ponerologically active roles.45</p><p>Results  similar  to  the  above  in  the  psychological  picture</p><p>may  be  caused  by  endogenous  toxins46  or  viruses.  When,  on</p><p>occasion,  the  mumps  proceeds  with  a  brain  reaction,  it  leaves</p><p>in its wake a discrete pallor or dullness of feelings and a slight</p><p>decrease  in  mental  efficiency.  Similar  phenomena  are  wit-</p><p>nessed  after  a  difficult  bout  with  diphtheria.  Finally,  polio  at-</p><p>tacks the brain, more often the higher part of the anterior horns,</p><p>which  was  affected  by  the  process.  People  with  leg  paresis</p><p>rarely manifest these effects, but those with paresis of the neck</p><p>and/or shoulders must count themselves lucky if they do not. In</p><p>addition  to  affective  pallor,  persons  manifesting  these  effects</p><p>usually  evidence  naivet�  and  an  inability  to  comprehend  the</p><p>crux of a matter.</p><p>We  rather  doubt  that  President  F.D.  Roosevelt  manifested</p><p>some of this latter features, since the polio virus which attacked</p><p>him when he  was forty caused paresis to his legs. After over-</p><p>coming this, years of creative activity followed. However, it is</p><p>possible that his naive attitude toward Soviet policy during his</p><p>last term of office had a pathological component related to his</p><p>deteriorating health.</p><p>Character  anomalies  developing  as  a  result  of  brain-tissue</p><p>damage behave like insidious ponerogenic factors.  As a result</p><p>of  the  above-described  features,  especially  the  above-</p><p>mentioned naivet� and an inability to comprehend the crux of a</p><p>matter, their influence easily anchors in human minds, trauma-</p><p>tizing our psyches, impoverishing and deforming our thoughts</p><p>and feelings, and limiting individuals� and societies� ability to</p><empty-line/><p>45 Editor�s reminder that this book was written in 1985.</p><p>46 Current Western medical opinion states: Endogenous toxins include heavy</p><p>metals, pesticides, food additives, and industrial and household chemicals.</p><p>These can damage the liver and kidneys; they can also cross the blood-brain</p><p>barrier and damage brain cells. Workers exposed to high levels of inhaled</p><p>manganese showed concentrated levels in the basal ganglia, and exhibited</p><p>Parkinson�s-like syndrome. Observational studies have also shown increased</p><p>levels of aluminum, mercury, copper, and iron in the cerebral spinal fluid</p><p>(CSF) of Parkinson's patients. It is not fully determined whether these miner-</p><p>als found in the brain have any clinical significance. (Mitchell J. Ghen, D.O.,</p><p>Ph.D., and Maureen Melindrez, N.D.) [Editor�s note.]</p><p>120</p><p>PONEROLOGY</p><p>use common sense and to read a psychological or moral situa-</p><p>tion  accurately.  This  opens  the  door  to  the  influence  of  other</p><p>pathological characters who most frequently carry some  <emphasis>inher-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>ited</emphasis>  psychological  deviations;  they  then  push  the  charac-</p><p>teropathic individuals into the shadows and proceed with their</p><p>ponerogenic work. That is why various types of characteropa-</p><p>thy participate during the initial periods of the genesis of evil,</p><p>both  on  the  macrosocial  scale  and  on  the  individual  scale  of</p><p>human families.</p><p>An improved social system of the future should thus protect</p><p>individuals and societies by preventing persons with the above</p><p>deviations,  or  certain  characteristics  to  be  discussed  below,</p><p>from  any  societal  functions  wherein  the  fate  of  other  people</p><p>would depend upon their behavior. This of course applies pri-</p><p>marily to top governmental positions. Such questions should be</p><p>dealt  with  by  an  appropriate  institution  composed  of  people</p><p>with a reputation for wisdom and with medical and psychologi-</p><p>cal training.</p><p>The features of brain-tissue lesions and their character dis-</p><p>order  results  are  much  easier  to  detect  than  certain  inherited</p><p>anomalies.  Thus,  stifling  ponerogenic  processes  by  removing</p><p>these factors from the process of the synthesis of evil is effec-</p><p>tive during the early phases of such genesis, and much easier in</p><p>practice.</p><p>Inherited Deviations</p><p>Science already protects societies from the results of  some</p><p>physiological  anomalies  which  are  accompanied  by  certain</p><p>psychological weaknesses. The tragic role played by hereditary</p><p>hemophilia among European royalty is well known. Responsi-</p><p>ble  people  in  countries  where  the  system  of  monarchy  still</p><p>survives,  are  anxious  not  to  allow  a  carrier  of  such  a  gene  to</p><p>become  queen.  Any  society  exercising  so  much  concern  over</p><p>individuals with blood-coagulation insufficiency or other seri-</p><p>ous  and  life-threatening  pathology  would  protest  if  a  man  af-</p><p>flicted  with  such  a  condition  were  appointed  to  a  high  office</p><p>bearing  responsibility  for  many  people.  This  behavior  model</p><p>should  be  extended  to  many  pathologies,  including  inherited</p><p>psychological anomalies.</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>121</p><p>Daltonists,  men  with  an  impaired  ability  to  distinguish  red</p><p>and green colors from grey, are now barred from professions in</p><p>which  this  could  cause  a  catastrophe.  We  also  know  that  this</p><p>anomaly is often accompanied by a decrease in esthetic experi-</p><p>ence,  emotions,  and  the  feeling  of  linkage  to  people  who  can</p><p>see colors normally. Industrial psychologists are thus cautious</p><p>whether such a person should be entrusted with work requiring</p><p>dependence  upon  an  autonomic  sense  of  responsibility,  as</p><p>workers safety is contingent upon this sense.</p><p>It was discovered long ago that these two above-mentioned</p><p>anomalies � hemophilia and color blindness - are inherited by</p><p>means  of  a  gene  located  in  the  X  chromosome,  and  tracking</p><p>their  transmission  through  many  generations  is  not  difficult.</p><p>Geneticists  have  similarly  studied  the  inheritance  of  many</p><p>other  features  of  human  organisms,  but  they  have  paid  scant</p><p>attention to the anomalies interesting us here. Many features of</p><p>human character have a hereditary bases in genes located in the</p><p>same X chromosome; although it is not a rule. Something simi-</p><p>lar could apply to the majority of the psychological anomalies</p><p>to be discussed below.</p><p>Significant progress has recently been made in cognition of</p><p>a  series  of  chromosomal  anomalies  resulting  from  defective</p><p>division of the reproductive cells and their phenotypic psycho-</p><p>logical  symptoms.  This  state  of  affairs  enables  us  to  initiate</p><p>studies  on  their  ponerogenetic  role  and  to  introduce  conclu-</p><p>sions  which  are  theoretically  valuable,  something  which  is  in</p><p>effect already being done. In practice, however, the  <emphasis>majority</emphasis> of</p><p>chromosomal anomalies are  <emphasis>not</emphasis> transferred to the next genera-</p><p>tion; furthermore, their carriers constitute a very small propor-</p><p>tion of the population at large, and their general intelligence is</p><p>lower  than  the  social  average,  so  their  ponerological  role  is</p><p>even  smaller  than  their  statistical  distribution.  Most  problems</p><p>are caused by the XYY karyotype47 which produces men who</p><p>are tall, strong, and emotionally violent, with an inclination to</p><p>collide  with  the  law.  These  engendered  tests  and  discussions,</p><p>but their role at the level studied herein is also very small.</p><empty-line/><p>47 Sandberg, A. A.; Koepf, G. F.; Ishihara, T.; Hauschka, T. S. (August 26,</p><p>1961) �An XYY human male�.  <emphasis>Lancet</emphasis> 2, 488-9.</p><p>122</p><p>PONEROLOGY</p><p>Much  more  numerous  are  those  psychological  deviations</p><p>which play a correspondingly greater role as pathological fac-</p><p>tors  in  the  ponerological  processes;  they  are  most  probably</p><p>transmitted  through  normal  heredity.  However,  this  realm  of</p><p>genetics  in  particular  is  faced  with  manifold  biological  and</p><p>psychological  difficulties  as  far  as  recognizing  these phenom-</p><p>ena.  People  studying  their  psychopathology  lack  biological</p><p>isolation  criteria.  Biologists  lack  clear  psychological  differen-</p><p>tiation  of  such  phenomena  which  would  permit  studies  of  he-</p><p>redity mechanics and some other properties.</p><p>At the time most of the observations on which this book is</p><p>based  were  being  done,  the  works  of  many  researchers  who</p><p>have  since  shed  light  upon  many  aspects  of  the  matters  dis-</p><p>cussed herein, during the latter half of the sixties,  were either</p><p>nonexistent or unavailable. Scientists studying the phenomena</p><p>described  below  were  hacking  their  way  through  a  thicket  of</p><p>symptoms  based  on  previous  works  and  on  their  own  efforts.</p><p>An  understanding  of  the  essence  of  some  of  these  hereditary</p><p>anomalies  and  their  ponerogenic  role  proved  a  necessary  pre-</p><p>condition for reaching the primary goal.  Results were gleaned</p><p>which served as a basis for further reasoning.  For the sake of</p><p>the  overall  picture,  and  because  the  manner  elaborated  also</p><p>brings  in  certain  theoretical  values,  I  decided  to  retain  the</p><p>methodology of description for such anomalies which emerged</p><p>from my own work and from that of others at the time.</p><p>Numerous scientists during the above-mentioned fertile era,</p><p>and  some  subsequent  scientists,  such  as  R.  Jenkins,  H.</p><p>Cleckley,  S.K.  Ehrlich,  K.C.  Gray,  H.C.  Hutchison, F. Kraupl</p><p>Taylor,  and  others  did  cast  more  stereoscopic  light  upon  the</p><p>matter. They were clinicians, concentrating their attention upon</p><p>the   <emphasis>more  demonstrative  cases  which  play  a  lesser  role  in  the </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>processes of the genesis of evil</emphasis>, in accordance with the above-</p><p>mentioned  general  rule  of  ponerology.  We  therefore  need  to</p><p>differentiate  those  analogic  states  which  are  less  intense  or</p><p>contain  less  of  a  psychological  deficit.  Equally  valuable  for</p><p>ponerology are inquiries concerning the nature of the phenom-</p><p>ena  under  discussion,  which  facilitate  differentiation  of  their</p><p>essence and analysis of their role as pathological factors in the</p><p>genesis of evil.</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>123</p><p>~~~</p><p><emphasis>Schizoidia</emphasis>: Schizoidia, or schizoidal psychopathy, was iso-</p><p>lated  by  the  very  first  of  the  famous  creators  of  modern  psy-</p><p>chiatry.48 From the beginning, it  was treated  as a lighter form</p><p>of the same hereditary taint which is the cause of susceptibility</p><p>to schizophrenia. However, this latter connection could neither</p><p>be  confirmed  nor  denied  with  the  help  of  statistical  analysis,</p><p>and no biological test was then found which would have been</p><p>able to solve this dilemma. For practical reasons, we shall dis-</p><p>cuss  schizoidia  with  no  further  reference  to  this  traditional</p><p>relationship.</p><p>Literature provides us with descriptions of several varieties</p><p>of  this  anomaly,  whose  existence  can  be  attributed  either  to</p><p>changes in the genetic factor or to differences in other individ-</p><p>ual  characteristics  of  a  non-pathological  nature.  Let  us  thus</p><p>sketch these sub-species� common features.</p><p>Carriers  of  this  anomaly  are  hypersensitive  and  distrustful,</p><p>while,  at  the  same  time,  pay  little  attention  to  the  feelings  of</p><p>others. They tend to assume extreme positions, and are eager to</p><p>retaliate for minor offenses. Sometimes they are eccentric and</p><p>odd.  Their  poor  sense  of  psychological  situation  and  reality</p><p>leads them to superimpose erroneous, pejorative interpretations</p><p>upon other people�s intentions. They easily become involved in</p><p>activities which are ostensibly moral, but which actually inflict</p><empty-line/><p>48 Emil Kraepelin (1856- 1926): German psychiatrist who attempted to create</p><p>a synthesis of the hundreds of mental disorders, grouping diseases together</p><p>based on classification of common patterns of symptoms, rather than by</p><p>simple similarity of major symptoms in the manner of his predecessors. In</p><p>fact, it was precisely because of the demonstrated inadequacy of the older</p><p>methods that Kraepelin developed his new diagnostic system. Kraepelin also</p><p>demonstrated specific patterns in the genetics of these disorders and specific</p><p>and characteristic patterns in their course and outcome. Generally speaking,</p><p>there tend to be more schizophrenics among the relatives of schizophrenic</p><p>patients than in the general population, while manic-depression is more fre-</p><p>quent in the relatives of manic-depressives. Kraepelin should be credited with</p><p>being the founder of modern scientific psychiatry, psychopharmacology and</p><p>psychiatric genetics, according to the eminent psychologist H. J. Eysenck in</p><p>his  <emphasis>Encyclopedia of Psychology</emphasis>. Kraepelin postulated that psychiatric dis-</p><p>eases are principally caused by biological and genetic disorders. His psychiat-</p><p>ric theories dominated the field of psychiatry at the beginning of the twenti-</p><p>eth century. He vigorously opposed the approach of Freud who regarded and</p><p>treated psychiatric disorders as caused by psychological factors. (Wikipedia)</p><p>124</p><p>PONEROLOGY</p><p>damage upon themselves and others.  Their impoverished psy-</p><p>chological worldview makes them typically pessimistic regard-</p><p>ing  human  nature.  We  frequently  find  expressions  of  their</p><p>characteristic  attitudes  in  their  statements  and  writings:  �Hu-</p><p>man nature is so bad that order in human society can only be</p><p>maintained by a strong power created by highly qualified indi-</p><p>viduals in the name of some higher idea.� Let us call this typi-</p><p>cal expression the �schizoid declaration�.</p><p>Human  nature  does  in  fact  tend  to  be  naughty,  especially</p><p>when  the  schizoids  embitter  other  people�s  lives.  When  they</p><p>become wrapped up in situations of serious stress, however, the</p><p>schizoid�s failings cause them to collapse easily. The capacity</p><p>for  thought  is  thereupon  characteristically  stifled,  and  fre-</p><p>quently the schizoids fall into reactive psychotic states so simi-</p><p>lar in appearance to schizophrenia that they lead to misdiagno-</p><p>ses.</p><p>The common factor in the varieties of this anomaly is a dull</p><p>pallor  of  emotion  and  lack  of  feeling  for  the  psychological</p><p>realities,  an  essential  factor  in  basic  intelligence.  This  can  be</p><p>attributed to some incomplete quality of the instinctive substra-</p><p>tum,  which  works  as  though  founded  on  shifting  sand.  Low</p><p>emotional pressure enables them to develop proper speculative</p><p>reasoning, which is useful in non-humanistic spheres of activ-</p><p>ity,  but  because  of  their  one-sidedness,  they  tend  to  consider</p><p>themselves intellectually superior to �ordinary� people.</p><p>The  quantitative  frequency  of  this  anomaly  varies  among</p><p>races and nations: low among Blacks, the highest among Jews.</p><p>Estimates of this frequency range from negligible up to 3 %. In</p><p>Poland it may be estimated as 0.7 % of population. My obser-</p><p>vations suggest this anomaly is autosomally hereditary.49</p><p>A  schizoid�s  ponerological  activity  should  be  evaluated  in</p><p>two aspects. On the small scale, such people cause their fami-</p><p>lies  trouble,  easily  turn  into  tools  of  intrigue  in  the  hands  of</p><p>clever  and  unscrupulous  individuals,  and  generally  do  a  poor</p><p>job of raising children. Their tendency to see human reality in</p><empty-line/><p>49  <emphasis>Autosomal</emphasis>: the disease is due to a DNA error in one of the 22 pairs that are</p><p>not sex chromosomes. Both boys and girls can then inherit this error. If the</p><p>error is in a sex chromosome, the inheritance is said to be sex-linked. [Edi-</p><p>tor�s note.]</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>125</p><p>the doctrinaire and simplistic manner they consider �proper� �</p><p>i.e.  �black  or  white�  -  transforms  their  frequently  good  inten-</p><p>tions  into  bad  results.  However,  their  ponerogenic  role  can</p><p>have  macrosocial  implications  if  their  attitude  toward  human</p><p>reality  and  their  tendency  to  invent  great  doctrines  are  put  to</p><p>paper and duplicated in large editions.</p><p>In spite of their typical deficits, or even an openly schizoi-</p><p>dal  declaration,  their  readers  do  not  realize  what  the  authors�</p><p>characters are really like. Ignorant of the true condition of the</p><p>author, such uninformed readers thed to interpret such works in</p><p>a  manner  corresponding  to  their  own  nature.  The  minds  of</p><p>normal people tend toward corrective interpretation due to the</p><p>participation of their own richer, psychological world view.</p><p>At the same time,  many other readers  critically reject such</p><p>works  with moral disgust but without being aware of  the spe-</p><p>cific cause.</p><p>An analysis of the role played by Karl Marx�s works easily</p><p>reveals all the above-mentioned types of apperception and the</p><p>social  reactions  which  engendered  animosity  between  large</p><p>groups of people.</p><p>When reading any of those disturbingly divisive works, we</p><p>should  examine  them  carefully  for  any  of  these  characteristic</p><p>deficits,  or  even  an  openly  formulated  schizoid  declaration.</p><p>Such a process will enable us to gain a proper critical distance</p><p>from the contents and make it easier to dig the potentially valu-</p><p>able elements out of the doctrinaire material. If this is done by</p><p>two or more people who represent greatly divergent interpreta-</p><p>tions,  their  methods  of  perception  will  come  closer  together,</p><p>and the causes of dissent will dissipate. Such a project might be</p><p>attempted  as  a  psychological  experiment  and  for  purposes  of</p><p>proper mental hygiene.</p><p>~~~</p><p><emphasis>Essential psychopathy</emphasis>: Within the framework of the  above</p><p>assumptions,  let  us  characterize  another  heredity-transmitted</p><p>anomaly  whose  role  in  ponerogenic  processes  on   <emphasis>any</emphasis>  social</p><p>scale  appears   <emphasis>exceptionally  great</emphasis>.  We  should  also  underscore</p><p>that the need to isolate this phenomenon and examine it in de-</p><p>tail became quickly and profoundly evident to those research-</p><p>ers � including the author - who were interested in the macro-</p><p>126</p><p>PONEROLOGY</p><p>social scale of the genesis of evil, because they witnessed it. I</p><p>acknowledge my debt to  Kazimierz  Dabrowski50 in doing this</p><p>and calling this anomaly an �essential psychopathy�.</p><p>Biologically speaking, the phenomenon is similar to color-</p><p>blindness  but  occurs  with  about  ten  times  lower  frequency</p><p>(slightly  above  1/2%),51  except  that,  unlike  color  blindness,  it</p><p>affects both sexes.  <emphasis>Its intensity also varies in scope from a level </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>barely  perceptive  to  an  experienced  observer  to  an  obvious </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>pathological deficiency. </emphasis></p><p>Like color blindness, this anomaly also appears to represent</p><p>a deficit in stimulus transformation, albeit occurring not on the</p><p>sensory  but  on  the  instinctive  level.52  Psychiatrist  of  the  old</p><p>school used to call such individuals �Daltonists of human feel-</p><p>ings and socio-moral values�.</p><p>The psychological picture shows clear deficits among men</p><p>only; among women it is generally toned down, as by the effect</p><p>of  a  second  normal  allele.  This  suggests  that  the  anomaly  is</p><p>also  inherited  via  the  X  chromosome,  but  through  a  semi-</p><p>dominating  gene.  However,  the  author  was  unable  to  confirm</p><p>this by excluding inheritance from father to son.</p><p>Analysis of the different experiential manner demonstrated</p><p>by these individuals caused us to conclude that their  <emphasis>instinctive </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>substratum is also defective</emphasis>, containing certain gaps and lack-</p><p>ing  the  natural  syntonic  responses  commonly  evidenced  by</p><empty-line/><p>50 Kazimierz Dabrowski (1902-1980):Polish psychologist, psychiatrist, phy-</p><p>sician, and poet. Dabrowski developed the theory of Positive Disintegration,</p><p>a novel approach to personality development, over his lifetime of clinical and</p><p>academic work. [Editor�s note.]</p><p>51 Recent research by Robert Hare, then Martha Stout, and finally Salekin,</p><p>Trobst, Krioukova, have tended to increase the probably rate of occurrence in</p><p>a given population. The latter researchers, in �Construct Validity of Psycho-</p><p>pathy in a Community Sample: A Nomological Net Approach�, Salekin,</p><p>Trobst, Krioukova,  <emphasis>Journal of Personality Disorders</emphasis>, 15(5), 425-441, 2001),</p><p>suggest the prevalence of psychopathy to be perhaps 5% or more, although</p><p>the vast majority of those will be male (more than 1/10 males versus ap-</p><p>proximately 1/100 females). [Editor�s note.]</p><p>52 Current day research suggests that many of the characteristics displayed by</p><p>psychopaths are closely associated with a profound lack of ability to con-</p><p>struct an empathic mental and emotional �facsimile� of another person. They</p><p>seem completely unable to �get into the skin� of others, except in a purely</p><p>intellectual sense. [Editor�s note.]</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>127</p><p>members of the species  <emphasis>Homo Sapiens</emphasis>.53 Our species instinct is</p><p>our  first  teacher;  it  stays  with  us  everywhere  throughout  our</p><p>lives. Upon this defective instinctive substratum, the deficits of</p><p>higher  feelings  and  the  deformities  and  impoverishments  in</p><p>psychological,  moral,  and  social  concepts  develop  in  corre-</p><p>spondence with these gaps.</p><p>Our  natural  world  of  concepts  �  based  upon  species  in-</p><p>stincts  as  described  in  an  earlier  chapter  -  strikes  the  psycho-</p><p>path as a nearly incomprehensible convention with no justifica-</p><p>tion  in  their  own  psychological  experience.  They  think  that</p><p>customs  and  principles  of  decency  are  a  foreign  convention</p><p>invented and imposed by someone else, (�probably by priests�)</p><p>silly,  onerous,  sometimes  even  ridiculous.  At  the  same  time,</p><p>however, they easily perceive the deficiencies and weaknesses</p><p>of our natural language of psychological and moral concepts in</p><p>a manner somewhat reminiscent of the attitude of a contempo-</p><p>rary psychologist�except in caricature.</p><p>The  average  intelligence  of  the  psychopath,  especially  if</p><p>measured  via  commonly  used  tests,  is  somewhat  lower  than</p><p>that  of  normal  people,  albeit  similarly  variegated.  Despite  the</p><p>wide  variety  of  intelligence  and  interests,  this  group  does  not</p><p>contain  examples  of  the  highest  intelligence,  nor  do  we  find</p><p>technical or craftsmanship talents among them. The most gifted</p><p>members  of  this  kind  may  thus  achieve  accomplishments  in</p><p>those sciences which do not require a correct humanistic world</p><p>view or practical skills. (Academic decency is another matter,</p><p>however.)  Whenever  we  attempt  to  construct  special  tests  to</p><p>measure  �life  wisdom�  or  �socio-moral  imagination�,  even  if</p><p>the  difficulties  of  psychometric  evaluation  are  taken  into  ac-</p><p>count, individuals of this type indicate a deficit disproportion-</p><p>ate to their personal IQ.</p><p>In  spite  of  their  deficiencies  in  normal  psychological  and</p><p>moral knowledge, they develop and then have at their disposal</p><p>a knowledge of their own, something lacked by people with a</p><p>natural  world  view.  <emphasis>They  learn  to  recognize  each  other  in  a </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>crowd as early as childhood, and they develop an awareness of </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>the  existence  of  other  individuals  similar  to  them. </emphasis>  They  also</p><empty-line/><p>53 What�s missing in psychopaths are the qualities that people depend on for</p><p>living in social harmony. [Editor�s note.]</p><p>128</p><p>PONEROLOGY</p><p>become  conscious  of  being  different  from  the  world  of  those</p><p>other  people  surrounding  them.  They  view  us  from  a  certain</p><p>distance, like a para-specific variety. Natural human reactions -</p><p>which often fail to elicit interest to normal people because they</p><p>are  considered  self-evident  -  strike  the  psychopath  as  strange</p><p>and, interesting, and even comical. They therefore observe us,</p><p>deriving conclusions, forming their different world of concepts.</p><p>They become experts in our weaknesses and sometimes effect</p><p>heartless  experiments.  The  suffering  and  injustice  they  cause</p><p>inspire  no  guilt  within them,  since  such  reactions  from  others</p><p>are  simply  a  result  of  their  being  different  and  apply  only  to</p><p>�those other� people they perceive to be not quite conspecific.</p><p>Neither a normal person nor our natural  world view  can fully</p><p>conceive  nor  properly  evaluate  the  existence  of  this  world  of</p><p>different concepts.</p><p>A researcher into such phenomena can glimpse the deviant</p><p>knowledge of the psychopath through long-term studies of the</p><p>personalities of such people, using it with some difficulty, like</p><p>a foreign language. As we shall see below, such practical skill</p><p>becomes  rather  widespread in nations afflicted by that macro-</p><p>social  pathological  phenomenon  wherein  this  anomaly  plays</p><p>the inspiring role.</p><p>A  normal  person  can  learn  to  speak  their  conceptual  lan-</p><p>guage even somewhat proficiently, but the psychopath is never</p><p>able to incorporate the world view of a normal person, although</p><p>they often try to do so all their lives.  The product of  their ef-</p><p>forts  is  only  a  role  and  a  mask  behind  which  they  hide  their</p><p>deviant reality.</p><p>Another  myth  and  role  they  often  play,  albeit  containing  a</p><p>grain  of  truth  in  relation  to  the  �special  psychological  knowl-</p><p>edge�  that  the  psychopath  acquires  regarding  normal  people,</p><p>would be the psychopaths� brilliant mind or psychological gen-</p><p>ius; some of them actually believe in this and attempt to insinu-</p><p>ate this belief to others.</p><p>In speaking of the mask of psychological normality worn by</p><p>such individuals (and by similar deviants to a lesser extent), we</p><p>should  mention  the  book   <emphasis>The  Mask  of  Sanity</emphasis>;  by  Hervey</p><p>Cleckley,  who  made  this  very  phenomenon  the  crux  of  his</p><p>reflections. A fragment:</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>129</p><p>Let us remember that his typical behavior defeats what ap-</p><p>pear to be his own aims. Is it not he himself who is most</p><p>deeply deceived by his apparent normality? Although he de-</p><p>liberately cheats others and is quite conscious of his lies, he</p><p>appears unable to distinguish adequately between his own</p><p>pseudointentions, pseudoremorse, pseudolove, etc., and the</p><p>genuine responses of a normal person. His monumental lack</p><p>of insight indicates how little he appreciates the nature of his</p><p>disorder. When others fail to accept immediately his �word of</p><p>honor as a gentleman�, his amazement, I believe, is often</p><p>genuine. His subjective experience is so bleached of deep</p><p>emotion that he is invincibly ignorant of what life means to</p><p>others.</p><p>His awareness of hypocrisy�s opposite is so insubstantially</p><p>theoretical that it becomes questionable if what we chiefly</p><p>mean by hypocrisy should be attributed to him. Having no ma-</p><p>jor value himself, can he be said to realize adequately the na-</p><p>ture and quality of the outrages his conduct inflicts upon oth-</p><p>ers? A young child who has no impressive memory of severe</p><p>pain may have been told by his mother it is wrong to cut off</p><p>the dog�s tail. Knowing it is wrong he may proceed with the</p><p>operation. We need not totally absolve him of responsibility if</p><p>we say he realizes less what he did than an adult who, in full</p><p>appreciation of physical agony, so uses a knife. Can a person</p><p>experience the deeper levels of sorrow without considerable</p><p>knowledge of happiness? Can he achieve evil intention in the</p><p>full sense without real awareness of evil�s opposite? I have no</p><p>final answer to these questions.  <emphasis>54</emphasis></p><p>All  researchers  into  psychopathy  underline  three  qualities</p><p>primarily with regard to this most typical variety: The absence</p><p>of  a  sense  of  guilt  for  antisocial  actions,  the  inability  to  love</p><p>truly, and the tendency to be garrulous in a  way  which easily</p><p>deviates from reality.55</p><empty-line/><p>54 Hervey Cleckley:  <emphasis>The Mask of Sanity</emphasis>, 1976; C.V. Mosby Co., p. 386.</p><p>55 In their paper, �Construct Validity of Psychopathy in a Community Sam-</p><p>ple: A Nomological Net Approach,� (op cit.) Salekin, Trobst, and Krioukova,</p><p>write: �Psychopathy, as originally conceived by Cleckley (1941), is not</p><p>limited to engagement in illegal activities, but rather encompasses such per-</p><p>sonality characteristics as manipulativeness, insincerity, egocentricity, and</p><p>lack of guilt - characteristics clearly present in criminals but also in spouses,</p><p>parents, bosses, attorneys, politicians, and CEOs, to name but a few.</p><p>(Bursten, 1973; Stewart, 1991).... As such, psychopathy may be characterized</p><p>130</p><p>PONEROLOGY</p><p>A neurotic patient is generally taciturn and has trouble ex-</p><p>plaining what hurts him most. A psychologist must know how</p><p>to overcome these obstacles with the help of non-painful inter-</p><p>actions.  Neurotics  are  also  prone  to  excessive  guilt  about  ac-</p><p>tions  which  are  easily  forgiven.  Such  patients  are  capable  of</p><p>decent  and  enduring  love,  although  they  have  difficulty  ex-</p><p>pressing it or achieving their dreams. A psychopath�s behavior</p><p>constitutes the antipode of such phenomena and difficulties.</p><p>Our  first contact  with the psychopath is characterized by a</p><p>talkative stream which flows with ease and avoids truly impor-</p><p>tant  matters  with  equal  ease  if  they  are  uncomfortable  for  the</p><p>speaker. His train of thought also avoids those abstract matters</p><p>of human feelings and values whose representation is absent in</p><p>the psychopathic world view unless, of course, he is being de-</p><p>liberately deceptive, in which case he will use many �feeling�</p><p>words  which  careful  scrutiny  will  reveal  that  he  does  not  un-</p><p>derstand those words the same way normal people do. We then</p><p>also  feel  we  are  dealing  with  an  imitation  of  the  thought  pat-</p><p>terns  of  normal  people,  in  which  something  else  is,  in  fact,</p><p>�normal�. From the logical point of view, the flow of thought is</p><p>ostensibly  correct,  albeit  perhaps  removed  from  commonly</p><p>accepted  criteria.  A  more  detailed  formal  analysis,  however,</p><p>evidences the use of many suggestive paralogisms.56</p><p>Individuals with the psychopathy referred to herein are vir-</p><p>tually  unfamiliar  with  the  enduring  emotions  of  love  for  an-</p><empty-line/><p>... as involving a tendency towards both dominance and coldness. Wiggins</p><p>(1995) in summarizing numerous previous findings... indicates that such</p><p>individuals are prone to anger and irritation and are willing to exploit others.</p><p>They are arrogant, manipulative, cynical, exhibitionistic, sensation-seeking,</p><p>Machiavellian, vindictive, and out for their own gain. With respect to their</p><p>patterns of social exchange (Foa &amp; Foa, 1974), they attribute love and status</p><p>to themselves, seeing themselves as highly worthy and important, but pre-</p><p>scribe neither love nor status to others, seeing them as unworthy and insig-</p><p>nificant. This characterization is clearly consistent with the essence of psy-</p><p>chopathy as commonly described. ...  What is clear from our findings is that</p><p>(a) psychopathy measures have converged on a prototype of psychopathy that</p><p>involves a combination of dominant and cold interpersonal characteristics;</p><p>(b) psychopathy does occur in the community and at what might be a higher</p><p>than expected rate; and (c) psychopathy appears to have little overlap with</p><p>personality disorders aside from Antisocial Personality Disorder.� [Editor�s</p><p>note.]</p><p>56 An unintentionally invalid argument. [Editor�s note.]</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>131</p><p>other person, particularly the marriage partner; it constitutes a</p><p>fairytale from that �other� human world. Love, for the psycho-</p><p>path, is an ephemeral phenomenon aimed at sexual adventure.</p><p>Many psychopathic Don Juans are able to play the lover�s role</p><p>well enough for their partners to accept it in good faith. After</p><p>the  wedding,  feelings  which  really  never  existed  are  replaced</p><p>by  egoism,  egotism,  and  hedonism.  Religion,  which  teaches</p><p>love for one�s neighbor, also strikes them as a similar fairytale</p><p>good only for children and those different �others�.</p><p>One  would  expect  them  to  feel  guilty  as  a  consequence  of</p><p>their  many  antisocial  acts,  however  their  lack  of  guilt  is  the</p><p>result  of  all  their  deficits,  which  we  have  been  discussing</p><p>here.57 The world of normal people whom they hurt is incom-</p><p>prehensible and hostile to them, and life for the psychopath is</p><p>the  pursuit  of  its  immediate  attractions,  moments  of  pleasure,</p><p>and temporary feelings of power. They often meet with failure</p><p>along this road, along with force and moral condemnation from</p><p>the society of those other incomprehensible people.</p><p>In  their  book   <emphasis>Psychopathy  and  Delinquency</emphasis>,  W.  and  J.</p><p>McCord say the following about them:</p><empty-line/><p>57 Robert Hare says, �What I thought was most interesting was that for the</p><p>first time ever, as far as I know, we found that there was no activation of the</p><p>appropriate areas for emotional arousal, but there was over-activation in other</p><p>parts of the brain, including parts of the brain that are ordinarily devoted to</p><p>language. Those parts were active, as if they were saying, �Hey, isn�t that</p><p>interesting.� So they seem to be analyzing emotional material in terms of its</p><p>linguistic or dictionary meaning. There are anomalies in the way psychopaths</p><p>process information. It may be more general than just emotional information.</p><p>In another functional MRI study, we looked at the parts of the brain that are</p><p>used to process concrete and abstract words. Non-psychopathic individuals</p><p>showed increased activation of the right anterior/superior temporal cortex.</p><p>For the psychopaths, that didn't happen.�</p><p>Hare and his colleagues then conducted an fMRI study using pictures of</p><p>neutral scenes and unpleasant homicide scenes. �Non-psychopathic offenders</p><p>show lots of activation in the amygdala [to unpleasant scenes], compared</p><p>with neutral pictures,� he points out. �In the psychopath, there was nothing.</p><p>No difference. But there was overactivation in the same regions of the brain</p><p>that were overactive during the presentation of emotional words. It�s like</p><p>they're analyzing emotional material in extra-limbic regions.� ( <emphasis>Psychopathy </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>vs. Antisocial Personality Disorder and Sociopathy: A Discussion by Robert </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>Hare</emphasis>; crimelibrary.com)</p><p>132</p><p>PONEROLOGY</p><p>The psychopath feels little, if any, guilt. He can commit</p><p>the most appalling acts, yet view them without remorse. The</p><p>Psychopath has a warped capacity for love. His emotional re-</p><p>lationships, when they exist, are meager, fleeting, and de-</p><p>signed to satisfy his own desires. These last two traits, guilt-</p><p>lessness and lovelessness, conspicuously mark the psychopath</p><p>as different from other men.  <emphasis>58</emphasis></p><p>The problem of a psychopath�s moral and legal responsibil-</p><p>ity  thus  remains  open  and  subject  to  various  solutions,  fre-</p><p>quently  summary  or  emotional,  in  various  countries  and  cir-</p><p>cumstances. It remains a subject of discussion whose  solution</p><p>does not appear possible within the framework of the presently</p><p>accepted principles of legal thought.</p><p>~~~</p><p><emphasis>Other  psychopathies</emphasis>:  The  cases  of  essential  psychopathy</p><p>seem similar enough to each other to permit them to be classi-</p><p>fied  as  qualitatively  homogenous.  However,  we  can  also  in-</p><p>clude  within  psychopathic  categories  a  somewhat  indetermi-</p><p>nate number of anomalies with a hereditary substratum, whose</p><p>symptoms are approximate to this most typical phenomenon.</p><p>We  also  meet  difficult  individuals  with  a  tendency  to  be-</p><p>have in a manner hurtful to other people, for whom tests do not</p><p>indicate existing damage to brain tissue and anamnesis does not</p><p>indicate  abnormal  childhood  experiences  which  could  explain</p><p>their state. The fact that such cases are repeated within families</p><p>would suggest a hereditary substratum, but  we must  also take</p><p>into account the possibility that harmful factors participated in</p><p>the  fetal  stage.  This  is  an  area  of  medicine  and  psychology</p><p>warranting  more  study,  as  there  is  more  to  learn  than  we  al-</p><p>ready know concretely.</p><p>Such  people  also  attempt  to  mask  their  different  world  of</p><p>experience  and to play a role of normal people to varying de-</p><p>grees,  although  this  is  no  longer  the  characteristic  �Cleckley</p><p>mask�.  Some  are  notable  by  demonstrations  of  their  strange-</p><p>ness.  These  people  participate  in  the  genesis  of  evil  in  very</p><p>different ways, whether taking part openly or, to a lesser extent,</p><p>when  they  have  managed  to  adapt  to  proper  ways  of  living.</p><empty-line/><p>58 McCord, W. &amp; McCord, J.  <emphasis>Psychopathy and Delinquency</emphasis>. New York:</p><p>Grune &amp; Stratton, 1956.</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>133</p><p>These psychopathic and related phenomena may, quantitatively</p><p>speaking,  be  summarily  estimated  at  two  or  three  times  the</p><p>number of cases of essential psychopathy, i.e. at less than two</p><p>per cent of the population.</p><p>This  type  of  person  finds  it  easier  to  adjust  to  social  life.</p><p>The lesser cases in particular adapt to the demands of the soci-</p><p>ety of normal people, taking advantage of its understanding for</p><p>the  arts  and  other  areas  with  similar  traditions.  Their  literary</p><p>creativity is often disturbing if conceived in ideational catego-</p><p>ries  alone;  they  insinuate  to  their  readers  that  their  world  of</p><p>concepts and experiences is self-evident; also it contains char-</p><p>acteristic deformities.59</p><p>The  most  frequently  indicated  and  long-known  of  these  is</p><p>the  <emphasis>asthenic psychopathy</emphasis>, which  <emphasis>appears in every conceivable </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>intensity,  from  barely  perceptible  to  an  obvious  pathologic </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>deficiency</emphasis>.</p><p>These  people,  asthenic  and  hypersensitive,  do  not  indicate</p><p>the same glaring deficit in moral feeling and ability to sense a</p><p>psychological  situation  as  do  essential  psychopaths.  They  are</p><p>somewhat idealistic and tend to have superficial pangs of con-</p><p>science as a result of their faulty behavior.</p><p>On  the  average,  they  are  also  less  intelligent  than  normal</p><p>people, and their mind avoids consistency and accuracy in rea-</p><p>soning. Their psychological  world view is clearly falsified, so</p><p>their options about people can never be trusted. A kind of mask</p><p>cloaks the world of their personal aspirations, which is at vari-</p><p>ance with what they are actually capable of doing. Their behav-</p><p>ior  towards  people  who  do  not  notice  their  faults  is  urbane,</p><p>even friendly; however, the same people manifest a preemptive</p><empty-line/><p>59 A number of researchers at present are suggesting that Asperger�s Syn-</p><p>drome belongs under the classification of psychopathy. Asperger�s Syndrome</p><p>describes children who: �lack basic social and motor skills, seem unable to</p><p>decode body language and sense the feelings of others, avoid eye contact, and</p><p>frequently launch into monologues about narrowly defined - and often highly</p><p>technical - interests. Even when very young, these children become obsessed</p><p>with order, arranging their toys in a regimented fashion on the floor and</p><p>flying into tantrums when their routines are disturbed. As teenagers, they�re</p><p>prone to getting into trouble with teachers and other figures of authority,</p><p>partly because the subtle cues that define societal hierarchies are invisible to</p><p>them.� ( Steve Silberman, �The Geek Syndrome�: wired.com) [Editor�s</p><p>note.]</p><p>134</p><p>PONEROLOGY</p><p>hostility and aggression against persons  who have a talent for</p><p>psychology, or demonstrate knowledge in this field.</p><p>The asthenic psychopath is relatively less vital sexually and</p><p>is therefore amenable to  accepting celibacy; that is  why some</p><p>Catholic  monks  and  priests  often  represent  lesser  or  minor</p><p>cases  of  this  anomaly.  Such  individuals  may  very  likely  have</p><p>inspired  the  anti-psychological  attitude  traditional  in  Church</p><p>thinking.</p><p>The more severe cases are more brutally anti-psychological</p><p>and contemptuous of normal people; they tend to be  active in</p><p>the  processes  of  the  genesis  of  evil  on  a  larger  scale.  Their</p><p>dreams are composed of a certain idealism similar to the ideas</p><p>of normal people. They would like to reform the world to their</p><p>liking but are unable to foresee more far-reaching implications</p><p>and  results.  Spiced  by  deviance,  their  visions  may  influence</p><p>naive  rebels  or  people  who  have  suffered  injustice.  Existing</p><p>social  injustice  may  look  like  a  justification  for  a  radicalized</p><p>world view and the assimilation of such visions.</p><p>The following is an example of the thought-pattern of a per-</p><p>son who displays a typical and severe case of asthenic psycho-</p><p>pathy:</p><empty-line/><p><emphasis/></p><p>Symptoms:</p><p><emphasis>�IIf I had to start life all over again, </emphasis></p><empty-line/><p><emphasis>I�d do exactly the same: it�s organic </emphasis></p><p>A feeling of being differ-</p><p><emphasis>necessity, nor the dictates of duty. I </emphasis></p><p>ent.</p><empty-line/><p><emphasis>have one thing which keeps me going </emphasis></p><empty-line/><p><emphasis>and bids me be serene even when </emphasis></p><p>The shallow nostalgia</p><p><emphasis>things are so very sad. That is an </emphasis></p><p>characteristic of this psy-</p><p><emphasis>unshakable faith in people. Condi-</emphasis></p><p>chopathy.</p><empty-line/><p><emphasis>tions will change and evil will cease </emphasis></p><empty-line/><p><emphasis>to reign, and man will be a brother to  </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>man, not a wolf as is the case today. </emphasis></p><p>Vision of a new world.</p><p><emphasis>My forebearance derives not from my  </emphasis> Different psychological</p><p><emphasis>fancy, but rather from my clear vision  </emphasis> knowledge.- <emphasis/></p><p><emphasis>of the cause which give rise to evil." </emphasis></p><empty-line/><p>Those words were written in prison on December 15, 1913</p><p>by Felix Dzerzhinsky, a descendant of Polish gentry who  was</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>135</p><p>soon to originate the  <emphasis>Cherezvichayka60</emphasis> in the Soviet Union and</p><p>to become the greatest idealist among these most famous mur-</p><p>derers. Psychopathies surface in all nations.61</p><p>If the time ever comes, when �conditions will change� and</p><p>�evil  will no longer rule�, it could be because progress in the</p><p>study  of  pathological  phenomena  and  their  ponerogenic  role</p><p>will  make  it  possible  for  societies  to  calmly  accept  the  exis-</p><p>tence of these phenomena and comprehend them as categories</p><p>of nature. The vision of a new, just structure of society can then</p><p>be realized within the framework and under the control of  <emphasis>nor-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>mal</emphasis>  people.  Having  reconciled  ourselves  to  the  fact  that  such</p><p>people are different and have  a limited capacity for social ad-</p><p>justment,  we  should  create  a  system  of  permanent  protection</p><p>for  them  within  the  framework  of  reason  and  proper  knowl-</p><p>edge,  a  system  which  will  partially  make  their  dreams  come</p><p>true.</p><p>For  our  purposes,  we  should  also  draw  attention  to  types</p><p>with deviant features; these were isolated relatively long ago by</p><p>Edward  Brzezicki62  and  accepted  by  Ernst  Kretschmer63  as</p><p>characteristic  of  eastern  Europe  in  particular.  <emphasis>Skirtoids64</emphasis>  are</p><empty-line/><p>60 The Cheka was the first secret police set up under Bolshevik rule. Dzerz-</p><p>hinsky was its first Commissar. [Editor�s note]</p><p>61 Dzerzhinsky is an interesting case. It is said of him that �His honest and</p><p>incorruptible character, combined with his complete devotion to the cause,</p><p>gained him swift recognition and the nickname Iron Felix.� His monument in</p><p>the center of Warsaw in �Dzerzhinsky square�, was hated by the population</p><p>of the Polish capital as a symbol of soviet oppression and was toppled down</p><p>in 1989, as soon as the PZPR started losing power, the square�s name was</p><p>soon changed to its pre-second world war name �Plac Bankowy� (Bank</p><p>square). According to a popular joke of that late People�s Republic of Poland-</p><p>era �Dzerzhinsky deserved a monument for being the Pole to kill the largest</p><p>number of communists�.</p><p>62 My professor of psychiatry � Yagiellonian University � Cracow (a friend</p><p>of Kretschmer).</p><p>63 Ernst Kretschmer is remembered for his correlation of build and physical</p><p>constitution with personality characteristics and mental illness. In 1933</p><p>Krestchmer resigned as president of the German society of Psychotherapy in</p><p>protest against the Nazi takeover of the government. But unlike other promi-</p><p>nent German psychologists he remained in Germany during World War II.</p><p>Kretschmer further developed new methods of psychotherapy and hypnosis,</p><p>and studied compulsive criminality, recommending adequate provision be</p><p>made for the psychiatric treatment of prisoners. [Editor�s note.]</p><p>64 Greek root  <emphasis>skirta�</emphasis>: to rebel, to jump. [Editor�s note.]</p><p>136</p><p>PONEROLOGY</p><p>vital, egotistical, and thick-skinned individuals who make good</p><p>soldiers  because  of  their  endurance  and  psychological  resis-</p><p>tance. In peacetime, however, they are incapable of understand-</p><p>ing  life�s  subtler  matters  or  rearing  children  prudently.  They</p><p>are  happy  in  primitive  surroundings;  a  comfortable  environ-</p><p>ment easily causes hysterization within them. They are rigidly</p><p>conservative  in  all  areas  and  supportive  of  governments  that</p><p>rule with a heavy hand.</p><p>Kretschmer  was  of  the  opinion  that  this  anomaly  was  a</p><p>biodynamic phenomenon caused by the crossing of two widely</p><p>separated  ethnic  groups,  which  is  frequent  in  that  area  of</p><p>Europe. If that were the case, North America should be full of</p><p>skirtoids,  a  hypothesis  that  deserves  observation.  We  may  as-</p><p>sume  that  skirtoidism  is  inherited  normally;  not  sex-linked.</p><p>This anomaly should be taken into consideration if we wish to</p><p>understand the history of Russia, as well as the history of Po-</p><p>land, to a lesser extent.</p><p>Another  interesting  question  suggests  itself:  what  kind  of</p><p>people  are  the  so-called  �jackals�,  hired  as  professional  and</p><p>mercenary  killers  by  various  groups,  and  who  so  quickly  and</p><p>easily take up arms as a means of political struggle? They offer</p><p>themselves as specialists who perform the duty as accepted; no</p><p>human  feelings  interfere  with  their  nefarious  plans.  They  are</p><p>most  certainly  not  normal  people,  <emphasis>but  none  of  the  deviations </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>described  herein  fits  this  picture</emphasis>.  As  a  rule,  essential  psycho-</p><p>paths  are  talkative  and  incapable  of  such  carefully  planned</p><p>activity.</p><p>Perhaps, we should assume this type to be the product of a</p><p>cross  between  lesser  taints  of  various  deviations.  Even  if  we</p><p>accept the statistical probability of the appearance of such hy-</p><p>brids, taking into account the quantitative data, they should be</p><p>an  extremely  rare  phenomena.  However,  mate-selection  psy-</p><p>chology  produces  pairings  which  bilaterally  represent  various</p><p>anomalies. Carriers of two or even three lesser deviational fac-</p><p>tors should thus be more frequent. A jackal could then be imag-</p><p>ined as the carrier of schizoidal traits in combination with some</p><p>other  psychopathy,  e.g.  essential  psychopathy  or  skirtoidism.</p><p>More  frequent  instances  of  such  hybrids  are  a  large  part  of  a</p><p>society�s pool of hereditary pathological ponerogenic factors.</p><p><image l:href="#0"/></p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>137</p><p>~~~</p><p>The above characterizations are selected examples of patho-</p><p>logical factors which participate in ponerogenic processes. The</p><p>ever-increasing literature in this area furnishes interested read-</p><p>ers with a wider range of data and sometimes colorful descrip-</p><p>tions  of  such  phenomena.  The  current  state  of  knowledge  in</p><p>this  area  is  nevertheless  still  insufficient  to  produce  practical</p><p>solutions  for  the  many  problems  human  beings  face,  particu-</p><p>larly  those  on  the  individual  and  family  scale.  Studies  on  the</p><p>biological nature of these phenomena are needed for  this pur-</p><p>pose.</p><p>I  would  like  to  warn  those  readers  lacking  knowledge  and</p><p>experience of their own in this area not to fall prey to the im-</p><p>pression that the world surrounding them is dominated by indi-</p><p>viduals with pathological deviations, whether described herein</p><p>or not; it is not. The following graphic representation in circle</p><p>form  approximates  the  presence  of  individuals  with  various</p><p>psychological anomalies within a society</p><p>~~~</p><p>Pathological  phenomena  as  described  in  approximate  pro-</p><p>portion of their appearance:</p><p><strong/></p><p><strong>T.P. </strong> Total population</p><p><strong/></p><p><strong>Psp. </strong> Psychopathies</p><p><strong/></p><p><strong>Chp. </strong> Characteropathies</p><p><strong/></p><p><strong>E.P. </strong> Essential psychopa-</p><p>thy</p><p><strong/></p><p><strong>Sh. </strong> Schizoidia</p><p><strong/></p><p><strong>XYY</strong> karyotype</p><empty-line/><p>The  fact  that  deviant  individuals  are  a  minority  should  be</p><p>emphasized all the more since there have been theories on the</p><p>exceptionally  creative  role  of  abnormal  individuals,  even  an</p><p>identification  of  human  genius  with  the  psychology  of  abnor-</p><p>mality. However, the one-sidedness of these theories appears to</p><p>be derived from people who were searching for an affirmation</p><p>138</p><p>PONEROLOGY</p><p>of their own personalities by means of such a world view. Out-</p><p>standing  thinkers,  discoverers,  and  artists  have  also  been</p><p>specimens of psychological normality, qualitatively speaking.</p><p>After all, psychologically normal people constitute both the</p><p>great  statistical  majority  and  the  real  base  of  societal  life  in</p><p>each community. According to natural law, they should thus be</p><p>the ones to set the pace; moral law is derived from their nature.</p><p>Power should be in the hands of normal people. A ponerologist</p><p>only  demands  that  such  authority  be  endowed  with  an  appro-</p><p>priate  understanding  of  these  less-normal  people,  and  that  the</p><p>law be based upon such understanding.</p><p>The quantitative and qualitative composition of this biopsy-</p><p>chologically deficient fraction of the population certainly varies</p><p>in time and space on our planet. This may be represented by a</p><p>single-digit percentage in some nations, in the teens in others.</p><p>Said  quantitative  and  qualitative  structure  influence  the  entire</p><p>psychological  and  moral  climate  of  the  country  in  question.</p><p>That  is  why  this  problem  should  be  the  subject  of  conscious</p><p>concern.  However  it  should  also  be  noted  that  evidence  sug-</p><p>gests  that  the  dreams  of  power  so  frequently  present  in  these</p><p>circles  do  not  always  and  necessarily  manifest  fully  in  coun-</p><p>tries where this percentile has been very high. Other historical</p><p>circumstances were decisive as well.</p><p>In  any  society  in  this  world,  psychopathic  individuals  and</p><p>some of the other deviant types create a ponerogenically active</p><p>network  of  common  collusions,  partially  estranged  from  the</p><p>community of normal people. An inspirational role of essential</p><p>psychopathy  in  this  network  appears  to  be  a  common  phe-</p><p>nomenon. They are aware of being different as they obtain their</p><p>life-experiences  and  become  familiar  with  different  ways  of</p><p>fighting for their goals. Their world is forever divided into �us</p><p>and them�; their little world with its own laws and customs and</p><p>that other foreign world of normal people that they see as full</p><p>of  presumptuous  ideas  and  customs  by  which  they  are  con-</p><p>demned  morally.  Their sense of honor bids them to cheat and</p><p>revile that other human world and its values at every opportu-</p><p>nity. In contradiction to the customs of normal people, they feel</p><p>that breaking their promises is appropriate behavior.</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>139</p><p>One  of  the  most  disturbing  things  about  psychopaths  that</p><p>normal  people  must  deal  with  is  the  fact  that  they  very  early</p><p>learn  how  their  personalities  can  have  traumatizing  effects  on</p><p>the  personalities  of  those  normal  people,  and  how  to  take  ad-</p><p>vantage  of  this  root  of  terror  for  purposes  of  reaching  their</p><p>goals.  This  dichotomy  of  worlds  is  permanent  and  does  not</p><p>disappear even if they succeed in realizing their youthful dream</p><p>of  gaining  power  over  the  society  of  normal  people.  This</p><p>strongly  suggests  that  the  separation  is  biologically  condi-</p><p>tioned.</p><p>In the psychopath, a dream emerges like some  Utopia of a</p><p>�happy� world and a social system which does not reject them</p><p>or force them to submit to laws and customs whose meaning is</p><p><emphasis>incomprehensible</emphasis>  to  them.  They  dream  of  a  world  in  which</p><p>their  simple  and  radical  way  of  experiencing  and  perceiving</p><p>reality would dominate65; where they  would, of course, be as-</p><p>sured safety and prosperity. In this Utopian dream, they imag-</p><p>ine  that  those  �others�,  different,  but  also  more  technically</p><p>skillful than they are, should be put to work to achieve this goal</p><p>for  the  psychopaths  and  others  of  their  kin.  �We�,  they  say,</p><p>�after all, will create a new government, one of justice�66. They</p><p>are prepared to fight and to suffer for the sake of such a brave</p><p>new world, and also, of course, to inflict suffering upon others.</p><p>Such a vision justifies killing people, whose suffering does not</p><p>move  them  to  compassion  because  �they�  are  not  quite  con-</p><p>specific.  They do not realize that they  will consequently meet</p><p>with opposition which can last for generations67.</p><p>Subordinating a normal person to psychologically abnormal</p><p>individuals has severe and deforming effects on his or her per-</p><p>sonality:  it  engenders  trauma  and  neurosis.  This  is  accom-</p><p>plished in a manner which generally evades conscious controls.</p><p>Such  a  situation  deprives  the  person  of  his  natural  rights:  to</p><p>practice  his  own  mental  hygiene,  develop  a  sufficiently</p><p>autonomous personality, and utilize his common sense. In the</p><p>light of natural law, it thus constitutes a kind of crime - which</p><empty-line/><p>65 i.e. Lying, cheating, destroying, using others, etc. [Editor�s note.]</p><p>66 For psychopaths only; injustice for everyone else. [Editor�s note.]</p><p>67 �Kill them all; God will know his own,� seems to be the method advocated</p><p>by psychopaths. [Editor�s note.]</p><p>140</p><p>PONEROLOGY</p><p>can  appear  at  any  social  scale,  in  any  context  -  although  it  is</p><p>not mentioned in any code of law.</p><p>We have already discussed the nature of some pathological</p><p>personalities,  e.g.  frontal  characteropathy,  and  how  they  can</p><p>deform  the  personalities  of  those  with  whom  they  interact.</p><p>Essential  psychopathy  has   <emphasis>exceptionally  intense  effects</emphasis>  in  this</p><p>manner. Something mysterious gnaws into the personality of an</p><p>individual  at  the  mercy  of  the  psychopath  and  is  then  fought</p><p>like a demon.  His emotions become chilled, his sense of psy-</p><p>chological reality is stifled.  This leads to de-criterialization of</p><p>thought and a feeling of helplessness, culminating in depressive</p><p>reactions  which  can  be  so  severe  that  psychiatrists  sometimes</p><p>misdiagnose them as a manic-depressive psychosis. Many peo-</p><p>ple rebel against a psychopathic domination much earlier than</p><p>such a crisis point and start searching for some way of liberat-</p><p>ing themselves from such an influence.</p><p>Many  life-situations  involve  far  less  mysterious  results  of</p><p>other psychological anomalies upon normal people (which are</p><p>always  unpleasant  and  destructive)  and  their  carriers�  unscru-</p><p>pulous drives to dominate and take advantage of others.  Gov-</p><p>erned by unpleasant experiences and feelings, as well as natural</p><p>egoism, societies thus have good reason to reject such people,</p><p>helping  to  push  them  into  marginal  positions  in  social  life,</p><p>including poverty and criminality.</p><p>It  is  unfortunately  almost  the  rule  that  such  behavior  is</p><p>amenable to moralizing justification in our natural world view</p><p>categories.  Most  members  of  society  feel  entitled  to  protect</p><p>their  own  persons  and  property  and  enact  legislation  for  that</p><p>purpose. Being based on natural perception of phenomena, and</p><p>on emotional motivations instead of an objective understanding</p><p>of  the  problems,  such  laws  in  no  way  serve  to  safeguard  the</p><p>kind of order and safety we would like; psychopaths and other</p><p>deviants merely perceive such laws as a force  which  needs to</p><p>be battled.</p><p>To  individuals  with  various  psychological  deviations,  the</p><p>social structure dominated by normal people and their concep-</p><p>tual  world  appears  to  be  a  �system  of  force  and  oppression�.</p><p>Psychopaths reach such a conclusion as a rule. If, at the same</p><p>time, a good deal of injustice does in fact exist in a given soci-</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>141</p><p>ety,  pathological  feelings  of  unfairness  and  suggestive  state-</p><p>ments emanating from deviants can resonate among those who</p><p>have  truly  been  treated  unfairly.  Revolutionary  doctrines  may</p><p>then  be  easily  propagated  among  both  groups,  although  each</p><p>group has completely different reasons for favoring such ideas.</p><p>~~~</p><p>The presence of pathogenic bacteria in our environment is a</p><p>common  phenomenon;  however,  it  is  not  the  single  decisive</p><p>factor  that  determines  whether  an  individual  or  a  society  be-</p><p>comes ill, since natural and artificial immunity as well as medi-</p><p>cal assistance may play a role as well. Similarly, psychopatho-</p><p>logical  factors  alone  do  not  �  themselves  -  decide  about  the</p><p>spread  of  evil.  Other  factors  have  parallel  importance:  socio-</p><p>economic conditions, and moral and intellectual deficits.</p><p>Individuals  and  nations that  are  able  to  endure  injustice  in</p><p>the  name  of  moral  values  can  more  easily  find  a  way  out  of</p><p>such  difficulties  without  resorting  to  violent  means.  A  rich</p><p>moral tradition contains the experience and reflections of cen-</p><p>turies in this regard. This book describes the role of these addi-</p><p>tional  factors  in  the  genesis  of  evil,  which  have  been  insuffi-</p><p>ciently  understood  for  centuries;  such  explication  is  essential</p><p>for  completing  the  overall  picture  and  permitting  more  effec-</p><p>tive practical measures to be formulated.</p><p>Thus,  emphasizing  the  role  of  pathological  factors  in  the</p><p>genesis  of  evil  does  not  minimize  the  responsibility  of  social</p><p>moral  failings  and  intellectual  deficits  in  contributing  to  the</p><p>situation. Real moral deficits and a grossly inadequate concep-</p><p>tion  of  human  reality  and  psychological  and  moral  situations</p><p>are frequently caused by some earlier or contemporary activity</p><p>on the part of pathological factors.</p><p>However, we must also acknowledge the constant, biologi-</p><p>cally  determined  presence  within  every  human  society  of  this</p><p>small minority of individuals who are  carriers of qualitatively</p><p>diverse,  but  ponerologically  active,  pathological  factors.  Any</p><p>discussion on what came first in the process of the genesis of</p><p>evil, moral failings or the activities of pathological factors, can</p><p>thus  be  considered  academic  speculation.  On  the  other  hand,</p><p>the  Bible  is  worth  re-reading  through  the  eyes  of  a  ponerolo-</p><p>gist.</p><p>142</p><p>PONEROLOGY</p><p>Detailed  analysis  of  the  personality  of  the  average  normal</p><p>person nearly always reveals conditions and difficulties caused</p><p>by the effects upon him of some kind of pathological factor. If</p><p>the  activity  was  far  removed  in  time  or  space,  or  the  factor</p><p>relatively  obvious,  healthy  common  sense  is  generally  suffi-</p><p>cient to correct such effects. If the pathological factor remains</p><p>incomprehensible,  the  person  has  difficulty  understanding  the</p><p>cause of his problems; he sometimes appears to remain a life-</p><p>long  slave  of  imaginings  and  patterns  of  behavioral  response</p><p>which originated under the influence of pathological individu-</p><p>als.  This  is  what  occurred  in  the  above-mentioned  family,</p><p>where the source of pathological induction was the eldest sister</p><p>with perinatal damage of the prefrontal fields of her brain cor-</p><p>tex.  Even  when  she  obviously  abused  her  youngest  child,  her</p><p>brothers attempted to interpret this in a paramoralistic manner,</p><p>a sacrifice in the name of �family honor�.</p><p>Such matters should be taught to everyone in order to facili-</p><p>tate  auto-pedagogical  self-monitoring.  Certain  outstanding</p><p>psychopathologists  became  convinced  that  developing  a</p><p>healthy functional view of human reality is impossible without</p><p>factoring in psychopathological findings, are correct, a conclu-</p><p>sion  difficult  to  accept  by  people  who  believe  they  have  at-</p><p>tained a mature  world view  without such burdensome studies.</p><p>The older egotistical defenders of the natural world view have</p><p>tradition, belles-lettres, even philosophy on their side. They do</p><p>not  realize  that  during  the  present  time,  their  manner  of  com-</p><p>prehending  life�s  questions  renders  the  battle  with  evil  more</p><p>problematic. However, the younger generation is more familiar</p><p>with biology and psychology, and is thus more amenable to an</p><p>objective understanding of the role of pathological phenomena</p><p>in the processes of the genesis of evil.</p><p>Parallax68,  often  even  a  wide  gap,  frequently  occurs  be-</p><p>tween human and social reality,  which is biological by nature</p><p>and  frequently  influenced  by  the  above-mentioned  refusal  to</p><p>factor in psychopathological elements, as well as the traditional</p><p>perceptions of reality as taught by philosophy, ethics, and secu-</p><p>lar and canon law. This gap is easily discernible to those people</p><empty-line/><p>68 The difference in appearance or position of an object when viewed from</p><p>two different locations. [Editor�s note.]</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>143</p><p>whose psychological world view was formed in a manner dif-</p><p>ferent from the natural way of a normal person. Many of them</p><p>consciously  and  subconsciously  take  advantage  of  this  weak-</p><p>ness in order to force themselves into it, along with their my-</p><p>opically-determined  activities  characterized  by  egoistical  con-</p><p>cepts of self-interest. Still people, whether pathologically indif-</p><p>ferent to other peoples� or nations� hurts, or lacking in knowl-</p><p>edge as to what is human and decent, then find an open gate to</p><p>bulldoze  their  different  way  of  life  through  unobliging  socie-</p><p>ties.</p><p>Will  we  ever  be  able  to  overcome  this  age-old  problem  of</p><p>humanity  sometime  in  the  yet  undetermined  future,  with  the</p><p>assistance of the biological and psychological sciences making</p><p>progress in the study of various pathological factors participat-</p><p>ing in ponerogenic processes? That will depend on the support</p><p>of the societies in question. Scientific and societal awareness of</p><p>the  role  played  by the  above-mentioned  factors  in  the  genesis</p><p>of  evil  will  help  public  opinion  to  elaborate  an  appropriate</p><p>position  against  evil,  which  will  then  cease  to  be  so  fascinat-</p><p>ingly mysterious. If properly modified based on an understand-</p><p>ing of the nature of phenomena, the law will permit prophylac-</p><p>tic countermeasures to the origin of evil.</p><p>Over the centuries, every society has been subjected to natu-</p><p>ral  eugenic  processes  which  cause  defective  individuals,  in-</p><p>cluding  those  with  above-mentioned  features,  to  drop  out  of</p><p>reproductive competition or reduce their birth rate. These proc-</p><p>esses  are  rarely  seen  as  such,  often  being  screened  by  the  ac-</p><p>companying  evil  or  some  other  conditions  apparently  relegat-</p><p>ing them to the background. Conscious comprehension of these</p><p>matters  based  on  proper  knowledge  and  approximate  moral</p><p>criteria could render these processes less stormy in form, not so</p><p>full  of  bitter  experience.  If  human  consciousness  and  con-</p><p>science are properly formed and good advice in these matters is</p><p>heeded,  the  balance  of  these  processes  could  be  tipped  mark-</p><p>edly  in  the  positive  direction.  After  a  number  of  generations,</p><p>society�s  burden  of  inherited  pathological  factors  would  be</p><p>144</p><p>PONEROLOGY</p><p>reduced below a certain critical level, and their participation in</p><p>ponerogenic processes would begin to fade away. 69</p><p>Ponerogenic Phenomena and Processes</p><p>Following  the  real  space-time  network  of  qualitatively</p><p>complex  causative  links  as  occur  in  ponerogenic  processes</p><p>requires the proper approach and experience. The fact that psy-</p><p>chologists daily face multiple cases of dealing with such devi-</p><p>ants  or  their  victims  means  that  they  are  becoming  progres-</p><p>sively  more  skilled  in  understanding  and  describing  the  many</p><p>components  of  psychological  causation.  They  are  observing</p><p>feedback  on  closed  causative  structures.  However,  this  skill</p><p>sometimes  proves  insufficient  in  overcoming  our  human  ten-</p><p>dency  to  concentrate  upon  some  facts  while  ignoring  others,</p><p>provoking an unpleasant sensation that our mind�s capacity of</p><p>understanding  the  reality  surrounding  us  is  inefficient.  This</p><p>explains the temptation to use the natural world view  in order</p><p>to  simplify  complexity  and  its  implications,  a  phenomenon  as</p><p>common as the �old sage� known to India�s philosophical psy-</p><p>chology.  Such  oversimplification  of  the  causative  picture  as</p><p>regards the genesis of evil, often to a single easily understood</p><p>cause or one perpetrator, itself becomes, itself, a cause in this</p><p>genesis.</p><p>With great respect for the shortcomings of our human rea-</p><p>son,  let  us  consciously  take  the  middle  road  and  use  the  ab-</p><p>straction process, first describing selected phenomena, then the</p><p>causative chains characteristic for ponerogenic processes. Such</p><p>chains  can  then  be  linked  into  more  complex  structures  ever</p><p>more sufficient for grasping the full picture of the real causa-</p><p>tive network. At first the holes in the net will be so large that a</p><p>school  of  sprats  can  swim  through  undetected,  although  large</p><p>fish  will  be  caught.  However,  this  world�s  evil  represents  a</p><p>kind  of  continuum,  where  minor  species  of  human  evil  effec-</p><p>tively  add  up  to  the  genesis  of  large  evil.  Making  this  net</p><p>denser and filling in the details of the picture appear to be eas-</p><empty-line/><p>69 !obaczewski seems to be referring to war and other physical conflicts and</p><p>suggesting that, if normal people would refuse to get involved and allow only</p><p>the deviants to fight, they would eventually kill each other off. [Editor�s</p><p>note.]</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>145</p><p>ier,  since  ponerogenic  laws  are  analogous  regardless  of  the</p><p>scale  of  occurrences.  Our  common  sense  thus  commits  minor</p><p>errors at the level of minor matters.</p><p>In  attempting  closer  observation  of  these  psychological</p><p>processes and phenomena which lead one man or one nation to</p><p>hurt another, let us select phenomena as characteristic as possi-</p><p>ble. We shall see that the participation of various pathological</p><p>factors in these processes  <emphasis>is the rule</emphasis>; the situation where such</p><p>participation is not noticeable tends to be the exception.</p><p>~~~</p><p>The second chapter sketched the human instinctive substra-</p><p>tum�s role in our personality development, the formation of the</p><p>natural  world view, and societal links and structures.  We also</p><p>indicated that our social, psychological, and moral concepts, as</p><p>well as our natural forms of reaction, are not adequate for every</p><p>situation  with  which  life  confronts  us.  We  generally  wind  up</p><p>hurting  someone  if  we  act  according  to  our  natural  concepts</p><p>and reactive archetypes in situations which seem to be appro-</p><p>priate  to  our  imaginings,  although  they  are  in  fact  essentially</p><p>different.  As  a  rule,  such  different  situations  allowing  para-</p><p>appropriate  reactions  occur  because  some  pathological  factor</p><p>difficult to understand has entered the picture.  <emphasis>Thus, the practi-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>cal value of our natural world view generally ends where psy-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>chopathology begins. </emphasis></p><p>Familiarity  with  this  common  weakness  of  human  nature</p><p>and the normal person�s �na�vet� is  <emphasis>part of the specific knowl-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>edge  we  find  in  many  psychopathic  individuals</emphasis>,  as  well  some</p><p>characteropaths.  Spellbinders  of  various  schools  attempt  to</p><p>provoke  such  para-appropriate  reactions  from  other  people  in</p><p>the name of their specific goals, or in the service of their reign-</p><p>ing  ideologies.  That  hard-to-understand  pathological  factor  is</p><p>located within the spellbinder himself.</p><p>~~~</p><p><emphasis>Egotism</emphasis>: We call egotism the attitude, subconsciously con-</p><p>ditioned as a rule, to which we attribute excessive value to our</p><p>instinctive  reflexes,  early  acquired  imaginings  and  habits,  and</p><p>individual world view. Egotism hampers a personality�s normal</p><p>evolution because it fosters the domination of subconscious life</p><p>and makes it difficult to accept disintegrative states which can</p><p>146</p><p>PONEROLOGY</p><p>be very helpful for growth and development. This egotism and</p><p>rejection  of  disintegration70  in  turn  favors  the  appearance  of</p><p>para-appropriate  reactions  as  described  above.  An  egotist</p><p>measures  other  people  by  his  own  yardstick,  treating  <emphasis>his</emphasis>  con-</p><p>cepts  and  experiential  manner  as   <emphasis>objective</emphasis>  criteria.  He  would</p><p>like to force other people to feel and think very much the same</p><p>way  he  does.  Egotist  nations  have  the  subconscious  goal  of</p><p>teaching or forcing other nations to think in their own catego-</p><p>ries, which makes them incapable of understanding other peo-</p><p>ple  and  nations  or  becoming  familiar  with  the  values  of  their</p><p>cultures.</p><p>Proper  rearing  and  self-rearing  thus  always  aims  at  de-</p><p>egotizing a young person or adult, thereby opening the door for</p><p>his  mind  and  character  to  develop.  Practicing  psychologists</p><p>nevertheless commonly believe that a  certain measure of ego-</p><p>tism is useful as a factor stabilizing the personality, protecting</p><p>it from overly facile neurotic disintegration, and thereby mak-</p><p>ing  it  possible  to  overcome  life�s  difficulties.  However  rather</p><p>exceptional  people  exist  whose  personality  is  very  well  inte-</p><p>grated even though they are almost totally devoid of  egotism;</p><p>this allows them to understand others very easily.</p><p>The kind of excessive egotism which hampers the develop-</p><p>ment of human values and leads to misjudgment and terrorizing</p><p>of others well deserves the title �king of human faults�. Diffi-</p><p>culties,  disputes,  serious  problems,  and  neurotic  reactions</p><p>sprout up in everyone around such an  egotist like mushrooms</p><p>after a rainfall.  Egotist nations start wasting money and effort</p><p>in order to achieve goals derived from their erroneous reason-</p><p>ing and overly emotional reactions. Their inability to acknowl-</p><p>edge  other  nations�  values  and  dissimilarities,  derived  from</p><p>other cultural traditions, leads to conflict and war.</p><empty-line/><p>70 See footnote p. 128. Kazimierz Dabrowski developed the theory of Positive</p><p>Disintegration which posits that individuals with strong developmental poten-</p><p>tial tend to experience frequent and intense crises (positive disintegrations)</p><p>that create opportunities for the development of an autonomous, self-crafted</p><p>personality. Dabrowski observed that gifted and creative populations tend to</p><p>exhibit increased levels of developmental potential and thus may be predis-</p><p>posed to experience the process of positive disintegration. ( <emphasis>A Brief Overview </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>Dabrowski's Theory of Positive Disintegration</emphasis> by William Tillier</p><p>Calgary, Alberta, Canada) [Editor�s note.]</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>147</p><p>We  can  differentiate  between  primary  and  secondary  ego-</p><p>tism.  The  former  comes  from  a  more  natural  process,  namely</p><p>the child�s natural egotism and child-rearing errors that tend to</p><p>perpetuate  this  childish  egotism.  The  secondary  one  occurs</p><p>when  a  personality  that  has  overcome  his  childish  egotism</p><p>regresses to this state under stress, which leads to an artificial</p><p>attitude  characterized  by  greater  aggression  and  social  nox-</p><p>iousness. Excessive egotism is a constant property of the hys-</p><p>terical  personality71,  whether  their  hysteria  be  primary  or  sec-</p><p>ondary.  That is  why the increase in a nations� egotism should</p><p>be  attributed  to  the  above  described  hysterical  cycle  before</p><p>anything else.</p><p>If  we  analyze  the  development  of  excessively  egotistical</p><p>personalities, we often find some non-pathological causes, such</p><p>as having been raised in a constricted and overly routine envi-</p><p>ronment or by persons less intelligent than the child. However,</p><p>the  main  reason  for  the  development  of  an  overly  egotistical</p><p>personality  in  a  normal  person  is  contamination,  through  psy-</p><p>chological  induction,  by  excessively  egotistical  or  hysterical</p><p>persons  who,  themselves,  developed  this  characteristic  under</p><p>the  influence  of  various   <emphasis>pathological</emphasis>  causes.  Most  of  the</p><p>above-described  genetic  deviations   <emphasis>cause  the  development  of </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>pathologically egotistical personalities</emphasis>, among other things.</p><p>Many  people  with  various  hereditary  deviations  and  ac-</p><p>quired defects develop pathological egotism.  For such people,</p><p>forcing others in their environment,  whole social groups, and,</p><p>if  possible,  entire  nations,  to  feel  and  think  like  themselves</p><p>becomes an internal necessity, a ruling concept. A game that a</p><p>normal person would not take seriously can become a lifelong</p><p>goal for them, the object of effort, sacrifices, and cunning psy-</p><p>chological strategy.</p><p><emphasis>Pathological  egotism</emphasis>  derives  from  repressing  from  one�s</p><p>field  of  consciousness  any  objectionable,  self-critical  associa-</p><p>tions  referring  to  one�s  own  nature  or  normality.  Dramatic</p><empty-line/><p>71 A personality disorder marked by immaturity, dependence, self-</p><p>centeredness, and vanity, with a craving for attention, activity, or excitement,</p><p>and behavior that is markedly unstable or manipulative. ( <emphasis>The American Heri-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>tage Stedman's Medical Dictionary</emphasis>, 2nd Edition 2004; Houghton Mifflin</p><p>Company) [Editor�s note.]</p><p>148</p><p>PONEROLOGY</p><p>question  such  as  �who  is  abnormal  here,  me  or  this  world  of</p><p>people  who  feel  and  think  differently?�  are  answered  in  the</p><p>world�s disfavor. Such egotism is always linked to a dissimula-</p><p>tive  attitude,  with  a  Cleckley  mask  over  some  pathological</p><p>quality being hidden from consciousness, both one�s  own  and</p><p>that of other people. The greatest intensity of such egotism can</p><p>be found in the  <emphasis>prefrontal characteropathy</emphasis> described above.</p><p>The importance of the contribution of this kind of egotism</p><p>to the genesis of evil thus hardly needs elaboration. It is a pri-</p><p>marily  societal  influence,  egotizing  or  traumatizing  others,</p><p>which  in  turn  causes  further  difficulties.  Pathological  egotism</p><p>is a constant component of variegated states wherein someone</p><p>who appears to be normal (although he is in fact not quite so) is</p><p>driven by motivations or battles for goals a normal person con-</p><p>siders  unrealistic  or  unlikely.  The  average  person  might  ask:</p><p>�What could he expect to gain by that?�. Environmental opin-</p><p>ion,  however,  often  interprets  such  a  situation  in  accordance</p><p>with  �common  sense�  and  is  thus  prone  to  accept  a  �more</p><p>likely� version of the situation and events. Such interpretation</p><p>often results in human tragedy. We should thus always remem-</p><p>ber  that  the  principle  of  law   <emphasis>cui  prodest72</emphasis>  becomes  illusory</p><p>whenever some pathological factor enters the picture.</p><p>~~~</p><p><emphasis>Moralizing interpretation</emphasis>: The tendency to impart a moral-</p><p>izing interpretation upon essentially pathological phenomena is</p><p>an  aspect  of  human  nature  whose  discernable  substratum  is</p><p>encoded in our specific instinct; namely humans normally fail</p><p>to  differentiate  between  moral  and  biological  evil.  Moralizing</p><p>always  surfaces,  albeit  to  varying  degrees,  within  the  natural</p><p>psychological and moral world view, which is why we should</p><p>consider this tendency a permanent error of public opinion. We</p><p>may  curb  it  with  increased  self-knowledge,  but  overcoming  it</p><p>requires  specific  knowledge  in  the  psychopathological  area.</p><p>Young  people  and  less  cultured  circles  always  tend  toward</p><p>such  interpretations  (although  it  characterizes  traditional  es-</p><p>thetes  too),  which  intensifies  whenever  our  natural  reflexes</p><p>take  over  control  from  reason,  i.e.  in  hysterical  states,  and  in</p><p>direct proportion to the intensity of egotism.</p><empty-line/><p>72 What or who does it advance? Who does it serve? What�s the point?</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>149</p><p>We  close  the  door  to  a  causative  comprehension  of  phe-</p><p>nomena  and  open  it  to  vengeful  emotions  and  psychological</p><p>error  whenever  we  impose  a  moralistic  interpretation  upon</p><p>faults and errors in human behavior,  which  are in fact largely</p><p>derived  from  the  various  influences  of  pathological  factors,</p><p>whether  mentioned  above  or  not,  which  are  often  obscured</p><p>from minds untrained in this area. We thereby also permit these</p><p>factors  to  continue  their  ponerogenic  activities,  both  within</p><p>ourselves and others. Nothing poisons the human soul and de-</p><p>prives us of our capacity to understand reality more objectively</p><p>than  this  very  obedience  to  that  common  human  tendency  to</p><p>take a moralistic view of human behavior.</p><p>Practically  speaking,  to  say  the  least,  each  instance  of  be-</p><p>havior  that  seriously  hurts  some  other  person  contains  within</p><p>its  psychological  genesis  the  influence  of  some  pathological</p><p>factors, among other things, of course. Therefore, any interpre-</p><p>tation  of  the  causes  of  evil  which  would  limit  itself  to  moral</p><p>categories  is  an  inappropriate  perception  of  reality.  This  can</p><p>lead,  generally  speaking,  to  erroneous  behavior,  limiting  our</p><p>capacity  for  counteraction  of  the  causative  factors  of  evil  and</p><p>opening  the  door  for  lust  for  revenge.  This  frequently  starts  a</p><p>new fire in the ponerogenic processes. We shall therefore con-</p><p>sider a unilaterally moral interpretation of the origins of evil to</p><p>be wrong and immoral at all times. The idea of overcoming this</p><p>common human inclination and its results can be considered a</p><p>moral motive intertwined throughout ponerology.</p><p>If  we  analyze  the  reasons  why  some  people  frequently</p><p>overuse  such  emotionally-loaded  interpretations,  often  indig-</p><p>nantly  rejecting  a  more  correct  interpretation,  we  shall  of</p><p>course  also  discover  pathological  factors  acting  within  them.</p><p>Intensification  of  this  tendency  in  such  cases  is  caused  by  re-</p><p>pressing  from  the  field  of  consciousness  any  self-critical  con-</p><p>cepts  concerning  their  own  behavior  and  its  internal  reasons.</p><p>The influence of such people causes this tendency to intensify</p><p>in others.</p><p>~~~</p><p><emphasis>Paramoralisms:</emphasis> The conviction that moral values exist and</p><p>that some actions violate moral rules is so common and ancient</p><p>a phenomenon that it seems to have some substratum at man�s</p><p>150</p><p>PONEROLOGY</p><p>instinctive endowment level (although it is certainly not totally</p><p>adequate  for  moral  truth),  and  that  it  does  not  only  represent</p><p>centuries�  of  experience,  culture,  religion,  and  socialization.</p><p>Thus,  any  insinuation  framed  in  moral  slogans  is  always  sug-</p><p>gestive, even if the �moral� criteria used  are just an  �ad hoc�</p><p>invention. Any act can thus be proved to be immoral or moral</p><p>by means of such paramoralisms utilized as active suggestion,</p><p>and  people  whose  minds  will  succumb  to  such  reasoning  can</p><p>always be found.</p><p>In  searching  for  an  example  of  an  evil  act  whose  negative</p><p>value  would  not  elicit  doubt  in  any  social  situation,  ethics</p><p>scholars  frequently  mention  child  abuse.  However,  psycholo-</p><p>gists often meet  with paramoral affirmations of such behavior</p><p>in  their  practice,  such  as  in  the  above-mentioned  family  with</p><p>the  prefrontal  field  damage  in  the  eldest  sister.  Her  younger</p><p>brothers  emphatically  insisted  that  their  sister�s  sadistic  treat-</p><p>ment of her son was due to her exceptionally high moral quali-</p><p>fications, and they believed this by auto-suggestion. Paramoral-</p><p>ism  somehow  cunningly  evades  the  control  of  our  common</p><p>sense, sometimes leading to acceptance or approval of behavior</p><p>that is openly pathological.73</p><p>Paramoralistic  statements  and  suggestions  so  often  accom-</p><p>pany  various  kinds  of  evil  that  they  seem  quite  irreplaceable.</p><p>Unfortunately, it has become a frequent phenomenon for indi-</p><p>viduals, oppressive groups, or patho-political systems to invent</p><p>ever-new moral criteria for someone�s convenience. Such sug-</p><p>gestions often partially deprive people of their moral reasoning</p><p>and deform its development in youngsters. Paramoralism facto-</p><p>ries have been founded worldwide, and a ponerologist finds it</p><p>hard to believe that they are managed by psychologically nor-</p><p>mal people.</p><empty-line/><p>73 Many examples of recent years include children beaten to death by their</p><p>parents for �religious reasons�. The parents may claim that the child is demon</p><p>possessed, or that they have behaved so loosely that only beating them will</p><p>�straighten them out�. Another example is circumcision, both for boys and</p><p>girls by certain ethnic groups. The Indian custom of suttee, where the wife</p><p>climbs on the funeral pyre of her husband; or in Muslim cultures where, if a</p><p>woman is raped, it is the duty of her male family members to kill her to wipe</p><p>away the shame from the family name. All of these acts are claimed to be</p><p>�moral�, but they are not, they are pathological and criminal. [Editor�s note.]</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>151</p><p>The  conversive74  features  in  the  genesis  of  paramoralisms</p><p>seem  to  prove  they  are  derived  from  mostly  subconscious  re-</p><p>jection  (and  repression  from  the  field  of  consciousness)  of</p><p>something  completely  different,  which  we  call   <emphasis>the  voice  of </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>conscience</emphasis>.</p><p>A ponerologist can nevertheless indicate many observations</p><p>supporting the opinion that various pathological factors partici-</p><p>pate in the tendency to use paramoralisms. This was the case in</p><p>the above-mentioned family. When it occurs with a moralizing</p><p>interpretation,  this  tendency  intensifies  in  egotists  and  hyster-</p><p>ics, and its causes are similar. Like all conversive phenomena,</p><p>the  tendency  to  use  paramoralisms  is  psychologically  conta-</p><p>gious. That explains why we observe it among people raised by</p><p>individuals  in  whom  it  was  developed  alongside  pathological</p><p>factors.</p><p>This  may  be  a  good  place  to  reflect  that  true  moral  law  is</p><p>born and exists independently of our judgments in this regard,</p><p>and  even  of  our  ability  to  recognize  it.  Thus,  the  attitude  re-</p><p>quired  for  such  understanding  is  scientific,  not  creative:  we</p><p>must humbly subordinate our mind to the apprehended reality.</p><p>That is when we discover the truth about man, both his weak-</p><p>nesses  and  values,  which  shows  us  what  is  decent  and  proper</p><p>with respect to other people and other societies.</p><p>~~~</p><p><emphasis>Reversive blockade</emphasis>: Emphatically insisting upon something</p><p>which is the opposite of the truth blocks the average  person�s</p><p>mind from perceiving the truth. In accordance with the dictates</p><p>of  healthy  common  sense,  he  starts  searching  for  meaning  in</p><p>the �golden mean� between the truth and its opposite, winding</p><p>up  with  some  satisfactory  counterfeit.  People  who  think  like</p><p>this do not realize that this effect is precisely the intent of the</p><p>person who subjects them to this method. If the counterfeit of</p><p>the  truth  is  the  opposite  of  a  moral  truth,  at  the  same  time,  it</p><p>simultaneously represents an extreme paramoralism, and bears</p><p>its peculiar suggestiveness.</p><p>We  rarely  see  this  method  being  used  by  normal  people;</p><p>even  if  raised  by  the  people  who  abused  it;  they  usually  only</p><p>indicate  its  results  in  their  characteristic  difficulties  in  appre-</p><empty-line/><p>74 See note p. 46.</p><p>152</p><p>PONEROLOGY</p><p>hending  reality  properly.  Use  of  this  method  can  be  included</p><p>within  the  above-mentioned  special  psychological  knowledge</p><p>developed  by  psychopaths  concerning  the  weaknesses  of  hu-</p><p>man nature and the art of leading others into error. Where they</p><p>are in rule, this method is used with virtuosity, and to an extent</p><p>conterminous with their power.</p><p>~~~</p><p><emphasis>Information  selection  and  substitution</emphasis>:  The  existence  of</p><p>psychological phenomena known to pre-Freudian philosophical</p><p>students  of  the  subconscious  bears  repeating.  <emphasis>Unconscious </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>psychological  processes  outstrip  conscious  reasoning,  both  in </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>time  and  in  scope,  which  makes  many  psychological phenom-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>ena  possible</emphasis>:  including  those  generally  described  as  conver-</p><p>sive,  such  as  subconscious  blocking  out  of  conclusions,  the</p><p>selection,  and,  also,  substitution  of  seemingly  uncomfortable</p><p>premises.</p><p>We  speak  of   <emphasis>blocking  out</emphasis>  conclusions  if  the  inferential</p><p>process  was  proper  in  principle  and  has  almost  arrived  at  a</p><p>conclusion  and  final  comprehension  within  the  act  of  internal</p><p>projection, but becomes stymied by a preceding directive from</p><p>the subconscious, which considers it inexpedient or disturbing.</p><p>This  is  primitive  prevention  of  personality  disintegration,</p><p>which  may  seem  advantageous;  however,  it  also  prevents  all</p><p>the advantages which could be derived from consciously elabo-</p><p>rated conclusion and reintegration.  A conclusion thus rejected</p><p>remains  in  our  subconscious  and  in  a  more  unconscious  way</p><p>causes the next blocking and selection of this kind. This can be</p><p>extremely harmful, progressively enslaving a person to his own</p><p>subconscious, and is often accompanied by a feeling of tension</p><p>and bitterness.</p><p>We  speak  of   <emphasis>selection  of  premises</emphasis>  whenever  the  feedback</p><p>goes deeper into the resulting reasoning and from its database</p><p>thus deletes and represses into the subconscious just that piece</p><p>of  information  which  was  responsible  for  arriving  at  the  un-</p><p>comfortable conclusion. Our subconscious then permits further</p><p>logical reasoning, except that the outcome will be erroneous in</p><p>direct  proportion  to  the  actual  significance  of  the  repressed</p><p>data. An ever-greater number of such repressed information is</p><p>collected in our subconscious memory. Finally, a kind of habit</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>153</p><p>seems  to  take  over:  similar  material  is  treated  the  same  way</p><p>even if reasoning would have reached an outcome quite advan-</p><p>tageous to the person.</p><p>The  most  complex  process  of  this  type  is  substitution  of</p><p>premises thus eliminated by other data, ensuring an ostensibly</p><p>more  comfortable  conclusion.  Our  associative  ability  rapidly</p><p>elaborates a new item to replace the removed one, but it is one</p><p>leading  to  a   <emphasis>comfortable</emphasis>  conclusion.  This  operation  takes  the</p><p>most  time,  and  it  is  unlikely  to  be  exclusively  subconscious.</p><p>Such  substitutions  are  often  effected  collectively,  in  certain</p><p>groups  of  people,  through  the  use  of  verbal  communication.</p><p>That  is  why  they  best  qualify  for  the  moralizing  epithet  �hy-</p><p>pocrisy� than either of the above-mentioned processes.</p><p>The  above  examples  of  conversive  phenomena  do  not  ex-</p><p>haust  a  problem  richly  illustrated  in  psychoanalytical  works.</p><p>Our subconscious may carry the roots of human genius within,</p><p>but its operation is not perfect; sometimes it is reminiscent of a</p><p>blind computer, especially whenever we allow it to be cluttered</p><p>with anxiously rejected material.  This explains why conscious</p><p>monitoring, even at the price of courageously accepting disin-</p><p>tegrative states, is likewise necessary to our nature, not to men-</p><p>tion our individual and social good.</p><p>There  is  no  such  thing  as  a  person  whose  perfect  self-</p><p>knowledge allows him to eliminate all tendencies toward con-</p><p>versive  thinking,  but  some  people  are  relatively  close  to  this</p><p>state,  while  others  remain  slaves  to  these  processes.  Those</p><p>people who use conversive operations too often for the purpose</p><p>of  finding  convenient  conclusions,  or  constructing  some  cun-</p><p>ning paralogistic or paramoralistic statements, eventually begin</p><p>to undertake such behavior for ever more trivial reasons, losing</p><p>the  capacity  for  conscious  control  over  their  thought  process</p><p>altogether. This necessarily leads to behavior errors which must</p><p>be paid for by others as well as themselves.</p><p>People  who  have  lost  their  psychological  hygiene  and  ca-</p><p>pacity of proper thought along this road also lose their natural</p><p>critical faculties with regard to the statements and behavior of</p><p>individuals whose abnormal thought processes were formed on</p><p>a  substratum  of  pathological  anomalies,  whether  inherited  or</p><p>acquired.  Hypocrites stop differentiating between pathological</p><p>154</p><p>PONEROLOGY</p><p>and  normal  individuals,  thus  opening  an  �infection  entry�  for</p><p>the ponerologic role of pathological factors.</p><p>Generally, each community contains people in whom simi-</p><p>lar methods of thinking were developed on a large scale,  with</p><p>their  various  deviations  as  a  backdrop.  We  find  this  both  in</p><p>characteropathic  and  psychopathic  personalities.  Some  have</p><p>even  been  influenced  by  others  to  grow  accustomed  to  such</p><p>�reasoning�,  since  conversion  thinking  is  highly  contagious</p><p>and can spread throughout an entire society. In �happy times�</p><p>especially,  the  tendency  for  conversion  thinking  generally  in-</p><p>tensifies. It appears accompanied by a rising  wave of hysteria</p><p>in said society. Those who try to maintain common sense and</p><p>proper  reasoning  finally  wind  up  in  the  minority,  feeling</p><p>wronged  because  their  human  right  to  maintain  psychological</p><p>hygiene is violated by pressure from all sides. This means that</p><p>unhappy times are not far away.</p><p>We  should  point  out  that  the  erroneous  thought  processes</p><p>described herein also, as a  rule, violate the laws of logic with</p><p>characteristic  treachery.  Educating  people  in  the  art  of  proper</p><p>reasoning can thus serve to counteract such tendencies; it has a</p><p>hallowed  age-old  tradition  which  seems  to  have  been  insuffi-</p><p>ciently effective for centuries. As an example: according to the</p><p>laws  of  logic,  a  question  containing  an  erroneous  or  uncon-</p><p>firmed suggestion has no answer.  Nevertheless, not only does</p><p>operating with such questions become epidemic among people</p><p>with a tendency to conversion thinking, and a source of terror</p><p>when used by psychopathical individuals; it also occurs among</p><p>people  who  think  normally,  or  even  those  who  have  studied</p><p>logic.</p><p>This decreasing tendency in a society�s capacity for proper</p><p>thought should be counteracted, since it also lowers its immu-</p><p>nity to ponerogenic processes. An effective measure would be</p><p>teaching both proper thought and skillful detection of errors in</p><p>thought.  The  front  of  such  education  should  be  expanded,  in-</p><p>cluding  psychology,  psychopathology,  and  the  science  de-</p><p>scribed herein, for the purpose of raising people who can easily</p><p>detect any paralogism.</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>155</p><p>Spellbinders</p><p>In order to comprehend ponerogenic pathways of contagion,</p><p>especially those acting in a wider social context, let us observe</p><p>the  roles  and  personalities  of  individuals  we  shall  call  �spell-</p><p>binders�,  who  are  highly  active  in  this  area  in  spite  of  their</p><p>statistically negligible number.</p><p>Spellbinders are generally the carriers of various pathologi-</p><p>cal factors, some characteropathies, and some inherited anoma-</p><p>lies.  Individuals  with  malformations  of  their  personalities  fre-</p><p>quently  play  similar  roles,  although  the  social  scale  of  influ-</p><p>ence  remains  small  (family  or  neighborhood)  and  does  not</p><p>cross certain boundaries of decency.</p><p>Spellbinders  are  characterized  by  pathological  egotism.</p><p>Such  a  person  is  forced  by  some  internal  causes  to  make  an</p><p>early choice between two possibilities: the first is forcing other</p><p>people to think and experience things in a manner similar to his</p><p>own;  the  second  is  a  feeling  of  being  lonely  and  different,  a</p><p>pathological misfit in social life. Sometimes the choice is either</p><p>snake-charming or suicide.</p><p>Triumphant  repression  of  self-critical  or  unpleasant  con-</p><p>cepts from the field of consciousness gradually gives rise to the</p><p>phenomena of conversion thinking, or paralogistics, paramoral-</p><p>isms, and the use of reversion blockades. They stream so pro-</p><p>fusely  from  the  mind  and  mouth  of  the  spellbinder  that  they</p><p>flood the average person�s mind. Everything becomes subordi-</p><p>nated  to  the  spellbinder�s  over-compensatory  conviction  that</p><p>they  are  exceptional,  sometimes  even  messianic.  An  ideology</p><p>emerges from this conviction, true in part, whose value is sup-</p><p>posedly superior. However, if we analyze the exact functions of</p><p>such an ideology in the spellbinder�s personality,  we  perceive</p><p>that it is a nothing other than a means of  <emphasis>self-charming</emphasis>, useful</p><p>for  repressing  those  tormenting  self-critical  associations  into</p><p>the subconscious. The ideology�s instrumental role in influenc-</p><p>ing other people also serves the spellbinder�s needs.</p><p>The spellbinder believes that he will always find converts to</p><p>his ideology, and most often, they are right. However, they feel</p><p>shock  (or  even  paramoral  indignation)  when  it  turns  out  that</p><p>their influence  extends to only a limited minority,  while most</p><p>people�s attitude to their activities remains critical, pained and</p><p>156</p><p>PONEROLOGY</p><p>disturbed.  The  spellbinder  is  thus  confronted  with  a  choice:</p><p>either withdraw back into his void or strengthen his position by</p><p><emphasis>improving the effectiveness</emphasis> of his activities.</p><p>The  spellbinder  places  on  a  high  moral  plane  anyone  who</p><p>has succumbed to his influence and incorporated the experien-</p><p>tial method he imposes. He showers such people with attention</p><p>and property, if possible. Critics are met with �moral� outrage.</p><p>It can even be proclaimed that the compliant minority is in fact</p><p>the  moral  majority,  since  it  professes  the  best  ideology  and</p><p>honors a leader whose qualities are above average.</p><p>Such activity is always necessarily characterized by the  <emphasis>in-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>ability to foresee its final results</emphasis>, something obvious from the</p><p>psychological  point  of  view  because  its  substratum  contains</p><p>pathological  phenomena,  and  both  spellbinding  and  self-</p><p>charming  make  it  impossible  to  perceive  reality  accurately</p><p>enough to foresee results logically. However, spellbinders nur-</p><p>ture great optimism and harbor visions of future triumphs simi-</p><p>lar  to  those  they  enjoyed  over  their  own  crippled  souls.  <emphasis>It  is </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>also possible for optimism to be a pathological symptom. </emphasis></p><p>In a healthy society, the activities of spellbinders meet with</p><p>criticism  effective  enough  to  stifle  them  quickly.  However,</p><p>when  they  are  preceded  by  conditions  operating  destructively</p><p>upon common sense and social order; such as social injustice,</p><p>cultural  backwardness,  or  intellectually  limited  rulers  some-</p><p>times  manifesting  pathological  traits,  spellbinders�  activities</p><p>have led entire societies into large-scale human tragedy.</p><p>Such  an  individual  fishes  an  environment  or  society  for</p><p>people amenable to his influence, deepening their psychologi-</p><p>cal weaknesses until they finally join together in a ponerogenic</p><p>union.  On  the  other  hand,  people  who  have  maintained  their</p><p>healthy critical faculties intact, based upon their own common</p><p>sense and moral criteria, attempt to counteract the spellbinders�</p><p>activities  and  their  results.  In  the  resulting   <emphasis>polarization</emphasis>  of  so-</p><p>cial attitudes, each side justifies itself by means of moral cate-</p><p>gories.  That  is  why  such  commonsense  resistance  is  always</p><p>accompanied by some feeling of helplessness and deficiency of</p><p>criteria.</p><p>The  awareness  that  a  spellbinder  is  always  a  pathological</p><p>individual should protect us from the known results of a moral-</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>157</p><p>izing interpretation of pathological phenomena, ensuring us  <emphasis>an </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>objective  criteria  for  more  effective  action</emphasis>.  Explaining  what</p><p>kind  of  pathological  substratum  is  hidden  behind  a  given  in-</p><p>stance of spellbinding activities should enable a modern solu-</p><p>tion to such situations.</p><p>It  is  a  characteristic  phenomenon  that  a  high  IQ  generally</p><p>helps  a  person  to  be  more  immune  to  spellbinding  activities</p><p><emphasis>only to a moderate degree</emphasis>. Actual differences in the formation</p><p>of human attitudes to the influence of such activities should be</p><p>attributed to other properties of human nature. The most deci-</p><p>sive factor in assuming a critical attitude is good basic intelli-</p><p>gence,  which  conditions  our  perception  of  psychological  real-</p><p>ity.  We  can  also  observe  how  a  spellbinder�s  activities  �husk</p><p>out� amenable individuals with an astonishing regularity.</p><p>We  shall  later  return  to  the  specific  relations  that  occur</p><p>among the spellbinder�s personality, the ideology he expounds,</p><p>and the choices made by those who easily succumb. More ex-</p><p>haustive  clarification  thereof  would  require  separate  study</p><p>within the framework of general ponerology, a  work  intended</p><p>for  specialists,  in  order  to  explain  some  of  those  interesting</p><p>phenomena which are still not properly understood today.</p><p>Ponerogenic Associations</p><p>We  shall  give  the  name  �ponerogenic  association�  to  any</p><p>group  of  people  characterized  by  ponerogenic  processes  of</p><p>above-average social intensity,  wherein the  carriers of various</p><p>pathological  factors  function  as  inspirers,  spellbinders,  and</p><p>leaders, and where a proper pathological social structure gener-</p><p>ates.  Smaller,  less  permanent  associations  may  be  called</p><p>�groups� or �unions�.</p><p>Such  an  association  gives  birth  to  evil  which  hurts  other</p><p>people  as  well  as  its  own  members.  We  could  list  various</p><p>names  ascribed  to  such  organizations  by  linguistic  tradition:</p><p>gangs,  criminal  mobs,  mafias,  cliques,  and  coteries,  which</p><p>cunningly  avoid  collision  with  the  law  while  seeking  to  gain</p><p>their own advantage. Such unions frequently aspire to political</p><p>power  in  order  to  impose  their  expedient  legislation  upon  so-</p><p>cieties  in  the  name  of  a  suitably  prepared  ideology,  deriving</p><p>158</p><p>PONEROLOGY</p><p>advantages  in  the  form  of  disproportionate  prosperity  and  the</p><p>satisfaction of their craving for power.</p><p>A description and classification of such associations with a</p><p>view of their numbers, goals, officially promulgated ideologies,</p><p>and  internal  organizations  would  of  course  be  scientifically</p><p>valuable. Such a description, effected by a perceptive observer,</p><p>could help a ponerologist determine some of the properties of</p><p>such unions, which cannot be determined by means of natural</p><p>conceptual language.</p><p>A description of this kind, however, ought not to cloak the</p><p>more factual phenomena and psychological dependencies oper-</p><p>ating  within  these  unions.  Failure  to  heed  this  warning  can</p><p>easily cause such a sociological description to indicate proper-</p><p>ties  which  are  of  secondary  importance,  or  even  made  �for</p><p>show�  to  impress  the  uninitiated,  thereby  overshadowing  the</p><p>actual  phenomena  which  decide  the  quality,  role,  and  fate  of</p><p>the  union.  Particularly  if  such  a  description  is  colorful  litera-</p><p>ture,  it  can  furnish  merely  illusory  or  ersatz  knowledge,  thus</p><p>rendering  a  naturalistic  perception  and  causative  comprehen-</p><p>sion of phenomena more difficult.</p><p>One  phenomenon  all  ponerogenic  groups  and  associations</p><p>have  in  common  is  the  fact  that  their  members  lose  (or  have</p><p>already  lost)   <emphasis>the  capacity  to  perceive  pathological  individuals </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>as  such</emphasis>,  interpreting  their  behavior  in  a  fascinated,  heroic,  or</p><p>melodramatic  ways.  The  opinions,  ideas,  and  judgments  of</p><p>people  carrying  various  psychological  deficits  are  endowed</p><p>with  an  importance  at  least  equal  to  that  of  outstanding  indi-</p><p>viduals among normal people.</p><p><emphasis>The  atrophy  of  natural  critical  faculties  with  respect  to </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>pathological individuals becomes an opening to their activities, </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>and, at the same time, a criterion for recognizing the associa-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>tion in concern as ponerogenic. </emphasis> Let us call this the first crite-</p><p>rion of ponerogenesis.</p><p><emphasis>Another  phenomenon  all  ponerogenic  associations  have  in </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>common is their statistically high concentration of individuals </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>with  various  psychological  anomalies</emphasis>.  Their  qualitative  com-</p><p>position  is  crucially  important  in  the  formation  of  the  entire</p><p>union�s character, activities, development, or extinction.</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>159</p><p>Groups dominated by various kinds of  <emphasis>characteropathic</emphasis> in-</p><p>dividuals  will  develop  relatively  primitive  activities,  proving</p><p>rather easy for a society of normal people to break.  However,</p><p>things  are  quite  different  when  such  unions  are  inspired  by</p><p>psychopathic individuals. Let us adduce the following example</p><p>illustrating the roles of two different anomalies, selected from</p><p>among actual events studied by the author.</p><p>In felonious youth gangs, a specific role is played by boys</p><p>(and occasionally girls) that carry a characteristic deficit that is</p><p>sometimes left behind by an inflammation of the parotid glands</p><p>(the mumps). This disease entails brain reactions in some cases,</p><p>leaving  behind  a  discreet  but  permanent  bleaching  of  feelings</p><p>and  a  slight  decrease  in  general  mental  skills.  Similar  results</p><p>are  sometimes  left  behind  after  diphtheria.  As  a  result,  such</p><p>people easily succumb to the suggestions and manipulations of</p><p>a more clever individuals.</p><p>When  drawn  into  a  felonious  group,  these  constitutionally</p><p>weakened individuals become faint-critical helpers and execu-</p><p>tors  of  the  leader�s  intentions,  tools  in  the  hands  of  more</p><p>treacherous, usually psychopathic, leaders. Once arrested, they</p><p>submit to their leaders� insinuated explanations that the higher</p><p>(paramoral) group ideal demands that they become scapegoats,</p><p>taking  the  majority  of  blame  upon  themselves.  In  court,  the</p><p>same leaders who initiated the delinquencies mercilessly dump</p><p>all  the  blame  onto  their  less  crafty  colleagues.  Sometimes  a</p><p>judge actually accepts the insinuations.</p><p>Individuals  with  the  above-mentioned  post-mumps  and</p><p>post-diphtheria traits constitute less than 1.0 % of the popula-</p><p>tion  as  a  whole,  but  their  share  reaches  1/4  of  juvenile  delin-</p><p>quent groups.  This represents an inspissation75 of the order of</p><p>30-fold,  requiring  no  further  methods  of  statistical  analysis.</p><p>When  studying  the  contents  of  ponerogenic  unions  skillfully</p><p>enough,  we  often  meet  with  an  inspissation  of  other  psycho-</p><p>logical anomalies which also speak for themselves.</p><p>~~~</p><p>Two  basic  types  of  the  above-mentioned  unions  should  be</p><p>differentiated:   <emphasis>Primary  ponerogenic  and  secondary  ponero-</emphasis></p><empty-line/><p>75 To thicken by either evaporation or absorption of fluid. Diminished fluid-</p><p>ity, increased thickness. A concentration. [Editor�s note.]</p><p>160</p><p>PONEROLOGY</p><p><emphasis>genic</emphasis>.  <emphasis/> Let us describe as primarily ponerogenic a union whose</p><p>abnormal members were active from the very beginning, play-</p><p>ing the role of crystallizing catalysts as early as the process of</p><p>creation  of  the  group  occurred.  We  shall  call  secondarily</p><p>ponerogenic a union which  was founded in the name  of some</p><p>idea  with  an  independent  social  meaning,  generally</p><p>comprehensible within the categories of the natural world view,</p><p>but  which  later  succumbed  to  a  certain  moral  degeneration.</p><p>This in turn opened the door to infection and activation of the</p><p>pathological  factors  within,  and  later  to  a  ponerization  of  the</p><p>group as a whole, or often of its fraction.</p><p>From  the  very  outset,  a  primarily  ponerogenic  union  is  a</p><p>foreign body within the organism of society, its character col-</p><p>liding with the moral values held or respected by the majority.</p><p>The  activities  of  such  groups  provoke  opposition  and  disgust</p><p>and  are  considered  immoral;  as  a  rule,  therefore,  such  groups</p><p>do  not  spread  large,  nor  do  they  metastasize  into  numerous</p><p>unions; they finally lose their battle with society.</p><p>In  order  to  have  a  chance  to  develop  into  a  large  ponero-</p><p>genic association, however, it suffices that some human orga-</p><p>nization, characterized by social or political goals and an ideol-</p><p>ogy with some creative value, be accepted by a larger number</p><p>of  normal  people   <emphasis>before</emphasis>  it  succumbs  to  a  process  of  ponero-</p><p>genic malignancy. The primary tradition and ideological values</p><p>of  such  a  society  may  then,  for  a  long  time,  protect  a  union</p><p>which  has  succumbed  to  the  ponerization  process  from  the</p><p>awareness  of  society,  especially  its  less  critical  components.</p><p>When the ponerogenic process touches such a human organiza-</p><p>tion, which originally emerged and acted in the name of politi-</p><p>cal or social goals, and whose causes were conditioned in his-</p><p>tory and the social situation, the original group�s primary val-</p><p>ues  will  nourish  and  protect  such  a  union,  in  spite  of  the  fact</p><p>that  those  primary  values  succumb  to  characteristic  degenera-</p><p>tion, the practical function becoming  <emphasis>completely different</emphasis> from</p><p>the primary one, because the names and symbols are retained.</p><p>This  is  where  the  weaknesses  of  individual  and  social  �com-</p><p>mon sense� are revealed.76</p><empty-line/><p>76 Just because a group operates under the banner of �communism� or �so-</p><p>cialism� or �democracy� or �conservatism� or �republicanism�, doesn�t mean</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>161</p><p>This is reminiscent of  a situation psychopathologists know</p><p>well:  a  person  who  enjoyed  trust  and  respect  in  their  circles</p><p>starts behaving with preposterous arrogance and hurting others,</p><p>allegedly  in  the  name  of  his  already  known,  decent  and  ac-</p><p>cepted  convictions,  which  have  �  in  the  meantime  -  deterio-</p><p>rated due to some psychological process rendering them primi-</p><p>tive but emotionally dynamic. However, his old acquaintances</p><p>�  having  known  him  for  long  as  the  person  he  was  -  do  not</p><p>believe  the  injured  parties  who  complain  about  his  new,  or</p><p>even hidden, behavior, and are prepared to denigrate them and</p><p>consider  them  liars.  This  adds  insult  to  their  injury  and  gives</p><p>encouragement and license to the individual whose personality</p><p>is undergoing deterioration, to commit further hurtful acts; as a</p><p>rule, such a situation lasts until the person�s madness becomes</p><p>obvious.</p><p>Ponerogenic unions of the primary variety are mainly of in-</p><p>terest  to  criminology;  our  main  concern  will  be  associations</p><p>that  succumb  to  a  secondary  process  of  poneric  malignancy.</p><p>First, however, let us sketch a few properties of such associa-</p><p>tions which have already surrendered to this process.</p><p>Within each ponerogenic union, a psychological structure is</p><p>created which can be considered a counterpart or caricature of</p><p>the  normal  structure  of  society  or  a  normal  societal  organiza-</p><p>tion. In a normal social organization, individuals with various</p><p>psychological  strengths  and  weaknesses  complement  each</p><p>other�s talents and characteristics. This structure is subjected to</p><p>diachronic77 modification with regard to changes in the charac-</p><p>ter of the association as  whole.  The same is true of a ponero-</p><p>genic union. Individuals with various psychological aberrations</p><p>also complement each other�s talents and characteristics.</p><p>The earlier phase of  a ponerogenic union�s activity is usu-</p><p>ally dominated by characteropathic, particularly paranoid, indi-</p><p>viduals, who often play an inspirational or spellbinding role in</p><p>the ponerization process. Recall here the power of the paranoid</p><p>characteropath lies in the fact that they easily enslave less criti-</p><p>cal  minds,  e.g.  people  with  other  kinds  of  psychological  defi-</p><empty-line/><p>that, in practice, their functions are anything close to the original ideology.</p><p>[Editor�s note.]</p><p>77 Over time; employing a chronological perspective. [Editor�s note.]</p><p>162</p><p>PONEROLOGY</p><p>ciencies, or who have been victims of individuals with charac-</p><p>ter disorders, and, in particular, a large segment of young peo-</p><p>ple.</p><p>At this point in time, the union still exhibits certain roman-</p><p>tic  features  and  is  not  yet  characterized  by  excessively  brutal</p><p>behavior.78  Soon,  however,  the  more  normal  members  are</p><p>pushed  into  fringe  functions  and  are  excluded  from  organiza-</p><p>tional secrets; some of them thereupon leave such a union.</p><p>Individuals with inherited deviations then progressively take</p><p>over  the  inspirational  and  leadership  positions.  The  role  of</p><p>essential  psychopaths  gradually  grows,  although  they  like  to</p><p>remain ostensibly in the shadows (e.g. directing small groups),</p><p>setting the pace as an �minence grise.79 In ponerogenic unions</p><p>on  the  largest  social  scales,  the  leadership  role  is  generally</p><p>played  by  a  different  kind  of  individual,  one  more  easily  di-</p><p>gestible  and  representative.  Examples  include  frontal  charac-</p><p>teropathy, or some more discreet complex of lesser taints.</p><p>A spellbinder at first simultaneously plays the role of leader</p><p>in  a  ponerogenic  group.  Later  there  appears  another  kind  of</p><p>�leadership  talent�,  a  more  vital  individual  who  often  joined</p><p>the organization later, once it has already succumbed to poneri-</p><p>zation. The spellbinding individual, being weaker, is forced to</p><p>come to terms with being shunted into the shadows and recog-</p><p>nizing  the  new  leader�s  �genius�,  or  accept  the  threat  of  total</p><p>failure.  Roles  are  parceled  out.  The  spellbinder  needs  support</p><p>from  the  primitive  but  decisive  leader,  who  in  turn  needs  the</p><p>spellbinder to uphold the association�s ideology, so essential in</p><p>maintaining the proper attitude on the part of those members of</p><p>the rank and file who betray a tendency to criticism and doubt</p><p>of the moral variety.</p><p>The spellbinder�s job then becomes to repackage the ideol-</p><p>ogy  appropriately,  sliding  new  contents  in  under  old titles,  so</p><empty-line/><p>78 An example would be a paranoid character who believes himself to be a</p><p>Robin Hood type character with a �mission� to �rob from the rich and give to</p><p>the poor�. This can easily transform to �rob from anyone to gain for the self�</p><p>under the cover of �social injustice against us makes it right�. [Editor�s note.]</p><p>79 A powerful advisor or decision-maker who operates secretly or otherwise</p><p>unofficially. This phrase originally referred to Cardinal Richelieu�s right-</p><p>hand man, Fran�ois Leclerc du Tremblay, a Capuchin priest who wore gray</p><p>robes. [Editor�s note.]</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>163</p><p>that  it  can  continue  fulfilling  its  propaganda  function  under</p><p>ever-changing  conditions.  He  also  has  to  uphold  the  leader�s</p><p><emphasis>mystique</emphasis>  inside  and  outside  the  association.  Complete  trust</p><p>cannot  exist  between  the  two,  however,  since  the  leader  se-</p><p>cretly  has  contempt  for  the  spellbinder  and  his  ideology,</p><p>whereas  the  spellbinder  despises  the  leader  for  being  such  a</p><p>coarse individual. A showdown is always probable; whoever is</p><p>weaker becomes the loser.</p><p>The structure of such a union undergoes further variegation</p><p>and specialization. A chasm opens between the somewhat more</p><p>normal members and the elite initiates who are, as a rule, more</p><p>pathological.  This  later  subgroup  becomes  ever  more  domi-</p><p>nated by hereditary pathological factors, the former by the af-</p><p>ter-effects of various diseases affecting the brain, less typically</p><p>psychopathic  individuals,  and  people  whose  malformed  per-</p><p>sonalities  were  caused  by  early  deprivation  or  brutal  child-</p><p>rearing methods on the part of pathological individuals. It soon</p><p>develops that there is less and less room for normal people in</p><p>the  group  at  all.  The  leaders�  secrets  and  intentions  are  kept</p><p>hidden  from  the  union�s  proletariat;  the  products  of  the  spell-</p><p>binders� work must suffice for this segment.</p><p>An  observer  watching  such  a  union�s  activities  from  the</p><p>outside  and  using  the  natural  psychological  world  view  will</p><p>always tend to overestimate the role of the leader and his alleg-</p><p>edly  autocratic  function.  The  spellbinders  and  the  propaganda</p><p>apparatus  are  mobilized  to  maintain  this  erroneous  outside</p><p>opinion.  The  leader,  however,  is   <emphasis>dependent  upon  the interests </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>of  the  union,  especially  the  elite  initiates</emphasis>,  to  an  extent  greater</p><p>than he himself knows. He wages a constant position-jockeying</p><p>battle; he is an actor with a director. In macrosocial unions, this</p><p>position  is  generally  occupied  by  a  more  representative  indi-</p><p>vidual  not  deprived  of  certain  critical  faculties;  initiating  him</p><p>into   <emphasis>all</emphasis>  those  plans  and  criminal  calculations  would  be  coun-</p><p>terproductive. In conjunction with part of the elite, a  <emphasis>group</emphasis> of</p><p>psychopathic  individuals  hiding  behind  the  scenes  steers  the</p><p>leader,  the  way  Borman  and  his  clique  steered  Hitler.  If  the</p><p>leader does not fulfill his assigned role, he generally knows that</p><p>the clique representing the elite of the union is in a position to</p><p>kill or otherwise remove him.</p><p>164</p><p>PONEROLOGY</p><p>We  have  sketched  the  properties  of  unions  in  which  the</p><p>ponerogenic  process  has  transformed  their  original  generally</p><p>benevolent content into a pathological counter-part thereof and</p><p>modified its structure and its later changes, in a manner suffi-</p><p>ciently wide-scale to encompass the greatest possible scope of</p><p>this kind of phenomena, from the smallest to the largest social</p><p>scale. The general rules governing those phenomena appear to</p><p>be  at  least  analogous,  independent  of  the  quantitative,  social,</p><p>and historical scale of such a phenomenon.</p><p>Ideologies</p><p>It is a common phenomenon for a ponerogenic  association</p><p>or group to contain a  <emphasis>particular ideology</emphasis> which always justifies</p><p>its  activities  and  furnishes  motivational  propaganda.  Even  a</p><p>small-time gang of hoodlums has its own melodramatic ideol-</p><p>ogy and pathological romanticism. Human nature demands that</p><p>vile  matters  be  haloed  by  an  over-compensatory  mystique  in</p><p>order to silence one�s conscience and to deceive consciousness</p><p>and critical faculties, whether one�s own or those of others.</p><p>If such a ponerogenic union could be stripped of its ideol-</p><p>ogy,  nothing  would  remain  except  psychological  and  moral</p><p>pathology,  naked  and  unattractive.  Such  stripping  would  of</p><p>course  provoke  �moral  outrage�,  and  not  only  among  the</p><p>members  of  the  union.  The  fact  is,  even  normal  people,  who</p><p>condemn this kind of union along with its ideologies, feel hurt</p><p>and  deprived  of  something  constituting  part  of  their  own  ro-</p><p>manticism, their way of perceiving reality when a widely ideal-</p><p>ized group is  exposed as little  more than a gang of criminals.</p><p>Perhaps  even  some  of  the  readers  of  this  book  will  resent  the</p><p>author�s  stripping  evil  so  unceremoniously  of  all  its  literary</p><p>motifs. The job of effecting such a �strip-tease� may thus turn</p><p>out to be much more difficult and dangerous than expected.</p><p>A primary ponerogenic union is formed at the same time as</p><p>its ideology, perhaps even somewhat earlier.  A normal person</p><p>perceives such ideology to be different from the  world of hu-</p><p>man  concepts,  obviously  suggestive,  and  even  primitively</p><p>comical to a degree.</p><p>An  ideology  of  a  secondarily  ponerogenic  association  is</p><p>formed by gradual adaptation of the primary ideology to func-</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>165</p><p>tions and goals other than the original formative ones. A certain</p><p>kind of layering or schizophrenia of ideology takes place dur-</p><p>ing  the  ponerization  process.  The  outer  layer  closest  to  the</p><p>original  content  is  used  for  the  group�s  propaganda  purposes,</p><p>especially regarding the outside  world, although it can in part</p><p>also  be  used  inside  with  regard  to  disbelieving  lower-echelon</p><p>members. The second layer presents the elite with no problems</p><p>of comprehension: it is more hermetic, generally composed by</p><p>slipping a different meaning into the same names. Since identi-</p><p>cal names signify different contents depending on the layer in</p><p>question,  understanding  this  �doubletalk�  requires  simultane-</p><p>ous fluency in both languages.</p><p>Average  people  succumb  to  the  first  layer�s  suggestive  in-</p><p>sinuations  for  a long  time  before  they  learn  to  understand  the</p><p>second one as  well.  Anyone  with certain psychological devia-</p><p>tions,  especially  if  he  is  wearing  the  mask  of  normality  with</p><p>which  we are already familiar, immediately perceives the sec-</p><p>ond layer to be attractive and significant; after all, it was built</p><p>by people like him. Comprehending this doubletalk is therefore</p><p>a vexatious task, provoking quite understandable psychological</p><p>resistance; this very duality of language, however, is a pathog-</p><p>nomonic80  symptom  indicating  that  the  human  union  in  ques-</p><p>tion is touched by the ponerogenic process to an advanced de-</p><p>gree.</p><p>The   <emphasis>ideology</emphasis>  of  unions  affected  by  such  degeneration  has</p><p>certain constant factors regardless of their quality, quantity, or</p><p>scope of action: namely,  <emphasis>the  motivations of a wronged group, </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>radical righting of the wrong, and the higher values of the in-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>dividuals who have joined the organization</emphasis>. These motivations</p><p>facilitate sublimation of the feeling of being wronged and dif-</p><p>ferent, caused by one�s own psychological failings, and appear</p><p>to liberate the individual from the need to abide by uncomfort-</p><p>able moral principles.</p><p>In  the  world  full  of  real  injustice  and  human  humiliation,</p><p>making it conducive to the formation of an ideology containing</p><p>the above elements, a union of its converts may easily succumb</p><p>to  degradation.  When  this  happens,  those  people  with  a  ten-</p><empty-line/><p>80 Specific characteristics of a disease. [Editor�s note.]</p><p>166</p><p>PONEROLOGY</p><p>dency to accept the better version of the ideology will tend to</p><p>justify such ideological duality.</p><p>The  ideology  of  the  proletariat,81  which  aimed  at  revolu-</p><p>tionary restructuring of the world, was already contaminated by</p><p>a schizoid deficit in the understanding of, and trust for, human</p><p>nature; small wonder, then, that it easily succumbed to a proc-</p><p>ess  of  typical  degeneration  in  order  to  nourish  and  disguise  a</p><p>macrosocial  phenomenon  whose  basic  essence  is  completely</p><p>different.82</p><p>For  future  reference,  let  us  remember:  ideologies  do  not</p><p>need  spellbinders.  Spellbinders  need  ideologies  in  order  to</p><p>subject them to their own deviant goals.</p><p>On the other hand, the fact that some ideology degenerated</p><p>along with its corollary social movement, later succumbing to</p><empty-line/><p>81 From the  <emphasis>Communist Manifesto</emphasis>: �By proletariat [is meant] the class of</p><p>modern wage laborers, who, having no means of production of their own, are</p><p>reduced to selling their labor-power in order to live.� [Editor�s note.]</p><p>82 Fascism seems to be the diametric opposite of Communism and Marxism,</p><p>both in a philosophic and political sense, and also opposed democratic capi-</p><p>talist economics along with socialism and liberal democracy. It viewed the</p><p>state as an organic entity in a positive light rather than as an institution de-</p><p>signed to protect collective and individual rights, or as one that should be</p><p>held in check. Fascism is also typified by totalitarian attempts to impose state</p><p>control over all aspects of life: political, social, cultural, and economic which</p><p>accurately describes what was passed off under the name of Communism.</p><p>The fascist state regulates and controls (as opposed to nationalizing) the</p><p>means of production. Fascism exalts the nation, state, or race as superior to</p><p>the individuals, institutions, or groups composing it. Fascism uses explicit</p><p>populist rhetoric; calls for a heroic mass effort to restore past greatness; and</p><p>demands loyalty to a single leader, often to the point of a cult of personality.</p><p>Again, we see that Fascism was passed off as Communism. So, what actually</p><p>seems to have happened is that the original ideals of the proletariat were</p><p>cleverly subsumed to State corporatism. Most people in the west are not</p><p>aware of this because of the Western propaganda against Communism. The</p><p>word �Fascist� has become a slur throughout the world since the stunning</p><p>failure of the Axis powers in World War II. In contemporary political dis-</p><p>course, adherents of some political ideologies tend to associate fascism with</p><p>their enemies, or define it as the opposite of their own views. There are no</p><p>major self-described fascist parties or organizations anywhere in the world.</p><p>However, at the present time, in the U.S., the system is far more fascist than</p><p>democratic, which probably explains the existence of the years of anti-</p><p>Communist propaganda. That would demonstrate an early process of poneri-</p><p>zation of Western democracy which, at present, has almost completed the</p><p>transformation to full-blown fascism. [Editor�s note.]</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>167</p><p>this  schizophrenia  and  serving  goals  which  the  originators  of</p><p>the  ideology  would  have  abhorred,  does  not  prove  that  it  was</p><p>worthless,  false,  and  fallacious  from  the  start.  Quite  the  con-</p><p>trary: it rather appears that under certain historical conditions,</p><p>the ideology of any social movement, even if it is sacred truth,</p><p>can yield to the ponerization process.</p><p>A  given  ideology  may  have  contained  weak  spots,  created</p><p>by the errors of human thought and emotion within; or it may,</p><p>during  the  course  of  its  history,  become  infiltrated  by  more</p><p>primitive foreign material which can contain ponerogenic fac-</p><p>tors. Such  material destroys an ideology�s internal homogeny.</p><p>The  source  of  such  infection  by  foreign  ideological  material</p><p>may  be  the  ruling  social  system  with  its  laws  and  customs</p><p>based on a more primitive tradition, or an imperialistic system</p><p>of  rule.  It  may  be,  of  course,  simply  another  philosophical</p><p>movement often contaminated by the eccentricities of its foun-</p><p>der, who considers the facts to blame for not conforming to his</p><p>dialectical construct.</p><p>The  Roman  Empire, including its legal system and paucity</p><p>of psychological concepts, similarly contaminated the primary</p><p>homogeneous idea of Christianity. Christianity had to adapt to</p><p>coexistence with a social system wherein �<emphasis>dura lex sed lex</emphasis>�83,</p><p>rather  than  an  understanding  of  human  beings,  decided  a  per-</p><p>son�s fate; this then led to the corruption of attempting to reach</p><p>the goals of the �Kingdom of God� by means of Roman impe-</p><p>rialistic methods.</p><p>The  greater  and  truer  the  original  ideology,  the  longer  it</p><p>may be capable of nourishing and disguising from human criti-</p><p>cism  that  phenomenon  which  is  the  product  of  the  specific</p><p>degenerative  process.  In  a  great  and  valuable  ideology,  the</p><p>danger for small minds is hidden; they can become the factors</p><p>of  such  preliminary  degeneration,  which  opens  the  door  to</p><p>invasion by pathological factors.</p><p>Thus, if we intend to understand the secondary ponerization</p><p>process and the kinds of human associations which succumb to</p><p>it,  we  must  take  great  care  to  separate  the  original  ideology</p><p>from its counterpart, or even caricature, created by the ponero-</p><p>genic  process.  Abstracting  from  any  ideology,  we  must,  by</p><empty-line/><p>83 The law [is] harsh, but [it is] the law.</p><p>168</p><p>PONEROLOGY</p><p>analogy, understand the essence of the process itself, which has</p><p>its  own  etiological  causes  which  are  potentially  present  in</p><p>every  society,  as  well  as  characteristic  developmental  patho-</p><p>dynamics.</p><p>The Ponerization Process</p><p>Observation of the ponerization processes of various human</p><p>unions throughout history easily leads to the conclusion that the</p><p>initial  step  is  a   <emphasis>moral  warping  of  the  group�s  ideational  con-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>tents</emphasis>. In analyzing the contamination of a group�s ideology, we</p><p>note first of all an infiltration of foreign, simplistic, and doctri-</p><p>naire contents, thereby depriving it of any healthy support for,</p><p>and  trust  in,  the  necessity  of  understanding  of  human  nature.</p><p>This opens the way for invasion by pathological factors and the</p><p>ponerogenic role of their carriers.</p><p>The  example  of  the  Roman  legal  system  vis  a  vis  early</p><p>Christianity  mentioned  above,  is  a  case  in  point.  The  Roman</p><p>imperial  and  legal  civilization  was  overly  attached  to  matter</p><p>and  law,  and  created  a  legal  system  that  was  too  rigid  to  ac-</p><p>commodate any real aspects of psychological and spiritual life.</p><p>This �earthy�  foreign  element infiltrated Christianity resulting</p><p>in  the  Catholic  church  adopting  Imperial  strategies  to  enforce</p><p>its system on others by violence.</p><p>This fact could justify the conviction of moralists that main-</p><p>taining a union�s ethical discipline and ideational purity is suf-</p><p>ficient  protection  against  derailing  or  hurtling  into  an  insuffi-</p><p>ciently comprehended world of error. Such a conviction strikes</p><p>a  ponerologist  as  a  unilateral  oversimplification  of  an  eternal</p><p>reality which is more complex. After all, the loosening of ethi-</p><p>cal and intellectual controls is sometimes a consequence of the</p><p>direct  or  indirect  influence  of  the  omnipresent  factors  of  the</p><p>existence  of  deviants  in  any  social  group,  along  with  some</p><p>other non-pathological human weaknesses.</p><p>Sometime during life, every human organism undergoes pe-</p><p>riods during which physiological and psychological resistance</p><p>declines,  facilitating  development  of  bacteriological  infection</p><p>within.  Similarly,  a  human  association  or  social  movement</p><p>undergoes  periods  of  crisis  which  weaken  its  ideational  and</p><p>moral cohesion. This may be caused by pressure on the part of</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>169</p><p>other  groups,  a  general  spiritual  crisis  in  the  environment,  or</p><p>intensification of its hysterical condition. Just as more stringent</p><p>sanitary  measures  are  an  obvious  medical  indication  for  a</p><p>weakened organism, the development of conscious control over</p><p>the  activity  of  pathological  factors  is  a  ponerological  indica-</p><p>tion. This is a crucial factor for prevention of tragedy during a</p><p>society�s periods of moral crisis.</p><p>For  centuries,  individuals  exhibiting  various  psychological</p><p>anomalies have had the tendency to participate in the activities</p><p>of  human  unions.  This  is  made  possible  on  the  one  hand  by</p><p>such group�s weaknesses, i.e. failure in adequate psychological</p><p>knowledge; on the other hand, it deepens the moral failings and</p><p>stifles  the  possibilities  of utilizing  healthy  common  sense  and</p><p>understanding  matters  objectively.  In  spite  of  the  resulting</p><p>tragedies and unhappiness, humanity has shown a certain pro-</p><p>gress, especially in the cognitive area; therefore, a ponerologist</p><p>may  be  cautiously  optimistic.  After  all,  by  detecting  and  de-</p><p>scribing  these  aspects  of  the  ponerization  process  of  human</p><p>groups, which could not be understood until recently, we shall</p><p>be  able  to  counteract  such  processes  earlier  and  more  effec-</p><p>tively. Again, depth and breadth of knowledge of human psy-</p><p>chological variations is crucial.</p><p>Any human group affected by the process described herein</p><p>is characterized by its increasing regression from natural com-</p><p>mon  sense  and  the  ability  to  perceive  psychological  reality.</p><p>Someone  considering  this  in  terms  of  traditional  categories</p><p>might consider it an instance of �turning into half-wits� or the</p><p>development  of  intellectual  deficiencies  and  moral  failings.  A</p><p>ponerological  analysis  of this  process,  however,  indicates  that</p><p>pressure is being applied to the more normal part of the asso-</p><p>ciation  by  pathological  factors  present  in  certain  individuals</p><p>who have been allowed to participate in the group because the</p><p>lack  of  good  psychological  knowledge  has  not  madated  their</p><p>exclusion.</p><p>Thus,  whenever  we  observe  some  group  member  being</p><p>treated with no critical distance, although he betrays one of the</p><p>psychological anomalies familiar to us, and his opinions being</p><p>treated  as  at  least  equal  to  those  of  normal  people,  although</p><p>they are based on a characteristically different view of human</p><p>170</p><p>PONEROLOGY</p><p>matters, we must derive the conclusion that this human group is</p><p>affected  by  a  ponerogenic  process  and  if  measures  are  not</p><p>taken  the  process  shall  continue  to  its  logical  conclusion.  We</p><p>shall  treat  this  in  accordance  with  the  above  described  first</p><p>criterion of ponerology, which retains its validity regardless of</p><p>the  qualitative  and  quantitative  features  of  such  a  union:   <emphasis>the </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>atrophy of natural critical faculties with respect to pathologi-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>cal individuals becomes an opening to their activities, and, at </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>the  same  time,  a  criterion  for  recognizing  the  association  in </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>concern as ponerogenic. </emphasis></p><p>Such a state of affairs simultaneously consists as  a liminal</p><p>(watershed)  situation,  whereupon  further  damage  to  people�s</p><p>healthy  common  sense  and  critical  moral  faculties  becomes</p><p>ever  easier.  Once  a  group  has  inhaled  a  sufficient  dose  of</p><p>pathological material to give birth to the conviction that these</p><p>not-quite-normal  people  are  unique  geniuses,  it  starts  subject-</p><p>ing its more normal members to pressure characterized by cor-</p><p>responding paralogical and paramoral elements.</p><p>For many people, such pressure of collective opinion takes</p><p>on attributes of a moral criterion; for others, it represents a kind</p><p>of psychological terror ever more difficult to endure. The phe-</p><p>nomenon of counter-selection thus occurs in this phase of pon-</p><p>erization: individuals with a more normal sense of psychologi-</p><p>cal  reality  leave  after  entering  into  conflict  with  the  newly</p><p>modified group; simultaneously, individuals with various psy-</p><p>chological  anomalies  join  the  group  and  easily  find  a  way  of</p><p>life  there.  The  former  feel  �pushed  into  counter-revolutionary</p><p>positions�,  and  the  latter  can  afford  to  remove  their  masks  of</p><p>sanity ever more often.</p><p>People who have been thus thrown out of a ponerogenic as-</p><p>sociation because they were  <emphasis>too normal</emphasis> suffer bitterly; they are</p><p>unable to understand their specific state. Their ideal, the reason</p><p>they joined the group, which constituted a part of the meaning</p><p>of life for them, has now been degraded, although they cannot</p><p>find  a  rational  basis  for  this  fact.  They  feel  wronged;  they</p><p>�fight  against  demons�  they  are  not  in  a  position  to  identify.</p><p>The fact is their personalities have already been   <emphasis>modified</emphasis> to a</p><p>certain  extent  due  to  saturation  by  abnormal  psychological</p><p>material, especially psychopathic material. They easily fall into</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>171</p><p>the  opposite  extreme  in  such  cases,  because  unhealthy  emo-</p><p>tions rule their decisions. What they need is good psychologi-</p><p>cal information in order to find the path of reason and measure.</p><p>Based on a ponerologic understanding of their condition, psy-</p><p>chotherapy  could  provide  rapid  positive  results.  However,  if</p><p>the union they left is succumbing to deep ponerization, a threat</p><p>looms  over  them:  they  may  become  the  objects  of  revenge,</p><p>since they have �betrayed� a magnificent ideology.84</p><p>This  is  the  stormy  period  of  a  group�s  ponerization,  fol-</p><p>lowed by a certain stabilization in terms of contents, structure,</p><p>and customs. Rigorous selective measures of a clearly psycho-</p><p>logical kind are applied to new members. So as to exclude the</p><p>possibility  of  becoming  sidetracked  by  defectors,  people  are</p><p>observed and tested to eliminate those characterized by exces-</p><p>sive mental independence or psychological normality. The new</p><p>internal  function  created  is  something  like  a  �psychologist�,</p><p>and  it  doubtless  takes  advantage  of  the  above-described  psy-</p><p>chological knowledge collected by psychopaths.</p><p>It  should  be  noted  that  certain  of  these  exclusionary  steps</p><p>taken  by  a  group  in  the  process  of  ponerization,  <emphasis>should  have</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>been  taken</emphasis><emphasis>against  deviants</emphasis>  by  the  ideological  group  in  the</p><p>beginning.  So  rigorous  selective  measures  of  a  psychological</p><p>kind  taken  by  a  group  is  not  necessarily  an  indicator  that  the</p><p>group  is  ponerogenic.  Rather  one  should  carefully  examine</p><p>what  the  psychological  selection  is  based  on.  If  any  group</p><p>seeks to avoid ponerization, it will want to exclude individuals</p><p>with any psychological dependence on subjective beliefs, rites,</p><p>rituals, drugs, and certainly those individuals that are incapable</p><p>of objectively analyzing their own inner psychological content</p><p>or who reject the process of Positive disintegration.</p><p>In a group in the process of ponerization, spellbinders take</p><p>care of �ideological purity�. The leader�s position is relatively</p><p>secure. Individuals manifesting doubt or criticism are subject to</p><p>paramoral  condemnation.  Maintaining  the  utmost  dignity  and</p><empty-line/><p>84 It should also be mentioned that the same process occurs when a psycho-</p><p>logical deviant is thrown out of a group of normal people. The way to tell the</p><p>difference is that a normal group ejecting a deviant will not seek to exact</p><p>revenge on the ejected member, while the deviant will seek revenge on the</p><p>group he has been ejected from. [Editor�s note.]</p><p>172</p><p>PONEROLOGY</p><p>style,  leadership  discusses  opinions  and  intentions  which  are</p><p>psychologically  and  morally  pathological.  Any  intellectual</p><p>connections  which  might  reveal  them  as  such  are  eliminated,</p><p>thanks  to  the  substitution  of  premises  operating  in  the  proper</p><p>subconscious process on the basis of prior conditioned reflexes.</p><p>An objective observer might wish to compare this state to one</p><p>in which the inmates of an asylum take over the running of the</p><p>institution.  The  association  enters  the state  wherein  the  whole</p><p>has donned the mask of ostensible normality. In the next chap-</p><p>ter,  we  shall  call  such  a  state  the  �dissimulative  phase�  with</p><p>regard to macrosocial ponerogenic phenomena.</p><p>Observing  the  appropriate  state  corresponding  to  the  first</p><p>ponerological  criterion  -   <emphasis>the  atrophy  of  natural  critical  facul-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>ties with respect to pathological individuals</emphasis> - requires skillful</p><p>psychology  and  specific  factual  knowledge;  the  second,  more</p><p>stable phase can be perceived both by a person of average rea-</p><p>son and by public opinion in most societies. The interpretation</p><p>imposed,  however,  is  unilaterally  moralistic  or  sociological,</p><p>simultaneously  undergoing  the  characteristic  feeling  of  defi-</p><p>ciency as regards the possibility of both understanding the phe-</p><p>nomenon and counteracting the spread of said evil.</p><p>However, in this phase a minority of social groups tend to</p><p>consider such a ponerogenic association comprehensible within</p><p>the  categories  of  their  own  world  view  and  the  outer  layer  of</p><p>diffusing ideology as a doctrine acceptable to them. The more</p><p>primitive the society in question, and the further removed from</p><p>direct  contact  to  the  union  affected  by  this  pathological  state,</p><p>the more numerous such minorities would be. This very period,</p><p>during  which  the  customs  of  the  union  become  somewhat</p><p>milder,  often  represents  simultaneously  its  most  intensive  ex-</p><p>pansionist activity.</p><p>This  period  may  last  long,  but  not  forever.  Internally,  the</p><p>group  is  becoming  progressively  more  pathological,  finally</p><p>showing its true qualitative colors again as its activities become</p><p>ever  clumsier.  At  this  point,  a  society  of  normal  people  can</p><p>easily  threaten  ponerologic  associations,  even  at  the macroso-</p><p>cial level.</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>173</p><p>Macrosocial Phenomena</p><p>When a ponerogenic process encompasses a society�s entire</p><p>ruling class, or nation, or when opposition from normal people</p><p>is stifled -- as a result of the mass character of the phenomenon,</p><p>or  by  using  spellbinding  means  and  physical  compulsion,  in-</p><p>cluding censorship -- we are dealing with a macrosocial pone-</p><p>rologic phenomenon. In such a case, however, a society�s trag-</p><p>edy, often coupled with that of the researcher�s own suffering,</p><p>opens before him an entire volume of ponerologic knowledge,</p><p>where he can read all about the laws governing such a process</p><p>if he is only able to familiarize himself in time with its natural-</p><p>istic language and its different grammar.</p><p>Studies in the genesis of evil which are based on observing</p><p><emphasis>small</emphasis> groups of people can indicate the details of these laws to</p><p>us.  However,  it  might  be  thought  that  this  would  present  a</p><p>warped  picture  that  is  dependent  upon  various  environmental</p><p>conditions which are further dependent on the historical period</p><p>in  question;  this  is  the  backdrop  to  the  phenomena  observed.</p><p>Nevertheless,  such  observations  may  enable  us  to  hazard  a</p><p>hypothesis to the effect that the general laws of ponerogenesis</p><p>may be at least analogous, regardless of the quantity and scope</p><p>of the phenomenon in time and space.  They do not,  however,</p><p>permit verification of such a hypothesis.</p><p>In studying a macrosocial phenomenon, we can obtain both</p><p>quantitative and qualitative data, statistical correlation indices,</p><p>and other observations as accurately as might be allowed by the</p><p>state of the art in science, research methodology, and the obvi-</p><p>ously very difficult situation of the observer.85 We can then use</p><p>the classical method, hazarding a hypothesis and then actively</p><p>searching  for  facts  which  could  falsify  it.  The  wide-spread</p><p>causative  regularity  of  ponerogenic  processes  would  then  be</p><p>confirmed within the bounds of the above-mentioned possibili-</p><p>ties. This is, in fact, what the author and his colleagues under-</p><p>took to do. It is astonishing how neatly causative regularity of</p><p>ponerogenic  processes  observed  in  small  groups  govern  this</p><p>macrosocial  phenomenon.  The  comprehension  of  the  phe-</p><empty-line/><p>85 Assuming that one can gather this information and survive the gathering!</p><p>[Editor�s note.]</p><p>174</p><p>PONEROLOGY</p><p>nomenon  thus  acquired  can  serve  as  a  basis  for  predicting  its</p><p>future  development,  to  be  verified  by  time.  It  is  in  close  and</p><p>careful observation, and only after time passes, that we become</p><p>aware that the colossus has an Achilles heel after all.</p><p>The  study  of  macrosocial  ponerogenic  phenomena  meets</p><p>with  obvious  problems:  their  period  of  genesis,  duration,  and</p><p>decay  is  several  times  longer  than  the  researcher�s  scientific</p><p>activity.  Simultaneously,  there  are  other  transformations  in</p><p>history,  customs,  economics,  and  technology;  however,  the</p><p>difficulties confronted in abstracting the appropriate symptoms</p><p>need not be insuperable, since our criteria are based on eternal</p><p>phenomena  subject  to  relatively  limited  transformations  in</p><p>time.</p><p>The  traditional  interpretation  of  these  great  historical  dis-</p><p>eases  has  already  taught  historians  to  distinguish  two  phases.</p><p>The first is represented by a period of spiritual crisis in a soci-</p><p>ety,86  which  historiography  associates  with  exhausting  of  the</p><p>ideational,  moral,  and  religious  values  heretofore  nourishing</p><p>the  society  in  question.  Egoism  among  individuals  and  social</p><p>groups  increases,  and  the  links  of  moral  duty  and  social  net-</p><p>works  are  felt  to  be  loosening.  Trifling  matters  thereupon</p><p>dominate human minds to such an extent that there is no room</p><p>left  for  thinking  about  public  matters  or  a  feeling  of  commit-</p><p>ment to the future. An atrophy of the hierarchy of values within</p><p>the  thinking  of  individuals  and  societies  is  an  indication</p><p>thereof;  it  has  been  described  both  in  historiographic  mono-</p><p>graphs and in psychiatric papers. The country�s government is</p><p>finally paralyzed, helpless in the face of problems which could</p><p>be  solved  without  great  difficulty  under  other  circumstances.</p><p>Let us associate such periods of crisis with the familiar phase in</p><p><emphasis>social hysterization</emphasis>.</p><p>The next phase has been marked by bloody tragedies, revo-</p><p>lutions, wars, and the fall of empires. The deliberations of his-</p><empty-line/><p>86 Sorokin, Pitirim. (1941).  <emphasis>Social and Cultural Dynamics, Volume Four: </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>Basic Problems, Principles and Methods</emphasis>, New York: American Book Com-</p><p>pany. Sorokin, Pitirim. (1957).  <emphasis>Social and Cultural Dynamics, One Volume </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>Revision</emphasis>. Boston: Porter Sargent. Simonton, Dean Keith. (1976). �Does</p><p>Sorokin�s data support his theory?: A study of generational fluctuations in</p><p>philosophical beliefs.�  <emphasis> Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion</emphasis> 15: 187-</p><p>198.</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>175</p><p>torians  or  moralists  regarding  these  occurrences  always  leave</p><p>behind  a  certain  feeling  of  deficiency  with  reference  to  the</p><p>possibility  of  perceiving  certain  psychological  factors  dis-</p><p>cerned  within  the  nature  of  phenomena;  the  essence  of  these</p><p>factors remains outside the scope of their scientific experience.</p><p>A  historian  observing  these  great  historical  diseases  is</p><p>struck first of all  <emphasis>by their similarities</emphasis>, easily forgetting that all</p><p>diseases  have  many  symptoms  in  common  because  they  are</p><p>states  of  absent  health.  A  ponerologist  thinking in  naturalistic</p><p>terms tends to doubt that we are dealing with only one kind of</p><p>societal  disease,  thereby  leading  to  a  certain  differentiation  of</p><p>forms  with  regard  to  ethnological  and  historical  conditions.</p><p>Differentiating the essence of such states is more appropriate to</p><p>the  reasoning  patterns  we  are  familiar  with  from  the  natural</p><p>sciences.  The complex conditions of social life, however, pre-</p><p>clude using the method of distinction, which is similar to etio-</p><p>logical  criterion  in  medicine:  qualitatively  speaking,  the  phe-</p><p>nomena  become  layered  in  time,  conditioning  each  other  and</p><p>transforming  constantly.  We  should  then  rather  use  certain</p><p>abstract patterns, similar to those used in analyzing the neurotic</p><p>states of human beings.</p><p>Governed  by  this  type  of  reasoning,  let  us  here  attempt  to</p><p>differentiate  two  pathological  states  of  societies;  their  essence</p><p>and  contents  appear  different  enough,  but  they  can  operate</p><p>sequentially in such a  way that the first opens the door to the</p><p>second.  The  first  such  state  has  already  been  sketched  in  the</p><p>chapter  on  the  hysteroidal  cycle;  we  shall  adduce  a  certain</p><p>number  of  other  psychological  details  hereunder.  The  next</p><p>chapter shall be dedicated to the second pathological state, for</p><p>which I have adopted the denomination of �pathocracy�.</p><p>States of Societal Hysterization</p><p>When perusing scientific or literary descriptions of hysteri-</p><p>cal  phenomena,  such  as  those  dating  from  the  last  great  in-</p><p>crease in hysteria in Europe encompassing the quarter-century</p><p>preceding World War I, a non-specialist may gain the impres-</p><p>sion  that  this  was  endemic  to  individual  cases,  particularly</p><p>among  woman.  The  contagious  nature  of  hysterical  states,</p><p>176</p><p>PONEROLOGY</p><p>however, had already been discovered and described  by Jean-</p><p>Martin Charcot87.</p><p>It is practically impossible for hysteria to manifest itself as a</p><p>mere  individual phenomenon,  since  it  is  contagious  by  means</p><p>of psychological resonance, identification, and imitation. Each</p><p>human being has a predisposition for this malformation of the</p><p>personality,  albeit  to  varying  degrees,  although  it  is  normally</p><p>overcome  by  rearing  and  self-rearing,  which  are  amenable  to</p><p>correct thinking and emotional self-discipline.</p><p>During �happy times� of peace dependent upon social injus-</p><p>tice,  children  of  the  privileged  classes  learn  to  repress  from</p><p>their field of consciousness the uncomfortable ideas suggesting</p><p>that they and their parents are benefitting from injustice against</p><p>others.  Such  young  people  learn  to  disqualify  disparage  the</p><p>moral and mental values of anyone whose work they are using</p><p>to over-advantage.  Young minds thus ingest habits of subcon-</p><p>scious selection and substitution of data, which leads to a hys-</p><p>terical conversion economy of  reasoning.  They grow  up to be</p><p>somewhat  hysterical  adults  who,  by  means  of  the  ways  ad-</p><p>duced above, thereupon transmit their hysteria to the next gen-</p><p>eration,  which  then  develops  these  characteristics  to  an  even</p><p>greater  degree.  The  hysterical  patterns  for  experience  and  be-</p><p>havior grow and spread downwards from the privileged classes</p><p>until crossing the boundary of the first criterion of ponerology:</p><p><emphasis>the atrophy of natural critical faculties with respect to patho-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>logical individuals</emphasis>.</p><p>When the habits of subconscious selection and substitution</p><p>of thought-data spread to the macrosocial level, a society tends</p><empty-line/><p>87 Jean-Martin Charcot (1825 - 1893) French neurologist. His work greatly</p><p>impacted the developing fields of neurology and psychology. Charcot took an</p><p>interest in the malady then called hysteria. It seemed to be a mental disorder</p><p>with physical manifestations, of immediate interest to a neurologist. He</p><p>believed that hysteria was the result of a weak neurological system which</p><p>was hereditary. It could be set off by a traumatic event like an accident, but</p><p>was then progressive and irreversible. To study the hysterics under his care,</p><p>he learned the technique of hypnosis and soon became a master of the rela-</p><p>tively new "science." Charcot believed that a hypnotized state was very</p><p>similar to a bout of hysteria, and so he hypnotized his patients in order to</p><p>induce and study their symptoms. He was single-handedly responsible for</p><p>changing the French medical community's opinion about the validity of</p><p>hypnosis (it was previously rejected as Mesmerism). [Editor�s note.]</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>177</p><p>to develop contempt for factual criticism and to humiliate any-</p><p>one  sounding  an  alarm.  Contempt  is  also  shown  for  other  na-</p><p>tions  which  have  maintained  normal  thought-patterns  and  for</p><p>their  opinions.  Egotistic  thought-terrorization  is  accomplished</p><p>by  the  society  itself  and  its  processes  of  conversive  thinking.</p><p>This  obviates  the  need  for  censorship  of  the  press,  theater,  or</p><p>broadcasting,  as   <emphasis>a  pathologically  hypersensitive  censor  lives </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>within the citizens themselves</emphasis>.</p><p>When  three  �egos�  govern,  egoism,  egotism,  and  egocen-</p><p>trism, the feeling of social links and responsibility toward oth-</p><p>ers disappear, and the society in question splinters into groups</p><p>ever more hostile to each other. When a hysterical environment</p><p>stops  differentiating  the  opinions  of  limited,  not-quite-normal</p><p>people from those of normal, reasonable persons, this opens the</p><p>door for activation of the pathological factors of a various na-</p><p>ture to enter in.</p><p>Individuals  we  have  already  met  who  are  governed  by  a</p><p>pathological view of reality and abnormal goals caused by their</p><p>different nature are able to develop their activities in such con-</p><p>ditions.  If  a  given  society  does  not  manage  to  overcome  the</p><p>state  of  hysterization  under  its  ethnological  and  political  cir-</p><p>cumstances, a huge bloody tragedy can be the result.</p><p>One  variation  of  such  a  tragedy  can  be  pathocracy.  Thus,</p><p>minor  setbacks  in  terms  of  political  failure  or  military  defeat</p><p>can be a warning in such a situation and may turn out to be a</p><p>blessing in disguise if properly understood and allowed to be-</p><p>come a factor in the regeneration of a society�s normal thought</p><p>patterns and customs. The most valuable advice a ponerologist</p><p>can  offer  under  such  circumstances  is  for  a  society  to   <emphasis>avail </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>itself  of  the  assistance  of  modern  science</emphasis>,  taking  particular</p><p>advantage  of  data  remaining  from  the  last  great  increase  of</p><p>hysteria in Europe.</p><p>A greater resistance to hysterization characterizes those so-</p><p>cial  groups  which  earn  their  daily  bread  by  daily  effort,  and</p><p>where the practicalities of everyday life force the mind to think</p><p>soberly  and  reflect  on  generalities.  As  an  example:  peasants</p><p>continue  to  view  the  hysterical  customs  of  the  well-to-do</p><p>classes  through  their  own  earthy  perception  of  psychological</p><p>reality and their sense of humor. Similar customs on the part of</p><p>178</p><p>PONEROLOGY</p><p>the  bourgeoisie  incline  workers  to  bitter  criticism  and  revolu-</p><p>tionary  anger.  Whether  couched  in  economic,  ideological,  or</p><p>political  terms,  the  criticism  and  demands  of  these  social</p><p>groups  always  contain  a  component  of  psychological,  moral,</p><p>and  anti-hysterical  motivation.  For  this  reason,  it  is  most  ap-</p><p>propriate to consider these demands with deliberation and take</p><p>these  classes�  feelings  into  account.  On  the  other  hand,  tragic</p><p>results  can  derive  from  thoughtless  action  paving  the way  for</p><p>spellbinders to make themselves heard.</p><p>Ponerology</p><p>Ponerology  utilizes  the  scientific  progress  of  the  last  dec-</p><p>ades  and  last  years,  especially  in  the  realms  of  biology,  psy-</p><p>chopathology  and  clinical  psychology.  It  clarifies  unknown</p><p>causative links and analyzes the processes of the genesis of evil</p><p>without giving a short shrift to factors which have so far been</p><p>underrated. In initiating this new discipline, the author has also</p><p>utilized  his  professional  experience  in  these  areas  and  the  re-</p><p>sults of his own recent research.</p><p>A  ponerological  approach  facilitates  an  understanding  of</p><p>some  of  mankind�s  more  dramatic  difficulties  on  both  levels,</p><p>the macrosocial and the individual human scale. This new dis-</p><p>cipline  will  make  it  possible  to  achieve  first  theoretical,  and</p><p>then practical, solutions for problems we have been attempting</p><p>to  solve  by  ineffective  traditional  means,  resulting  in  feelings</p><p>of helplessness against the tides of history. These latter means</p><p>are based on historiographical concepts and excessively moral-</p><p>izing attitudes, which makes them  <emphasis>overrate force as a means of </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>counteracting  evil</emphasis>.  Ponerology  can  help  equalize  such  one-</p><p>sidedness  by  means  of  modern  naturalistic  thinking,  supple-</p><p>menting  our  comprehension  of  the  causes  and  genesis  of  evil</p><p>with the  facts necessary to build a  more stable  foundation for</p><p>practical inhibition of the processes of ponerogenesis and coun-</p><p>teraction of their results.</p><p>Synergetic  activity  of  several  measures  aimed  at  the  same</p><p>valuable goal, e.g. such as treating a sick person, usually pro-</p><p>duces better effects than the mere sum of the factors involved.</p><p>In building a second wing for the activities of moralistic efforts</p><p>to  date,  ponerology  will  make  it  possible  to  achieve  results</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>179</p><p>which  are  also  better  than  the  sum  of  their  useful  effects.  By</p><p>reinforcing trust in familiar moral values, it will make it possi-</p><p>ble  to  answer  many  heretofore  unanswerable  questions  and</p><p>utilize  means  not  used  thus  far,  especially  on  a  larger  social</p><p>scale.</p><p><emphasis>Societies have a right to defend themselves against any evil </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>harassing or threatening them. </emphasis> National governments are obli-</p><p>gated to use effective means for this purpose, and to use them</p><p>as  skillfully  as  possible.88  In  order  to  discharge  this  essential</p><p>function, nations obviously utilize the information available at</p><p>the  time  in  that  given  civilization  relating  to  the  nature  and</p><p>genesis  of  evil,  as  well  as  whatever  means  they  can  muster.</p><p>Society�s  survival  must  be  protected,  but  abuse  of  power  and</p><p>sadistic degenerations come about all too easily.</p><p>We now have rational and moral doubts about prior genera-</p><p>tions� comprehension and counteraction of evil. Simple obser-</p><p>vation of history justifies this. The general developing opinion</p><p>in  free  societies  requires  that  evil  repressing  measures  be  hu-</p><p>manized and limited so as to set boundaries to possible abuse.</p><p>This seems to be due to the fact that morally sensitive individu-</p><p>als want to protect their personalities and those of their children</p><p>from the destructive influence conveyed by the awareness that</p><p>severe punishment, especially capital punishment, is still being</p><p>meted out.</p><p>And so it is that the methods of counteracting evil are being</p><p>mitigated in their severity, but at the same time effective meth-</p><p>ods  to  protect  the  citizenry  against  the  birth  of  evil  and  force</p><p>are  not  indicated.  This  creates  an  ever-widening  gap  between</p><p>the need for counteraction and the means at our disposal; as a</p><p>result,  many  kinds  of  evil  can  develop  at  every  social  scale.</p><p>Under such circumstances, it may be understandable that some</p><p>voices  clamor  for  a  return  to  the  old-fashioned,  iron-fisted</p><p>methods so inimical to the development of human thought.</p><p>Ponerology studies the nature of evil and the complex proc-</p><p>esses of its genesis, thereby opening new ways for counteract-</p><p>ing it. It points out that evil has certain weaknesses in its struc-</p><p>ture and genesis which can be exploited to inhibit its develop-</p><empty-line/><p>88 Unless, of course, the government itself is the evil that threatens and har-</p><p>asses the people. [Editor�s note.]</p><p>180</p><p>PONEROLOGY</p><p>ment  as  well  as  to  quickly  eliminate  the  fruits  of  such  devel-</p><p>opment.  If  the  ponerogenic  activity  of  pathological  factors  -</p><p>deviant  individuals  and  their  activities  -  is  subjected  to  con-</p><p>scious  controls  of  a  scientific,  individual,  and  societal  nature,</p><p>we can counteract evil as effectively as by means of persistent</p><p>calls  to  respect  moral  values.  The  ancient  method  and  this</p><p>completely new one can thus combine to produce results more</p><p>favorable  than  an  arithmetic  sum  of  the  two.  Ponerology  also</p><p>leads to the possibilities of  <emphasis>prophylactic behavior</emphasis> at the levels</p><p>of  individual,  societal,  and  macrosocial  evil.  This  new  ap-</p><p>proach ought to enable societies to feel safe again, both at the</p><p>internal level and on the scale of international threats.</p><p>Methods  of  counteracting  evil  which  are  conditioned  upon</p><p>causation, supported by ever-increasing scientific progress, will</p><p>of course be much more complex, just as the nature and genesis</p><p>of evil are complex. Any allegedly fair relationship between a</p><p>person�s  crime  and  the  punishment  meted  out  is  a  survival  of</p><p>archaic thinking, something ever more difficult to comprehend.</p><p>That is why our times demand that we further develop the dis-</p><p>cipline  initiated  herein  and  undertake  detailed  research,  espe-</p><p>cially as regards the nature of many pathological factors which</p><p>take  part  in  ponerogenesis.  An  appropriately  ponerological</p><p>reading  of  history  is  an  essential  condition  for  understanding</p><p>macrosocial  ponerogenic  phenomena  whose  duration  exceeds</p><p>the  observation  possibilities  of  a  single  person.  The  author</p><p>utilized this method in the following chapter, reconstructing the</p><p>phase wherein characteropathic factors dominated in the initial</p><p>period of the creation of pathocracy.</p><p>In teaching us about the causes and genesis of evil, ponerol-</p><p>ogy  barely  addresses  human  guilt.  Thus,  it  does  not  solve  the</p><p>perennial  problem  of  human  responsibility,  although  it  does</p><p>shed  additional  light  from  the  side  of  causation.  We  become</p><p>aware  of  just  how  little  we  understand  in  this  area,  and  how</p><p>much remains to be researched, while attempting to correct our</p><p>comprehension  of  the  complex  causation  of  phenomena  and</p><p>acknowledging greater individual dependence upon the opera-</p><p>tion of outside factors. At that point, any moral judgment about</p><p>another person or his blame-worthiness may strike us as based</p><p>mostly upon emotional responses and centuries-old tradition.</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>181</p><p>We have the right and duty to critically judge our own be-</p><p>havior  and  the  moral  value  of  our  motivations.  This  is  condi-</p><p>tioned by our conscience, a phenomenon as ubiquitous as it is</p><p>incomprehensible  within  the  boundaries  of  naturalistic  think-</p><p>ing. Even if armed with all the present and future accomplish-</p><p>ments of ponerology, will we ever be in a position to abstract</p><p>and evaluate the individual blame of another person? In terms</p><p>of theory, this appears ever more doubtful; in terms of practice,</p><p>ever more unnecessary.</p><p>If  we  consistently  abstain  from  moral  judgments  of  other</p><p>people, we transfer our attention to tracking the causative proc-</p><p>esses that are responsible for conditioning the behavior of an-</p><p>other person or society. This improves our prospects for proper</p><p>mental  hygiene  and  our  capacity  to  apprehend  psychological</p><p>reality.  Such  restraint  also  enables  us to  avoid  an  error  which</p><p>poisons  minds  and  souls  all  too  effectively,  namely  superim-</p><p>posing  a  moralizing  interpretation  upon  the  activity  of   <emphasis>patho-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>logical</emphasis>  factors.  We  also  avoid  emotional  entanglements  and</p><p>better control our own egotism and egocentrism, thus facilitat-</p><p>ing objective analysis of phenomena.</p><p>If  such  an  attitude  strikes  some  readers  as  being  close  to</p><p>moral  indifference,  we  should  reiterate  that  the  here-adduced</p><p>method  of  analyzing  evil  and  its  genesis  gives  rise  to  a  new</p><p>type of reasoned distance from its temptations, as well as acti-</p><p>vating  additional  theoretical  and  practical  possibilities  for</p><p>counter-acting it. Also, we should give thought to the astonish-</p><p>ing and obvious convergence between the conclusions we can</p><p>derive  from  this  analysis  of  the  phenomena  and  certain  ideas</p><p>from  ancient  philosophies,  well  stated  in  the  Christian  Bible:</p><p>�Judge not, that ye be not judged. For with what judgment ye</p><p>judge,  ye  shall  be  judged;  and  with  what  measure  ye  mete,  it</p><p>shall be measured to you again.� (Mat. 7:1-2)</p><p>These  values,  unfortunately  often  overshadowed  by  a  gov-</p><p>ernment�s  immediate  needs,  as  well  as  the  activity  of  our  in-</p><p>stinctive  and  emotional  reflexes  goading  us  to  revenge  and</p><p>punishment of others, find at least partial rational justification</p><p>in this new science. Practicing such rigorous understanding and</p><p>behavior can only confirm these values in a more evident and</p><p>scientific manner.</p><p>182</p><p>PONEROLOGY</p><p>This new discipline can be applicable to many walks of life.</p><p>The author has utilized these accomplishments and tested their</p><p>practical value in the course of individual psychotherapy upon</p><p>his patients. As a result, their personality and future were rear-</p><p>ranged  in  a  manner  more  favorable  than  if  it  were  based  on</p><p>earlier  skills.  Bearing  in  mind  the  exceptional  nature  of  our</p><p>times,  when  multi-faceted  mobilization  of  moral  and  mental</p><p>values  must  be  effected  to  counteract  the  evil  threatening  the</p><p>world,  in  the  coming  chapters,  the  author  shall  suggest  the</p><p>adoption of just such an attitude, whose end result ought be an</p><p>act  of  forgiveness  heretofore  unheard  of  in  history.  Keep  in</p><p>mind also that understanding and forgiveness does not exclude</p><p>correction of conditions and taking prophylactic measures.</p><p>Disentangling the Gordian Knot of present times, composed</p><p>of  the  macrosocial  pathological  phenomenon  threatening  our</p><p>future,  may  appear  impossible  without  the  development  and</p><p>utilization  of  this  new  discipline.  This  knot  can  no  longer  be</p><p>cut with a sword. A psychologist cannot afford to be as impa-</p><p>tient  as  Alexander  the  Great.  That  is  why  we  have  here  de-</p><p>scribed it within the indispensable scope, adaptation, and selec-</p><p>tion of data, so as to enable clarification of the problems to be</p><p>discussed  later  in  the  book.  Perhaps  the  future  will  make  it</p><p>possible to elaborate a general theoretical work.</p><p>CHAPTER I</p><p><strong>INTRODUCTION </strong></p><p>May  the  reader  please  imagine  a  very  large  hall  in  an  old</p><p>Gothic university building. Many of us gathered there early in</p><p>our studies in order to listen to the lectures of outstanding phi-</p><p>losophers  and  scientists.  We  were  herded  back  there  �  under</p><p>threat - the year before graduation in order to listen to the in-</p><p>doctrination lectures which recently had been introduced.</p><p>Someone nobody knew appeared behind the lectern and in-</p><p>formed us that he would now be the professor. His speech was</p><p>fluent,  but  there  was  nothing  scientific  about  it:  he  failed  to</p><p>distinguish  between  scientific  and  ordinary  concepts  and</p><p>treated  borderline  imaginings  as  though  it  were  wisdom  that</p><p>could  not  be  doubted.  For  ninety  minutes  each  week,  he</p><p>flooded us with naive, presumptuous paralogistics and a patho-</p><p>logical view of human reality. We were treated with contempt</p><p>and  poorly  controlled  hatred.  Since  fun-poking  could  entail</p><p>dreadful  consequences,  we  had  to  listen  attentively  and  with</p><p>the utmost gravity.</p><p>The grapevine soon discovered this person�s origins. He had</p><p>come  from  a  Cracow  suburb  and  attended  high  school,  al-</p><p>though no one knew if he had graduated. Anyway, this was the</p><p>first time he had crossed university portals, and as a professor,</p><p>at that!</p><p>�You  can�t  convince  anyone  this  way!�  we  whispered  to</p><p>each  other.  �It�s  actually  propaganda  directed  against  them-</p><p>34</p><p><strong>INTRODUCTION </strong></p><p>selves.�  But  after  such  mind-torture,  it  took  a  long  time  for</p><p>someone to break the silence.</p><p>We studied ourselves, since  we felt something strange had</p><p>taken  over  our  minds  and  something  valuable  was  leaking</p><p>away  irretrievably.  The  world  of  psychological  reality  and</p><p>moral  values  seemed  suspended  as  if  in  a  chilly  fog.  Our  hu-</p><p>man  feeling  and  student  solidarity  lost  their  meaning,  as  did</p><p>patriotism  and  our  old  established  criteria.  So  we  asked  each</p><p>other, �are you going through this too�? Each of us experienced</p><p>this  worry  about  his  own  personality  and  future  in  his  own</p><p>way.  Some  of  us  answered  the  questions  with  silence.  The</p><p>depth  of  these  experiences  turned  out  to  be  different  for  each</p><p>individual.</p><p>We thus wondered how to protect ourselves from the results</p><p>of  this  �indoctrination�.  Teresa  D.  made  the  first  suggestion:</p><p>Let�s  spend  a  weekend  in  the  mountains.  It  worked.  Pleasant</p><p>company,  a  bit  of  joking,  then  exhaustion  followed  by  deep</p><p>sleep in a shelter, and our human personalities returned, albeit</p><p>with  a  certain  remnant.  Time  also  proved  to  create  a  kind  of</p><p>psychological immunity, although not  with everyone.  Analyz-</p><p>ing  the  psychopathic  characteristics  of  the  �professor�s�  per-</p><p>sonality proved another excellent way of protecting one�s own</p><p>psychological hygiene.</p><p>You  can  just  imagine  our  worry,  disappointment,  and  sur-</p><p>prise  when  some  colleagues  we  knew  well  suddenly began  to</p><p>change  their  world  view;  their  thought-patterns  furthermore</p><p>reminded us of the �professor�s� chatter. Their feelings, which</p><p>had  just  recently  been  friendly,  became  noticeably  cooler,  al-</p><p>though not yet hostile. Benevolent or critical student arguments</p><p>bounced right of them. They gave the impression of possessing</p><p>some secret knowledge; we were only their former colleagues,</p><p>still believing what those �professors of old� had taught us. We</p><p>had  to  be  careful  of  what  we  said  to  them.  These  former  col-</p><p>leagues soon joined the Party.</p><p>Who  were  they,  what  social  groups  did  they  come  from,</p><p>what kind of students and people were they? How and why did</p><p>they change so much in less than a year? Why did neither I nor</p><p>a majority of my fellow students succumb to this phenomenon</p><p>and process? Many such questions fluttered through our heads</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>35</p><p>then. It was in those times, from those questions, observations</p><p>and attitudes that the idea was born that this phenomenon could</p><p>be  objectively  studied  and  understood;  an  idea  whose  greater</p><p>meaning crystallized with time.</p><p>Many  of  us  newly  graduated  psychologists  participated  in</p><p>the  initial  observations  and  reflections,  but  most  crumbled</p><p>away in the face of material or academic problems. Only a few</p><p>of that group remained; so the author of this book may be the</p><p>last of the Mohicans.</p><p>It  was  relatively  easy  to  determine  the  environments  and</p><p>origins of the people  who succumbed to this process, which I</p><p>then  called  �transpersonification�.  They  came  from  all  social</p><p>groups,  including  aristocratic  and  fervently  religious  families,</p><p>and  caused  a  break  in  our  student  solidarity  to  the  order  of</p><p>some 6 %. The remaining majority suffered varying degrees of</p><p>personality disintegration which gave rise to individual search-</p><p>ing for the values necessary to find ourselves again; the results</p><p>were varied and sometimes creative.</p><p>Even then, we had no doubts as to the pathological nature of</p><p>this  �transpersonification�  process,  which  ran  similar  but  not</p><p>identical  in  all  cases.  The  duration  of  the  results  of  this  phe-</p><p>nomenon also varied. Some of these people later became zeal-</p><p>ots.  Others  later  took  advantage  of  various  circumstances  to</p><p>withdraw and re-establish their lost links to the society of nor-</p><p>mal people. They were replaced.  <emphasis>The only constant value of the </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>new social system was the magic number of 6 %. </emphasis></p><p>We tried to evaluate the talent level of those colleagues who</p><p>had succumbed to this personality-transformation process, and</p><p>reached  the  conclusion  that,  on  average,  it  was  slightly  lower</p><p>than  the  average  of  the  student  population.  Their  lesser  resis-</p><p>tance  obviously  resided  in  other  bio-psychological  features</p><p>which were most probably qualitatively heterogeneous.</p><p>I found that I had to study subjects bordering on psychology</p><p>and  psychopathology  in  order  to  answer  the  questions  arising</p><p>from our observations; scientific neglect in these areas proved</p><p>an  obstacle  difficult  to  overcome.  At  the  same  time,  someone</p><p>guided by special knowledge apparently vacated the libraries of</p><p>anything  we  could  have  found  on  the  topic;  books  were  in-</p><p>dexed, but not physically present.</p><p>36</p><p><strong>INTRODUCTION </strong></p><p>Analyzing these occurrences now in hindsight, we could say</p><p>that the �professor� was dangling bait over our heads, based on</p><p>specific psychological knowledge. He knew in advance that he</p><p>would fish out amenable individuals, and even how to do it, but</p><p>the limited numbers disappointed him. The transpersonification</p><p>process generally took hold only when an individual�s instinc-</p><p>tive substratum was marked by pallor or certain deficits. To a</p><p>lesser  extent,  it  also  worked  among  people  who  manifested</p><p>other deficiencies in which the state provoked within them was</p><p>partially impermanent, being largely the result of psychopatho-</p><p>logical induction.</p><p>This knowledge about the existence of susceptible individu-</p><p>als  and  how  to  work  on  them  will  continue  being  a  tool  for</p><p>world conquest as long as it remains the secret of such �profes-</p><p>sors�.  When  it  becomes  skillfully  popularized  science,  it  will</p><p>help nations to develop immunity. But none of us knew this at</p><p>the time.</p><p>Nevertheless,  we  must  admit  that  in  demonstrating  the</p><p>properties of this process to us in such a way as to force us into</p><p>in-depth  experience,  the  professor  helped  us  understand  the</p><p>nature  of  the  phenomenon  in  a  larger  scope  than  many  a  true</p><p>scientific  researcher  participating  in  this  work  in  other  less</p><p>direct ways.</p><p>~~~</p><p>As  a  youth,  I  read  a  book  about  a  naturalist  wandering</p><p>through  the  Amazon-basin  wilderness.  At  some  moment  a</p><p>small animal fell from a tree onto the nape of his neck, clawing</p><p>his  skin  painfully  and  sucking  his  blood.  The  biologist  cau-</p><p>tiously removed it -- without anger, since that was its form of</p><p>feeding -- and proceeded to study it carefully. This story stub-</p><p>bornly stuck in my mind during those very difficult times when</p><p>a vampire fell onto our necks, sucking the blood of an unhappy</p><p>nation.</p><p>Maintaining the attitude of a naturalist, while attempting to</p><p>track the nature of macrosocial phenomenon in spite of all ad-</p><p>versity,  insures  a  certain  intellectual  distance  and  better  psy-</p><p>chological hygiene in the face of horrors that might otherwise</p><p>be  difficult  to  contemplate.  Such  an  attitude  also  slightly  in-</p><p>creases  the  feeling  of  safety  and  furnishes  an  insight  that  this</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>37</p><p>very  method  may  help  find  a  certain  creative  solution.  This</p><p>requires  strict  control  of  the  natural,  moralizing  reflexes  of</p><p>revulsion,  and  other  painful  emotions  that  the  phenomenon</p><p>provokes in any normal person when it deprives him of his joy</p><p>of life  and personal safety, ruining his own future and that of</p><p>his  nation.  Scientific  curiosity  therefore  becomes  a  loyal  ally</p><p>during such times.</p><p>~~~</p><empty-line/><p>Hopefully, my readers will forgive me for recounting here a</p><p>youthful reminiscence that will lead us directly into the subject.</p><p>My  uncle,  a  very  lonely  man,  would  visit  our  house  periodi-</p><p>cally.  He  had  survived  the  great  Soviet  Revolution  in  the</p><p>depths of Russia, where he had been shipped out by the Czarist</p><p>police.  For  over  a  year  he  wandered  from  Siberia  to  Poland.</p><p>Whenever  he  met  with  an  armed  group  during  his  travels,  he</p><p>quickly  tried  to  determine  which  ideology  they  represented,</p><p>white  or  red,  and  thereupon  skillfully  pretended  to  profess  it.</p><p>Had  his  ruse  been  unsuccessful,  he  would  have  had  his  head</p><p>blown  off  as  a  suspected  enemy  sympathizer.  It  was  safest  to</p><p>have a gun and belong to a gang. So he would wander and war</p><p>alongside either group, usually only until he found an opportu-</p><p>nity  to  desert  westward  toward  his  native  Poland,  a  country</p><p>which had just regained its freedom.</p><p>When  he  finally  reached  his  beloved  homeland  again,  he</p><p>managed to finish his long-interrupted law studies, to become a</p><p>decent person, and to achieve a responsible position. However,</p><p><emphasis>he  was  never  able  to  liberate  himself  from  his  nightmarish </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>memories</emphasis>. Women were frightened by his stories of the bad old</p><p>days  and  thought  it  would  make  no  sense  to  bring  a  new  life</p><p>into  an  uncertain  future.  Thus,  he  never  started  a  family.  Per-</p><p>haps  he  would  have  been  unable  to  relate  to  his  loved  ones</p><p>properly.</p><p>This  uncle  of  mine  would  recapture  his  past  by  telling  the</p><p>children in my  family stories about what he had seen, experi-</p><p>enced and taken part in; our young imaginations were unable to</p><p>come to terms with any of it. Nightmarish terror shuddered in</p><p>our bones.  We  would think of questions: why did people lose</p><p>all their humanity, what was the reason for all this? Some sort</p><p>38</p><p><strong>INTRODUCTION </strong></p><p>of  apprehensive  premonition  choked  its  way  into  our  young</p><p>minds; unfortunately, it was to come true in the future.</p><p>~~~</p><p>If a collection were to be made of all those books which de-</p><p>scribe the horrors of wars, the cruelties of revolutions, and the</p><p>bloody deeds of political leaders and their systems, many read-</p><p>ers would avoid such a library. Ancient works would be placed</p><p>alongside books by contemporary historians and reporters. The</p><p>documentary treatises on German extermination and concentra-</p><p>tion  camps,  and  of  the  extermination  of  the  Jewish  Nation,</p><p>furnish  approximate  statistical  data  and  describe  the  well-</p><p>organized  �labor�  of  the  destruction  of  human  life,  using  a</p><p>properly calm language, and providing a concrete basis for the</p><p>acknowledgement of the nature of evil.</p><p>The  autobiography  of  Rudolf  Hoess,  the  commander  of</p><p>camps in Oswiecim ( <emphasis>Auschwitz</emphasis>) and Brzezinka ( <emphasis>Birkenau</emphasis>), is a</p><p>classic  example  of  how  an  intelligent  psychopathic  individual</p><p>with a deficit of human emotion thinks and feels.</p><p>Foremost among these would be books written by witnesses</p><p>to  criminal  insanity  such  as  Arthur  Koestler�s   <emphasis>Darkness  at </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>Noon, </emphasis> from  prewar  Soviet  life;  <emphasis>Smoke  over  Birkenau  </emphasis> the  per-</p><p>sonal memories of Severina Szmaglewska5 from the Oswiecim</p><p>German concentration camp for women;  <emphasis>The Other World, </emphasis> the</p><p>Soviet memoires of Gustav Herling-Grudzinski6; and the Solz-</p><p>henitsyn volumes turgid with human suffering.</p><p>The  collection  would  include  works  on  the  philosophy  of</p><p>history discussing the social and moral aspects of the genesis of</p><p>evil,  but  they  would  also  use  the  half-mysterious  laws  of  his-</p><p>tory to partly justify the blood-stained solutions. However, an</p><empty-line/><p>5 Szmaglewska, Seweryna, 1916-92, writer; 1942-45 prisoner in Nazi con-</p><p>centration camps; wrote  <emphasis>Dymy nad Birkenau</emphasis> (Smoke over Birkenau, 1945);</p><p>witness at Nuremberg Trial; stories and novels mainly concerned with war</p><p>and occupation:  <emphasis>Zapowiada sie piekny dzien</emphasis> (Looks Like a Beautiful Day,</p><p>1960),  <emphasis>Niewinni w Norymberdze</emphasis> (The Innocent at Nuremberg, 1972); novels</p><p>for young people; anthology of memoirs 1939-45:  <emphasis>Wiezienna krata</emphasis> (Prison</p><p>Bars, 1964). [Editor�s note.]</p><p>6 Herling-Grudzinski, Gustav: Polish writer who after WWII lived in Napoli,</p><p>Italy. Married the daughter of well known Italian philosopher Benedetto</p><p>Croce. He wrote an account of his time in a Soviet gulag:  <emphasis>A World Apart</emphasis>.</p><p>[Editor�s note.]</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>39</p><p>alert reader would be able to detect a certain degree of evolu-</p><p>tion  in  the  authors�  attitudes,  from  an  ancient  affirmation  of</p><p>primitive  enslavement  and  murder  of  vanquished  peoples,  to</p><p>the  present-day  moralizing  condemnation  of  such  methods  of</p><p>behavior.</p><p>Such a library would nevertheless be missing a single work</p><p>offering  a  sufficient  explanation  of  the  causes  and  processes</p><p>whereby  such  historical  dramas  originate,  of  how  and  why</p><p>human  frailties  and  ambitions  degenerate  into  bloodthirsty</p><p>madness.  Upon  reading  the  present  volume,  the  reader  will</p><p>realize  that  writing  such  a  book  was  scientifically  impossible</p><p>until recently.</p><p>The  old  questions  would  remain  unanswered:  what  made</p><p>this happen? Does everyone carry the seeds of crime within, or</p><p>is it only some of us? No matter how faithful and psychologi-</p><p>cally true, no literary description of occurrences, such as those</p><p>narrated  by  the  above-mentioned  authors,  can  answer  these</p><p>questions, nor can they fully explain the origins of evil. They</p><p>are thus incapable of furnishing sufficiently effective principles</p><p>for  counter-acting  evil.  The  best  literary  description  of  a  dis-</p><p>ease cannot produce an understanding of its essential etiology,</p><p>and thus furnishes no principles for treatment. In the same way,</p><p>such descriptions of historical tragedies are unable to elaborate</p><p>effective measures  for counteracting the genesis,  existence, or</p><p>spread of evil.</p><p>In  using  natural7  language  to  circumscribe  psychological,</p><p>social, and moral concepts which cannot properly be described</p><p>within its sphere of utility, we produce a sort of surrogate com-</p><p>prehension leading to a nagging suspicion of helplessness. Our</p><p>natural system of concepts and imaginings is not equipped with</p><p>the  necessary  factual  content  to  permit  reasoned  comprehen-</p><p>sion of the quality of the factors (particularly the psychological</p><p>ones)  which  were  active  before  the  birth  of,  and  during,  such</p><p>inhumanly cruel times</p><p>We must nevertheless point out that the authors of such lit-</p><p>erary  descriptions  sensed  that  their  language  was  insufficient</p><p>and  therefore  attempted  to  infuse  their  words  with  the  proper</p><empty-line/><p>7 Ordinary, everyday words which have various meanings, generally benign,</p><p>and often do not embrace a specific, scientific meaning. [Editor�s note.]</p><p>40</p><p><strong>INTRODUCTION </strong></p><p>scope of precision, almost as though they foresaw that someone</p><p>� at some point in time - might use their works in order to ex-</p><p>plain  what  cannot  be  explained,  not  even  in  the  best  literary</p><p>language. Had these writers not been so precise and descriptive</p><p>in  their  language,  this  author  would  have  been  unable  to  use</p><p>their works for his own scientific purposes.</p><p>In  general,  most  people  are  horrified  by  such  literature;  in</p><p>hedonistic  societies  particularly,  people  have  the  tendency  to</p><p>escape  into  ignorance  or  naive  doctrines.  Some  people  even</p><p>feel  contempt  for  suffering  persons.  The  influence  of  such</p><p>books can thus be partially harmful; we should counteract that</p><p>influence  by  indicating  what  the  authors  had  to  leave  out  be-</p><p>cause  our  ordinary  world  of  concepts  and  imaginings  cannot</p><p>contain it.</p><p>The  reader  will  therefore  find  herein  no  bloodcurdling  de-</p><p>scriptions of criminal behavior or human suffering. It is not the</p><p>author�s job to present a graphic return of material adduced by</p><p>people  who  saw  and  suffered  more  than  he  did,  and  whose</p><p>literary  talents  are  greater.  Introducing  such  descriptions  into</p><p>this work  would run  counter to its purpose: it  would not only</p><p>focus attention on some occurrences to the exclusion of many</p><p>others, but would also distract the mind from the real heart of</p><p>the matter, namely,  <emphasis>the general laws of the origin of evil</emphasis>.</p><p>In  tracking  the  behavioral  mechanisms  of  the  genesis  of</p><p>evil,  one  must  keep  both  abhorrence  and  fear  under  control,</p><p>submit  to  a  passion  for  epistemological  science,  and  develop</p><p>the calm outlook needed in natural history. We must never lose</p><p>sight of the objective: to trace the processes of ponerogenesis;</p><p>where they can lead and what threat they can pose to us in the</p><p>future.</p><p>This book therefore aims to take the reader by the hand into</p><p>a world beyond the concepts and imaginings he has relied on to</p><p>describe his world since childhood, in an overly egotistic way,</p><p>probably because his parents, surroundings, and the community</p><p>of his country used concepts similar to his own. Thereafter, we</p><p>must show him an appropriate selection from the world of fac-</p><p>tual concepts which have given birth to recent scientific think-</p><p>ing  and  which  will  allow  him  an  understanding  of  what  has</p><p>remained irrational in his everyday system of concepts.</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>41</p><p>However, this tour of another reality will not be a psycho-</p><p>logical experiment conducted upon readers� minds for the sole</p><p>purpose of exposing the weak points and gaps in their natural</p><p>world view. Rather, it an urgent necessity due to our contempo-</p><p>rary  world�s  pressing  problems,  which  we  can  ignore  only  at</p><p>our peril.</p><p>It is important to realize that we cannot possibly distinguish</p><p>the path to nuclear catastrophe from the path to creative dedica-</p><p>tion   <emphasis>unless</emphasis>  we  step  beyond  this  world  of  natural  egotism  and</p><p>well known concepts. Then we can come to the understanding</p><p>that  the  path  was  chosen  for  us  by  powerful  forces,  against</p><p>which our nostalgia for homey, familiar human concepts can be</p><p>no  match.  We  must  step  beyond  this  world  of  everyday,  illu-</p><p>sory thinking for our own good and for the good of our loved</p><p>ones.</p><p>The social sciences have already elaborated their own con-</p><p>ventional language which mediates between the ordinary man�s</p><p>view and a fully objective naturalistic view. It is useful to sci-</p><p>entists in terms of communication and cooperation, but it is still</p><p>not  the  kind  of  conceptual  structure  which  can  fully  take  into</p><p>account  the  biological,  psychological,  and  pathological  prem-</p><p>ises at issue in the second and fourth chapters of this book. In</p><p>the  social  sciences,  the  conventional  terminology   <emphasis>eliminates </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>critical  standards</emphasis>  and  puts  ethics  on  ice;  in  the  political  sci-</p><p>ences,  it  leads  to  an  underrated  evaluation  of  factors  which</p><p>describe  the  essence  of  political  situations  when  evil  is  at  the</p><p>core.</p><p>This social science language left the author and other inves-</p><p>tigators feeling helpless and scientifically stranded early in our</p><p>research  on  the  mysterious  nature  of  this  inhuman  historical</p><p>phenomenon  which  engulfed  our  nation,  and  still  fires  his  at-</p><p>tempts to reach an objective understanding of it. Ultimately, I</p><p>had no choice but to resort to objective biological, psychologi-</p><p>cal, and psychopathological terminology in order to bring into</p><p>focus the true nature of the phenomenon, the heart of matter.</p><p>The nature of the phenomena under investigation as well as</p><p>the needs of readers, particularly those unfamiliar with psycho-</p><p>pathology,  dictate  the  descriptive  manner  which  must  first  in-</p><p>troduce the data and concepts necessary for further comprehen-</p><p>42</p><p><strong>INTRODUCTION </strong></p><p>sion  of  psychologically  and  morally  pathological occurrences.</p><p>We  shall  thus  begin  with  human  personality  questions,  inten-</p><p>tionally  formulated  in  such  a  way  as  to  coincide  largely  with</p><p>the  experience  of  a  practicing  psychologist,  passing  then  to</p><p>selected questions of societal psychology. In the �ponerology�</p><p>chapter,  we  shall  familiarize  ourselves  with  how  evil  is  born</p><p>with regard to each social scale, emphasizing the actual role of</p><p>some psychopathological phenomena in the process of ponero-</p><p>genesis. This will facilitate the transition from natural language</p><p>to the necessary objective language of naturalistic, psychologi-</p><p>cal,  and  statistical  science  to  the  extent  that  is  necessary  and</p><p>sufficient. Hopefully, it will not be irksome for readers to dis-</p><p>cuss these matters in clinical terms.</p><p>In  the  author�s  opinion,  Ponerology  reveals  itself  to  be  a</p><p>new branch of science born out of historical need and the most</p><p>recent  accomplishments  of  medicine  and  psychology.  In  the</p><p>light  of  objective  naturalistic  language,  it  studies  the  causal</p><p>components and processes of the genesis of evil, regardless of</p><p>the latter�s social scope. We may attempt to analyze these pon-</p><p>erogenic  processes  which  have  given  rise  to  human  injustice,</p><p>armed  with proper knowledge, particularly in the area of psy-</p><p>chopathology. Again and again, as the reader will discover, in</p><p>such a study,  we meet  with the  effects of pathological factors</p><p>whose  carriers  are  people  characterized  by  some  degree  of</p><p>various psychological deviations or defects.</p><p>Moral  evil  and  psychobiological  evil  are,  in  effect,  inter-</p><p>linked via so many causal relationships and mutual influences</p><p>that they can only be separated by means of abstraction. How-</p><p>ever, the ability to distinguish them  <emphasis>qualitatively</emphasis> can help us to</p><p>avoid a moralizing interpretation of the pathological factors, an</p><p>error to which we are all prone, and which poisons the human</p><p>mind  in  an  insidious  way,  whenever  social  and  moral  affairs</p><p>are at issue.</p><p>The ponerogenesis of  <emphasis>macrosocial phenomena �</emphasis> large scale</p><p>evil <emphasis> - </emphasis> which constitutes the most important object of this book,</p><p>appears  to  be  subject  to  the  same  laws  of  nature  that  operate</p><p>within human questions on an individual or small-group level.</p><p>The  role  of  persons  with  various  psychological  defects  and</p><p>anomalies  of  a  clinically  low  level  appears  to  be  a  perennial</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>43</p><p>characteristic  of  such  phenomena.  In  the  macrosocial  phe-</p><p>nomenon  we shall later call �pathocracy�, a  certain hereditary</p><p>anomaly isolated as �essential psychopathy� is catalytically and</p><p>causatively essential for the genesis and survival of large scale</p><p>social evil.</p><p>Our natural human  world view actually creates a barrier to</p><p>our understanding of such questions, thus, it is necessary to be</p><p>familiar  with  psychopathological  phenomena,  such  as  those</p><p>encountered  in  this  field,  in  order  to  breach  that  barrier.  May</p><p>then  the  readers  please  forgive  the  author�s  occasional  lapses</p><p>along this innovative path and fearlessly follow his lead, famil-</p><p>iarizing themselves rather systematically with the data adduced</p><p>in  the  first  few  chapters.  Thus,  we  shall  be  able  to  accept  the</p><p>truth of the nature of evil without reflex protests on the part of</p><p>our natural egotism.</p><p>Specialists familiar with psychopathology will find the road</p><p>less novel. They  will, however, notice some differences in in-</p><p>terpreting  several  well  known  phenomena,  resulting  in  part</p><p>from  the  anomalous  situations  under  which  the  research  was</p><p>done, but mostly from the  <emphasis>more intensive penetration</emphasis> needed to</p><p>achieve  the  primary  purpose.  That  is  why  this  aspect  of  our</p><p>work  contains  certain  theoretical  values  useful  for  psychopa-</p><p>thology.  Hopefully,  non-specialists  will  depend  upon  the</p><p>author�s  long  experience  in  distinguishing  individual  psycho-</p><p>logical  anomalies  found  among  people  and  factored  into  the</p><p>process of the genesis of evil.</p><p>It  should  be  pointed  out  that  considerable  moral,  intellec-</p><p>tual,  and  practical  advantages  can  be  gleaned  from  an  under-</p><p>standing of the ponerogenic processes thanks to the naturalistic</p><p>objectivity  required.  The  long-term  heritage  of  ethical  ques-</p><p>tions  is  thereby  not  destroyed;  quite  the  contrary,  it  is   <emphasis>rein-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>forced</emphasis>, since modern scientific methods confirm the basic val-</p><p>ues of moral teachings. However, ponerology forces some cor-</p><p>rections upon many details.</p><p>Understanding  the  nature  of  macrosocial  pathological  phe-</p><p>nomena  permits  us  to  find  a  healthy  attitude  and  perspective</p><p>toward  them,  thus  assisting  us  in  protecting  our  minds  from</p><p>being poisoned by their diseased contents and the influence of</p><p>their  propaganda.  The  unceasing  counter-propaganda  resorted</p><p>44</p><p><strong>INTRODUCTION </strong></p><p>to by some countries with a normal human system could easily</p><p>be  superseded  by  straightforward  information  of  a  scientific</p><p>and popular scientific nature on the subject. The bottom line is</p><p>that we can only conquer this huge, contagious social cancer if</p><p>we  comprehend  its  essence  and  its  etiological  causes.  This</p><p>would eliminate the mystery of this phenomenon as its primary</p><p>survival asset.  <emphasis>Ignota nulla curatio morbi!8</emphasis></p><p>Such an understanding of the nature of the phenomena that</p><p>this  study  brings  forward  leads  to  the  logical  conclusion  that</p><p>the measures for healing and reordering the world today should</p><p>be completely different from the ones heretofore used for solv-</p><p>ing  international  conflicts.  Solutions  to  such  conflicts  should</p><p>function more like modern antibiotics, or, even better, psycho-</p><p>therapy  properly  handled,  rather  than  taking  the  approach  of</p><p>old-style weapons such as clubs, swords, tanks or nuclear mis-</p><p>siles. Healing social problems should be the objective, not de-</p><p>stroying society. An analogy can be drawn between the archaic</p><p>method of bleeding a patient as opposed to the modern method</p><p>of strengthening and restoring the ill one in order to effect the</p><p>cure.</p><p>With reference to phenomena of a ponerogenic nature, mere</p><p>proper  knowledge  alone  can  begin  healing  individual  humans</p><p>and  helping  their  minds  regain  harmony.  Toward  the  end  of</p><p>this book, we shall be discussing how to use this knowledge in</p><p>order to arrive at the correct political decisions and apply it to</p><p>an overall therapy of the world.</p><empty-line/><p>8  <emphasis>Do not attempt to cure what you do not understand</emphasis>.</p><p><strong>CHAPTER II </strong></p><p><strong>SOME INDISPENSABLE CONCEPTS </strong></p><p>Three  principal  heterogeneous  items  coincided  in  order  to</p><p>form  our  European  civilization:  Greek  philosophy,  Roman</p><p>imperial  and  legal  civilization,  and  Christianity,  consolidated</p><p>by  time  and  effort  of  later  generations.  The  culture  of  cogni-</p><p>tive/spiritual heritage thus born was internally fuzzy wherever</p><p>the language of concepts, being overly attached to  matter and</p><p>law, turned out to be too stiff to comprehend aspects of psycho-</p><p>logical and spiritual life.</p><p>Such a state of affairs had negative repercussions upon our</p><p>ability  to  comprehend  reality,  especially  that  reality  which</p><p>concerns humanity and society. Europeans became unwilling to</p><p>study reality (subordinating intellect to facts), but rather tended</p><p>to  impose  upon  nature  their  subjective  ideational  schemes,</p><p>which  are  extrinsic  and  not  completely  coherent.  Not  until</p><p>modern  times,  thanks  to  great  developments  in  the  hard  sci-</p><p>ences,  which  study  facts  by  their  very  nature,  as  well  as  the</p><p>apperception  of  the  philosophical  heritage  of  other  cultures,</p><p>could we help clarify our world of concepts and permit its own</p><p>homogenization.</p><p>It is surprising to observe what an autonomous tribe the cul-</p><p>ture  of  the  ancient  Greeks  represented.  Even  in  those  days,  a</p><p>civilization  could  hardly  develop  in  isolation,  without  being</p><p>affected  by  older  cultures  in  particular.  However,  even  with</p><p>that consideration, it seems that Greece was relatively isolated,</p><p>culturally speaking. This was probably due to the era of decay</p><p>46</p><p>SOME INDESPENSIBLE CONCEPTS</p><p>the archaeologist refer to as the �dark age�, which occurred in</p><p>those  Mediterranean  areas  between  1200  and  800  B.C.,  and</p><p>also to the Achaean tribes� belligerence.</p><p>Among the Greeks, a rich mythological imagination, devel-</p><p>oped  in  direct  contact  with  nature  and  the  experiences  of  life</p><p>and war, furnished an image of this link with the nature of the</p><p>country and peoples. These conditions saw the birth of a liter-</p><p>ary  tradition,  and  later  of  philosophical  reflections  searching</p><p>for  generalities,  essential  contents,  and  criteria  of  values.  The</p><p>Greek heritage is fascinating due to its richness and individual-</p><p>ity,  but  above  all  due  to  its  primeval  nature.  Our  civilization,</p><p>however,  would  have  been  better  served  if  the  Greeks  had</p><p>made  more  ample  use  of  the  achievements  of  other  civiliza-</p><p>tions.</p><p>Rome was too vital and practical to reflect profoundly upon</p><p>the Greek thoughts it had appropriated. In this imperial civili-</p><p>zation,  administrative  needs  and  juridical  developments  im-</p><p>posed practical priorities. For the Romans, the role of philoso-</p><p>phy was more didactic, useful for helping to develop the think-</p><p>ing process which  would later be utilized for the discharge of</p><p>administrative  functions  and  the  exercise  of  political  options.</p><p>The Greek reflective influence softened Roman customs, which</p><p>had a salutary effect on the development of the empire.</p><p>However,  in   <emphasis>any</emphasis>  imperial  civilization,  the  complex  prob-</p><p>lems of human nature are troublesome factors complicating the</p><p>legal regulations of public affairs and administrative functions.</p><p>This begets a tendency to dismiss such matters and develop a</p><p>concept  of  human  personality  simplified  enough  to  serve  the</p><p>purposes of law. Roman citizens could achieve their goals and</p><p>develop  their  personal  attitudes  within  the  framework  set  by</p><p>fate  and  legal  principles,  which  characterized  an  individual�s</p><p>situation based on premises having little to do with actual psy-</p><p>chological  properties.  The  spiritual  life  of  people  lacking  the</p><p>rights  of  citizenship  was  not  an  appropriate  subject  of  deeper</p><p>studies. Thus, cognitive psychology remained barren,  a condi-</p><p>tion  which  always  produces  moral  recession  at  both  the  indi-</p><p>vidual and public levels.</p><p>Christianity had stronger ties with the ancient cultures of the</p><p>Asiatic  continent,  including  their  philosophical  and  psycho-</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>47</p><p>logical reflections. This was of course a dynamic factor render-</p><p>ing  it  more  attractive,  but  it  was  not  the  most  important  one.</p><p>Observing  and  understanding  the  apparent  transformations</p><p>faith  caused  in  human  personalities  created  a  psychological</p><p>school of thought and art on the part of the early believers. This</p><p>new relationship to another person, i.e. one�s neighbor, charac-</p><p>terized  by  understanding,  forgiveness,  and  love,  opened  the</p><p>door  to  a  psychological  cognition  which,  often  supported  by</p><p>charismatic  phenomena,  bore  abundant  fruit  during  the  first</p><p>three centuries after Christ.</p><p>An observer at the time might have expected Christianity to</p><p>help develop the art of human understanding to a higher level</p><p>than  the  older  cultures  and  religions,  and  to  hope  that  such</p><p>knowledge  would  protect  future  generations  from  the  dangers</p><p>of  speculative  thought  divorced  from  that  profound  psycho-</p><p>logical  reality  which  can  only  be  comprehended  through  sin-</p><p>cere respect for another human being.</p><p>History,  however,  has  not  confirmed  such  an  expectation.</p><p>The symptoms of decay in sensitivity and psychological com-</p><p>prehension, as well as the Roman Imperial tendency to impose</p><p>extrinsic patterns upon human beings, can be observed as early</p><p>as  350  A.D.  During  later  eras,  Christianity  passed  through  all</p><p>those  difficulties  which  result  from  insufficient  psychological</p><p>cognition  of  reality.  Exhaustive  studies  on  the  historical  rea-</p><p>sons  for  suppressing  the  development  of  human  cognition  in</p><p>our civilization would be an extremely useful endeavor.</p><p>First of all, Christianity adapted the Greek heritage of phi-</p><p>losophical  thought  and language  to  its  purposes.  This  made  it</p><p>possible  to  develop  its  own  philosophy,  but  the  primeval  and</p><p>materialistic  traits  of  that  language  imposed  certain  limits</p><p>which  hampered  communication  between  Christianity  and</p><p>other religious cultures for many centuries.</p><p>Christ�s  message  expanded  along  the  seacoast  and  beaten</p><p>paths  of  the  Roman  empire�s  transportation  lines,  within  the</p><p>imperial civilization, but only through bloody persecutions and</p><p>ultimate  compromises  with  Rome�s  power  and  law.  Rome  fi-</p><p>nally  dealt  with  the  threat  by  appropriating  Christianity  to  its</p><p>own  purposes  and,  as  a  result,  the  Christian  Church  appropri-</p><p>ated Roman organizational forms and adapted to existing social</p><p>48</p><p>SOME INDESPENSIBLE CONCEPTS</p><p>institutions. As a result of this unavoidable process of adapta-</p><p>tion,  Christianity  inherited  Roman  habits  of  legal  thinking,</p><p>including its indifference to human nature and its variety.</p><p>Two  heterogeneous  systems  were  thus  linked  together  so</p><p>permanently  that  later  centuries  forgot  just  how  strange  they</p><p>actually  were  to  each  other.  However,  time  and  compromise</p><p>did not eliminate the internal inconsistencies, and Roman influ-</p><p>ence  divested  Christianity  of  some  of  its  profound  primeval</p><p>psychological  knowledge.  Christian  tribes  developing  under</p><p>different  cultural  conditions  created  forms  so  variegated  that</p><p>maintaining unity turned out to be an historical impossibility.</p><p>A �Western civilization� thus arose hampered by a serious</p><p>deficiency in an area  which both can and does play a creative</p><p>role,  and  which  is  supposed  to  protect  societies  from  various</p><p>kinds  of  evil.  This  civilization  developed  formulations  in  the</p><p>area  of  law,  whether  national,  civil,  or  finally  canon,  which</p><p>were conceived for  <emphasis>invented and simplified beings</emphasis>. These for-</p><p>mulations  gave  short  shrift  to  the  total  contents  of  the  human</p><p>personality  and  the  great  psychological  differences  between</p><p>individual  members  of  the  species   <emphasis>Homo  sapiens. </emphasis>  For  many</p><p>centuries any understanding of certain psychological anomalies</p><p>found  among  some  individuals  was  out  of  the  question,  even</p><p>though these anomalies repeatedly caused disasters.</p><p>This  civilization  was   <emphasis>insufficiently  resistant  to  evil</emphasis>,  which</p><p>originates  beyond  the  easily  accessible  areas  of  human  con-</p><p>sciousness  and  takes  advantage  of  the  enormous  gap  between</p><p>formal or legal thought and psychological reality. In a civiliza-</p><p>tion deficient in psychological cognition, hyperactive individu-</p><p>als driven by their internal doubts caused by a feelings of being</p><p>different  easily  find  a  ready  echo  in  other  people�s  insuffi-</p><p>ciently  developed  consciousness.  Such  individuals  dream  of</p><p>imposing  their  power  and  their  different  experiential  manner</p><p>upon  their  environment  and  their  society.Unfortunately,  in  a</p><p>psychologically  ignorant  society,  their  dreams  have  a  good</p><p>chance of becoming reality for them  and a nightmare for oth-</p><p>ers.</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>49</p><p>Psychology</p><p>In the 1870s, a tempestuous event occurred: a search for the</p><p>hidden  truth  about  human  nature  was  initiated  as  a  secular</p><p>movement  based  on  biological  and  medical  progress,  thus  its</p><p>cognition originated in the material sphere. From the very out-</p><p>set,  many  researchers  had  a  vision  of  the  great  future  role  of</p><p>this science for the good of peace and order. However, since it</p><p>relegated  prior  knowledge  to  the  spiritual  sphere,  any  such</p><p>approach  to  the  human  personality  was  necessarily  one-sided.</p><p>People  like  Ivan  Pavlov,  C.G.  Jung,  and  others  soon  noticed</p><p>this one-sidedness and attempted to reach a synthesis. Pavlov,</p><p>however, was not allowed to state his convictions in public.</p><p>Psychology is the only science wherein the observer and the</p><p>observed belong to the same species, even to the same person</p><p>in an act of introspection. It is thus easy for subjective error to</p><p>steal into the reasoning process of the thinking person�s com-</p><p>monly used imaginings and individual habits. Error then often</p><p>bites  its  own  tail  in  a  vicious  circle,  thus  giving  rise  to  prob-</p><p>lems  due  to  the  lack  of  distance  between  observer  and  ob-</p><p>served, a difficulty unknown in other disciplines.</p><p>Some  people,  such  as  the  behaviorists,  attempted  to  avoid</p><p>the above error at  all costs. In the process, they impoverished</p><p>the  cognitive  contents  to  such  an  extent  that  there  was  very</p><p>little  matter  left.  However,  they  produced  a  very  profitable</p><p>discipline  of  thought.  Progress  was  very  often  elaborated  by</p><p>persons simultaneously driven by internal anxieties and search-</p><p>ing  for  a  method  of  ordering  their  own  personalities  via  the</p><p>road of knowledge and self-knowledge. If these anxieties were</p><p>caused by a defective upbringing, then overcoming these diffi-</p><p>culties gave rise to excellent discoveries. However, if the cause</p><p>for such anxieties  rested   <emphasis>within human nature</emphasis>, it resulted in a</p><p>permanent  tendency  to  deform  the  understanding  of  psycho-</p><p>logical  phenomena.  Within  this  science,  progress  is  unfortu-</p><p>nately very contingent upon the individual values and nature of</p><p>its  practitioners.  It  is  also  dependent  upon  the  social  climate.</p><p>Wherever a society has become enslaved to others or to the rule</p><p>of  an  overly-privileged  native  class,  psychology  is  the  first</p><p>discipline to suffer from censorship and incursions on the part</p><p>50</p><p>SOME INDESPENSIBLE CONCEPTS</p><p>of  an  administrative  body  which  starts  claiming  the  last  word</p><p>as to what represents scientific truth.</p><p>Thanks to the work of outstanding pathfinders, however, the</p><p>scientific discipline exists and continues to develop in spite of</p><p>all  these  difficulties;  it  is  useful  for  the  life  of  society.  Many</p><p>researchers  fill  in  the  gaps  of  this  science  with  detailed  data</p><p>which function as a corrective to the subjectivity and vagueness</p><p>of famous pioneers. The childhood ailments of any new disci-</p><p>pline persist, including a lack of general order and synthesis, as</p><p>does the tendency to splinter into individual schools, expound-</p><p>ing upon certain theoretical and practical achievements, at the</p><p>cost of limiting themselves in other areas.</p><p>At the same time, however, findings of a practical nature are</p><p>gleaned for the good of people who need help.  The direct ob-</p><p>servations furnished by everyday work of therapists in the field</p><p>are more instrumental in forming scientific comprehension and</p><p>developing the language of contemporary psychology than any</p><p>academic experiments or deliberations undertaken in a labora-</p><p>tory.  After  all,  life  itself  provides  variegated  conditions,</p><p>whether comfortable or tragic,  which subject human individu-</p><p>als  to  experiments  no  scientist  in  any  laboratory  would  ever</p><p>undertake.  This  very  volume  exists  because  of  studies,  in  the</p><p>field, of inhuman experimentation upon entire nations.</p><p>Experience teaches a psychologist�s mind how to track an-</p><p>other  person�s  life  quickly  and  effectively,  discovering  the</p><p>causes that conditioned the development of his personality and</p><p>behavior.  Our  minds  can  thus  also  reconstruct  those  factors</p><p>which influenced him, although  <emphasis>he himself may be unaware of </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>them. </emphasis> In doing this, we do not, as a rule, use the natural struc-</p><p>ture  of  concepts,  often  referred  to  as  �common  sense�  relied</p><p>upon by public opinion and many individuals. Rather, we use</p><p>categories  which  are  as  objective  as  we  can  possibly achieve.</p><p>Psychologists utilize conceptual language  with descriptions of</p><p>phenomena  that  are  independent  of  any  common  imaginings,</p><p>and  this is  an indispensable tool  of  practical  activity. In  prac-</p><p>tice, however, it usually turns into clinical slang rather than the</p><p>distinguished scientific language it would behoove us to foster.</p><p>An analogy can be drawn between this conceptual language of</p><p>psychology  and  mathematical  symbols.  Very  often,  a  single</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>51</p><p>Greek letter stands for many pages of mathematical operations</p><p>which is instantly recognized by the mathematician.</p><p>Objective language</p><p>In the categories of psychological objectivity, cognition and</p><p>thought are based on the same logical and methodological prin-</p><p>ciples shown to be the best tool in many other areas of natural-</p><p>istic studies. Exceptions to these rules have become a tradition</p><p>for ourselves and for creatures similar to us, but they turn out to</p><p>engender  more  error  than  usefulness.  At  the  same  time,  how-</p><p>ever, consistent adherence to these principles, and rejection of</p><p>additional  scientific  limitations,  lead  us toward  the  wide  hori-</p><p>zon from  which it is possible to glimpse  <emphasis>supernatural causal-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>ity</emphasis>.  Accepting  the  existence  of  such  phenomena  within  the</p><p>human personality becomes a necessity if our language of psy-</p><p>chological concepts is to remain an objective structure.</p><p>In  affirming  his  own  personality,  man  has  the  tendency  to</p><p>repress  from  the  field  of  his  consciousness  any  associations</p><p>indicating an external causative conditioning of his world view</p><p>and behavior. Young people in particular want to believe they</p><p>freely  chose  their  intentions  and  decisions;  at  the  same  time,</p><p>however,  an  experienced  psychological  analyst  can  track  the</p><p>causative conditions of these  choices  without much difficulty.</p><p>Much of this conditioning is hidden within our childhood; the</p><p>memories may be receding into the distance, but we  carry the</p><p>results of our early experiences around with us throughout our</p><p>lives.</p><p>The better our understanding of the causality of the human</p><p>personality, the stronger the impression that humanity is a part</p><p>of nature and society, subject to dependencies we are ever bet-</p><p>ter able to understand. Overcome by human nostalgia, we then</p><p>wonder if there is really no room for a scope of freedom, for a</p><p>Purusha9?  The  more  progress  we  make  in  our  art  of  under-</p><empty-line/><p>9 Sanskrit. A word literally meaning �man�; but bearing the mystical signifi-</p><p>cance of the �Ideal Man�, the Higher Self within. The term  <emphasis>Purusha</emphasis> is often</p><p>used in the Esoteric philosophy to express the Spirit or the everlasting entita-</p><p>tive individual of a Universe, a Solar System, or of a man.  <emphasis>Purusha</emphasis> comes</p><p>from the verb-root  <emphasis>pri</emphasis> � to fill, to make complete, to bestow. One of the two</p><p>52</p><p>SOME INDESPENSIBLE CONCEPTS</p><p>standing human causation, the better we are able to liberate the</p><p>person  who  trusts  us  from  the  toxic  effects  of  conditioning,</p><p>which  has  unnecessarily  constricted  his  freedom  of  proper</p><p>comprehension and decision making. We are thus in a position</p><p>to close ranks with our patient in a search for the best way out</p><p>of his problems. If we succumb to the temptation of using the</p><p>natural structure of psychological concepts for this purpose, our</p><p>advice to him would sound similar to the many non-productive</p><p>pronouncements  he  has  already  heard  and  that  never  quite</p><p>manage to really help him to become free of his problem.</p><p>The  everyday,  ordinary,  psychological,  societal,  and  moral</p><p>world view is a product of man�s developmental process within</p><p>a society, under the constant influence of innate traits. Among</p><p>these  innate  traits  are  mankind�s  phylogenetically  determined</p><p>instinctive  foundation,  and  the  upbringing  furnished  by  the</p><p>family  and  the  environment.  No  person  can  develop  without</p><p>being influenced by other people and their personalities, or by</p><p>the values imbued by his civilization and his moral  and relig-</p><p>ious traditions. That is why his natural world view of humans</p><p>can  be  neither  sufficiently  universal  nor  completely  true.  Dif-</p><p>ferences among individuals and nations are the product of both</p><p>inherited dispositions and the ontogenesis10 of personalities.</p><p>It  is  thus  significant  that  the  main  values  of  this  human</p><p>world view of nature indicate basic similarities in spite of great</p><p>divergences  in  time,  race,  and  civilization.  This  world  view</p><p>quite obviously derives  <emphasis>from the nature of our species</emphasis> and the</p><p>natural  experience  of  human  societies  which  have  achieved  a</p><p>certain  necessary  level  of  civilization.  Refinements  based  on</p><p>literary values or philosophical and moral reflections do show</p><p>differences, but, generally speaking, they tend to bring together</p><p>the  natural  conceptual  languages  of  various  civilizations  and</p><p>eras. People with a humanistic education may therefore get the</p><p>impression  that  they  have  achieved  wisdom.  We  shall  also</p><empty-line/><p>ultimate realities of Sankhya philosophy. The divine Self, the absolute Real-</p><p>ity, pure Consciousness. [Editor�s note.]</p><p>10  <emphasis>Ontogeny</emphasis> (also ontogenesis or morphogenesis) describes the origin and the</p><p>development of an organism from the fertilized egg to its mature form. On-</p><p>togeny is studied in developmental biology. [Editor�s note.]</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>53</p><p>continue  to  respect  the  wisdom  of  that  �common  sense�  de-</p><p>rived from life experience and reflections thereon.</p><p>However, a conscientious psychologist must ask the follow-</p><p>ing questions: Even if the natural world view has been refined,</p><p>does it mirror reality with sufficient reliability? Or does it only</p><p>mirror  <emphasis>our species� perception</emphasis>? To what extent can we depend</p><p>upon it as a basis for decision making in the individual, societal</p><p>and political spheres of life?</p><p>Experience  teaches  us,  first  of  all,  that  this  natural  world</p><p>view  has  permanent  and  characteristic  tendencies  toward  de-</p><p>formation  dictated  by  our  instinctive  and  emotional  features.</p><p>Secondly,  our  work  exposes  us  to  many  phenomena  which</p><p>cannot be understood nor described by natural language alone.</p><p>An objective scientific language able to analyze the essence of</p><p>a phenomenon thus becomes an indispensable tool. It has also</p><p>shown itself to be similarly indispensable for an understanding</p><p>of the questions presented within this book.</p><p>Now, having laid the groundwork, let us attempt a listing of</p><p>the  most  important   <emphasis>reality-deforming  tendencies</emphasis>  and  other</p><p>insufficiencies of the natural human world view.</p><p>Those emotional features which are a natural component of</p><p>the human personality are never completely appropriate to the</p><p>reality  being  experienced.  This  results  both  from  our  instinct</p><p>and  from  our  common  errors  of  upbringing.  That  is  why  the</p><p>best tradition of philosophical and religious thought have coun-</p><p>seled subduing the emotions in order to achieve a  more accu-</p><p>rate view of reality.</p><p>The  natural  world  view  is  also  characterized  by  a  similar,</p><p>emotional,  tendency  to  endow  our  opinions  with  moral  judg-</p><p>ment, often so negative as to represent outrage. This appeals to</p><p>tendencies which are deeply rooted in human nature and socie-</p><p>tal customs.  We easily extrapolate this method of comprehen-</p><p>sion  onto  manifestations  of  improper  human  behavior,  which</p><p>are, in fact, caused by minor psychological deficiencies. When</p><p>another individual behaves in a way that we deem to be �bad�,</p><p>we tend to make a judgment of negative intent rather than seek-</p><p>ing  to  understand  the  psychological  conditions  that  might  be</p><p>driving them, and convincing them that they are, in fact, behav-</p><p>ing very properly. Thus, any moralizing interpretation of minor</p><p>54</p><p>SOME INDESPENSIBLE CONCEPTS</p><p>psychopathological  phenomena  is  erroneous  and  merely  leads</p><p>to an exceptional number of unfortunate consequences,  which</p><p>is why we shall repeatedly refer to it.</p><p>Another defect of the natural world view is its lack of uni-</p><p>versality.  In  every  society,  a  certain  percentage  of  the  people</p><p>has  developed  a  world  view  a  good  deal  different  from  that</p><p>used by the  majority.  The causes of the  aberrations are by no</p><p>means qualitatively monolithic; we will be discussing them in</p><p>greater detail in the fourth chapter.</p><p>Another essential deficiency of the natural world view is its</p><p>limited scope of applicability. Euclidean geometry  would suf-</p><p>fice for a technical reconstruction of our world and for a trip to</p><p>the  moon  and  the  closest  planets.  We  only  need  a  geometry</p><p>whose axioms are less natural if we reach inside of an atom or</p><p>outside  of  our  solar  system.  The  average  person  does  not  en-</p><p>counter  phenomena  for  which  Euclidean  geometry  would  be</p><p>insufficient. Sometime during his lifetime, virtually every per-</p><p>son is faced with problems he must deal with. Since a compre-</p><p>hension of the truly operational factors is beyond the ken of his</p><p>natural  world  view,  he  generally  relies  on  emotion:  intuition</p><p>and  the  pursuit  of  happiness.  Whenever  we  meet  a  person</p><p>whose individual world view developed under the influence of</p><p>non-typical  conditions,  we  tend  to  pass  moral  judgment  upon</p><p>him  in  the  name  of  our  more  typical  world  view.  In  short,</p><p>whenever  some  unidentified  psychopathological  factor  comes</p><p>into play, the natural human  world view ceases to be  applica-</p><p>ble.</p><p>Moving  further,  we  often  meet  with  sensible  people  en-</p><p>dowed  with  a  well-developed  natural  world  view  as  regards</p><p>psychological,  societal,  and  moral  aspects,  frequently  refined</p><p>via literary influences, religious deliberations, and philosophi-</p><p>cal  reflections.  Such  persons  have  a  pronounced  tendency  to</p><p>overrate the values of their world view, behaving as though it</p><p>were an objective basis for judging other people. They do not</p><p>take  into  account  the  fact  that  such  a  system  of  apprehending</p><p>human matters can also be erroneous, since it is insufficiently</p><p>objective. Let us call such an attitude the �egotism of the natu-</p><p>ral world view�.  To date, it has been the least pernicious type</p><p>of egotism, being  merely an overestimation of that method of</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>55</p><p>comprehension containing the eternal values of human experi-</p><p>ence.</p><p>Today,  however,  the  world  is  being  jeopardized  by  a  phe-</p><p>nomenon which cannot be understood nor described by means</p><p>of such a natural conceptual language; this kind of egotism thus</p><p>becomes a dangerous factor stifling the possibility of objective</p><p>counteractive  measures.  Developing  and  popularizing  the  ob-</p><p>jective  psychological  world  view  could  thus  significantly  ex-</p><p>pand  the  scope  of  dealing  with  evil,  via  sensible  action  and</p><p>pinpointed countermeasures.</p><p>The objective psychological language, based on mature phi-</p><p>losophical criteria, must meet the requirements derived from its</p><p>theoretical  foundations,  and  meet  the  needs  of  individual  and</p><p>macrosocial practice. It should be evaluated fully on the basis</p><p>of  <emphasis>biological realities</emphasis> and constitute an extension of the analo-</p><p>gous  conceptual  language  elaborated  by  the  older  naturalistic</p><p>sciences,  particularly  medicine.  Its  range  of  applicability</p><p>should cover all those facts and phenomena  conditioned upon</p><p>cognizable  biological  factors  for  which  this  natural  language</p><p>has proved inadequate. It should, within this framework, allow</p><p>sufficient understanding of the contents, and varied causes, for</p><p>the genesis of the above-mentioned deviant world views.</p><p>Elaborating  such  a  conceptual  language,  being  far  beyond</p><p>the individual scope of any scientist, is a step-by-step affair; by</p><p>means of the contribution of many researchers, it matures to the</p><p>point when it could be organized under philosophical supervi-</p><p>sion in the light of above-mentioned foundations.  Such a task</p><p>would  greatly  contribute  to  the  development  of  all  bio-</p><p>humanistic  and  social  sciences  by  liberating  them  from  the</p><p>limitations  and  erroneous  tendencies  imposed  by  the  overly</p><p>great influence of the natural language of psychological imagi-</p><p>nation,  especially  when  combined  with  an  excessive  compo-</p><p>nent of egotism.</p><p>Most of the questions dealt with in this book are beyond the</p><p>scope of applicability of the natural language. The fifth chapter</p><p>shall deal with a macrosocial phenomenon which has rendered</p><p>our  traditional  scientific  language  completely  deceptive.  Un-</p><p>derstanding  these  phenomena  thus  requires  consistent  separa-</p><p>tion from the habits of that method of thinking and the use of</p><p>56</p><p>SOME INDESPENSIBLE CONCEPTS</p><p>the  most  objective  system  of  concepts  possible.  For  this  pur-</p><p>pose,  it  proves  necessary  to  develop  the  contents,  organize</p><p>them, and familiarize the readers with them as well.</p><p>At the same time, an examination of the phenomena whose</p><p>nature forced the use of such a system will render a great con-</p><p>tribution  to  enriching  and  perfecting  the  objective  system  of</p><p>concepts.</p><p>While working on these matters, the author gradually accus-</p><p>tomed himself to comprehending reality by means of this very</p><p>method, a way of thinking which turned out to be both the most</p><p>appropriate and the  most economical in terms of time and ef-</p><p>fort. It also protects the mind from its own natural egotism and</p><p>any excessive emotionalism.</p><p>In  the  course  of  the  above-mentioned  inquiries,  each  re-</p><p>searcher  went through his own period of crisis and frustration</p><p>when  it  became  evident  that  the  concepts  he  had  trusted  thus</p><p>far  proved  to  be  inapplicable.  Ostensibly,  correct  hypotheses</p><p>formulated  in  the  scientifically  improved  natural  conceptual</p><p>language turned out to be completely unfounded in the light of</p><p>facts,  and  of  preliminary  statistical  calculations.  At  the  same</p><p>time, the elaboration of concepts better suited for investigated</p><p>reality  became  extremely  complex:  after  all,  the  key  to  the</p><p>question lies in a scientific area still in the process of develop-</p><p>ment.</p><p>Surviving this period thus required  an acceptance of  and a</p><p>respect  for  a  feeling  of  nescience11  truly  worthy  of  a  philoso-</p><p>pher.  Every science is born in an area uninhabited by popular</p><p>imaginings that must be overcome and left behind. In this case,</p><p>however, the procedure had to be exceptionally radical; we had</p><p>to venture into any area indicated by systematic analysis of the</p><p>facts  we  observed  and  experienced  from  within  a  full-blown</p><p>condition  of  macrosocial  evil,  guided  by  the  light  of  the  re-</p><p>quirements of scientific methodology. This had to be upheld in</p><p>spite of the difficulties caused by extraordinary outside condi-</p><p>tions and by our own human personalities.</p><p>Very few of the  many people  who started out on this road</p><p>were able to arrive at the end, since they withdrew for various</p><p>reasons  connected  to  this  period  of  frustration.  Some  of  them</p><empty-line/><p>11 Literally, the absence of knowledge. [Editor�s note.]</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>57</p><p>concentrated  on  a  single  question;  succumbing  to  a  kind  of</p><p>fascination  regarding  its  scientific  value;  they  delved  into  de-</p><p>tailed  inquiries.  Their  achievements  may  be  present  in  this</p><p>work, since they understood the general mining of their work.</p><p>Others  gave  up  in  the  face  of  scientific  problems,  personal</p><p>difficulties,  or  the  fear  of  being  discovered  by  the  authorities,</p><p>who are highly vigilant in such matters.</p><p>Perusing  this  book  will  therefore  confront  the  reader  with</p><p>similar  problems,  albeit  on  a  much  smaller  scale.  A  certain</p><p>impression  of  injustice  may  be  conveyed  due  to  the  need  to</p><p>leave  behind  a  significant  portion  of  our  prior  conceptualiza-</p><p>tions,  the  feeling  that  our  natural  world  view  is  inapplicable,</p><p>and  the  expendability  of  some  emotional  entanglements.  I</p><p>therefore ask my readers to accept these disturbing feelings in</p><p>the spirit of the love of knowledge and its redeeming values.</p><p>The above explanations were crucial in order to render the</p><p>language of this work more easily comprehensible to the read-</p><p>ers. The author has attempted to approach the matters described</p><p>herein  in  such  a  way  as  to  avoid  both  losing  touch  with  the</p><p>world of objective concepts and becoming incomprehensible to</p><p>anyone outside a narrow circle of specialists. We must thus beg</p><p>the reader to pardon any slips along the tightrope between the</p><p>two methods of thought. However, the author would not be an</p><p>experienced  psychologist  if  he  could  not  predict  that  some</p><p>readers will reject the scientific data adduced within this work,</p><p>feeling that they constitute an attack upon the natural wisdom</p><p>of their life-experience.</p><p>The Human Individual</p><p>When Auguste Comte12 attempted to found the new science</p><p>of  sociology  during  the  early  nineteenth  century,  i.e.  well  be-</p><empty-line/><p>12 Auguste Comte (1798 - 1857) was a French positivist thinker who invented</p><p>the term �sociology� to name the new science made by Saint-Simon. Comte</p><p>saw a �universal law� at work in all sciences which he called the �law of</p><p>three phases�. It is for this law that he is best known in the English-speaking</p><p>world; namely, that society has gone through three phases: Theological,</p><p>Metaphysical, and Scientific. He also gave the name �Positive� to the last of</p><p>these. The other universal law he called the �encyclopedic law�. By combin-</p><p>ing these laws, Comte developed a systematic and hierarchical classification</p><p>of all sciences, including inorganic physics (astronomy, earth science and</p><p>58</p><p>SOME INDESPENSIBLE CONCEPTS</p><p>fore  modern  psychology  was  born,  he  was  immediately  con-</p><p>fronted with the problem of man, a mystery he could not solve.</p><p>If  he  rejected  the  Catholic  Church�s  oversimplifications  of</p><p>human  nature,  then  nothing  remained  except  traditional</p><p>schemes for comprehending the personality, derived from well</p><p>known  social  conditions.  He  thus  had  to  avoid  this  problem,</p><p>among others, if he wanted to create his new scientific branch</p><p>under such conditions.</p><p>Therefore,  he  accepted  that  the  basic  cell  of  society  is  the</p><p>family, something much easier to characterize and treat like an</p><p>elementary  model  of  societal  relations.  This  could  also  be  ef-</p><p>fected  by  means  of  a  language  of  comprehensible  concepts,</p><p>without confronting problems which could truly not have been</p><p>overcome at the time. Slightly later, J. S. Mill13 pointed out the</p><p>resulting deficiencies of psychological cognition and the role of</p><p>the individuals.</p><empty-line/><p>chemistry) and organic physics (biology and for the first time,  <emphasis>physique </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>sociale</emphasis>, later renamed  <emphasis>sociologie</emphasis>). Comte saw this new science, sociology, as</p><p>the last and greatest of all sciences, one that would include all other sciences,</p><p>and which would integrate and relate their findings into a cohesive whole.</p><p>(Wikipedia)</p><p>13 John Stuart Mill (1806 � 1873), an English philosopher and political</p><p>economist, was an influential liberal thinker of the 19th century. He was an</p><p>advocate of utilitarianism, the ethical theory first proposed by his godfather</p><p>Jeremy Bentham. During his time as an MP, Mill advocated easing the bur-</p><p>dens on Ireland, and became the first person in parliament to call for women</p><p>to be given the right to vote. In �Considerations on Representative Govern-</p><p>ment�, Mill called for various reforms of Parliament and voting, especially</p><p>proportional representation, the Single Transferable Vote, and the extension</p><p>of suffrage. He was godfather to Bertrand Russell. Mill argued that it is</p><p>Government�s role only to remove the barriers, such as laws, to behaviors</p><p>that do not harm others. Crucially, he felt that offense did not constitute</p><p>harm, and therefore supported almost total freedom of speech; only in cases</p><p>where free speech would lead to direct harm did Mill wish to limit it. For</p><p>example, whipping up an angry mob to go and attack people would not be</p><p>defended in Mill�s system. Mill argued that free discourse was vital to ensure</p><p>progress. He argued that we could never be sure if a silenced opinion did not</p><p>hold some portion of the truth. Ingeniously, he also argued that even false</p><p>opinions have worth, in that in refuting false opinions the holders of true</p><p>opinions have their beliefs reaffirmed. Without having to defend one�s be-</p><p>liefs, Mill argued, the beliefs would become dead and we would forget why</p><p>we held them at all. [Editor�s note.]</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>59</p><p>Only  now  is  sociology  successfully  dealing  with  the  diffi-</p><p>culties  which  resulted,  laboriously  reinforcing  the  existing</p><p>foundations  of  science  by  the  achievements  of  psychology,  a</p><p>science  which  by  its  very  nature  treats  the   <emphasis>individual  as  the </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>basic object of observation</emphasis>.  This restructuring  and acceptance</p><p>of  an  objective  psychological  language  will  in  time  permit</p><p>sociology  to  become  a  scientific  discipline  which  can  mirror</p><p>the  social  reality  with  sufficient  objectivity  and  attention  to</p><p>detail in order to render it a basis for practical action. After all,</p><p>it is  <emphasis>man  who is the basic unit of society</emphasis>, including the entire</p><p>complexity of his human personality.</p><p>In  order  to  understand  the  functioning  of  an  organism,</p><p>medicine  begins  with  cytology,  which  studies  the  variegated</p><p>structures and functions of cells. If we want to understand the</p><p>laws  governing  social  life,  we  must  similarly  first  understand</p><p>the individual human being, his physiological and psychologi-</p><p>cal nature, and fully accept the quality and scope of differences</p><p>(particularly  psychological  ones)  among  the  individuals  who</p><p>constitute two sexes, different families, associations, and social</p><p>groups, as well as the complex structure of society itself.</p><p>The  doctrinaire  and  propaganda-based  Soviet  system  con-</p><p>tains  a  characteristic  built-in  contradiction  whose  causes  will</p><p>be readily understandable toward the  end of this book.  Man�s</p><p>descent  from  the  animals,  bereft  of  any  extraordinary  occur-</p><p>rences, is accepted there as the obvious basis for the materialis-</p><p>tic world view.  At the same time, however, they  <emphasis>suppress the </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>fact  that  man  has  an  instinctive  endowment</emphasis>,  i.e.  something  in</p><p>common with the rest of the animal world. If faced with espe-</p><p>cially  troublesome  questions,  they  sometimes  admit  that  man</p><p>contains  an  insignificant  survival  of  such  phylogenetic  heri-</p><p>tage, however, they  <emphasis>prevent the publication of any work study-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>ing this basic phenomenon of psychology</emphasis>.14</p><empty-line/><p>14 See: �A Mess in Psychiatry�, an interview with Robert van Voren, General</p><p>Secretary of Geneva Initiative on Psychiatry, published in the Dutch newspa-</p><p>per  <emphasis>De Volkskrant</emphasis> on August 9, 1997 where he says: �Since 1950 Soviet</p><p>psychiatry has not just been standing still, but has gone downhill. Absolutely</p><p>nothing has changed. The bulk of the [Russian] psychiatrists could never find</p><p>a job as a psychiatrist in the West. There, methods of treatment are customary</p><p>about which you cannot even talk anymore in the West. � [Editor�s note.]</p><p>60</p><p>SOME INDESPENSIBLE CONCEPTS</p><p>In order to understand humanity, however,  <emphasis>we  must gain a </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>primary understanding of mankind�s instinctive substratum and </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>appreciate  its  salient  role  in the  life  of individuals</emphasis>  and  socie-</p><p>ties. This role easily escapes our notice, since our human spe-</p><p>cies�  instinctive  responses  seem  so  self-evident  and  are  so</p><p>much  taken  for  granted  that  it  arouses  insufficient  interest.  A</p><p>psychologist,  schooled  in  the  observation  of  human  beings,</p><p>does not fully appreciate the role of this eternal phenomenon of</p><p>nature until he has years of professional experience.</p><p>Man�s  instinctive  substratum  has  a  slightly  different  bio-</p><p>logical structure than that of animals. Energetically speaking, it</p><p>has  become  less  dynamic  and  become  more  plastic,  thereby</p><p>giving up its job as the main dictator of behavior. It has become</p><p>more receptive to the controls of reasoning, without, however,</p><p>losing much of the rich specific contents of the human kind.</p><p>It is precisely this phylogenetically developed basis for our</p><p>experience, and its emotional dynamism, that allow individuals</p><p>to develop their feelings and social bounds, enabling us to in-</p><p>tuit other people�s psychological state and individual or social</p><p>psychological reality. It is thus possible to perceive and under-</p><p>stand  human  customs  and  moral  values.  From  infancy,  this</p><p>substratum stimulates various activities aiming at the develop-</p><p>ment  of  the  mind�s  higher  functions.  In  other  words,  our   <emphasis>in-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>stinct  is  our  first  tutor</emphasis>,  whom  we  carry  inside  all  our  lives.</p><p>Proper  child-rearing  is  thus  not  limited  to  teaching  a  young</p><p>person to control the overly violent reactions of his instinctual</p><p>emotionalism; it also ought to teach him to appreciate the wis-</p><p>dom  of  nature  contained  and  speaking  through  his  instinctive</p><p>endowment</p><p>This  substratum  contains   <emphasis>millions  of  years�  worth  of  bio-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>psychological development</emphasis> that was the product of species� life</p><p>conditions,  so  it  neither  is  nor  can  be  a  perfect  creation.  Our</p><p>well known weaknesses of human nature and errors in the natu-</p><p>ral  perception  and  comprehension  of  reality  have  thus  been</p><p>conditioned on that phylogenetic level for millennia.15</p><empty-line/><p>15 Konrad Lorenz:  <emphasis>Evolution and Modification of Behavior</emphasis> (1965);  <emphasis>On Ag-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>gression</emphasis> (1966);  <emphasis>Studies in Animal and Human Behavior</emphasis>, Volume I (1970);</p><p><emphasis>Studies in Animal and Human Behavior, Volume II</emphasis> (1971);  <emphasis>Behind the Mirror</emphasis></p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>61</p><p>The  common  substratum  of  psychology  has  made  it  possi-</p><p>ble  for  peoples  throughout  the  centuries  and  civilizations  to</p><p>create  concepts  regarding  human,  social,  and  moral  matters</p><p>which  share  significant  similarities.  Inter-epochal  and  interra-</p><p>cial variations in this area are  <emphasis>less striking than those differen-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>tiating persons whose instinctual human substratum is normal </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>from those who are carriers of an instinctual bio-psychological </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>defect</emphasis>, though they are members of the same race and civiliza-</p><p>tion. It shall behoove us to return to this latter question repeat-</p><p>edly,  since  it  has  taken  on  a  crucial  importance  for  the  prob-</p><p>lems dealt with in this book.</p><p>Man  has  lived  in  groups  throughout  his  prehistory,  so  our</p><p>species� instinctual substratum was shaped in this tie, thus con-</p><p>ditioning our emotions as regards the mining of existence. The</p><p>need for an appropriate internal structure of commonality, and</p><p>a  striving  to  achieve  a  worthy  role  within  that  structure,  are</p><p>encoded  at  this  very  level.  In  the  final  analysis,  our  self-</p><p>preservation instinct is rivaled by another feeling: the good of</p><p>society  demands  that  we  make  sacrifices,  sometimes  even  the</p><p>supreme sacrifice. At the same time, however, it is worth point-</p><p>ing out that if we love a man, we love his human instinct above</p><p>all.</p><p>Our  zeal  to  control  anyone  harmful  to  ourselves  or  our</p><p>group  is  so  primal  in  its  near-reflex  necessity  as  to  leave  no</p><p>doubt  that  it  is   <emphasis>also  encoded  at  the  instinctual  level</emphasis>.  Our  in-</p><p>stinct, however,  <emphasis>does not differentiate between behavior moti-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>vated by simple human failure and behavior performed by indi-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>viduals  with  pathological  aberrations</emphasis>.  Quite  the  contrary:  we</p><empty-line/><p>(1973);  <emphasis>The Natural Science of the Human Species: An Introduction to Com-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>parative Behavioral Research - The Russian Manuscript</emphasis> (1944-1948)(1995).</p><p>Lorenz joined the Nazi Party in 1938 and accepted a university chair under</p><p>the Nazi regime. His publications during that time led in later years to allega-</p><p>tions that his scientific work had been contaminated by Nazi sympathies.</p><p>When accepting the Nobel Prize, he apologized for a 1940 publication that</p><p>included Nazi views of science, saying that �many highly decent scientists</p><p>hoped, like I did, for a short time for good from National Socialism, and</p><p>many quickly turned away from it with the same horror as I.� It seems highly</p><p>likely that Lorenz�s ideas about an inherited basis for behavior patterns were</p><p>congenial to the Nazi authorities, but there is no evidence to suggest that his</p><p>experimental work was either inspired or distorted by Nazi ideas. [Editor�s</p><p>note.]</p><p>62</p><p>SOME INDESPENSIBLE CONCEPTS</p><p>instinctively  tend  to  judge  the  latter  more  severely,  harkening</p><p>to nature�s striving to eliminate biologically or psychologically</p><p>defective  individuals.  Our  tendency  to  such  evil  generating</p><p>error is thus conditioned at the instinctual level.</p><p>It  is  also  at  this  level  that  differences  begin  to  occur  be-</p><p>tween  normal  individuals,  influencing  the  formation  of  their</p><p>characters, world views, and attitudes. The primary differences</p><p>are  in  the  bio-psychical  dynamism  of  this  substratum;  differ-</p><p>ences of content are secondary.  For some people the  sthenic16</p><p>instinct supersedes psychology; for others, it easily relinquishes</p><p>control  to  reason.  It  also  appears  that  some  people  have  a</p><p>somewhat  richer  and  more  subtle  instinctual  endowment  than</p><p>others.  Significant  deficiencies  in  this  heritage  nevertheless</p><p>occur  in  only  a  tiny  percentage  of  the  human  population;  and</p><p>we perceive this to be qualitatively pathological. We shall have</p><p>to pay closer attention to such anomalies, since they participate</p><p>in that pathogenesis of evil which we would like to understand</p><p>more fully.</p><p>A  more  subtle  structure  of  effect  is  built upon  our  instinc-</p><p>tual substratum, thanks to constant cooperation from the latter</p><p>as  well  as  familial  and  societal  child-rearing  practices.  With</p><p>time, this structure becomes a  more easily observable compo-</p><p>nent  of  our  personality,  within  which  it  plays  an  integrative</p><p>role. This higher effect is instrumental in linking us to society,</p><p>which is why its correct development is a proper duty of peda-</p><p>gogues and constitutes one of the objects of a psychotherapist�s</p><p>efforts, if perceived to be abnormally formed. Both pedagogues</p><p>and psychotherapists sometimes feel helpless, if this process of</p><p>formation was influenced by a defective instinctual substratum.</p><p>~~~</p><p>Thanks to memory, that phenomenon ever better described</p><p>by  psychology,  but  whose  nature  remains  partly  mysterious,</p><p>man stores life-experiences and purposely acquired knowledge.</p><p>There  are  extensive  individual  variations  in  regard  to  this  ca-</p><p>pacity, its quality, and its contents. A young person also looks</p><p>at the world differently from an old man endowed with a good</p><p>memory.  People  with  a  good  memory  and  a  great  deal  of</p><empty-line/><p>16 Relating to or marked by  <emphasis>sthenia</emphasis>; strong, vigorous, or active. [Editor�s</p><p>note.]</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>63</p><p>knowledge have a greater tendency to reach for the written data</p><p>of collective memory in order to supplement their own.</p><p>This collected material constitutes the subject matter of the</p><p>second  psychological  process,  namely  association;  our  under-</p><p>standing of its characteristics is constantly improving, although</p><p>we have not yet been able to shed sufficient light upon its nur-</p><p>turance.  In  spite  of,  or  maybe  thanks  to,  the  value  judgments</p><p>contributed  to  this  question  by  psychologists  and  psychoana-</p><p>lysts,  it  appears  that  achieving  a  satisfactory  synthetic  under-</p><p>standing of the associative processes will not be possible unless</p><p>and until we humbly decide to cross the boundaries of purely</p><p>scientific comprehension.</p><p>Our reasoning faculties continue to develop throughout our</p><p>entire  active  lives,  thus,  accurate  judgmental  abilities  do  not</p><p>peak until our hair starts greying and the drive of instinct, emo-</p><p>tion, and habit begins to abate. It is a collective product derived</p><p>from  an  interaction  between  man  and  his  environment,  and</p><p>from  many  generations�  worth  of  creation  and  transmission.</p><p>The  environment  may  also  have  a  destructive  influence  upon</p><p>the development of our reasoning faculties. In its environment</p><p>in  particular,  the  human  mind  is  contaminated  by  conversive</p><p>thinking17, which is the most common anomaly in this process.</p><p>It  is  for  this  reason  that  the  proper  development  of  mind  re-</p><p>quires periods of solitary reflection on occasion.</p><p>Man has also developed a psychological function not found</p><p>among animals. Only man can apprehend a certain quantity of</p><p>material  or  abstract  imaginings  within  his  field  of  attention,</p><p>inspecting them internally in order to effect further operations</p><p>of  the  mind  upon  this  material.  This  enables  us  to  confront</p><p>facts,  affect  constructive  and  technical  operations,  and  predict</p><p>future  results.  If  the  facts  subjected  to  internal  projection  and</p><p>inspection deal with  man�s own personality, man performs an</p><p>act of introspection  essential for  monitoring the state  of a hu-</p><empty-line/><p>17 Conversive thinking: using terms but giving them opposing or twisted</p><p>meanings. Examples: peacefulness = appeasement; freedom = license; initia-</p><p>tive = arbitrariness; traditional = backward; rally = mob; efficiency = small-</p><p>mindedness. Example: the words �peacefulness� and �appeasement� denote</p><p>the same thing: a striving to establish peace, but have entirely different con-</p><p>notations which indicate the speaker�s attitude toward this striving toward</p><p>peace. [Editor�s note.]</p><p>64</p><p>SOME INDESPENSIBLE CONCEPTS</p><p>man personality and the meaning of his own behavior. This act</p><p>of  internal  projection  and  inspection  complements  our  con-</p><p>sciousness;  it  characterizes  no  species  other  than  the  human.</p><p>However,  there  is  exceptionally  wide  divergence  among  indi-</p><p>viduals  regarding  the   <emphasis>capacity</emphasis>  for  such  mental  acts.  The  effi-</p><p>ciency of this mental function shows a somewhat low statistical</p><p>correlation with general intelligence.</p><p>Thus,  if  we  speak  of  man�s  general  intelligence,  we  must</p><p>take into account both its internal structure  and the individual</p><p>differences occurring at every level of this structure. The sub-</p><p>stratum of our intelligence,  after  all, contains nature�s instinc-</p><p>tual heritage of wisdom and error, giving rise to the basic intel-</p><p>ligence  of  life  experience.  Superimposed  upon  this  construct,</p><p>thanks to memory and the associative capacity, is our ability to</p><p>effect  complex  operations  of  thought,  crowned  by  the  act  of</p><p>internal projection, and to constantly improve their correctness.</p><p>We  are  variously  endowed  with  these  capabilities,  which</p><p>makes for a mosaic of individually variegated talents.</p><p>Basic  intelligence  grows  from  this  instinctual  substratum</p><p>under the influence of  an amicable environment and  a readily</p><p>accessible compendium of human experience; it is intertwined</p><p>with higher effect, enabling us to understand others and to in-</p><p>tuit their psychological state by means of some naive realism.</p><p>This conditions the development of moral reason.</p><p>This  layer  of  our  intelligence  is  widely  distributed  within</p><p>society; the overwhelming majority of people have it, which is</p><p>why  we  can  so  often  admire  the  tact,  the  intuition,  of  social</p><p>relationships,  and  sensible  morality  of  people  whose  intellec-</p><p>tual  gifts  are  only  average.  We  also  see  people  with  an  out-</p><p>standing intellect who lack these very natural values. As is the</p><p>case with deficiencies in the instinctual substratum, the deficits</p><p>of  this  basic  structure  of  our  intelligence  frequently  take  on</p><p>features we perceive as pathological.</p><p>The   <emphasis>distribution</emphasis>  of  human  intellectual  capacity  within  so-</p><p>cieties is completely different, and its amplitude has the great-</p><p>est scope. Highly gifted people constitute a tiny percentage of</p><p>each population, and those with the highest quotient of intelli-</p><p>gence constitute only a few per thousand. In spite of this, how-</p><p>ever, the latter play such a significant role in collective life that</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>65</p><p><emphasis>any society attempting to prevent them from fulfilling their duty </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>does  so  at its  own  peril</emphasis>.  At  the  same  time,  individuals  barely</p><p>able  to  master  simple  arithmetic  and  the  art  of  writing  are,  in</p><p>the  majority,  normal  people  whose  basic  intelligence  is  often</p><p>entirely adequate.</p><p>It  is  a  universal  law  of  nature  that  the  higher  a  given  spe-</p><p>cies� psychological organization, the greater the psychological</p><p>differences  among  individual  units.  Man  is  the  most  highly</p><p>organized species; hence, these variations are the greatest. Both</p><p>qualitatively  and  quantitatively,  psychological  differences  oc-</p><p>cur  in  all  structures  of  the  human  personality  dealt  with  here,</p><p>albeit  in  terms  of  necessary  oversimplification.  Profound  psy-</p><p>chological variegations may strike some  as an injustice of na-</p><p>ture, but they are her right and have meaning.</p><p>Nature�s  seeming  injustice,  alluded  to  above,  is,  in  fact,  a</p><p>great  gift  to  humanity,  enabling  human  societies  to  develop</p><p>their  complex  structures  and  to  be  highly  creative  at  both  the</p><p>individual  and  collective  level.  Thanks  to  psychological  vari-</p><p>ety, the creative potential of any society is many times higher</p><p>than  it  could  possibly  be  if  our  species  were  psychologically</p><p>more  homogeneous.  Thanks  to  these  variations,  the  societal</p><p>structure  implicit  within  can  also  develop.  The  fate  of  human</p><p>societies  depends  upon  the  proper  adjustment  of  individuals</p><p>within  this  structure  and  upon  the  manner  in  which  innate</p><p>variations of talents are utilized.</p><p>Our  experience  teaches  us  that  psychological  differences</p><p>among  people  are  the  cause  of  misunderstandings  and  prob-</p><p>lems. We can overcome these problems only if we  <emphasis>accept psy-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>chological differences as a law of nature and appreciate their </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>creative value</emphasis>. This  would also enable us to gain an objective</p><p>comprehension  of  man  and  human  societies;  unfortunately,  it</p><p>would  also  teach  us  that  equality  under  the  law  is  inequality</p><p>under the law of nature.</p><p>~~~</p><p>If we observe our human personality by consistently track-</p><p>ing  psychological  causation  within,  if  we  are  able  to  exhaust</p><p>the question to a sufficient degree, we shall come ever closer to</p><p>phenomena whose biopsychological energy is very low, which</p><p>begin  to  manifest  themselves  to  us  with  certain  characteristic</p><p>66</p><p>SOME INDESPENSIBLE CONCEPTS</p><p>subtlety.  Discovering  this  phenomenon,  we  then  attempt  to</p><p>track  our  associations  particularly  because  we  have  exhausted</p><p>the  available  analytical  platform.  Finally,  we  must  admit  to</p><p>noticing something within us which is a result of supra-sensory</p><p>causation.  This  path  may  be  the  most  laborious  of  all,  but  it</p><p>will nevertheless lead to the  most material certainty regarding</p><p>the existence of what all the major religious systems talk about.</p><p>Attaining  some  small  piece  of  truth  via  this  path  brings  us  to</p><p>respect for some of the teachings of the ancients regarding the</p><p>existence of something beyond the material universe.</p><p>If  we  thus  wish  to  understand  mankind,  man  as  whole,</p><p>without abandoning the laws of thought required by the objec-</p><p>tive language, we are finally forced to accept this reality, which</p><p>is within each of us,  whether normal or not,  whether  we have</p><p>accepted it because we have been brought up that way, or have</p><p>achieved such gnosis on our own, or whether we have rejected</p><p>it for reasons of materialism or science.  After all, invariabley,</p><p>when  we  analyze  negative  psychological  attitudes,  we  always</p><p>discern an affirmation which has been repressed from the field</p><p>of consciousness. As a consequence, the constant subconscious</p><p>effort  of  denying  concepts  about  existing  things  engenders  a</p><p>zeal to eliminate them in other people.</p><p>Trustfully opening our mind to perception of this reality is</p><p>thus  indispensable  for  someone  whose  duty  is  to  understand</p><p>other people, and is advisable for everyone else as well. Thanks</p><p>to  this,  our  mind  is  rendered  free  of  internal  tensions  and</p><p>stresses  and  can  be  liberated  from  its  tendency  to  select  and</p><p>substitute  information,  including  those  areas  which  are  more</p><p>easily accessible to naturalistic comprehension.</p><p>~~~</p><p>The human personality is unstable by its very nature, and a</p><p>lifelong  evolutionary  process  is  the  normal  state  of  affairs.</p><p>Some  political  and  religious  systems  advocate  slowing  down</p><p>this  process  or  achieving  excessive  stability  in  our  personali-</p><p>ties,  but  these  are  unhealthy  states  from  the  point  of  view  of</p><p>psychology.  If  the  evolution  of  a  human  personality  or  world</p><p>view  becomes  frozen  long  and  deeply  enough,  the  condition</p><p>enters the realm of psychopathology. The process of personal-</p><p>ity  transformation  reveals  its  meaning  thanks  to  its  own  crea-</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>67</p><p>tive nature which is based on the conscious acceptance of this</p><p>creative changing as the natural course of events.</p><p>Our  personalities  also  pass  through  temporary  destructive</p><p>periods  as  a  result  of  various  life  events,  especially  if  we  un-</p><p>dergo suffering or meet with situations or circumstances which</p><p>are  at  variance  with  our  prior  experiences  and  imaginings.</p><p>These  so-called  disintegrative  stages  are  often  unpleasant,  al-</p><p>though not necessarily so. A good dramatic work, for instance,</p><p>enables us to experience a disintegrative state, simultaneously</p><p>calming down the unpleasant components and furnishing crea-</p><p>tive ideas for a renewed reintegration of our own personalities.</p><p>True theater therefore causes the condition known as catharsis.</p><p>A  disintegrative  state  provokes  us  to  mental  efforts  in  at-</p><p>tempts  to  overcome  it  in  order  to  regain  active  homeostasis.</p><p>Overcoming  such  states,  in  effect,  correcting  our  errors  and</p><p>enriching our personalities, is a proper and creative process of</p><p>reintegration,  leading  to  a  higher  level  of  understanding  and</p><p>acceptance of the laws of life, to a better comprehension of self</p><p>and others, and to a more highly developed sensitivity in inter-</p><p>personal relationships. Our feelings also validate the successful</p><p>achievement of a reintegrative state: the unpleasant conditions</p><p>we have survived are endowed with meaning. Thus, the experi-</p><p>ence renders us better prepared to confront the next disintegra-</p><p>tive situation.</p><p>If, however, we have proved unable to master the problems</p><p>which occurred because our reflexes were too quick to repress</p><p>and substitute the uncomfortable material from our conscious-</p><p>ness,  or  for  some  similar  reason,  our  personality  undergoes</p><p>retroactive  egotization,18  but  it  is  not  free  of  the  sensation  of</p><p>failure. The results are devolutionary; the person becomes more</p><p>difficult to get along with. If we cannot overcome such a disin-</p><p>tegrative state because the causative circumstances  were over-</p><p>powering  or  because  we  lacked  the  information  essential  for</p><p>constructive use, our organism reacts with a neurotic condition.</p><p>~~~</p><p>The  diagram  of  the  human  personality  presented  herein,</p><p>summarized and simplified for reasons of necessity, makes us</p><p>aware  of  how  complex  human  beings  are  in  their  structure,</p><empty-line/><p>18 Similar to narcissistic withdrawal. [Editor�s note.]</p><p>68</p><p>SOME INDESPENSIBLE CONCEPTS</p><p>their changes, and their mental and spiritual lives. If we wish to</p><p>create social sciences  whose descriptions of our reality would</p><p>be capable of enabling us to rely on them in practice, we must</p><p>accept  this  complexity  and  make  certain  that  it  is  sufficiently</p><p>respected. Any attempt to substitute this basic knowledge with</p><p>the help of oversimplifying schemes leads to loss of that indis-</p><p>pensable convergence between our reasoning and the reality we</p><p>are  observing.  It  behooves  us  to  reemphasize  that  using  our</p><p>natural language of psychological imaginations for this purpose</p><p>cannot be a substitute for objective premises.</p><p>Similarly, it is extremely difficult for a psychologist to be-</p><p>lieve in the value of any social ideology based on simplified or</p><p>even  naive  psychological  premises.  This  applies  to  any  ideol-</p><p>ogy  which  attempts  to  over-simplify  psychological  reality,</p><p>whether it be one utilized by a totalitarian system or,  unfortu-</p><p>nately, by democracy as well. People are different. Whatever is</p><p>qualitatively different and remains in a state of permanent evo-</p><p>lution cannot be equal.</p><p>~~~</p><p>The above-mentioned statements about human nature apply</p><p>to normal people, with a few exceptions. However, each soci-</p><p>ety on earth contains a certain percentage of individuals, a rela-</p><p>tively  small  but  active  minority,  <emphasis>who  cannot  be  considered </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>normal</emphasis>.</p><p>We emphasize that here we are dealing with qualitative, not</p><p>statistical,  abnormality.  Outstandingly  intelligent  persons  are</p><p>statistically abnormal, but they can be quite normal members of</p><p>society from the qualitative point of view. We are going to be</p><p>looking at individuals that are statistically small in number, but</p><p>whose quality of difference is such that it can affect hundreds,</p><p>thousands,  even  millions  of  other  human  beings  in  negative</p><p>ways.</p><p>The individuals we wish to consider are people who reveal</p><p>morbid19  phenomena,  and  in  whom  mental  deviations  and</p><p>anomalies of various qualities and intensities can be observed.</p><p>Many such people are driven by internal anxieties: they search</p><p>for unconventional paths of action and adjustment to life with a</p><empty-line/><p>19 Diseased; caused by or altered by or manifesting disease or pathology.</p><p>[Editor�s note.]</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>69</p><p>certain characteristic hyperactivity. In some cases, such activity</p><p>can  be  pioneering  and  creative,  which  ensures  societal  toler-</p><p>ance  for  some  of  these  individuals.  Some  psychiatrists,  espe-</p><p>cially  Germans,  have  praised  such  people  as  embodying  the</p><p>principal inspiration for the development of civilization; this is</p><p>a damagingly unilateral view of reality. Laymen in the field of</p><p>psychopathology frequently gain the impression that such per-</p><p>sons  represent  some  extraordinary  talents.  This  very  science,</p><p>however, then goes on to explain that these individuals� hyper-</p><p>activity  and  sense  of  being  exceptional  are  derived  from  their</p><p>drive to overcompensate for a feeling of some deficiency. This</p><p>aberrant  attitude  results  in  the  obscuration  of  the  truth:  that</p><p>normal people are the richest of all.</p><p>The fourth chapter of the book  contains a  concise descrip-</p><p>tion of some of these anomalies, their causes, and the biologi-</p><p>cal  reality,  selected  in  such  a  way  as  to  facilitate  comprehen-</p><p>sion  of  this  work  as  a  whole.  Other  data  are  distributed</p><p>throughout  many  specialized  works  that  will  not  be  included</p><p>here.  However,  we  must  consider  the  overall  shape  of  our</p><p>knowledge in this area, which is so basic to our understanding</p><p>of, and practical solutions to, many difficult problems of social</p><p>life, is unsatisfactory. Many scientists treat this area of science</p><p>as  being  peripheral;  others  consider  it  �thankless�  because  it</p><p>easily  leads  to  misunderstandings  with  other  specialists.  As  a</p><p>consequence,  various  concepts  and  various  semantic  conven-</p><p>tions  emerge,  and  the  totality  of  knowledge  in  this  science  is</p><p>still  characterized  by  an  excessively   <emphasis>descriptive</emphasis>  nature.  This</p><p>book  therefore  encompasses  efforts  whose  purpose  was  to</p><p>bring to light the  <emphasis>causative</emphasis> aspects of the descriptively known</p><p>phenomena.</p><p>The pathological phenomena in question, usually of a suffi-</p><p>ciently low intensity which can be more easily concealed from</p><p>environmental opinion, merge without much difficulty into the</p><p>eternal process of the genesis of  evil,  which later affects peo-</p><p>ple, families, and  entire societies.  Later in this book,  we shall</p><p>learn  that  these  pathological  factors  become  indispensable</p><p>components  in  a  synthesis  which  results  in  widescale  human</p><p>suffering,  and  also  that  tracking  their  activities  by  means  of</p><p>70</p><p>SOME INDESPENSIBLE CONCEPTS</p><p>scientific control and social consciousness may prove to be an</p><p>effective weapon against evil.</p><p>For the above reasons, this scope of psychopathological sci-</p><p>ence represents an indispensable part of that objective language</p><p>we have dealt with before. Ever-increasing accuracy in biologi-</p><p>cal and psychological facts in this area is an essential precondi-</p><p>tion  for  an  objective  comprehension  of  many  phenomena</p><p>which become extremely onerous for societies, as well as for a</p><p>modern  solution  to  age-old  problems.  Biologists,  physicians,</p><p>and psychologists who have been struggling with these elusive</p><p>and  convoluted  problems  deserve  assistance  and  encourage-</p><p>ment from society, since their work will enable the future pro-</p><p>tection of people and nations from an evil whose causes we do</p><p>not as yet sufficiently understand.</p><p>Society</p><p>Nature has designed man to be social, a state of affairs en-</p><p>coded early, on the instinctual level of our species as described</p><p>above. Our minds and personalities could not possibly develop</p><p>without contact and interaction with an ever-widening circle of</p><p>people.  Our  mind  receives  input  from  others,  whether  con-</p><p>sciously  or  unconsciously,  in  regard  to  matters  of  emotional</p><p>and  mental  life,  tradition  and  thought,  by  means  of  resonant</p><p>sensitivity, identification, imitation, and by exchange of ideas,</p><p>and  permanent  rules.  The  material  we  obtain  in these  ways  is</p><p>then transformed by our psyche in order to create a new human</p><p>personality, one we call �our own�. However, our existence is</p><p>contingent  upon  necessary  links  with  those  who  lived  before,</p><p>those who presently make up our society, and those who shall</p><p>exist  in  the  future.  Our  existence  only  assumes  meaning  as  a</p><p>function  of  societal  bonds;  hedonistic  isolation  causes  us  to</p><p>lose our selves.</p><p>It is man�s fate to actively cooperate in giving shape to the</p><p>fate of society by two principal means: forming his individual</p><p>and family life within it, and becoming active in the sum total</p><p>of social affairs based on his � hopefully sufficient  -  compre-</p><p>hension of what needs to be done, what ought to be done, and</p><p>whether or not he can do it. This requires an individual to de-</p><p>velop  two  somewhat  overlapping  areas  of  knowledge  about</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>71</p><p>things; his life depends on the quality of this development, as</p><p>does his nation and humanity as a whole.</p><p>If,  say,  we  observe  a  beehive  with  a  painter�s  eye,  we  see</p><p>what  looks  like  a  crowding  throng  of  insects  linked  by  their</p><p>species-similarity.  A  beekeeper,  however,  tracks  complicated</p><p>laws  encoded  in  every  insect�s  instinct  and  in  the  collective</p><p>instinct of the hive as  well; that helps him understand how to</p><p>cooperate with the laws of nature governing apiary society. The</p><p>beehive is a higher-order organism; no individual bee can exist</p><p>without it, and thus it submits to the absolute nature of its laws.</p><p>If we observe the throngs of people crowding the streets of</p><p>some great human metropolis, we see what looks like individu-</p><p>als  driven  by  their  business  and  problems,  pursuing  some</p><p>crumb  of  happiness.  However,  such  an  oversimplification  of</p><p>reality causes us to disregard the laws of social life which ex-</p><p>isted long before the metropolis ever did, and which will con-</p><p>tinue to exist long after huge cities are emptied of people and</p><p>purpose. Loners in a crowd have a difficult time accepting that</p><p>reality,  which  �  for  them  -  exists  in  only  potential  form,  al-</p><p>though they cannot perceive it directly.</p><p>In reality, accepting the laws of social life in all their com-</p><p>plexity,  even  if  we  find  initial  difficulties  in  comprehending</p><p>them, helps us to come, finally, to a certain level of understand-</p><p>ing  that  we  acquire  by  something  akin  to  osmosis.  Thanks  to</p><p>this comprehension, or even just an instinctive intuition of such</p><p>laws,  an  individual  is  able  to  reach  his  goals  and  mature  his</p><p>personality  in  action.  Thanks  to  sufficient  intuition  and  com-</p><p>prehension  of  these  conditions,  a  society  is  able  to  progress</p><p>culturally and economically and to achieve political maturity.</p><p>The more we progress in this understanding, the more social</p><p>doctrines  strike  us  as  primitive  and  psychologically  naive,  es-</p><p>pecially  those  based  on  the  thoughts  of  thinkers  living  during</p><p>the  18th  and  19th  centuries  which  were  characterized  by  a</p><p>dearth  of  psychological  perception.  The  suggestive  nature  of</p><p>these doctrines derives from their oversimplification of reality,</p><p>something  easily  adapted  and  used  in  political  propaganda.</p><p>These  doctrines  and  ideologies  show  their  basic  faults,  in  re-</p><p>gard  to  the  understanding  of  human  personalities  and  differ-</p><p>ences among people, all rather clearly if viewed in the light of</p><p>72</p><p>SOME INDESPENSIBLE CONCEPTS</p><p>our natural language of psychological concepts, and even more</p><p>so in the light of objective language.</p><p>A psychologist�s view of society, even if based only on pro-</p><p>fessional experience, always places the human individual in the</p><p>foreground;  it  then  widens  the  perspective  to  include  small</p><p>groups, such as families, and finally societies and humanity as</p><p>whole.  We  must  then  accept  from  the  outset  that  an  individ-</p><p>ual�s fate is significantly dependent upon circumstance.  When</p><p>we  gradually  increase  the  scope  of  our  observations,  we  also</p><p>gain a greater pictorial specificity of causative links, and statis-</p><p>tical data assume ever greater stability.</p><p>In order to describe the interdependence between someone�s</p><p>fate  and  personality,  and  the  state  of  development  of  society,</p><p>we must study the entire body of information collected in this</p><p>area to date, adding a new work written in objective language.</p><p>Herein I shall adduce only a few examples of such reasoning in</p><p>order to open the door to questions presented in later chapters.</p><p>~~~</p><p>Throughout the ages and in various cultures, the best peda-</p><p>gogues  have  understood  the  importance,  regarding  the  forma-</p><p>tion of a culture and a person�s character, of the scope of con-</p><p>cepts  describing  psychological  phenomena.  The  quality  and</p><p>richness of concepts and terminology20 mastered by an individ-</p><empty-line/><p>20 !obaczewski�s emphasis on language is very important. Semiotics is the</p><p>study of language or any other symbol system that conveys meaning. One of</p><p>the great philosophical discussions that has continued for centuries relates to</p><p>that of the alphabet giver and �namer� of things. In the monotheistic world,</p><p>Adam is, of course, the one we think of when we think of the �giving of</p><p>names� to things. In terms of the study of Semiotics, the question is: did he</p><p>name things based on what they were, in essence, or did he simply create a</p><p>convention, and arbitrarily name them whatever appealed to him?</p><p>The theories of Semiotics propose that there are two levels, or �planes of</p><p>articulation�. At the level of any given language, such as Greek, English,</p><p>Chinese, or whatever, there is what they call the �Expression plane� that</p><p>consists of a lexicon, a phonology and syntax. In other words, the Expression</p><p>Plane is the selection of words that belong to that language, the sounds that</p><p>the selection of words produce, and the way they are arranged to convey</p><p>meaning. That is the first plane. The second plane is called the Content Plane.</p><p>This is the array of concepts that the language is capable of expressing. This</p><p>last is rather important because, as we have all heard at least once in our</p><p>lives, Eskimos have many words for snow while people who do not live in an</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>73</p><p>ual  and  society,  as  well  as  the  degree  to  which  they  approxi-</p><p>mate  an  objective  world  view,  condition  the  development  of</p><p>our  moral  and  social  attitudes.  The  correctness  of  our  under-</p><p>standing of self and others characterizes the components condi-</p><p>tioning our decisions and choices, be they mundane or impor-</p><p>tant, in our private lives and social activities.</p><p>The  level  and  quality  of  a  given  society�s  psychological</p><p>worldview  is  also  a  condition  of  realization  of  the  full  socio-</p><p>psychological  structure  present  as  a  potential  in  the  psycho-</p><p>logical  variety  within  our  species.  Only  when  we  can  under-</p><p>stand  a  person  in  relation  to  his  actual  internal  contents,  not</p><p>some substituted external label, can we help him along his path</p><p>to proper adjustment to social life,  which  would be to his ad-</p><p>vantage  and  would  also  assist  in  the  creation  of  a  stable  and</p><p>creative structure of society.</p><p>Supported by a proper feel for,  and understanding of, psy-</p><p>chological qualities, such a structure would impart high social</p><p>office to individuals possessing both full psychological normal-</p><p>ity, sufficient talent and specific preparation. The basic collec-</p><p>tive  intelligence  of  the  masses  of  people  would  then  respect</p><p>and support them.</p><p>And so, in such a society, the only pending problems to be</p><p>resolved  would  be  those  matters  so  difficult  as  to  overwhelm</p><p>the natural language of concepts, however enriched and quali-</p><p>tatively ennobled.</p><p>However,  there  have  always  been  �society  pedagogues�,</p><p>less  outstanding  but  more  numerous,  who  have  become  fasci-</p><p>nated by their own great ideas, which might, sometimes, even</p><empty-line/><p>environment where snow and ice are the dominant features may only have</p><p>one or two words for these phenomena.</p><p>So it is that the �Content Plane� of a language becomes crucial to what can be</p><p>discussed in that language. In order for the sounds of speech to be meaning-</p><p>ful, the words formed out of these sounds must have a meaning associated</p><p>with them. In other words, the sounds relate to the Content. The Content</p><p>Continuum represents the Universe or reality to which our words relate as we</p><p>are capable of conceiving it.</p><p>!obaczewski is rightly pointing out that the normal person (not to mention</p><p>psychology as a whole, though to a lesser extent) has an extremely psycho-</p><p>logical vocabulary of limited understanding because the content continuum of</p><p>understanding has been artificially truncated, repressed, or otherwise dimin-</p><p>ished. [Editor�s note.]</p><p>74</p><p>SOME INDESPENSIBLE CONCEPTS</p><p>be  true,  but  are  more  often  constricted  or  contain  the  taint  of</p><p>some hidden pathological thought processes. Such people have</p><p>always  striven  to  impose  pedagogical  methods  which  would</p><p>impoverish  and  deform  the  development  of  individuals�  and</p><p>societies�  psychological  world  view;  they  inflict  permanent</p><p>harm upon societies, depriving them of universally useful val-</p><p>ues.  By  claiming  to  act  in  the  name  of  a  more  valuable  idea,</p><p>such pedagogues actually undermine the values they claim and</p><p>open the door for destructive ideologies.</p><p>At the same time, as we have already mentioned, each soci-</p><p>ety contains a small but active minority of persons with various</p><p>deviant  worldviews,  especially  in  the  areas  treated  above,</p><p>which are caused either by psychological anomalies, to be dis-</p><p>cussed below, or by the long-term influence of such anomalies</p><p>upon  their  psyches,  especially  during  childhood.  Such  people</p><p>later exert a pernicious influence upon the formative process of</p><p>the  psychological  world  view  in  society,  whether  by  direct</p><p>activity or by means of written or other transmission, especially</p><p>if they engage in the service of some ideology or other.</p><p>Many causes which easily escape the notice of sociologists</p><p>and political scientists can thus be broken down into either the</p><p>development  or  involution  of  this  factor,  whose  meaning  for</p><p>the life of society is as decisive as the quality of their language</p><p>of psychological concepts.</p><p>Let us imagine that we want to analyze these processes: we</p><p>would construct a sufficiently credible inventory method which</p><p>would  examine  the  contents  and  correctness  of  the  area  of</p><p>world view in question. After subjecting the appropriate repre-</p><p>sentative groups to such testing, we would then obtain indica-</p><p>tors  of  that  particular  society�s  ability  to  understand  psycho-</p><p>logical phenomena  and dependencies  within their country and</p><p>other  nations.  This  would  simultaneously  constitute  the  basic</p><p>indicators of said society�s talent for self-government and pro-</p><p>gress,  as  well  as  its  ability  to  carry  on  a  reasonable  interna-</p><p>tional policy. Such tests could provide an early warning system</p><p>if such abilities were to deteriorate, in which case, it would be</p><p>proper  to  make  the  appropriate  efforts  in  the  realm  of  social</p><p>pedagogy. In extreme cases, it might be proper for those coun-</p><p>tries evaluating the problem to take more direct corrective ac-</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>75</p><p>tion, even to isolating the deteriorating country until the appro-</p><p>priate corrections are well under way.</p><p>Let  as  adduce  another  example  of  a  congenial  nature:  the</p><p>development of an adult human�s gifts, skills, realistic thought,</p><p>and natural psychological world view will be optimal where the</p><p>level and quality of his education and the demands of his pro-</p><p>fessional practice correspond to his individual talents. Achiev-</p><p>ing such a position provides personal, material, and  moral ad-</p><p>vantages  to  him;  society  as  whole  also  reaps  benefits  at  the</p><p>same time. Such a person would then perceive it as social jus-</p><p>tice in relation to himself.</p><p>If  various  circumstances  combine,  including  a  given  soci-</p><p>ety�s  deficient  psychological  world  view,  individual�s  are</p><p>forced to exercise functions which do not make full use of his</p><p>or her talents. When this happens, said person�s productivity is</p><p>no  better,  and  often  even  worse,  than  that  of  a  worker  with</p><p>satisfactory  talents.  Such  an  individual  then  feels  cheated  and</p><p>inundated  by  duties  which  prevent  him  from  achieving  self-</p><p>realization. His thoughts wander from his duties into a world of</p><p>fantasy, or into matters which are of greater interest to him; in</p><p>his daydream  world, he is  what he should and deserves to be.</p><p>Such a person always knows if his social and professional ad-</p><p>justment  has  taken  a  downward  direction;  at  the  same  time,</p><p>however,  if  he  fails  to  develop  a  healthy  critical  faculty  con-</p><p>cerning the upper limits of his own talents, his daydreams may</p><p>�fix on� an unfair world where �all you need is power�. Revo-</p><p>lutionary and radical ideas find fertile soil among such people</p><p>in downward social adaptations. It is in society�s best interests</p><p>to correct such conditions not only for better productivity, but</p><p>to avoid tragedies.</p><p>Another type of individual, on the other hand, may achieve</p><p>an  important  post  because  they  belong  to  privileged  social</p><p>groups or organizations in power  while their talents and skills</p><p>are not sufficient for their duties, especially the more  difficult</p><p>problems.  Such  persons  then  avoid  the  problematic  and  dedi-</p><p>cate themselves to minor  matters quite ostentatiously. A com-</p><p>ponent of histrionics appears in their conduct and tests indicate</p><p>that  their  correctness  of  reasoning  progressively  deteriorates</p><p>after only a few years�  worth of such activities. In the face of</p><p>76</p><p>SOME INDESPENSIBLE CONCEPTS</p><p>increasing pressures to perform at a level unattainable for them,</p><p>and  in  fear  of  being  discovered  as  incompetent,  they  begin  to</p><p>direct attacks against anyone with greater talent or skill, remov-</p><p>ing them from appropriate posts and playing an active role in</p><p>degrading  their  social  and  professional  adjustment.  This,  of</p><p>course,  engenders  a  feeling  of  injustice  and  can  lead  to  the</p><p>problems  of  the  downwardly  adapted  individual  as  described</p><p>above.  Upwardly-adjusted  people  thus  favor  whip-cracking,</p><p>totalitarian governments which would protect their positions.</p><p>Upward  and  downward  social  adjustments,  as  well  the</p><p>qualitatively improper ones, result in a  waste of  any  society�s</p><p>basic  capital,  namely  the  talent  pool  of  its  members.  This  si-</p><p>multaneously  leads  to  increasing  dissatisfaction  and  tensions</p><p>among individuals and social groups; any attempt to approach</p><p>human talent and its productivity problematics as a purely pri-</p><p>vate  matter  must  therefore  be  considered  dangerously  naive.</p><p>Development  or  involution  in  all  areas  of  cultural,  economic</p><p>and political life depend on the extent to which this talent pool</p><p>is  properly  utilized.  <emphasis>In  the  final  analysis,  it  also  determines </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>whether there will be evolution or revolution. </emphasis></p><p>Technically speaking, it would be easier to construct appro-</p><p>priate  methods  that  enable  us  to  evaluate  the  correlations  be-</p><p>tween individual talents and social adjustment in a given coun-</p><p>try, than to deal with the prior proposition of the development</p><p>of  psychological  concepts.  Conducting  the  proper  tests  would</p><p>furnish us a valuable index that we might call �the social order</p><p>indicator.�  The  closer  the  figure  to  +1.0,  the  more  likely  the</p><p>country in question would be to fulfill that basic precondition</p><p>for  social  order  and  take  the  proper  path  in  the  direction  of</p><p>dynamic  development.  A  low  correlation  would  be  an  indica-</p><p>tion that social reform is needed. A near-zero or even negative</p><p>correlation should be interpreted  as a danger-sign that revolu-</p><p>tion is imminent. Revolutions in one country often cause mani-</p><p>fold problems for other countries, so it is in the best interests of</p><p>all countries to monitor such conditions.</p><p>The examples adduced above do not exhaust the question of</p><p>causative  factors  influencing  the  creation  of  a  social  structure</p><p>which would adequately correspond to the laws of nature. Our</p><p>species-instinct level has already encoded the intuition that the</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>77</p><p>existence  of  society�s  internal  structure,  <emphasis>based  on  psychologi-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>cal  variations</emphasis>,  is  necessary;  it  continues  to  develop  alongside</p><p>our  basic  intelligence,  inspiring  our  healthy  common  sense.</p><p>This  explains  why  the  most  numerous  part  of  populations,</p><p>whose  talents  are  near  average,  generally  accepts  its  modest</p><p>social position in any country as long as the position fulfills the</p><p>indispensable  requirements  of  proper  social  adjustment  and</p><p>guarantees an equitable  way of life no matter at  what level of</p><p>society the individual finds their proper fit.</p><p>This average majority accepts and respects the social role of</p><p>people  whose  talents  and  education  are  superior,  as  long  as</p><p>they  occupy  appropriate  positions  within  the  social  structure.</p><p>The same people, however, will react with criticism, disrespect,</p><p>and  even  contempt,  whenever  someone  as  average  as  them-</p><p>selves  compensates  for  his  deficiencies  by  flaunting  an  up-</p><p>wardly-adjusted  position.  The  judgments  pronounced  by  this</p><p>sphere of average but sensible people can often be highly accu-</p><p>rate,  which  can  and  should  be  all  the  more  remarkable  if  we</p><p>take into account that said people could not possibly have had</p><p>sufficient knowledge of many of the actual problems, be they</p><p>scientific, technical, or economic.21</p><p>An  experienced  politician  can  rarely  assume  that  the  diffi-</p><p>culties in the areas of economics, defense, or international pol-</p><p>icy will be  fully understand by his constituency.  However, he</p><p>can and should assume that his own comprehension of human</p><p>matters, and anything having to do with interpersonal relations</p><p>within said structure, will find an echo in this same majority of</p><p>his society�s members. These facts  <emphasis>partially</emphasis> justify the idea of</p><p>democracy,  especially  if  a  particular  country  has  historically</p><p>had such a tradition, the social structure is well developed, and</p><p>the  level  of  education  is  adequate.  Nevertheless,  they  do  not</p><p>represent  psychological  data  sufficient  to  raise  democracy  to</p><p>the  level  of  a  moral  criterion  in  politics.  A  democracy  com-</p><p>posed  of  individuals  of  inadequate  psychological  knowledge</p><p>can only devolve.</p><empty-line/><p>21 Very often false opinion polls are used to attempt to manipulate a society�s</p><p>perception of its officials. This never works for very long as, eventually,</p><p>incompetence is revealed to all. [Editor�s note.]</p><p>78</p><p>SOME INDESPENSIBLE CONCEPTS</p><p>The same politician should be conscious of the fact that so-</p><p>ciety  contains  people  who  already  carry  the  psychological  re-</p><p>sults  of  social  maladjustment.  Some  of  these  individuals  at-</p><p>tempt  to  protect  positions  for  which  their  skills  are  not  com-</p><p>mensurate, while others fight to be allowed to use their talents.</p><p>Governing a country becomes increasingly difficult when such</p><p>battles begin to eclipse other important needs. That is why the</p><p><emphasis>creation of a fair social structure continues to be a basic pre-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>condition for social order</emphasis> and the liberation of creative values.</p><p>It also explains why the propriety and productivity of a struc-</p><p>ture-creation process constitute a criterion for  a good  political</p><p>system.</p><p>Politicians  should  also  be  aware  that  in  each  society  there</p><p>are  people  whose  basic  intelligence,  natural  psychological</p><p>world  view,  and  moral  reasoning  have  developed  improperly.</p><p>Some  of  these  persons  contain  the  cause  within  themselves,</p><p>others  were  subjected  to  psychologically  abnormal  people  as</p><p>children. Such individuals� comprehension of social and moral</p><p>questions is different, both from the natural and from the objec-</p><p>tive  viewpoint;  they  constitute  a  destructive  factor  for  the  de-</p><p>velopment of society�s psychological concepts, social structure,</p><p>and internal bonds.</p><p>At the same time, such people easily interpenetrate the so-</p><p>cial structure with a ramified22 network of mutual pathological</p><p>conspiracies  poorly  connected  to  the  main  social  structure.</p><p>These  people  and  their  networks  participate  in  the  genesis  of</p><p>that evil which spares no nation.  This substructure gives birth</p><p>to  dreams  of  obtaining  power  and  imposing  one�s  will  upon</p><p>society,  and  is  quite  often  actually  brought  about  in  various</p><p>countries, and during historical times as well. It is for this rea-</p><p>son that a significant portion of our consideration shall be de-</p><p>voted to an understanding of this age-old and dangerous source</p><p>of problems.</p><p>Some countries  with a non-homogeneous population mani-</p><p>fest further factors which operate destructively upon the forma-</p><p>tion of social structure and the permanent developmental proc-</p><empty-line/><p>22 Showing one or more branches. In mathematics, ramification is a geomet-</p><p>ric term used for �branching out�. It is also used from the opposite perspec-</p><p>tive (branches coming together). [Editor�s note.]</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>79</p><p>esses of a society�s psychological world view. Primarily among</p><p>these are the racial, ethnic, and cultural differences existing in</p><p>virtually  every  conquest-engendered  nation.  Memories  of  for-</p><p>mer  sufferings  and  contempt  for  the  vanquished  continue  to</p><p>divide the population for centuries. It is possible to overcome</p><p>these  difficulties  if  understanding  and  goodwill  prevail</p><p>throughout several generations.</p><p>Differences  in  religious  beliefs  and  the  moral  convictions</p><p>related thereto continue to cause problems, albeit less danger-</p><p>ous  than  the  above,  <emphasis>unless  aggravated  by  some  doctrine  of </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>intolerance or superiority</emphasis> of one faith above others. The crea-</p><p>tion  of  a  social  structure  whose  links  are  patriotic  and  supra-</p><p>religious has, after all, been demonstrated as possible.</p><p>All these difficulties become extremely destructive if  a so-</p><p>cial  or  religious  group,  in  keeping  with  its  doctrine,  demands</p><p>that  its  members  be  accorded  positions  which  are  in  fact  up-</p><p>ward-adjusted with relation to these people�s true talents.</p><p>A  just  social  structure  woven  of  individually  adjusted  per-</p><p>sons, i.e. creative and dynamic as a whole, can only take shape</p><p>if this process is subjected to its natural laws rather than some</p><p>conceptual  doctrines.  It  benefits  society  as  a  whole  for  each</p><p>individual  to  be  able  to  find  his  own  way  to  self-realization</p><p>with  assistance  from  a  society  which  understands  these  laws,</p><p>individual interests and the common good.</p><p>One obstacle to the development of a society�s psychologi-</p><p>cal world view, the building of a healthy societal structure, and</p><p>the institution of proper forms for governing the nation, would</p><p>appear  to  be  the  enormous  populations  and  vast  distances  of</p><p>giant countries. It is just precisely these nations which give rise</p><p>to the greatest ethnic and cultural variations. In a vast spreading</p><p>land  containing  hundreds  of  millions  of  people,  individuals</p><p>lack the support of a  familiar homeland  and feel powerless to</p><p>exert  an  effect  upon  matters  of  high  politics.  The  structure  of</p><p>society  becomes  lost  in  wide-open  spaces.  What  remains  is</p><p>narrow, generally familial, links.</p><p>At the same time, governing such a country creates its own</p><p>unavoidable problems: giants suffer from what could be called</p><p>permanent  macropathy  (giant  sickness),  since  the  principal</p><p>authorities  are  far  away  from  any  individual  or  local  matters.</p><p>80</p><p>SOME INDESPENSIBLE CONCEPTS</p><p>The  main symptom is the proliferation of regulations required</p><p>for  administration;  they  may  appear  proper  in  the  capital  but</p><p>are  often  meaningless  in  outlying  districts  or  when  applied  to</p><p>individual  matters.  Officials  are  forced  to  follow  regulations</p><p>blindly; the scope of using their human reason and differentiat-</p><p>ing  real  situations  becomes  very  narrow  indeed.  Such  behav-</p><p>ioral  procedures  have  an  impact  upon  the  society,  which  also</p><p>starts to think regulations instead of practical and psychological</p><p>reality.  The  psychological  world  view,  which  constitutes  the</p><p>basic  factor  in  cultural  development  and  activates  social  life,</p><p>thus becomes involuted.</p><p>It  thus  behooves  us  to  ask:  Is  good  government  possible?</p><p><emphasis>Are  giant  countries  capable  of  sustaining  social  and  cultural </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>evolution? </emphasis> It would appear, rather, that the best candidates for</p><p>development  are  those  countries  whose  populations  number</p><p>between  ten  and  twenty  million,  and  where  personal  bonds</p><p>among citizens, and between citizens and their authorities, still</p><p>safeguard  correct  psychological  differentiation  and  natural</p><p>relationships.  Overly  large  countries  should  be  divided  into</p><p>smaller organisms enjoying considerable autonomy, especially</p><p>as  regards  cultural  and  economic  matters;  they  could  afford</p><p>their citizens a feeling of homeland within which their person-</p><p>alities could develop and mature.</p><p>If  someone  asked  me  what  should  be  done  to  heal  the</p><p>United States of America, a country which manifests symptoms</p><p>of macropathy,  <emphasis>inter alia</emphasis>, I would advise subdividing that vast</p><p>nation  into  thirteen  states--just  like  the  original  ones,  except</p><p>correspondingly larger and with more natural boundaries. Such</p><p>states should then be given considerable autonomy. That would</p><p>afford citizens a feeling of homeland, albeit a smaller one, and</p><p>liberate  the  motivations  of  local  patriotism  and  rivalry  among</p><p>such  states.  This  would,  in  turn,  facilitate  solutions  to  other</p><p>problems with a different origin.</p><p>~~~</p><p>Society  is  not  an  organism  subordinating  every  cell  to  the</p><p>good of the whole; neither is it a colony of insects, where the</p><p>collective instinct acts like a dictator. However, it should also</p><p>avoid  being  a  compendium  of  egocentric  individuals  linked</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>81</p><p>purely  by  economic  interests  and  legal  and  formal  organiza-</p><p>tions.</p><p>Any society is a socio-psychological structure woven of in-</p><p>dividuals whose psychological organization is the highest, and</p><p>thus the most variegated. A significant scope of man�s individ-</p><p>ual freedom derives from this state of affairs and subsists in an</p><p>extremely complicated relationship to his manifold psychologi-</p><p>cal  dependencies  and  duties,  with  regard  to  this  collective</p><p>whole.</p><p>Isolating an individual�s personal interest as if it were at war</p><p>with  collective  interests  is  pure  speculation  which  radically</p><p>oversimplifies real conditions instead of tracking their complex</p><p>nature.  Asking  questions  based  on  such  schemes  is  logically</p><p>defective, since it contains erroneous suggestions.</p><p>In  reality,  many  ostensibly  contradictory  interests,  such  as</p><p>individual vs. collective or those of various social groups and</p><p>substructures, could be  reconciled if  we could be guided by a</p><p>sufficiently penetrating understanding of the good of man and</p><p>society, and if  we  could overcome the operations of emotions</p><p>as well as some  more or less primitive doctrines.  Such recon-</p><p>ciliation,  however,  requires  transferring  the  human  and  social</p><p>problems  in  question  to  a  higher  level  of  understanding  and</p><p>acceptance  of  the  natural  laws  of  life.  At  this  level,  even  the</p><p>most difficult problems turn out to have a solution, since they</p><p>invariably  derive  from  the  same  insidious  operations  of  psy-</p><p>chopathological  phenomena.  We  shall  deal  with  this  question</p><p>toward the end of this book.</p><p>A colony of insects, no matter how well-organized socially,</p><p>is doomed to extinction whenever its collective instinct contin-</p><p>ues  to  operate  according  to  the  psychogenetic  code,  although</p><p>the  biological  meaning  has  disappeared.  If,  for  instance,  a</p><p>queen bee does not affect her nuptial flight in time because the</p><p>weather  has  been  particularly  bad,  she  begins  laying  unfertil-</p><p>ized eggs  which  will hatch nothing but drones. The bees con-</p><p>tinue  to  defend  their  queen,  as  required  by  their  instinct;  of</p><p>course,  and  when  the  worker  bees  die  out  the  hive  becomes</p><p>extinct.</p><p>At  that  point,  only  a  �higher  authority�  in  the  shape  of  a</p><p>beekeeper can save such a hive. He must find and destroy the</p><p>82</p><p>SOME INDESPENSIBLE CONCEPTS</p><p>drone  queen  and  insinuate  a  healthy  fertilized  queen  into  the</p><p>hive along with a few of her young workers. A net is required</p><p>for a few days to protect such a queen and her providers from</p><p>being stung by those bees loyal to the old queen. Then the hive</p><p>instinct  accepts  the  new  one.  The  apiarist  generally  suffers  a</p><p>few painful stings in the process.</p><p>The following question derives from the above comparison:</p><p>Can  the  human  hive  inhabiting  our  globe  achieve  sufficient</p><p>comprehension  of  macrosocial  pathological  phenomenon</p><p>which  is  so  dangerous,  abhorrent,  and  fascinating  at  the  same</p><p>time, before it is too late? At present, our individual and collec-</p><p>tive  instincts  and  our  natural  psychological  and  moral  world</p><p>view cannot furnish all the answers upon which to base skillful</p><p>counteractive measures.</p><p>Those fair-minded people  who preach that all we have left</p><p>is to trust in the �Great Apiarist in the sky� and a return to His</p><p>commandments  are  glimpsing  a  general  truth,  but  they  also</p><p>tend  to  trivialize  particular  truths,  especially  the  naturalistic</p><p>ones. It is the latter which constitute a basis for comprehending</p><p>phenomena  and  targeting  practical  action.  The  laws  of  nature</p><p>have  made  us  very  different  from  one  another.  Thanks  to  his</p><p>individual  characteristics,  exceptional  life-circumstances,  and</p><p>scientific effort, man may have  achieved some  mastery of the</p><p>art of objectively comprehending the phenomena of the above-</p><p>mentioned  type,  but  we  must  underscore  that  this  could  only</p><p>occur because it was in accordance with the laws of nature.</p><p>If societies and their  wise people are able to accept an ob-</p><p>jective understanding of social and sociopathological phenom-</p><p>ena,  overcoming  the  emotionalism  and  egotism  of  the  natural</p><p>world view for this purpose, they shall find a means of action</p><p>based on an understanding of the essence of the phenomena. It</p><p>will then become evident that a proper vaccine or treatment can</p><p>be  found  for  each  of  the  diseases  scourging  the  earth  in  the</p><p>form of major or minor social epidemics.</p><p>Just as a sailor possessing an accurate nautical map enjoys</p><p>greater  freedom  of  course-selection  and  maneuvering  amid</p><p>islands and bays,  a person endowed  with a better comprehen-</p><p>sion  of  self,  other  people,  and  the  complex  interdependencies</p><p>of social life becomes more independent of the various circum-</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>83</p><p>stances of life and better able to overcome situations which are</p><p>difficult  to  understand.  At  the  same  time,  such  improved</p><p>knowledge makes an individual more liable to accept his duties</p><p>toward  society  and  to  subordinate  himself  to  the  discipline</p><p>which  arises  as  a  corollary.  Better  informed  societies  also</p><p>achieve  internal  order  and  criteria  for  collective  efforts.  This</p><p>book is dedicated to reinforcing this knowledge by means of a</p><p>naturalistic understanding of phenomena, something heretofore</p><p>comprehended only by means of excessively moralistic catego-</p><p>ries of the natural world view.</p><p>In a wider perspective, a constantly improving grasp of the</p><p>laws  governing  social  life,  and  its  atypical  secluded  recesses,</p><p>must  lead  us  to  reflect  upon  the  failings  and  deficiencies  of</p><p>those social doctrines expounded to date, which were based on</p><p>an  extremely  primitive  understanding  of  these  laws  and  phe-</p><p>nomena.  The  distance  is  not  far  between  such  considerations</p><p>and a better understanding of the operations of these dependen-</p><p>cies in former and existing social systems; the same applies to</p><p>substantive  critiques  thereof.  A  new  idea  is  about  to  be  born</p><p>based upon this ever-deepening comprehension of natural laws,</p><p>namely the building of a new social system for nations.</p><p>Such a system would be better than any of its predecessors.</p><p>Building it is possible and necessary, not just some vague fu-</p><p>turistic  vision.  After  all,  a  whole  series  of  countries  is  now</p><p>dominated  by  conditions  which  have  destroyed  the  structural</p><p>forms  worked  out  by  history  and  replaced  them  with  social</p><p>systems  inimical  to  creative  functioning,  systems  which  can</p><p>only survive by means of force. We are thus confronted with a</p><p>great  construction  project  demanding  wide-ranging  and  well-</p><p>organized  work.  The  earlier  we  undertake  the  job,  the  more</p><p>time we will have to carry it out.</p><p><strong>CHAPTER III </strong></p><p><strong>THE HYSTEROIDAL CYCLE </strong></p><p>Ever since human societies and civilizations have been cre-</p><p>ated on our globe, people have longed for happy times full of</p><p>tranquility and justice, which would have allowed everyone to</p><p>herd  his  sheep  in  peace,  search  for  fertile  valleys,  plow  the</p><p>earth,  dig  for  treasures,  or  build  houses  and  palaces.  Man  de-</p><p>sires  peace  so  as  to  enjoy  the  benefits  accumulated  by  earlier</p><p>generations  and  to  proudly  observe  the  growth  of  future  ones</p><p>he has begotten. Sipping wine or mead in the meantime would</p><p>be  nice.  He  would  like  to  wander  about,  becoming  familiar</p><p>with  other  lands  and  people,  or  enjoy  the  star-studded  sky  of</p><p>the south, the colors of nature, and the faces  and costumes of</p><p>women. He would also like to give free rein to his imagination</p><p>and immortalize his name in  works of  art,  whether sculptured</p><p>in marble or eternalized in myth and poetry.</p><p>From time immemorial, then, man has dreamed of a life in</p><p>which the measured effort of mind and muscle would be punc-</p><p>tuated  by  well-deserved  rest.  He  would  like  to  learn  nature�s</p><p>laws so as to dominate her and take advantage of her gifts. Man</p><p>enlisted  the  natural  power  of  animals  in  order  to  make  his</p><p>dreams  come  true,  and  when  this  did  not  meet  his  needs,  he</p><p>turned to his own kind for this purpose, in part depriving other</p><p>humans of their humanity simply because he was more power-</p><p>ful.</p><p>Dreams of a happy and peaceful life thus gave rise to force</p><p>over others, a force which depraves the mind of its user. That is</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>85</p><p>why man�s dreams of happiness have not come true throughout</p><p>history. This hedonistic view of �happiness� contains the seeds</p><p>of misery and feed the eternal cycle  whereby good times give</p><p>birth to bad times, which in turn cause the suffering and mental</p><p>effort  which produce experience, good sense, moderation, and</p><p>a certain amount of psychological knowledge, all virtues which</p><p>serve to rebuild more felicitous conditions of existence.</p><p>During  good  times,  people  progressively  lose  sight  of  the</p><p>need for profound reflection, introspection, knowledge of oth-</p><p>ers, and an understanding of life�s complicated laws. Is it worth</p><p>pondering  the  properties  of  human  nature  and  man�s  flawed</p><p>personality,  whether  one�s  own  or  someone  else�s?  Can  we</p><p>understand the creative  meaning of suffering  we have not un-</p><p>dergone  ourselves,  instead  of  taking  the  easy  way  out  and</p><p>blaming the victim? Any excess mental effort seems like point-</p><p>less labor if life�s joys appear to be available for the taking. A</p><p>clever,  liberal,  and  merry  individual  is  a  good  sport;  a  more</p><p>farsighted person predicting dire results becomes a wet-blanket</p><p>killjoy.</p><p>Perception  of  the  truth  about  the  real  environment,  espe-</p><p>cially an understanding of the human personality and its values,</p><p>ceases  to  be  a  virtue  during  the  so-called  �happy�  times;</p><p>thoughtful doubters are decried as meddlers  who cannot leave</p><p>well enough alone. This, in turn, leads to an impoverishment of</p><p>psychological  knowledge,  the  capacity  of  differentiating  the</p><p>properties  of  human  nature  and  personality,  and  the  ability to</p><p>mold minds creatively. The cult of power thus supplants those</p><p>mental  values  so  essential  for  maintaining  law  and  order  by</p><p>peaceful means. A nation�s enrichment or involution regarding</p><p>its psychological world view could be considered an indicator</p><p>of whether its future will be good or bad.</p><p>During �good� times, the search for truth becomes uncom-</p><p>fortable  because  it  reveals  inconvenient  facts.  It  is  better  to</p><p>think  about  easier  and  more  pleasant  things.  Unconscious</p><p>elimination  of  data  which  are,  or  appear  to  be,  inexpedient</p><p>gradually turns into habit, and then becomes a custom accepted</p><p>by  society  at  large.  The  problem  is  that  any  thought  process</p><p>based on such truncated information cannot possibly give rise</p><p>to correct conclusions; it further leads to subconscious substitu-</p><p>86</p><p>THE HYSTEROIDAL CYCLE</p><p>tion  of  inconvenient  premises  by  more  convenient  ones,</p><p>thereby approaching the boundaries of psychopathology.</p><p>Such  contented  periods  for  one  group  of  people  -  often</p><p>rooted  in  some  injustice  to  other  people  or  nations  -  start  to</p><p>strangle the capacity for individual and societal consciousness;</p><p>subconscious  factors  take  over  a  decisive  role  in  life.  Such  a</p><p>society,  already  infected  by  the  hysteroidal23  state,  considers</p><p>any  perception  of  uncomfortable  truth  to  be  a  sign  of  �ill-</p><p>breeding�. J. G. Herder�s24 iceberg is drowned in a sea of falsi-</p><p>fied  unconsciousness;  only  the  tip  of  the  iceberg  is  visible</p><p>above the waves of life. Catastrophe waits in the wings. In such</p><p>times, the capacity for logical and disciplined thought, born of</p><p>necessity during difficult times, begins to fade. When commu-</p><p>nities  lose  the  capacity  for  psychological  reason  and  moral</p><p>criticism, the processes of the generation of evil are intensified</p><p>at  every  social  scale,  whether  individual  or  macrosocial,  until</p><p>everything reverts to �bad� times.</p><p>We already know that every society contains a certain per-</p><p>centage of people carrying psychological deviations caused by</p><p>various inherited or acquired factors which produce anomalies</p><p>in  perception,  thought,  and  character.  Many  such  people  at-</p><p>tempt  to  impart  meaning  to  their  deviant  lives  by  means  of</p><p>social  hyperactivity.  They  create  their  own  myths  and  ideolo-</p><p>gies  of  overcompensation  and  have  the  tendency  to  egotisti-</p><p>cally insinuate to others that their own deviant perceptions and</p><p>the resulting goals and ideas are superior.</p><p>When a few generations� worth of �good-time� insouciance</p><p>results  in  societal  deficit  regarding  psychological  skill  and</p><p>moral  criticism,  this  paves  the  way  for  pathological  plotters,</p><empty-line/><p>23 Hysteria is a diagnostic label applied to a state of mind, one of unmanage-</p><p>able fear or emotional excesses. Here it is being used to describe �fear of</p><p>truth� or fear of thinking about unpleasant things so as to not �rock the boat�</p><p>of current contentment. [Editor�s note.]</p><p>24 Johann Gottfried Herder (1744-1803), a theologian by training and profes-</p><p>sion, greatly influenced German letters with his literary criticism and his</p><p>philosophy of history. Along with W. Goethe and Schiller, he made Weimar</p><p>the seat of German neohumanism. His analogy of national cultures as organic</p><p>beings had an enormous impact on modern historical consciousness. Nations,</p><p>he argued, possessed not only the phases of youth, maturity, and decline but</p><p>also singular, incomparable worth. His mixture of anthropology and history</p><p>was characteristic of the age. [Editor�s note.]</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>87</p><p>snake-charmers, and even more primitive impostors to act and</p><p>merge  into  the  processes  of  the  origination  of  evil.  They  are</p><p>essential factors in its synthesis. In the next chapter I shall at-</p><p>tempt  to  persuade  my  readers  that  the  participation  of  patho-</p><p>logical factors, so underrated by the social sciences, is a com-</p><p>mon phenomenon in the processes of the origin of evil.</p><p>Those times which many people later recall as the �good old</p><p>days� thus provide fertile soil for future tragedy because of the</p><p>progressive  devolution  of  moral,  intellectual,  and  personality</p><p>values which give rise to Rasputin-like eras.</p><p>The above is a sketch of the causative understanding of real-</p><p>ity  which  in  no  way  contradicts  a  teleological25  perception  of</p><p>the  sense  of  causality.  Bad  times  are  not  merely  the  result  of</p><p>hedonistic regression to the past; they have a historical purpose</p><p>to fulfill.</p><p>Suffering, effort, and mental activity during times of immi-</p><p>nent  bitterness  lead  to  a  progressive,  generally  heightened,</p><p>regeneration  of  lost  values,  which  results  in  human  progress.</p><p>Unfortunately,  we  still  lack  a  sufficiently  exhaustive  philoso-</p><p>phical grasp of this interdependence of causality and teleology</p><p>regarding occurrences. It seems that prophets were more clear-</p><p>sighted, in the light of the laws of  creation, than philosophers</p><p>such as E. S.  Russell26, R. B. Braithwaite27, G. Sommerhoff28,</p><p>and others who pondered this question.</p><empty-line/><p>25  <emphasis>Teleology</emphasis> is the supposition that there is design, purpose, directive princi-</p><p>ple, or finality in the works and processes of nature, and the philosophical</p><p>study of that purpose. [Editor�s note.]</p><p>26 Russell, E.S. 1916.  <emphasis> Form and Function: A Contribution to the History of </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>Animal Morphology</emphasis>. London: Murray. [Editor�s note.]</p><p>27 Braithwaite, R.B. (1900-1990): British philosopher best known for his</p><p>theories in the philosophy of science and in moral and religious philosophy.</p><p>Braithwaite�s work in the philosophy of the physical sciences was important</p><p>for his theories on the nature of scientific inductive reasoning and the use of</p><p>models, as well as on the use of probabilistic laws. He also applied his scien-</p><p>tific background to his studies of moral and religious philosophy, particularly</p><p>in the application of mathematical game theory. In his book  <emphasis>Theory of Games </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>as a Tool for the Moral Philosopher</emphasis> (1955), he demonstrated the ways in</p><p>which game theory could be used to arrive at moral choices and ethical deci-</p><p>sions. His classic work was  <emphasis>Scientific Explanation: A Study of Theory, Prob-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>ability and Law in Science</emphasis> (1953), on the methodology of natural science.</p><p>[Editor's note.]</p><p>28 G. Sommerhoff,  <emphasis>Analytical Biology</emphasis> (O.U.P., 1950). [Editor�s note.]</p><p>88</p><p>THE HYSTEROIDAL CYCLE</p><p>When bad times  arrive  and people are overwhelmed  by an</p><p>excess  of  evil,  they  must  gather  all  their  physical  and  mental</p><p>strength  to  fight  for  existence  and  protect  human  reason.  The</p><p>search for some way out of the difficulties and dangers rekin-</p><p>dles  long-buried  powers  of  discretion.  Such  people  have  the</p><p>initial  tendency  to  rely  on  force  in  order  to  counteract  the</p><p>threat;  they  may,  for  instance,  become  �trigger-happy�  or  de-</p><p>pendent upon armies.</p><p>Slowly and laboriously, however, they discover the advan-</p><p>tages  conferred  by  mental  effort;  improved  understanding  of</p><p>the  psychological  situation  in  particular,  better  differentiation</p><p>of human characters and personalities, and, finally, comprehen-</p><p>sion  of  one�s  adversaries.  During  such  times,  virtues  which</p><p>former generations relegated to literary motifs regain their real</p><p>and useful substance and become prized for their value. A wise</p><p>person capable of furnishing sound advice is highly respected.</p><p>How  astonishingly similar were the philosophies of Socra-</p><p>tes  and  Confucius,  those  half-legendary  thinkers  who,  albeit</p><p>near-contemporaries, resided at opposite ends of the great con-</p><p>tinent. Both lived during evil, bloody times and adumbrated a</p><p>method for conquering evil, especially regarding perception of</p><p>the laws of life and knowledge of human nature. They searched</p><p>for criteria of moral values within human nature and considered</p><p>knowledge  and  understanding  to  be  virtues.  Both  men,  how-</p><p>ever,  heard  the  same  wordless  internal  Voice  warning  those</p><p>embarking  upon  important  moral  questions:  �Socrates,  do  not</p><p>do this�. That is why their efforts and sacrifices constitute per-</p><p>manent assistance in the battle against evil.</p><p>Difficult  and  laborious  times  give  rise  to  values  which  fi-</p><p>nally conquer evil and produce better times.  The succinct and</p><p>accurate  analysis  of  phenomena,  made  possible  thanks  to  the</p><p>conquest of the expendable emotions and egotism characteriz-</p><p>ing self-satisfied people, opens the door to causative behavior,</p><p>particularly  in  the  areas  of  philosophical,  psychological,  and</p><p>moral  reflection;  this  tips  the  scale  to  the  advantage  of  good-</p><p>ness.  If  these  values  were  totally  incorporated  into  human-</p><p>kind�s cultural heritage, they could sufficiently protect nations</p><p>from  the  next  era  of  errors  and  distortions.  However,  the  col-</p><p>lective  memory  is  impermanent  and  particularly  liable  to  re-</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>89</p><p>move a philosopher and his work from his context, namely his</p><p>time and place and the goals which he served.</p><p>Whenever an experienced person finds a moment of relative</p><p>peace  after  a  difficult  and  painful  effort,  his  mind  is  free  to</p><p>reflect unencumbered by the expendable emotions and outdated</p><p>attitudes  of  the  past,  but  aided  by  the  cognizance  of  bygone</p><p>years.  He  thus  comes  closer  to  an  objective  understanding  of</p><p>phenomena and a view of actual causative links, including such</p><p>links  which  cannot  be  understood  within  the  framework  of</p><p>natural  language.  He  thus  meditates  upon  an  ever-expanding</p><p>circle  of  general  laws  while  contemplating  the  meaning  of</p><p>those  former  occurrences  which  separated  the  periods  of  his-</p><p>tory.  We  reach  for  ancient  precepts  because  we  understand</p><p>them  better;  they  make  it  easier  for  us  to  understand both  the</p><p>genesis and the creative meaning of unhappy times.</p><p>The  cycle  of  happy,  peaceful  times  favors  a  narrowing  of</p><p>the  world  view  and  an  increase  in  egotism;  societies  become</p><p>subject to progressive hysteria and to that final stage, descrip-</p><p>tively  known  to  historians,  which  finally  produces  times  of</p><p>despondency and confusion, that have lasted for millennia and</p><p>continue to do so. The recession of mind and personality which</p><p>is a feature of ostensibly happy times varies from one nation to</p><p>another;  thus  some  countries  manage  to  survive  the  results  of</p><p>such crises with minor losses, whereas others lose nations and</p><p>empires. Geopolitical factors have also played a decisive role.</p><p>The psychological features of such crises doubtless bear the</p><p>stamp  of  the  time  and  of  the  civilization  in  question,  but  one</p><p>common denominator must have been an exacerbation of soci-</p><p>ety�s hysterical condition. This deviation or, better yet, forma-</p><p>tive deficiency of character, is a perennial sickness of societies,</p><p>especially  the  privileged  elites.  The  existence  of  exaggerated</p><p>individual cases, especially such characterized as clinical, is an</p><p>offshoot of the level of social hysteria, quite frequently corre-</p><p>lated  with  some  additional  causes  such  as  carriers  of  minor</p><p>lesions  of  brain  tissue.  Quantitatively  and  qualitatively,  these</p><p>individuals  may  serve  to  reveal  and  evaluate  such  times,  as</p><p>indicated in history�s  <emphasis>Book of San Michele</emphasis> 29. From the perspec-</p><empty-line/><p>29 Axel Munthe, (1857-1949) physician, psychiatrist, and writer, was born in</p><p>Oskarshamn, Sweden. He was educated at the University of Uppsala and at</p><p>90</p><p>THE HYSTEROIDAL CYCLE</p><p>tive  of  historical  time,  it  would  be  harder  to  examine  the  re-</p><p>gression  of  the  ability  and  correctness  of  reasoning  or  the  in-</p><p>tensity of �Austrian talk�, although these approximate the crux</p><p>of the matter better and more directly.</p><p>In spite of above-mentioned qualitative differences, the du-</p><p>ration  of  these  time-cycles  tends  to  be  similar.  If  we  assume</p><p>that  the  extreme  of  European  hysteria  occurred  around  1900</p><p>and returns not quite every two centuries, we find similar con-</p><p>ditions. Such cyclical isochronicity may embrace a civilization</p><p>and  cross  into  neighboring  countries,  but  it  would  not  swim</p><p>oceans or penetrate into faraway and far different civilizations.</p><p>When the First World War broke out, young officers danced</p><p>and  sang  on  the  streets  of  Vienna:  �<emphasis>Krieg,  Krieg,  Krieg!  Es </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>wird  ein  schoener  Krieg</emphasis>  ...�.  While  visiting  Upper  Austria  in</p><p>1978, I decided to drop in on the local parson, who was in his</p><p>seventies  by  then.  When  I  told  him  about  myself,  I  suddenly</p><p>realized he thought I was lying and inventing pretty stories. He</p><p>subjected  my  statements  to  psychological  analysis,  based  on</p><p>this unassailable assumption and attempted to convince me that</p><p>his morals were lofty.  When I complained to a friend of mine</p><p>about  this,  he  was  amused:  �As  a  psychologist,  you  were  ex-</p><p>tremely  lucky  to  catch  the  survival  of  authentic  Austrian  talk</p><p>( <emphasis>die oesterreichische Rede</emphasis>). We young ones have been incapa-</p><p>ble  of  demonstrating  it  to  you  even  if  we  wanted  to  simulate</p><p>it.�</p><p>In the European languages, �Austrian talk� has become the</p><p>common  descriptive  term  for  paralogistic30  discourse.  Many</p><p>people  using  this  term  nowadays  are  unaware  of  its  origin.</p><p>Within the context of maximum hysterical intensity in Europe</p><empty-line/><p>Montpellier in Paris where he received his M.D. He studied the work of the</p><p>French neurologist Jean Martin Charcot and used hypnosis in his own work</p><p>with the physical and psychological symptoms of his patients. He later be-</p><p>came physician to the Swedish Royal family. He became known as �the</p><p>modern St. Francis of Assissi� because he financed sanctuaries for birds. As a</p><p>writer Munthe recounted his own experiences as a physician and psychiatrist.</p><p>He is most famous for the autobiographical work  <emphasis>The Story of San Michele</emphasis></p><p>which was published in 1929. [Editor�s note.]</p><p>30  <emphasis>Paralogism</emphasis>: n. illogical or fallacious deduction. paralogical, paralogistic, a.</p><p>paralogize, v.i. be illogical; draw unwarranted conclusions. paralogist, n.</p><p>[Editor�s note.]</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>91</p><p>at the time, the authentic article represented a typical product of</p><p>conversive thinking: subconscious selection and substitution of</p><p>data leading to chronic avoidance of the crux of the matter. In</p><p>the  same  manner,  the  reflex  assumption  that  every  speaker  is</p><p>lying is an indication of the hysterical anti-culture of mendac-</p><p>ity, within which telling the truth becomes �immoral�.</p><p>That era of hysterical regression gave birth to the great war</p><p>and  the  great  revolution  which  extended  into  Fascism,  Hitler-</p><p>ism,  and  the  tragedy  of  the  Second  World  War.  It  also  pro-</p><p>duced  the  macrosocial  phenomenon  whose  deviant  character</p><p>became  superimposed  upon  this  cycle,  screening  and  destroy-</p><p>ing its nature. Contemporary Europe is heading for the opposite</p><p>extreme of this historical sine curve. We could thus assume that</p><p>the beginning of the next century  will produce an era of opti-</p><p>mal capability and correctness of reason, thus leading to many</p><p>new values in all realms of human discovery and creativity. We</p><p>can also foresee that realistic psychological understanding and</p><p>spiritual enrichment will be features of this era.</p><p>At  the  same  time,  America,  especially  the  U.S.A.,  has</p><p>reached  a  nadir  for  the  first  time  in  its  short  history.  Grey-</p><p>haired  Europeans  living  in  the  U.S.  today  are  struck  by  the</p><p>similarity  between  these  phenomena  and  the  ones  dominating</p><p>Europe at the times of their youth. The emotionalism dominat-</p><p>ing individual, collective and political life, as well as the sub-</p><p>conscious  selection  and  substitution  of  data  in  reasoning,  are</p><p>impoverishing the development of a psychological world view</p><p>and leading to individual and national egotism. The  mania for</p><p>taking offense at the drop of a hat provokes constant retaliation,</p><p>taking  advantage  of  hyper-irritability  and  hypo-criticality  on</p><p>the  part  of  others.31  This  can  be  considered  analogous  to  the</p><p>European  dueling  mania  of  those  times.  People  fortunate</p><p>enough to achieve a position higher than someone else are con-</p><p>temptuous of their supposed inferiors in a way highly reminis-</p><p>cent  of  czarist  Russian  customs.  Turn-of-the-century  Freudian</p><p>psychology finds fertile soil in this country because of the simi-</p><p>larity in social and psychological conditions.</p><p>America�s psychological recession drags in its wake an im-</p><p>paired  socio-professional  adaptation  of  this  country�s  people,</p><empty-line/><p>31 The litigious nature of Americans is known the world over. [Editor�s note.]</p><p>92</p><p>THE HYSTEROIDAL CYCLE</p><p>leading to a waste of human talent and an involution of societal</p><p>structure. If we were to calculate this country�s adaptation cor-</p><p>relation  index,  as  suggested  in  the  prior  chapter,  it  would</p><p>probably be lower than the great majority of the free and civi-</p><p>lized nations of this world, and possibly lower than some coun-</p><p>tries which have lost their freedom.</p><p>A highly talented individual in the USA finds it ever more</p><p>difficult  to  fight  his  way  through  to  self-realization  and  a  so-</p><p>cially  creative  position.  Universities,  politics,  and  businesses</p><p>ever  more  frequently  demonstrate  a  united  front  of  relatively</p><p>untalented  persons  and  even  incompetent  persons.  The  word</p><p>�overeducated� is heard more and more often. Such �overquali-</p><p>fied� individuals finally hide out in some foundation laboratory</p><p>where they are allowed to earn the Nobel prize as long as they</p><p>don�t do anything really useful. In the meantime, the country as</p><p>whole suffers due to a deficit in the inspirational role of highly</p><p>gifted individuals.</p><p>As a result, America is stifling progress in all areas of life,</p><p>from  culture  to  technology  and  economics,  not  excluding  po-</p><p>litical  incompetence.  When  linked  to  other  deficiencies,  an</p><p>egotist�s incapability of understanding other people and nations</p><p>leads  to  political  error  and  the  scapegoating  of  outsiders.</p><p>Slamming  the  brakes  on  the  evolution  of  political  structures</p><p>and social institutions increases both administrative inertia and</p><p>discontent on the part of its victims.</p><p>We should realize that the most dramatic social difficulties</p><p>and  tensions  occur  at  least  ten  years  after  the  first  observable</p><p>indications  of  having  emerged  from  a  psychological  crisis.</p><p>Being  a  sequel,  they  also  constitute  a  delayed  reaction  to  the</p><p>cause  or  are  stimulated  by  the  same  psychological  activation</p><p>process.  The  time  span  for  effective  countermeasures  is  thus</p><p>rather limited.</p><p>Is  Europe  entitled  to  look  down  on  America  for  suffering</p><p>from  the  same  sickness  the  former  has  succumbed  to  several</p><p>times  in  the  past?  Is  America�s  feeling  of  superiority  toward</p><p>Europe  derived  from  these  past  events  and  their inhuman  and</p><p>tragic results? If so, is this attitude anything more than a harm-</p><p>fless  anachronism?  It  would  be  most  useful  if  the  European</p><p>nations took advantage of their historical experience and more</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>93</p><p>modern  psychological  knowledge  so  as  to  help  America  most</p><p>effectively.</p><p>East Central Europe, now under Soviet domination,32 is part</p><p>of the European cycle, albeit somewhat delayed; the same ap-</p><p>plies to the Soviet empire, especially to the European portion.</p><p>There,  however,  tracking  these  changes  and  isolating  them</p><p>from more dramatic phenomena eludes the possibilities of ob-</p><p>servation,  even  if  it  is  only  a  matter  of  methodology.  Even</p><p>there,  however,  there  is  progressive  growth  in  the  grass-roots</p><p>resistance of the regenerative power of healthy common sense.</p><p>Year by year, the dominant system feels weaker vis-a-vis these</p><p>organic transformations. May we add to this a phenomenon the</p><p>West  finds  totally  incomprehensible,  and  which  shall  be  dis-</p><p>cussed in greater detail: namely, the growing specific, practical</p><p>knowledge about the governing reality within countries whose</p><p>regimes are similar. This facilitates individual resistance and a</p><p>reconstruction of social links. Such processes shall, in the final</p><p>analysis, produce a watershed situation, although it will proba-</p><p>bly not be a bloody counter-revolution.</p><p>The question suggests itself: Will the time ever come when</p><p>this eternal cycle rendering the nations almost helpless can be</p><p>conquered? Can countries permanently maintain their creative</p><p>and critical activities at a consistently high level? Our era con-</p><p>tains  many  exceptional  moments;  our  contemporary  Macbeth</p><p>witches�  cauldron  holds  not  only  poisonous  ingredients,  but</p><p>also progress and understanding such as humanity has not seen</p><p>in millennia.</p><p>Upbeat  economists  point  out  that  humanity  has  gained  a</p><p>powerful slave in the form of electric energy and that war, con-</p><p>quest, and subjugation of other countries is becoming increas-</p><p>ingly  unprofitable  in  the  long  run.  Unfortunately,  as  we  shall</p><p>see later in this work, nations can be pushed into economically</p><p>irrational desires and actions by other motives whose character</p><p>is meta-economic.  That is why overcoming these other causes</p><p>and  phenomena  which  give  rise  to  evil  is  a  difficult,  albeit  at</p><p>least theoretically attainable, task. However, in order to master</p><p>it,  we  must  understand  the  nature  and  dynamics  of  said  phe-</p><empty-line/><p>32 At the time of writing, 1984.</p><p>94</p><p>THE HYSTEROIDAL CYCLE</p><p>nomena:  an  old  principle  of  medicine  that  I  will  repeat  again</p><p>and again is: �<emphasis>Ignota, nulla curatio morbi. </emphasis>�</p><p>One accomplishment of modern science, contributing to the</p><p>destruction of these eternal cycles, is the development of com-</p><p>munication systems which have linked our globe into one huge</p><p>�village�.  The  time  cycles  sketched  herein  used  to  run  their</p><p>course almost independently in various civilizations at different</p><p>geographical  locations.  Their  phases  neither  were,  nor  are,</p><p>synchronized. We can assume that the American phase lags 80</p><p>years behind the European. When the world becomes an inter-</p><p>related  structure  from  the  viewpoint  of  communicating  both</p><p>information  and  news,  different  social  contents  and  opinions</p><p>caused by unlike phases of said cycles,  <emphasis>inter alia</emphasis>, will overflow</p><p>all boundaries and information security systems. This will give</p><p>rise to pressures which can change the causative dependencies</p><p>herein.  A  more  plastic  psychological  situation  thus  emerges,</p><p>which increases the possibilities for pinpointed action based on</p><p>an understanding of the phenomena.</p><p>At  the  same  time,  in  spite  of  many  difficulties  of  a  scien-</p><p>tific,  social  and  political  nature,  we  see  the  development  of  a</p><p>new community of factors which may eventually contribute to</p><p>the liberation of mankind from the effects of uncomprehended</p><p>historical  causation.  The  development  of  science,  whose  final</p><p>goal  is  a  better  understanding  of  man  and  the  laws  of  social</p><p>life, could, in the long run, cause public opinion to accept the</p><p>essential knowledge about human nature  and the development</p><p>of the human personality, which will enable the harmful proc-</p><p>esses to be controlled. Some forms of international cooperation</p><p>and supervision will be needed for this.</p><p>The development of human personality and its capacity for</p><p>proper thinking and accurate comprehension of reality entails a</p><p>certain  amount  of  risk  and  demands  overcoming  comfortable</p><p>laziness and applying the efforts of special scientific work un-</p><p>der conditions quite different from those under which we have</p><p>been raised.</p><p>Under such conditions, an egotistic personality, accustomed</p><p>to a comfortably narrow environment, superficial thinking, and</p><p>uncontrolled  emotionalism,  will  experience  very  favorable</p><p>changes,  which  cannot be induced by anything else.  Specially</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>95</p><p>altered conditions will cause such a personality to begin disin-</p><p>tegrating,  thus  giving  rise  to  intellectual  and  cognitive  efforts</p><p>and moral reflection.</p><p>One example of such a program of experience is the Ameri-</p><p>can Peace Corps.  Young people travel to many poor  develop-</p><p>ing countries in order to live and work there, often under primi-</p><p>tive  conditions.  They  learn  to  understand  other  nations  and</p><p>customs, and their egotism decreases. Their world view devel-</p><p>ops and becomes more realistic. They thus lose the characteris-</p><p>tic defects of the modern American character.</p><p>In order to overcome something whose origin is shrouded in</p><p>the mists of time immemorial, we often feel we must battle the</p><p>ever-turning  windmills  of  history.  However,  the  end  goal  of</p><p>such effort is the possibility that an objective understanding of</p><p>human  nature  and  its  eternal  weaknesses,  plus  the  resulting</p><p>transformation  of  societal  psychology,  may  enable  us  effec-</p><p>tively to counteract or prevent the destructive and tragic results</p><p>sometime in the not too distant future.</p><p>Our  times  are  exceptional,  and  suffering  now  gives  rise  to</p><p>better  comprehension  than  it  did  centuries  ago.  This  under-</p><p>standing  and  knowledge  fit  better  into  the  total  picture,  since</p><p>they  are  based  on  objective  data.  Such  a  view  therefore  be-</p><p>comes  realistic,  and  people  and  problems  mature  in  action.</p><p>Such action should not be limited to theoretical contemplations,</p><p>but rather, acquire organization and form.</p><p>In order to facilitate this, let us consider the selected ques-</p><p>tions and the draft of  a new scientific discipline  which would</p><p>study  evil,  discovering  its  factors  of  genesis,  insufficiently</p><p>understood  properties,  and  weak  spots,  thereby  outlining  new</p><p>possibilities to counteract the origin of human suffering.</p><p><strong>CHAPTER V </strong></p><p><strong>PATHOCRACY </strong></p><p>The Genesis of the Phenomenon</p><p>The  time-cycle  sketched  in  Chapter  III  was  referred  to  as</p><p>hysteroidal because the intensification or diminution of a soci-</p><p>ety�s hysterical condition can be considered its chief measure-</p><p>ment. It does not, of course, constitute the only quality subject</p><p>to  change  within  the  framework  of  certain  periodicity.  The</p><p>present  chapter  shall  deal  with  the  phenomenon  which  can</p><p>emerge from the phase of maximal intensification of  hysteria.</p><p>Such a sequence does not appear to result from any relatively</p><p>constant  laws  of  history;  quite  the  contrary,  some  additional</p><p>circumstances and factors must participate in such a period of a</p><p>society�s general spiritual crisis and cause its reason and social</p><p>structure  to  degenerate  in  such  a  way  as  to  bring  about  the</p><p>spontaneous generation of this worst disease of society. Let us</p><p>call this societal disease phenomenon �pathocracy�; this is not</p><p>the first time it has emerged during the history of our planet.</p><p>It appears that this phenomenon, whose causes also appear</p><p>to be potentially present in every society, has its own character-</p><p>istic process of genesis, only partially conditioned by, and hid-</p><p>den  within,  the  maximal  hysterical  intensity  of  the  above-</p><p>described cycle. As a result, unhappy times become exception-</p><p>ally  cruel  and  enduring  and  their  causes  impossible  to  under-</p><p>stand  within  the  categories  of  natural  human  concepts.  Let  us</p><p>therefore bring this process of the origin of pathocracy closer,</p><p>184</p><p>PATHOCRACY</p><p>methodically isolating it from other phenomena we can recog-</p><p>nize as being conditional or even accompanying it.</p><p>A  psychologically  normal,  highly  intelligent  person  called</p><p>to  high  office  normally  experiences  doubts  as  to  whether  he</p><p>can meet the demands expected of him and seeks the assistance</p><p>of others whose opinions he values. At the same time, he feels</p><p>nostalgia for his old life, freer and less burdensome, to which</p><p>he would like to return after fulfilling his social obligations.</p><p>Every society worldwide contains individuals whose dreams</p><p>of power  arise very early as  we have already discussed.  They</p><p>are  generally  discriminated  against  in  some  way  by  society,</p><p>which uses a moralizing interpretation with regard to their fail-</p><p>ings  and  difficulties,  although  these  individuals  are  rarely</p><p>guilty of them in the precise terms of morality. They would like</p><p>to change this unfriendly world into something else. Dreams of</p><p>power  also  represent  overcompensation  for  the  feeling  of  hu-</p><p>miliation, the second angle in Adler�s rhombus.89 A significant</p><p>and active proportion of this group is composed of individuals</p><p>with various deviations who imagine this better world in their</p><p>own way, of which we are already familiar.</p><p>In  the  prior  chapter,  the  readers  have  become  acquainted</p><p>with examples of these deviations selected in such a way as to</p><p>permit us now to present the ponerogenesis of pathocracy and</p><p>to introduce the essential factors of this historical phenomenon</p><p>which  is  so  difficult  to  understand.  It  has  certainly  appeared</p><p>many times in history, in various countries  and in various so-</p><p>cial  scales.  However,  no  one  has  ever  managed  to  identify  it</p><p>objectively because it would  <emphasis>hide in one of the ideologies</emphasis> char-</p><p>acteristic  of  the  respective  culture  and  era,  developing  in  the</p><empty-line/><p>89 Austrian psychiatrist who rejected Sigmund Freud�s emphasis on sexuality</p><p>and theorized that neurotic behavior is an overcompensation for feelings of</p><p>inferiority. He argued that human personality could be explained teleologi-</p><p>cally, separate strands dominated by the guiding purpose of the individual�s</p><p>unconscious self ideal to convert feelings of inferiority to superiority (or</p><p>rather completeness). The desires of the self ideal were countered by social</p><p>and ethical demands. If the corrective factors were disregarded and the indi-</p><p>vidual over-compensated, then an inferiority complex would occur, the indi-</p><p>vidual becoming egocentric, power-hungry and aggressive or worse. Adler</p><p>believed that personality can be distinguished into the getting, avoiding,</p><p>ruling and socially useful types, i.e. the �rhombus�. [Editor�s note.]</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>185</p><p>very  bosom  of  different  social  movements.  Identification  was</p><p>so  difficult  because  the  indispensable  naturalistic  knowledge</p><p>needed for proper classification of phenomena in this area did</p><p>not develop until our contemporary times. Thus, historians and</p><p>sociologists  discern  many  similarities,  but  they  possess  no</p><p>identifying criteria because the latter belongs to another scien-</p><p>tific discipline.</p><p>Who plays the first crucial role in this process of the origin</p><p>of  pathocracy,  schizoids  or  characteropaths?  It  appears  to  be</p><p>the former; therefore, let us delineate their role first.</p><p>During  stable  times  which  are  ostensibly  happy,  albeit  de-</p><p>pendent upon injustice to other individuals and nations, doctri-</p><p>naire90 people believe they have found a simple solution to fix</p><p>the  world.  Such  a historical period is always  characterized by</p><p>an  impoverished  psychological  world  view,  so  that  a  schizoi-</p><p>dally  impoverished  psychological  world  view  does  not  stand</p><p>out  as  odd  during  such  times  and  is  accepted  as  legal  tender.</p><p>These doctrinaire individuals characteristically manifest a cer-</p><p>tain contempt with regard to moralists then preaching the need</p><p>to rediscover lost human values and to develop a richer, more</p><p>appropriate psychological world view.</p><p>Schizoid  characters  aim  to  impose  their  own  conceptual</p><p>world upon other people or social groups, using relatively con-</p><p>trolled  pathological  egotism  and  the  exceptional  tenacity  de-</p><p>rived from their persistent nature. They are thus eventually able</p><p>to  overpower  another  individual�s  personality,  which  causes</p><p>the  latter�s  behavior  to  turn  desperately  illogical.  They  may</p><p>also  exert  a  similar  influence  upon  the  group  of  people  they</p><p>have joined.  They are  <emphasis>psychological</emphasis> loners who then  begin to</p><p>feel better in some human organization,  wherein they become</p><p>zealots  for  some  ideology,  religious  bigots,  materialists,  or</p><p>adherents of an ideology with satanic features. If their activities</p><p>consist of direct contact on a small social scale, their acquain-</p><p>tances generally just consider them to be eccentric, which lim-</p><p>its  their  ponerogenic  role.  However,  if  they  manage  to  hide</p><p>their  own  personality  behind the  written  word,  their  influence</p><empty-line/><p>90  <emphasis>Dogmatic</emphasis>: stubborn person of arbitrary or arrogant opinions who insists on</p><p>theory without regard for practicality or suitability. [Editor�s note.]</p><p>186</p><p>PATHOCRACY</p><p>may poison the minds of society on a wide scale and for a long</p><p>time.</p><p>The conviction that Karl Marx is the best example of this is</p><p>correct as he was the best-known figure of that kind. Frostig91,</p><p>a psychiatrist of the old school, included Engels and others into</p><p>a category he called �bearded schizoidal fanatics�. The famous</p><p>writings  attributed  to  �Zionist  Wise  Men�  at  the  turn  of  the</p><p>century  begin  with  a  typically  schizoidal  declaration.92  The</p><p>nineteenth  century,  especially  its  latter  half,  appears  to  have</p><p>been  a  time  of  exceptional  activity  on  the  part  of  schizoidal</p><p>individuals,  often  but  not  always  of  Jewish  descent.  After  all</p><p>we have to remember that 97 % of all Jews do not manifest this</p><p>anomaly, and that  <emphasis>it also appears among all European nations</emphasis>,</p><p>albeit  to  a  markedly  lesser  extent.  Our  inheritance  from  this</p><p>period  includes  world-images,  scientific  traditions,  and  legal</p><p>concepts  flavored  with  the  shoddy  ingredients  of  a  schizoidal</p><p>apprehension of reality.</p><p>Humanists are prepared to understand that era and its legacy</p><p>within  categories  characterized  by  their  own  traditions.  They</p><p>search  for  societal,  ideational,  and  moral  causes  for  known</p><p>phenomena.  Such  an  explanation,  however,  can  never  consti-</p><p>tute  the  whole  truth,  since  it   <emphasis>ignores  the  biological  factors</emphasis></p><p>which participated in the genesis of the phenomena. Schizoidia</p><p>is the most frequent factor, albeit not the only one.</p><p>In  spite  of  the  fact  that  the  writings  of  schizoidal  authors</p><p>contain the above described deficiency, or even an openly for-</p><p>mulated  schizoidal  declaration  which  constitutes  sufficient</p><empty-line/><p>91 Peter Jacob Frostig, 1896-1959. Professor of King John Kasimir University</p><p>in Lwow, (now Ukraine). I used his manual  <emphasis>Psychiatria</emphasis>. Poland was then</p><p>under pathocratic rule and his works were removed from public libraries as</p><p>�ideologically improper�.</p><p>92 The �Protocols of the Elders of Zion� is now well known to have been a</p><p>hoaxed attribution to Jews. However, the contents of the Protocols are clearly</p><p>not �hoaxed ideas� since a reasonable assessment of the events in the United</p><p>States over the past 50 years or so gives ample evidence of the application of</p><p>these Protocols in order to bring about the current Neocon administration.</p><p>Anyone who wishes to understand what has happened in the U.S. only needs</p><p>to read the Protocols to understand that some group of deviant individuals</p><p>took them to heart. The document, �Project For A New American Century�,</p><p>produced by the Neoconservatives reads as if it had been inspired by the</p><p>Protocols. [Editor�s note.]</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>187</p><p>warning to specialists, the average reader accepts them not as a</p><p>view of reality warped by this anomaly, but rather as an idea to</p><p>which  he  should  consider  seriously  based  on  his  convictions</p><p>and his reason. That is the first mistake.</p><p>The oversimplified pattern of ideas, devoid of psychological</p><p>color and based on  easily available data, tends to exert an in-</p><p>tense attracting influence on individuals who are insufficiently</p><p>critical, frequently frustrated  as result of downward social ad-</p><p>justment,  culturally  neglected,  or  characterized  by  some  psy-</p><p>chological deficiencies of their own. Such writings are particu-</p><p>larly attractive to a hystericized society. Others who may read</p><p>such writings will be immediately provoked to criticism based</p><p>on  their  healthy  common  sense,  though  they  also  they  fail  to</p><p>grasp  the  essential  cause  of  the  error:  that  it  emerges  from  a</p><p>biologically deviant mind.</p><p>Societal interpretation of such writings and doctrinaire dec-</p><p>larations  breaks  down  into  main  trifurcations,  engendering</p><p>divisiveness and conflict. The first branch is the path of aver-</p><p>sion, based on rejection of the contents of the work due to per-</p><p>sonal  motivations,  differing  convictions,  or  moral  revulsion.</p><p>These reactions contain the component of a moralistic interpre-</p><p>tation of pathological phenomena.</p><p>The  second  and  third  branches  relate  to  two  distinctly  dif-</p><p>ferent apperception types among those persons who  <emphasis>accept</emphasis> the</p><p>contents of such works: the  <emphasis>critically-corrective</emphasis> and the  <emphasis>patho-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>logical</emphasis>.</p><p>The  <emphasis>critically-corrective</emphasis> approach is taken by people whose</p><p>feel for psychological reality is normal and they tend to incor-</p><p>porate  the  more  valuable  elements  of  the  work.    They  then</p><p>trivialize the obvious errors and fill in the missing elements of</p><p>the  schizoid  deficiencies  by  means  of  their  own  richer  world</p><p>view.  This  gives  rise  to  a  more  sensible,  measured,  and  thus</p><p>creative  interpretation,  but  is  cannot  be  completely  free  from</p><p>the influence of the error frequently adduced above.</p><p><emphasis>Pathological  acceptance</emphasis>  is  manifested  by  individuals  with</p><p>psychological deficiencies of their own: diversiform deviations,</p><p>whether inherited or acquired, as well as by many people bear-</p><p>ing  personality  malformations  or  who  have  been  injured  by</p><p>social injustice. That explains why this scope is wider than the</p><p>188</p><p>PATHOCRACY</p><p>circle drawn by direct action of pathological factors. Pathologi-</p><p>cal  acceptance  of  schizoidal  writings  or  declarations  by  other</p><p>deviants  often  brutalizes  the  authors�  concepts  and  promotes</p><p>ideas of force and revolutionary means.</p><p>The passage of time and bitter experience has unfortunately</p><p>not  prevented  this  characteristic  misunderstanding  born  of</p><p>schizoid  nineteenth-century  creativity,  with  Marx�s  works  at</p><p>the  fore,  from  affecting  people  and  depriving  them  of  their</p><p>common sense.</p><p>If only for purposes of the above-mentioned psychological</p><p>experiment, it is good practice for developing awareness of this</p><p>pathological factor by searching the works of K. Marx for sev-</p><p>eral statements with these characteristic deficits.  When such a</p><p>study is conducted by several people with varied world views,</p><p>the experiment will show how a clear picture of reality can be</p><p>restored, and it becomes easier to find a common language.</p><p>Schizoidia  has  thus  played  an  essential  role  as  one  of  the</p><p>factors in the genesis of the evil threatening our contemporary</p><p>world. Practicing psychotherapy upon the world will therefore</p><p>demand that the results of such evil be eliminated as skillfully</p><p>as possible.</p><p>The  first  researchers  �  the  author  and  his  colleagues  -  at-</p><p>tracted by the idea of objectively understanding this phenome-</p><p>non  initially  failed  to  perceive  the  role  of   <emphasis>characteropathic </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>personalities</emphasis> in the genesis of pathocracy. However, when we</p><p>attempted to reconstruct the early phase of said genesis, we had</p><p>to acknowledge that characteropaths played a significant role in</p><p>this process.</p><p>We already know from the preceding chapter how their de-</p><p>fective  experiential  and  thought  patterns  take  hold  in  human</p><p>minds, insidiously destroying their way of reasoning and their</p><p>ability to utilize their healthy common sense. This role has also</p><p>proved essential because their activities as  <emphasis>fanatical leaders</emphasis> or</p><p><emphasis>spellbinders</emphasis>  in  various  ideologies  open  the  door  to  psycho-</p><p>pathic individuals and the view of the world they  want to im-</p><p>pose.</p><p>In the ponerogenic process of the pathocratic phenomenon,</p><p>characteropathic  individuals  adopt  ideologies  created  by  doc-</p><p>trinaire,  often  schizoidal  people,  recast  them  into  an  active</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>189</p><p>propaganda  form,  and  disseminate  it  with  their  characteristic</p><p>pathological egotism and paranoid intolerance for any philoso-</p><p>phies which may differ from their own.  They also inspire fur-</p><p>ther transformation of this ideology into its  <emphasis>pathological coun-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>terpart</emphasis>. Something which had a doctrinaire character and circu-</p><p>lated in numerically limited groups is now activated at societal</p><p>level, thanks to their spellbinding abilities.</p><p>It also appears that this process tends to intensify with time;</p><p>initial activities are undertaken by persons with milder charac-</p><p>teropathic features, who are easily able to hide their aberrations</p><p>from others.  Paranoid individuals then become principally ac-</p><p>tive. Toward the end of the process, an individual with  <emphasis>frontal </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>characteropathy</emphasis> and the highest degree of pathological egotism</p><p>can easily take over leadership.</p><p>As long as the characteropathic individuals play a dominant</p><p>role  within  a  social  movement  affected  by  the  ponerogenic</p><p>process,  the  ideology,  whether  doctrinaire  from  the  outset  or</p><p>later  vulgarized  and  further  perverted  by  these  latter  people,</p><p>continues to keep and maintain its content link with the original</p><p>prototype.  The  ideology  continuously  affects  the  movement�s</p><p>activities  and  remains  an  essential  justifying  motivation  for</p><p>many. In this phase, therefore, such a union does not move in</p><p>the direction of criminal acts on a mass scale. To a certain ex-</p><p>tent, at this stage, one can still define such a movement or un-</p><p>ion by the name of its original ideology.</p><p>In the meantime, however, the carriers of other (mainly he-</p><p>reditary)  pathological  factors  become  engaged  in  this  already</p><p>sick social movement and proceed with the work of final trans-</p><p>formation  of  the  contents  �  both  ideological  and  human  -  of</p><p>such a union in such a way that it becomes a pathological cari-</p><p>cature of its original ideology. This is effected under the ever-</p><p>growing  influence  of   <emphasis>psychopathic</emphasis>  personalities  of  various</p><p>types, with particular emphasis on the inspiration role of essen-</p><p>tial psychopathy.</p><p>Such  a  situation  eventually  engenders  a  wholesale  show-</p><p>down: the adherents of the original ideology are shunted aside</p><p>or  terminated.  (This  group  includes  many  characteropaths,</p><p>especially of the lesser and paranoidal varieties.) The ideologi-</p><p>cal motivations and the double talk they created then  are util-</p><p>190</p><p>PATHOCRACY</p><p>ized to hide the actual new contents of the phenomenon. From</p><p>this  time  on,  using  the  ideological  name  of  the  movement  in</p><p>order  to  understand  its  essence  becomes  a  keystone  of  mis-</p><p>takes.</p><p>Psychopathic  individuals  generally  stay  away  from  social</p><p>organizations  characterized  by  reason  and  ethical  discipline.</p><p>After all, such organizations are created by that other world of</p><p>normal  people  so  foreign  to  them.  They  hold  various  social</p><p>ideologies in contempt, while, at the same time, easily discern-</p><p>ing all their actual failings. However, once the process of pon-</p><p>eric transformation of some human union into its yet undefined</p><p>cartoon counterpart has begun and advanced sufficiently, they</p><p>perceive this fact with almost infallible sensitivity: a circle has</p><p>been  created  wherein  they  can  hide  their  failings  and  psycho-</p><p>logical differentness, find their own  <emphasis>modus vivendi</emphasis>, and maybe</p><p>even  realize  their  youthful  Utopian  dream  of  a  world  where</p><p>they  are  in  power  and  all  those  other,  �normal  people�,  are</p><p>forced into servitude. They then begin infiltrating the rank and</p><p>file  of  such  a  movement;  pretending  to  be  sincere  adherents</p><p>poses no difficulty for the psychopath, since it is second nature</p><p>for  them  to  play  a  role  and  hide  behind  the  mask  of  normal</p><p>people.</p><p>The psychopaths� interest in such movements is not an ex-</p><p>clusive result of their egoism and lack of moral scruples. These</p><p>people have in fact been hurt by nature and society.93 An ideol-</p><empty-line/><p>93 It is important to note here that it is not meant that the psychopath has been</p><p>�emotionally� hurt, or that such �hurt� has contributed to their state of being.</p><p>Rather, as the author explained to me in private correspondence: �For them</p><p>you are their worst enemy. You are hurting them very painfully. For a psy-</p><p>chopath, revealing his real condition, tearing down his Cleckley mask, brings</p><p>the end of his self-admiration. You are threatening them with destruction of</p><p>their secret world, and bring to null their dreams of ruling and introducing [a</p><p>social system where they can rule and be served]. When his real condition is</p><p>publicly revealed, a psychopath feels like a wounded animal.</p><p>�You are partly right in finding some similarity of the essential psychopath</p><p>with the thought [processes] of a crocodile. They are somewhat mechanical.</p><p>But, are they guilty that they have inherited an abnormal gene, and that their</p><p>instinctive substratum is different from that of the majority of the human</p><p>population? Such a person is not able to feel like a normal person, or to un-</p><p>derstand a person bearing a normal instinctive endowment. [It is important]</p><p>to try to understand the psychopath, and have some pity for them [as you</p><p>would have pity for a crocodile and its right to exist in nature]. Limiting the</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>191</p><p>ogy liberating a social class or a nation from injustice may thus</p><p>seem to them to be friendly; unfortunately it also gives rise to</p><p>unrealistic hopes that they themselves will be liberated as well.</p><p>The pathological motivations which appeared in a union at the</p><p>time it begins to be affected by the ponerogenic process strikes</p><p>them  as  familiar  and  hope-inspiring.  They  therefore  insinuate</p><p>themselves into such a movement preaching revolution and war</p><p>against that unfair world so foreign to them.</p><p>They  initially  perform  subordinate  functions  in  such  a</p><p>movement and execute the leaders� orders, especially whenever</p><p>something  needs  to  be  done  which  inspires  revulsion  in  oth-</p><p>ers.94 Their evident zealotry and cynicism gives rise to criticism</p><empty-line/><p>role of psychopaths in ponerogenesis, particularly in the case of the tragedies</p><p>they cause women, thus reducing their numbers, is the real aim.</p><p>�Take as well in your consideration that in the whole pool of pathological</p><p>factors taking part in ponrogenezis all kinds of psychopathies make up some-</p><p>thing less than half. The other pathologic conditions, usually not hereditary,</p><p>make up more than other half. Stalin was not a psychopath. He was a case of</p><p>frontal characteropathy due to the damage of frontal centers (10A&amp;B) caused</p><p>be a disease he suffered as a newborn. This produces dramaticaly dangerous</p><p>characters.� [Editor�s note.]</p><p>94 Here, we cannot help but think of Karl Rove, Dick Cheney, and Donald</p><p>Rumsfeld, prot�g�s of the neocon philosopher, Leo Strauss. Strauss evi-</p><p>dences typical schizoidal doctrinaire characteristics.</p><p>�Like Plato, Strauss believed that the supreme political ideal is the rule of the</p><p>wise. But the rule of the wise is unattainable in the real world. Now, accord-</p><p>ing to the conventional wisdom, Plato realised this, and settled for the rule of</p><p>law. But Strauss did not endorse this solution entirely. Nor did he think that it</p><p>was Plato's real solution - Strauss pointed to the �nocturnal council� in Plato's</p><p>Laws to illustrate his point.</p><p>�The real Platonic solution as understood by Strauss is the covert rule of the</p><p>wise. This covert rule is facilitated by the overwhelming stupidity of the</p><p>gentlemen. The more gullible and unperceptive they are, the easier it is for</p><p>the wise to control and manipulate them. [...]</p><p>�For Strauss, the rule of the wise is not about classic conservative values like</p><p>order, stability, justice, or respect for authority. The rule of the wise is in-</p><p>tended as an antidote to modernity. Modernity is the age in which the vulgar</p><p>many have triumphed. It is the age in which they have come closest to having</p><p>exactly what their hearts desire - wealth, pleasure, and endless entertainment.</p><p>But in getting just what they desire, they have unwittingly been reduced to</p><p>beasts.</p><p>�Nowhere is this state of affairs more advanced than in America. And the</p><p>global reach of American culture threatens to trivialise life and turn it into</p><p>entertainment. This was [a] terrifying [...] spectre for Strauss. [�]</p><p>192</p><p>PATHOCRACY</p><p>on the part of the union�s more reasonable members, but it also</p><p>earns  the  respect  of  some  its  more  extreme  revolutionaries.</p><p>They  thus  find  protection  among  those  people  who  earlier</p><p>played  a  role  in  the  movement�s  ponerization,  and  repay  the</p><p>favor  with  compliments  or  by  making  things  easier  for  them.</p><p>Thus  they  climb  up  the  organizational  ladder,  gain  influence,</p><p>and almost involuntarily bend the contents of the entire group</p><p>to  their  own  way  of  experiencing  reality  and  to  the  goals  de-</p><p>rived from their deviant nature. A mysterious disease is already</p><p>raging inside the union. The adherents of the original ideology</p><p>feel  ever  more  constricted  by  powers  they  do  not  understand;</p><p>they start fighting with demons and making mistakes.</p><p>If such a movement triumphs by revolutionary means and in</p><p>the name of freedom, the welfare of the people, and social jus-</p><p>tice, this only brings about further transformation of a govern-</p><p>mental  system  thus  created  into  a  macrosocial  pathological</p><p>phenomenon.  Within this system, the common  man is blamed</p><p>for  <emphasis>not</emphasis> having been born a psychopath, and is considered good</p><p>for  nothing  except  hard  work,  fighting  and  dying  to protect  a</p><p>system  of  government  he  can  neither  sufficiently  comprehend</p><p>nor ever consider to be his own.</p><p>An ever-strengthening network of psychopathic and related</p><p>individuals  gradually  starts  to  dominate,  overshadowing  the</p><p>others.  Characteropathic  individuals  who  played  an  essential</p><empty-line/><p>�[Strauss was] convinced that liberal economics would turn life into enter-</p><p>tainment and destroy politics.[...] [Strauss] thought that man's humanity</p><p>depended on his willingness to rush naked into battle and headlong to his</p><p>death. Only perpetual war can overturn the modern project, with its emphasis</p><p>on self-preservation and �creature comforts.� Life can be politicised once</p><p>more, and man�s humanity can be restored.</p><p>�This terrifying vision fits perfectly well with the desire for honour and glory</p><p>that the neo-conservative gentlemen covet. It also fits very well with the</p><p>religious sensibilities of gentlemen. The combination of religion and nation-</p><p>alism is the elixir that Strauss advocates as the way to turn natural, relaxed,</p><p>hedonistic men into devout nationalists willing to fight and die for their God</p><p>and country.</p><p>�I never imagined when I wrote my first book on Strauss that the unscrupu-</p><p>lous elite that he elevates would ever come so close to political power, nor</p><p>that the ominous tyranny of the wise would ever come so close to being</p><p>realised in the political life of a great nation like the United States. But fear is</p><p>the greatest ally of tyranny.� (Shadia Drury, professor of political theory at</p><p>the University of Regina in Saskatchewan). [Editor�s note.]</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>193</p><p>role in ponerizing the movement and preparing for revolution,</p><p>are  also  eliminated.  Adherents  of  the  revolutionary  ideology</p><p>are  unscrupulously  �pushed  into  a  counter-revolutionary  posi-</p><p>tion�.  They  are  now  condemned  for  �moral�  reasons  in  the</p><p>name of new criteria whose paramoralistic essence they are not</p><p>in a position to comprehend.  Violent  <emphasis>negative selection</emphasis> of the</p><p>original  group  now  ensues.  The  inspirational  role  of   <emphasis>essential </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>psychopathy</emphasis> is now also consolidated;  <emphasis>it remains characteristic </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>for the entire future of this macrosocial pathological phenome-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>non. </emphasis></p><p>In spite of these transformations, the pathological block of</p><p>the  revolutionary  movement  remains  a  minority,  a  fact  which</p><p>cannot  be  changed  by  propaganda  pronouncements  about  the</p><p><emphasis>moral  majority</emphasis> adhering to the new,  more glorious version of</p><p>the ideology. The rejected majority and the very forces which</p><p>naively  created  such  power  to  begin  with,  start  mobilizing</p><p>against  the  block  of  psychopaths  who  have  taken  over.  Ruth-</p><p>less confrontation with these forces is seen by the psychopathic</p><p>block  as  the  only  way  to  safeguard  the  long-term  survival  of</p><p>the  pathological  authority.  We  must  thus  consider  the  bloody</p><p>triumph of a pathological minority over the movement�s major-</p><p>ity to be a  <emphasis>transitional</emphasis> phase during which the new contents of</p><p>the phenomenon coagulate.</p><p>The entire life of a society thus affected then becomes sub-</p><p>ordinated  to  deviant  thought-criteria  and  permeated  by  their</p><p>specific experiential mode, especially the one described in the</p><p>section on essential psychopathy. At this point, using the name</p><p>of the original ideology to designate this phenomenon is mean-</p><p>ingless  and  becomes  an  error  rendering  its  comprehension</p><p>more difficult.</p><p>I shall accept the denomination of <strong>pathocracy </strong>for a system</p><p>of  government  thus  created,  wherein  a  small  pathological  mi-</p><p>nority takes control over a society of normal people. The name</p><p>thus  selected,  above  all,  emphasizes  the  basic  quality  of  the</p><p>macrosocial  psychopathological  phenomenon,  and  differenti-</p><p>ates  it  from  the  many  possible  social  systems  dominated  by</p><p>normal people�s structure, custom, and law.</p><p>I tried to find a name  which  would  more clearly designate</p><p>the  psychopathological,  even  psychopathic  quality  of  such  a</p><p>194</p><p>PATHOCRACY</p><p>government,  but  I  gave  up  because  of  certain  perceived  phe-</p><p>nomena  (to  be  referred  to  below)  and  for  practical  considera-</p><p>tions  (to  avoid  lengthening  the  denomination).  Such  a  name</p><p>sufficiently indicates the phenomenon�s basic quality and also</p><p>emphasizes that the ideological cloak (or some other ideology</p><p>which cloaked similar phenomena in the past)  <emphasis>does not consti-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>tute  its  essence</emphasis>.  When  I  happened  to  hear  that  a  Hungarian</p><p>scientist unknown to me had already used this term,  my deci-</p><p>sion was finalized. I think this name is consistent with the de-</p><p>mands  of  semantics,  since  no  concise  term  can  adequately</p><p>characterize  such  a  complex  phenomenon.  I  shall  also  hence-</p><p>forth designate the social systems wherein the links of normal</p><p>people dominate in any way as �the systems of normal man�.</p><p>More on the Contents of the Phenomenon</p><p>The  achievement  of  absolute  domination  by  pathocrats  in</p><p>the  government  of  a  country  cannot  be  permanent  since  large</p><p>sectors  of  the  society  become  disaffected  by  such  rule  and</p><p>eventually  find  some  way  of  toppling  it.  This  is  part  of  the</p><p>historical  cycle,  easily  discerned  when  history  is  read  from  a</p><p>ponerological point of view. Pathocracy at the summit of gov-</p><p>ernmental organization also does not constitute the entire pic-</p><p>ture  of  the  �mature  phenomenon�.  <emphasis>Such  a  system  of  govern-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>ment has nowhere to go but down. </emphasis></p><p>In  a  pathocracy,  all  leadership  positions,  (down  to  village</p><p>headman and community cooperative managers, not to mention</p><p>the directors of police units, and special services police person-</p><p>nel,  and  activists  in  the  pathocratic  party)  must  be  filled  by</p><p>individuals  with  corresponding  psychological  deviations,</p><p>which are inherited as a rule. However, such people constitute</p><p>a very small percentage of the population and this makes them</p><p>more valuable to the pathocrats. Their intellectual level or pro-</p><p>fessional skills cannot be taken into account, since people rep-</p><p>resenting superior abilities are even harder to find. After such a</p><p>system has lasted several years, one hundred percent of all the</p><p>cases  of  essential  psychopathy  are  involved  in pathocratic  ac-</p><p>tivity; they are considered the most loyal, even though some of</p><p>them were formerly involved on the other side in some way.</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>195</p><p>Under  such  conditions,  no  area  of  social  life  can  develop</p><p>normally,  whether  in  economics,  culture,  science,  technology,</p><p>administration, etc.  <emphasis>Pathocracy progressively paralyzes every-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>thing. </emphasis> Normal people must develop a level of patience beyond</p><p>the ken of anyone living in a normal man�s system just in order</p><p>to explain what to do and how to do it to some obtuse medioc-</p><p>rity of a psychological deviant who has been placed in charge</p><p>of  some  project  that  he  cannot  even  understand,  much  less</p><p>manage.  This  special  kind  of  pedagogy  �  instructing  deviants</p><p>while  avoiding  their  wrath  -  requires  a  great  deal  of  time  and</p><p>effort, but it would otherwise not be possible to maintain toler-</p><p>able living conditions and necessary achievements in  the eco-</p><p>nomic area or intellectual life of a society. Even with such ef-</p><p>forts,  pathocracy  progressively  intrudes  everywhere  and  dulls</p><p>everything.</p><p>Those  people  who  initially  found  the  original  ideology  at-</p><p>tractive eventually come to the realization that they are in fact</p><p>dealing with something else that has taken its place under the</p><p>old  name.  The  disillusionment  experienced  by  such  former</p><p>ideological adherents is bitter in the extreme. Thus, the patho-</p><p>logical  minority�s  attempts  to  retain  power  will  be  threatened</p><p>by the society of normal people,  whose  criticism keeps grow-</p><p>ing.</p><p>Therefore,  to  mitigate  the  threat  to  their  power,  the</p><p>pathocrats must employ any and all methods of terror and ex-</p><p>terminatory  policies  against  individuals known  for  their  patri-</p><p>otic  feelings  and  military  training;  other,  specific  �indoctrina-</p><p>tion�  activities  such  as  those  we  have  presented  are  also  util-</p><p>ized. Individuals lacking the natural feeling of being linked to</p><p>normal  society  become  irreplaceable  in  either  of  these  activi-</p><p>ties. Again, the foreground of this type of activity is occupied</p><p>by cases of essential psychopathy, followed by those with simi-</p><p>lar anomalies, and finally by people alienated from the society</p><p>in question as a result of racial or national differences.</p><p>The phenomenon of pathocracy matures during this period:</p><p>an  extensive  and  active  indoctrination  system  is  built,  with  a</p><p>suitably refurbished ideology constituting the vehicle or Trojan</p><p>horse for the purpose of pathologizing the thought processes of</p><p>individuals  and  society.  The  goal-  forcing  human  minds  to</p><p>196</p><p>PATHOCRACY</p><p>incorporate  pathological  experiential  methods  and  thought-</p><p>patterns,  and  consequently  accepting  such  rule  -  is  never</p><p>openly admitted. This goal is conditioned by pathological ego-</p><p>tism,  and  the  possibility  of  accomplishing  it  strikes  the</p><p>pathocrats as not only indispensable, but feasible. Thousands of</p><p>activists must therefore participate in this work. However, time</p><p>and  experience  confirm  what  a  psychologist  may  have  long</p><p>foreseen: the entire effort produces results so very limited that</p><p>it  is  reminiscent  of  the  labors  of  Sisyphus.  It  only  results  in</p><p>producing  a  general  stifling  of  intellectual  development  and</p><p>deep-rooted  protest  against  affront-mongering  �hypocrisy�.</p><p><emphasis>The  authors  and  executors  of  this  program  are  incapable  of </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>understanding that the decisive factor making their work diffi-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>cult  is  the  fundamental  nature  of  normal  human  beings  �  the </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>majority. </emphasis></p><p>The entire system of force, terror, and forced indoctrination,</p><p>or,  rather,  pathologization,  thus  proves  effectively  unfeasible,</p><p>which causes the pathocrats no small measure of surprise. Re-</p><p>ality  places  a  question  mark  on  their  conviction  that  such</p><p>methods can  change people in such  fundamental  ways so that</p><p>they can eventually recognize this pathocratic kind of govern-</p><p>ment as a �normal state�.</p><p>During the initial shock, the feeling of social links between</p><p>normal people fade. After that has been survived, however, the</p><p>overwhelming  majority of people begin to  manifest their own</p><p>phenomenon  of  psychological  immunization.  Society  simulta-</p><p>neously starts collecting practical knowledge on the subject of</p><p>this new reality and its psychological properties.</p><p>Normal  people  slowly  learn  to  perceive  the  weak  spots  of</p><p>such  a  system  and  utilize  the  possibilities  of  more  expedient</p><p>arrangement  of  their  lives.  They  begin  to  give  each  other  ad-</p><p>vice  in  these  matters,  thus  slowly  regenerating  the  feelings  of</p><p>social  links  and  reciprocal  trust.  A  new  phenomenon  occurs:</p><p><emphasis>separation  between  the  pathocrats  and  the  society  of  normal </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>people</emphasis>.  The  latter  have  an  advantage  of  talent,  professional</p><p>skills, and healthy common sense. They therefore hold certain</p><p>very advantageous cards. The pathocracy finally realizes that it</p><p>must find some  <emphasis>modus vivendi</emphasis> or relations with the majority of</p><p>society: �After all, somebody�s got to do the work for us.�</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>197</p><p>There  are  other  needs  and  pressures  felt  by  the  pathocrats,</p><p>especially from outside. The pathological face   <emphasis>must</emphasis> be hidden</p><p>from the world somehow, since recognition of the deviant rul-</p><p>ership  by  world  opinion  would  be  a  catastrophe.  Ideological</p><p>propaganda  alone  would  then  be  an  inadequate  disguise.  Pri-</p><p>marily  in  the  interests  of  the  new  elite  and  its  expansionary</p><p>plans,  a  pathocratic  state  must  maintain  commercial  relations</p><p>with the countries of normal man. The pathocratic state aims to</p><p>achieve  international  recognition  as  a   <emphasis>certain  kind</emphasis>  of political</p><p>structure;  and  it  fears  recognition  in  terms  of  a  true  clinical</p><p>diagnosis.</p><p>All this makes pathocrats tend to limit their measures of ter-</p><p>ror, subjecting their propaganda and indoctrination methods to</p><p>a  certain  cosmetology,  and  to  accord  the  society  they  control</p><p>some margin of autonomous activity, especially regarding cul-</p><p>tural  life.  The  more  liberal  pathocrats  would  not  be  averse  to</p><p>giving such a society a certain minimum of economic prosper-</p><p>ity in order to reduce the irritation level, but their own corrup-</p><p>tion  and  inability  to  administer  the  economy  prevents  them</p><p>from doing so.</p><p>And so, with the above considerations being brought to the</p><p>forefront  of  pathocratic  attention,  this  great  societal  disease</p><p>continues  to  run  its  course  through  a  new  phase:  methods  of</p><p>activity become milder, and there is coexistence with countries</p><p>whose structure is that of normal man.</p><p>Any  psychopathologist  studying  this  phenomenon  will  be</p><p>reminded  of  the  dissimulative  state  or  phase  of  a  patient  at-</p><p>tempting to play the role of a normal person, hiding his patho-</p><p>logical  reality  although  he  continues  to  be  sick  or  abnormal.</p><p>Let  as  therefore  use  the  term  �the  dissimulative  phase  of</p><p>pathocracy�  for  the  state  of  affairs  wherein  a  pathocratic  sys-</p><p>tem ever more skillfully plays the role of a normal sociopoliti-</p><p>cal system with �different� doctrinal institutions.</p><p>In  this  phase,  normal  people  within  the  country  ruled  by</p><p>pathocrats become resistant and adapt themselves to the situa-</p><p>tion.  On  the  outside,  however,  this  phase  is  marked  by   <emphasis>out-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>standing ponerogenic activity</emphasis>. The pathological material of this</p><p>system can all-too-easily infiltrate into other societies, particu-</p><p>larly  if  they  are  more  primitive,  and  all  the  avenues  of</p><p>198</p><p>PATHOCRACY</p><p>pathocratic expansion are facilitated because of the decrease of</p><p>commonsensical criticism on the part of the nations constitut-</p><p>ing the territory of expansionism.</p><p>Meanwhile,  in  the  pathocratic  country,  the  active  structure</p><p>of  government  rests  in  the  hands  of  psychopathic  individuals,</p><p>and essential psychopathy plays a starring role, especially dur-</p><p>ing the dissimulative phase. However, individuals with obvious</p><p>pathological traits must be removed from certain areas of activ-</p><p>ity:  namely,  political  posts  with  international  exposure,  where</p><p>such personalities could betray the pathological contents of the</p><p>phenomenon.  Individuals  with  obvious  pathological  traits  are</p><p>also limited in their ability to exercise diplomatic functions or</p><p>to  become  fully  cognizant  with  the  political  situations  of  the</p><p>countries  of  normal  man.  Therefore,  the  persons  selected  for</p><p>such positions are chosen because they have thought-processes</p><p>more similar to the world of normal people; in general, they are</p><p>sufficiently  connected  to  the  pathological  system  to  provide  a</p><p>guarantee  of  loyalty.95  An  expert  in  various  psychological</p><p>anomalies can nevertheless discern the discreet deviations upon</p><p>which  such  links  are  based.  Another  factor  to  be  noted  is  the</p><p>great personal advantages accorded to such demi-normal indi-</p><p>viduals  by the  pathocracy.  Small  wonder,  then,  that  such  loy-</p><p>alty  is  sometimes  deceptive.  This  applies  in  particular  to  the</p><p>sons  of  typical  pathocrats,  who  of  course  enjoy  trust  because</p><p>they  have  been  reared  to  allegiance  since  infancy;  if  through</p><p>some happy genetic coincidence they have not inherited patho-</p><p>logical properties, their nature takes precedence over nurture.</p><p>Similar needs apply to other areas as well. The building di-</p><p>rector  for  a  new  factory  is  often  someone  barely  connected</p><p>with the pathocratic system but whose skills are essential. Once</p><p>the  plant  is  operational,  administration  is  taken  over  by</p><p>pathocrats,  which  then  often  leads  to  technical  and  financial</p><p>ruin.</p><p>The army similarly needs people endowed with perspicacity</p><p>and  essential  qualifications,  especially  in  the  area  of  modern</p><p>weapons  and  warfare.  At  crucial  moments,  healthy  common</p><p>sense  can  override  the  results  of  pathocratic  drill.  In  such  a</p><p>state of affairs, many people are forced to adapt, accepting the</p><empty-line/><p>95 Condoleezza Rice and Colin Powell come to mind here. [Editor�s note.]</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>199</p><p>ruling system as a status quo, but also criticizing it. They fulfill</p><p>their  duties  amid  doubts  and  conflicts  of  conscience,  always</p><p>searching  for  a  more  sensible  way  out  which  they  discuss</p><p>within  trusted  circles.  In  effect,  they  are  always  hanging  in  a</p><p>limbo  between  pathocracy  and  the  world  of  normal  people.</p><p>Deficiently  faithful  people  have  been  and  are  a  factor  of  the</p><p>pathocratic system�s internal weakness.</p><p>The  following  questions  thus  suggest  themselves:  what</p><p>happens  if  the  network  of  understanding  among  psychopaths</p><p>achieves power in leadership positions with international expo-</p><p>sure? This can happen, especially during the later phases of the</p><p>phenomenon.  Goaded  by  their  character,  such  deviant  people</p><p>thirst for just that even though it ultimately conflicts with their</p><p>own  life  interest,  and  so  they  are  removed  by  the  less  patho-</p><p>logical, more logical  wing of the ruling apparatus. Such devi-</p><p>ants do not understand that a catastrophe would otherwise en-</p><p>sue. Germs are not aware that they will be burned alive or bur-</p><p>ied deep in the ground along with the human body whose death</p><p>they are causing.</p><p>If the many managerial positions are assumed by individu-</p><p>als  deprived  of  sufficient  abilities  to  feel  and  understand  the</p><p>majority of other people, and  who also  exhibit deficiencies in</p><p>technical imagination and practical skills - (faculties indispen-</p><p>sable for governing economic and political matters) - this then</p><p>results  in  an  exceptionally  serious  crisis  in  all  areas,  both</p><p>within the country in question and with regard to international</p><p>relations.  Within,  the  situation  becomes  unbearable  even  for</p><p>those  citizens  who  were  able  to  feather  their  nest  into  a  rela-</p><p>tively comfortable  <emphasis>modus vivendi</emphasis>. Outside, other societies start</p><p>to  feel  the  pathological  quality  of  the  phenomenon  quite  dis-</p><p>tinctly. Such a state of affairs cannot last long. One must then</p><p>be prepared for ever more rapid changes, and also behave with</p><p>great circumspection.</p><p>Pathocracy is a disease of great social movements followed</p><p>by  entire  societies,  nations,  and  empires.  In  the  course  of  hu-</p><p>man  history,  it  has  affected  social,  political,  and  religious</p><p>movements, as well as the accompanying ideologies, character-</p><p>istic  for  the  time  and  the  ethnological  conditions,  and  turned</p><p>them into caricatures of themselves. This occurs as a result of</p><p>200</p><p>PATHOCRACY</p><p>the activities of similar etiological factors in this phenomenon,</p><p>namely  the  participation  of  pathological  agents  in  a  pathody-</p><p>namically similar process. That explains why all the pathocra-</p><p>cies of the world are and have been so similar in their essential</p><p>properties.  Contemporaneous  ones  easily  find  a  common  lan-</p><p>guage,  even  if  the  ideologies  nourishing  them  and  protecting</p><p>their pathological contents from exposure differ widely.</p><p>Identifying  these  phenomena  through  history  and  properly</p><p>qualifying them according to their true nature and contents, not</p><p>according to the ideology in question, which succumbed to the</p><p>characteristic process of caricaturization, is a job for historians.</p><p>However, it must be understood that the primary ideology was</p><p>undoubtedly socially dynamic and contained creative elements,</p><p>otherwise  it  would  have  been  incapable  of  nurturing  and  pro-</p><p>tecting the pathocratic phenomenon from recognition and criti-</p><p>cism  for  very  long.  It  would  also  have  been  incapable  of  fur-</p><p>nishing  the  pathological  caricature  with  the  tools  for  imple-</p><p>menting its expansionist goals on the outside.</p><p>Defining the moment at which a movement has been trans-</p><p>formed into something we can call a pathocracy as a result of</p><p>the ponerogenic process is a matter of convention. The process</p><p>is  temporally  cumulative  and  reaches  a  point  of  no  return  at</p><p>some  particular  moment.  Eventually,  however,  internal  con-</p><p>frontation  with  the  adherents  of  the  original  ideology  occurs,</p><p>thus finally affixing the seal of the pathocratic character of the</p><p>phenomenon.  Naziism  most  certainly  passed  this  point  of  no</p><p>return,  but  was  prevented  from  all-out  confrontation  with  the</p><p><emphasis>adherents</emphasis>  of  the  original  ideology  because  the  Allied  armies</p><p>smashed its entire military might.</p><p>Pathocracy and Its Ideology</p><p>It  should  be  noted  that  a  great  ideology  with  mesmerizing</p><p>values  can  also  easily  deprive  people  of  the  capacity for  self-</p><p>critical control over their behavior. The adherents of such ideas</p><p>tend to lose sight of the fact that the  means used, not just the</p><p>end, will be decisive for the result of their activities. Whenever</p><p>they reach for overly radical methods of action, still convinced</p><p>that  they  are  serving  their  idea,  they  are  not  aware  that  their</p><p>goal  has  already  changed.  The  principle  �the  end  justifies  the</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>201</p><p>means� opens the door to a different kind of person for whom a</p><p>great idea is useful for purposes of liberating themselves from</p><p>the  uncomfortable  pressure  of  normal  human  custom.  Every</p><p>great ideology thus contains danger, especially for small minds.</p><p>Therefore,  every  great  social  movement  and  its  ideology  can</p><p>become a host upon  which some pathocracy initiates its para-</p><p>sitic life.</p><p>The ideology in question may have been marked by deficits</p><p>in  truth  and  moral  criteria  from  the  very  outset,  or  by  the  ef-</p><p>fects  of  activities  by  pathological  factors.  The  original,  very</p><p>high-minded idea, may also have succumbed to early contami-</p><p>nation  characteristic  of  a  particular  time  and  social  circum-</p><p>stance.  If such an ideology is infiltrated by foreign, local cul-</p><p>tural material which, being heterogeneous, destroys the original</p><p>coherent structure of the idea, the actual value may become so</p><p>enfeebled that it loses some of its attractiveness for reasonable</p><p>people.  Once  weakened,  however,  the  sociological  structure</p><p>can  succumb  to  further  degeneration,  including  the  activation</p><p>of pathological factors, until it has become transformed into its</p><p>caricature: the name is the same, but the contents are different.</p><p>Differentiating the essence of the pathological phenomenon</p><p>from its contemporary ideological host is thus a basic and nec-</p><p>essary  task,  both  for  scientific-theoretical  purposes  and  for</p><p>finding  practical  solutions  for  the  problems  derived  from  the</p><p>existence of the above-mentioned macrosocial phenomena.</p><p>If, in order to designate a pathological phenomenon, we ac-</p><p>cept the name furnished by the ideology of a social movement</p><p>which succumbed to degenerative processes, we lose any abil-</p><p>ity to understand or evaluate that ideology and its original con-</p><p>tents or to effect proper classification of the phenomenon, per</p><p>se.  This  error  is  not  semantic;  it  is  the  keystone  of  all  other</p><p>comprehension errors regarding such phenomena, rendering us</p><p>intellectually  helpless,  and  depriving  us  of  our  capacity  for</p><p>purposeful, practical action.</p><p>This error is based upon compatible propaganda elements of</p><p>incompatible  social  systems.  This  has,  unfortunately,  become</p><p>much too common and is reminiscent of the very first clumsy</p><p>attempts to classify mental diseases according to the systems of</p><p>delusions manifested by the patients.  Even today, people who</p><p>202</p><p>PATHOCRACY</p><p>have not received training in this field will consider a sick per-</p><p>son who manifests sexual delusions to be crazy in this area, or</p><p>someone  with  religious  delusions  to  be  a  �religious  maniac�.</p><p>The author has even encountered a patient who insisted that he</p><p>had become the object of cold and hot rays (paresthesia) on the</p><p>basis of a special agreement concluded by the U.S.A.  and the</p><p>U.S.S.R.</p><p>As  early  as the  end of the nineteenth  century, famous pio-</p><p>neers  of  contemporary  psychiatry  correctly  distinguished  be-</p><p>tween the disease and the patient�s system of delusions. A dis-</p><p>ease has its own etiological causes, whether determined or not,</p><p>and  its  own  pathodynamics  and  symptomatics  which  distin-</p><p>guish its nature. Various delusional systems can become mani-</p><p>fest within the same disease, and similar systems can appear in</p><p>various diseases. The delusions, which have sometimes become</p><p>so systemic that they convey the impression of an actual story,</p><p>originate  in the  patient�s  nature  and intelligence,  especially  in</p><p>the imaginations of the environment within which he grew up.</p><p>These  can  be  disease-induced  caricaturizations  of  his  former</p><p>political and social convictions. After all, every mental illness</p><p>has  its  particular  style  of  deforming  human  minds,  producing</p><p>nuanced but characteristic differences known for some time to</p><p>psychiatrists, and which help them render a diagnosis.</p><p>Thus deformed, the world of former fantasies is put to work</p><p>for  a  different  purpose:  concealing  the  dramatic  state  of  the</p><p>disease from one�s own consciousness and from public opinion</p><p>for  as  long  as  possible.  An  experienced  psychiatrist  does  not</p><p>attempt premature disillusionment of such a delusional system;</p><p>that would provoke the patient�s suicidal tendencies. The doc-</p><p>tor�s main object of interest remains the disease he is trying to</p><p>cure.  There  is  usually  insufficient  time  to  discuss  a  patient�s</p><p>delusions  <emphasis>with him</emphasis> unless it becomes necessary for reasons of</p><p>the safety of said patient and other people. Once the disease has</p><p>been  cured,  however,  psychotherapeutic  assistance  in  reinte-</p><p>grating  the  patient  into  the  world  of  normal  thought  is  defi-</p><p>nitely indicated.</p><p>If  we  effect  a  sufficiently  penetrating  analysis  of  the  phe-</p><p>nomenon of pathocracy and its relationship to its ideology, we</p><p>are faced with a clear analogy to the above described relation-</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>203</p><p>ship  now  familiar  to  all  psychiatrists.  Some  differences  will</p><p>appear  later  in  the  form  of  details  and  statistical  data,  which</p><p>can  be  interpreted  both  as  a  function  of  the  above-mentioned</p><p>characteristic  style  of  caricaturizing  an  ideology,  pathocracy</p><p>effects, and as a result of the macrosocial character of the phe-</p><p>nomenon.</p><p>As a counterpart of disease, pathocracy has its own etiologi-</p><p>cal factors  which  make it potentially present in  every society,</p><p>no matter how healthy. It also has its own pathodynamic proc-</p><p>esses  which  are  differentiated  as  a  function  of  whether  the</p><p>pathocracy  in  question  was  born  in  that  particular  country</p><p>(primary pathocracy), was artificially infected in the country by</p><p>some other system of the kind, or was imposed by force.</p><p>We  have  already  sketched  above  the  ponerogenesis  and</p><p>course of such a macrosocial phenomenon in its primary form,</p><p>intentionally  refraining  from  mentioning  any  particular  ideol-</p><p>ogy.  We  shall  soon  address  the  other  two  courses  mentioned</p><p>above.</p><p>The ideology of pathocracy is created by caricaturizing the</p><p>original ideology of a social movement in a manner character-</p><p>istic  of  that  particular  pathological  phenomenon.  The  above-</p><p>mentioned hysteroidal states of societies also deform  the con-</p><p>temporary  ideologies  of  the  times  in  question,  using  a  style</p><p>characteristic for them. Just as doctors are interested in disease,</p><p>the  author  has  become  primarily  interested  in  the  pathocratic</p><p>phenomenon and the analysis thereof. In a similar manner, the</p><p>primary  concern of those people  who have assumed responsi-</p><p>bility for the fate of nations should be curing the world of this</p><p>heretofore  mysterious  disease.  The  proper  time  will  come  for</p><p>critical  and  analytical  attitudes  toward  ideologies  which  have</p><p>become  the  �delusional  systems�  of  such  phenomena  during</p><p>historical times. We should at present focus our attention upon</p><p>the very essence of the macrosocial pathological phenomena.</p><p>Understanding the nature of a disease is basic to any search</p><p>for the proper methods of treatment. The same applies by anal-</p><p>ogy with regard to that macrosocial pathological phenomenon,</p><p>especially  since,  in  the  latter  case,  <emphasis>mere  understanding  of  the </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>nature  of  the  disease  starts  curing  human  minds  and  souls</emphasis>.</p><p>Throughout  the  entire  process,  reasoning  approximated  to  the</p><p>204</p><p>PATHOCRACY</p><p>style elaborated by medicine is the proper method which leads</p><p>to untangling the contemporary Gordian knot.</p><p>A pathocracy�s ideology changes its function, just as occurs</p><p>with a mentally ill person�s delusional system. It stops being a</p><p>human  conviction  outlining  methods  of  action  and  takes  on</p><p>other  duties  which  are  not  openly  defined.  It  becomes  a   <emphasis>dis-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>guising story</emphasis> concealing the new reality from people�s critical</p><p>consciousness,  both  inside  and  outside  one�s  nation.  The  first</p><p>function � a conviction outlining methods of action - soon be-</p><p>comes  ineffective  for  two  reasons:  on  the  one  hand,  reality</p><p>exposes  the  methods  of  action  as  unworkable;  on  the  other</p><p>hand,  the  masses  of  common  people  notice  the  contemptuous</p><p>attitude  toward  the  ideology  represented  by  the  pathocrats</p><p>themselves. For that reason, the main operational theater for the</p><p>ideology  consists  of  nations  remaining  outside  the  immediate</p><p>ambit  of  the  pathocracy,  since  that  world  tends  to  continue</p><p>believing in ideologies. The ideology thus becomes the instru-</p><p>ment  for  external  action  to  a  degree  even  greater  than  in  the</p><p>above-mentioned relationship between the disease and its delu-</p><p>sional system.</p><p>Psychopaths  are  conscious  of  being  different  from  normal</p><p>people.  That  is  why  the  �political  system�  inspired  by  their</p><p>nature is able to conceal this awareness of being different. They</p><p>wear a personal mask of sanity and know how to create a mac-</p><p>rosocial mask of the same dissimulating nature. When we ob-</p><p>serve  the  role  of  ideology  in  this  macrosocial  phenomenon,</p><p>quite  conscious  of  the  existence  of  this  specific  awareness  of</p><p>the psychopath, we  can then understand  why ideology is rele-</p><p>gated to a tool-like role: something useful in dealing with those</p><p>other  naive  people  and  nations.  Pathocrats  must  nevertheless</p><p>appreciate the  function of ideology as being something essen-</p><p>tial  in  any  ponerogenic  group,  especially  in  the  macrosocial</p><p>phenomenon which is their �homeland�. This factor of aware-</p><p>ness simultaneously constitutes a certain qualitative difference</p><p>between  the  two  above-mentioned  relationships.  Pathocrats</p><p>know that their  <emphasis>real</emphasis> ideology is derived from their deviant na-</p><p>tures,  and  treat  the  �other�  �  the  masking  ideology  -  with</p><p>barely concealed contempt. And the common people eventually</p><p>begin to perceive this as noted above.</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>205</p><p>Thus,  a  well-developed pathocratic system no longer  has a</p><p>clear  and  direct  relationship  to  its  original  ideology,  which  it</p><p>only keeps as its primary, traditional tool for action and mask-</p><p>ing. For practical purposes of pathocratic expansion, other ide-</p><p>ologies may be useful, even if they contradict the main one and</p><p>heap moral denunciation upon it. However, these other ideolo-</p><p>gies  must  be  used  with  care,  refraining  from  official  acknow-</p><p>ledgement  within  environments  wherein  the  original  ideology</p><p>can be made to appear too foreign, discredited, and useless.</p><p>The main ideology succumbs to symptomatic deformation,</p><p>in keeping with the characteristic style of this very disease and</p><p>with what has already been stated about the matter. The names</p><p>and  <emphasis>official</emphasis> contents are kept, but another, completely different</p><p>content  is  insinuated  underneath,  thus  giving  rise  to  the  well</p><p>known double talk phenomenon within which the same names</p><p>have  two  meanings:  one  for  initiates,  one  for  everyone  else.</p><p>The latter is derived from the original ideology; the former has</p><p>a specifically pathocratic meaning, something which is known</p><p>not  only  to  the  pathocrats  themselves,  but  also  is  learned  by</p><p>those people living under long-term subjection to their rule.</p><p>Doubletalk  is  only  one  of  many  symptoms.  Others  are  the</p><p>specific facility for producing new names  which have sugges-</p><p>tive effects and are accepted virtually uncritically, in particular</p><p>outside the immediate scope of such a system�s rule.96 We must</p><p>thus  point  out  the  paramoralistic  character  and  paranoidal</p><p>qualities  frequently  contained  within  these  names.  The  action</p><p>of  paralogisms  and  paramoralisms  in  this  deformed  ideology</p><p>becomes  comprehensible  to  us  based  on  the  information  pre-</p><p>sented  in  Chapter  IV.  <emphasis>Anything  which  threatens  pathocratic </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>rule becomes deeply immoral. </emphasis> 97This also applies to the concept</p><p>of forgiving the pathocrats themselves; it is extremely danger-</p><p>ous and thus �immoral�.</p><p>We  thus  have  the  right  to  invent  appropriate  names  which</p><p>would  indicate  the  nature  of  the  phenomena  as  accurately  as</p><empty-line/><p>96 �Extraordinary rendition� as the nomenclature for illegally transporting</p><p>prisoners to countries where torture is practiced comes immediately to mind</p><p>as an example. [Editor�s note.]</p><p>97 Example: �You are with us, or you are against us.� And being �against us�</p><p>means that �you are a terrorist� and thus, immoral. [Editor�s note.]</p><p>206</p><p>PATHOCRACY</p><p>possible,  in  keeping  with  our  recognition  and  respect  for  the</p><p>laws  of  the  scientific  methodology  and semantics.  Such  accu-</p><p>rate terms will also serve to protect our minds from the sugges-</p><p>tive effects of those other names and paralogisms, including the</p><p>pathological material the latter contain.</p><p>The Expansion of the Pathocracy</p><p>The  world�s  tendency  to  fasten  its  gaze  adoringly  upon  its</p><p>rulers has a long tradition dating back to the times when sover-</p><p>eigns could virtually ignore their subjects� opinions. However,</p><p>rulers  have  always  been  dependent  upon  the  social  and  eco-</p><p>nomic  situation  in  their  country,  even  long  ago,  and  even  in</p><p>pathocratic systems, and the influence of various social groups</p><p>has reached their thrones by various means.</p><p>Much too common is the pattern of error which reasons that</p><p>purportedly  autocratic  leaders  of  countries  affected  by  this</p><p>pathocracy  actually  possess  decision-making  powers  in  areas</p><p>which they in fact do not. Millions of people, including minis-</p><p>ters  and  members  of  parliaments,  ponder  the  dilemma  of</p><p>whether  such  a  ruler  could  not,  under  certain  circumstances,</p><p>modify his convictions somewhat and relinquish his dreams of</p><p>conquering the world; they continue hope that this will be the</p><p>eventual outcome.98 People with personal experience in such a</p><p>system  may  attempt  to  persuade  them  that  their  dreams,  al-</p><p>though decent, lack a foundation in reality, but at the same time</p><p>they sense a lack of concrete arguments on their part. Such an</p><p>explanation is in fact impossible within the realm of the natural</p><p>language of psychological concepts; only an objective compre-</p><p>hension of the historical phenomenon and its essentially devi-</p><p>ant nature permits light to be shed upon the causes of the  <emphasis>per-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>ennial deceitfulness</emphasis> of this macrosocial pathological phenome-</p><p>non.</p><empty-line/><p>98 This is especially true in the present day when the leaders and parliaments</p><p>of many other countries, unhappy with the Bush Neocon administration,</p><p>think that diplomacy or new elections in the U.S. will �set things right�. They</p><p>do not understand the full nature of Pathocracy and that the psychopaths in</p><p>the shadows of this phenomenon will never relinquish control without blood-</p><p>shed. [Editor�s note.]</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>207</p><p>The  actions  of  this  phenomenon  affect  an  entire  society,</p><p>starting  with  the  leaders  and  infiltrating  every  village,  small</p><p>town, factory, business, or farm. The pathological social struc-</p><p>ture gradually covers the entire country, creating a �new class�</p><p>within  that  nation.  This  privileged  class  of  deviants  feels  per-</p><p>manently  threatened  by  the  �others�,  i.e.  by  the  majority  of</p><p>normal  people.  <emphasis>Neither  do  the  pathocrats  entertain  any  illu-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>sions about their personal fate should there be a return to the </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>system of normal man. </emphasis></p><p>A normal person deprived of privilege or high position will</p><p>go  about  finding  and  performing  some  work  which  will  earn</p><p>him a living; but pathocrats never possessed any solid practical</p><p>talent, and the time frame of their rule eliminates any residual</p><p>possibilities of adapting to the demands of normal work. If the</p><p>laws of normal man were to be reinstated, they and theirs could</p><p>be subjected to judgment, including a moralizing interpretation</p><p>of their psychological deviations; they would be threatened by</p><p>a  loss  of  freedom  and  life,  not  merely  a  loss  of  position  and</p><p>privilege. Since they are incapable of this kind of sacrifice, the</p><p>survival  of  a  system  which  is  the  best  for  them   <emphasis>becomes  a </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>moral  imperative</emphasis>.  Such  a  threat  must  be  battled  by  means  of</p><p>any  and  all  psychological  and  political  cunning  implemented</p><p>with  a  lack  of  scruples  with  regard  to  those  other  �inferior-</p><p>quality� people that can be shocking in its depravity.99</p><p>In general, this new class is in the position to purge its lead-</p><p>ers  should  their  behavior  jeopardize  the  existence  of  such  a</p><p>system.  This  could  occur  particularly  if  the  leadership  wished</p><p>to go too far in compromising with the society of normal peo-</p><p>ple, since their qualifications make them essential for produc-</p><p>tion. The latter is more a direct threat to the lower echelons of</p><p>the pathocratic elite than to the leaders.</p><p><emphasis>Pathocracy  survives  thanks  to  the  feeling  of  being  threat-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>ened by the society of normal people, as well as by other coun-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>tries wherein various forms of the system of normal man per-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>sist. For the rulers, staying on the top is therefore the classic </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>problem of �to be or not to be�. </emphasis></p><empty-line/><p>99 This should be kept firmly in mind by those who think that getting rid of</p><p>George W. Bush and the Neocons will change anything. [Editor�s note.]</p><p>208</p><p>PATHOCRACY</p><p>We can thus formulate a more cautious question: can such a</p><p>system  ever  waive  territorial  and  political  expansion  abroad</p><p>and  settle  for  its  present  possessions?  What  would  happen  if</p><p>such  a  state  of  affairs  ensured  internal  peace,  corresponding</p><p>order,  and  relative  prosperity  within  the  nation?  The  over-</p><p>whelming  majority  of  the  country�s  population  would  then</p><p>make  skillful  use  of  all  the  emerging  possibilities,  taking  ad-</p><p>vantage of their superior qualifications in order to fight for an</p><p>ever-increasing scope of activities; thanks to their higher birth</p><p>rate, their power will increase. This majority will be joined by</p><p>some  sons  from  the  privileged  class  who  did  not  inherit  the</p><p>pathological  genes.  The  pathocracy�s  dominance  will  weaken</p><p>imperceptibly  but  steadily,  finally  leading  to  a  situation</p><p>wherein the society of normal people reaches for power. This is</p><p>a nightmare vision to the psychopaths.</p><p><emphasis>Thus,  the  biological,  psychological,  moral,  and  economic </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>destruction of the majority of normal people becomes, for the </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>pathocrats,  a  �biological�  necessity. </emphasis>  Many  means  serve  this</p><p>end,  starting  with  concentration  camps  and  including  warfare</p><p>with  an  obstinate,  well-armed  foe  who  will  devastate  and  de-</p><p>bilitate the human power thrown at him, namely the very power</p><p>jeopardizing pathocrats rule: the sons of normal man sent out to</p><p>fight  for  an  illusionary  �noble  cause.�  Once  safely  dead,  the</p><p>soldiers  will  then  be  decreed  heroes  to  be  revered  in  paeans,</p><p>useful  for  raising  a  new  generation  faithful  to  the  pathocracy</p><p>and ever willing to go to their deaths to protect it.</p><p>Any war waged by a pathocratic nation has two fronts, the</p><p>internal and the external.  The internal  front is more important</p><p>for the leaders and the governing elite, and the internal threat is</p><p>the deciding factor where unleashing war is concerned. In pon-</p><p>dering  whether  to  start  a  war  against  the  pathocratic  country,</p><p>other nations must therefore give primary consideration to the</p><p>fact that such a war can be used as an executioner of the com-</p><p>mon people whose increasing power represents incipient jeop-</p><p>ardy for the pathocracy. After all, pathocrats give short shrift to</p><p>blood  and  suffering  of  people  they  consider  to  be  not  quite</p><p>conspecific. Kings may have suffered due to the death of their</p><p>knights,  but  pathocrats  never  do:  �We  have  a  lot  of  people</p><p>here.� Should the situation be, or become, ripe in such a coun-</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>209</p><p>try, however, anyone furnishing assistance to the nation will be</p><p>blessed by it; anyone withholding it will be cursed.</p><p>Pathocracy  has  other  internal  reasons  for  pursuing  expan-</p><p>sionism through the use of all means possible. As long as that</p><p>�other� world governed by the systems of normal man exists, it</p><p>inducts  into  the  non-pathological  majority  a  certain  sense  of</p><p>direction. The non-pathological majority of the country�s popu-</p><p>lation  will  never  stop  dreaming  of  the  reinstatement  of  the</p><p>normal man�s system in any possible form. This majority will</p><p>never stop watching other countries, waiting for the opportune</p><p>moment;  its  attention  and  power  must  therefore  be  distracted</p><p>from  this  purpose,  and  the  masses  must  be  �educated�  and</p><p>channeled  in  the  direction  of  imperialist  strivings.  This  goal</p><p>must be pursued doggedly so that everyone knows what is be-</p><p>ing fought for and in whose name harsh discipline and poverty</p><p>must be endured. The latter factor � creating conditions of pov-</p><p>erty and hardship - effectively limits the possibility of �subver-</p><p>sive� activities on the part of the society of normal people.</p><p>The ideology must, of course, furnish a corresponding justi-</p><p>fication  for  this  alleged  right  to  conquer  the  world  and  must</p><p>therefore be properly elaborated. Expansionism is derived from</p><p>the very nature of pathocracy, not from ideology, but this fact</p><p>must  be  masked  by  ideology.100  Whenever  this  phenomenon</p><p>has been witnessed in history, imperialism was always its most</p><p>demonstrative quality.</p><p>On  the  other  hand,  there  are  countries  with  normal  man�s</p><p>governments  wherein  the  overwhelming  majority  of  societies</p><p>shudders to think a similar system could be imposed on them.</p><p>The governments of such nations thereupon do everything they</p><p>can within the framework of their possibilities and their under-</p><p>standing of the phenomenon in order to contain its expansion.</p><p>The  citizens of those countries  would sigh with relief if some</p><p>upheaval were to replace this malevolent and incomprehensible</p><p>system  with  a  more  human,  more  easily  understood,  govern-</p><p>mental method with whom peaceful coexistence would be pos-</p><p>sible.</p><empty-line/><p>100 Example: the events of September 11, 2001, undoubtedly manufactured</p><p>by the Pathocracy. [Editor�s note.]</p><p>210</p><p>PATHOCRACY</p><p>Such  countries  thus  undertake  various  means  of  action  for</p><p>this  purpose,  <emphasis>their  quality  depending  on  the  possibility  of  un-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>derstanding that other reality</emphasis>. Such efforts resonate within the</p><p>country,  and  the  military  power  of  normal  man�s  countries</p><p>limits  the  pathocracy�s  possibilities  of  armed  maneuvers.</p><p>Weakening  those  countries  that  could  possibly  stand  against</p><p>the pathocracy, especially by utilizing the response pathocracy</p><p>awakens  in  some  of  their  deviant  citizens,  again  becomes  a</p><p>matter of the pathocracy�s survival.</p><p>Economic factors constitute a non-negligible part of the mo-</p><p>tivation  for  this  expansionist  tendency.  Since  the  managerial</p><p>functions  have  been  taken  over  by  individuals  with  mediocre</p><p>intelligence  and  pathological  character  traits,  the  pathocracy</p><p>becomes  incapable  of  properly  administering  anything  at  all.</p><p>The  area  suffering  most  severely  must  always  be  whichever</p><p>one  requires  a  person  to  act  independently,  not  wasting  time</p><p>searching for the proper way to behave. Agriculture is depend-</p><p>ent  upon  changing  climate  conditions  and  the  appearance  of</p><p>pests  and  plant  diseases.  A  farmer�s  personal  qualities  have</p><p>thus  been  an  essential  factor  of  success  in this  area,  as  it  was</p><p>for  many  centuries.  Pathocracy  therefore  invariably  brings</p><p>about food shortages.</p><p>However,  many  countries  with  normal  man�s  systems</p><p>abound  in  sufficiency  of  industrial  products  and  experience</p><p>problems  with  their  food  surpluses  and  temporary  economic</p><p>recessions  even  though  the  citizens  are  by  no  means  over-</p><p>worked.  The  temptation  to  dominate  such  a  country  and  its</p><p>prosperity,  that  perennial  imperialist  motive,  thus  becomes</p><p>even more strong in the pathocracy. The collected prosperity of</p><p>the  conquered  nation  can  be  exploited  for  a  time,  the  citizens</p><p>forced to work harder for paltry remuneration. For the moment,</p><p>no  thought  is  given  to  the  fact  that  introducing  a  pathocratic</p><p>system  within  such  a  country  will  eventually  cause  similar</p><p>unproductive  conditions;  after  all  psychological  deviance,  by</p><p>definition, indicates a lack of self-knowledge in this area. Un-</p><p>fortunately,  the  idea  of  conquering  rich  countries  also  moti-</p><p>vates the minds of many poor non-pathological fellows suffer-</p><p>ing under the pathocracy, but not understanding why, and who</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>211</p><p>would like to use this opportunity to grab something for them-</p><p>selves and eat their fill of good food.</p><p>As  has  been  the  case  for  centuries,  military  power  is  of</p><p>course the primary means for achieving these ends. Throughout</p><p>the  centuries,  though,  whenever  history  has  registered  the  ap-</p><p>pearance of the phenomenon of pathocracy, (regardless of the</p><p>ideological  cloak  covering  it),  specific  measures  of  influence</p><p>have also become apparent: something in the order of specific</p><p>intelligence  in  the  service  of  international  intrigue  facilitating</p><p>conquest.  This  quality  is  derived  from  the  above-discussed</p><p>personality characteristics inspiring the overall phenomenon; it</p><p>should  constitute  data  for  historians  to  identify  this  type  of</p><p>phenomenon throughout history.</p><p>People exist everywhere in the world with specifically sus-</p><p>ceptible  deviant  personalities;  even  a  faraway  pathocracy</p><p>evokes a resonating response in them, working on their under-</p><p>lying  feeling  that  �there  is  a  place  for  people  like  us  there�.</p><p>Uncritical, frustrated, and abused people also exist everywhere,</p><p>and  they  can  be  reached  by  appropriately  elaborated  propa-</p><p>ganda.  The  future  of  a  nation  is  greatly  dependent  on  how</p><p>many  such  people  it  contains.  Thanks  to  its  specific  psycho-</p><p>logical  knowledge  and  its  conviction  that  normal  people  are</p><p>naive,  a  pathocracy  is  able  to  improve  its  �anti-</p><p>psychotherapeutic�  techniques,  and  pathologically  egotistical</p><p>as usual, to insinuate its deviant world of concepts to others in</p><p>other countries, thus making them susceptible to conquest and</p><p>domination.</p><p>The most frequently used methods include paralogistic and</p><p>conversion methods such as the projection of one�s own quali-</p><p>ties and intention onto other persons, social groups, or nations,</p><p>paramoral indignation, and reverse blocking.  This last method</p><p>is  a  pathocratic  favorite  used  on  the  mass  scale,  driving  the</p><p>minds of average people into a dead end because, as a result, it</p><p>causes  them  to  search  for  the  truth  in  the  �golden  mean�  be-</p><p>tween the reality and its opposite.101</p><empty-line/><p>101 This is being very effectively used at the present time under the guise of</p><p>�The War on Terror�, a completely manufactured device that utilizes �false</p><p>flag operations� to herd people into �support camps� for the U.S. imperialist</p><p>agenda. [Editor�s note.]</p><p>212</p><p>PATHOCRACY</p><p>We should thus point out that although various works in the</p><p>area of psychopathology contain descriptions of most of these</p><p>near-hypocritical methods, an overall summary filling the gaps</p><p>observed  is  absent  and  sorely  needed.  How  much  better  it</p><p>would be if the people and governments of normal man�s coun-</p><p>tries  could  take  advantage  of  such  a  work  and  behave  like  an</p><p>experienced  psychologist,  noting  the  reproaches  heaped  upon</p><p>them in the course of projection and turning around statements</p><p>whose  character  indicate  reverse  blocking.  A  bit  of  analytical</p><p>cosmetics  would  then  produce  a  low-cost  list  of  a  pathocratic</p><p>empire�s intentions.102</p><p>Law  has  become  the  measure  of  right  within  the  countries</p><p>of  normal  human  systems.  We  often  forget  how  imperfect  a</p><p>creation  of  human  minds  it  really  is,  how  dependent  it  is  on</p><p>formulations based upon data which legislators can understand.</p><p>In legal theory, we accept its regulatory nature as a given and</p><p>consequently  agree  that  in  certain  cases  its  activities  may  not</p><p>be  quite  concurrent  with  human  reality.  Understood  thus,  <emphasis>the </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>law  furnishes  insufficient  support  for  counteracting  a  phe-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>nomenon whose character lies outside of the possibilities of the </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>legislators� imagination</emphasis>. Quite the contrary: pathocracy knows</p><p>how  to  take  advantage  of  the  weaknesses  of  such  a  legalistic</p><p>manner of thinking.</p><p>However,  this  macrosocial  phenomenon�s  internal  actions</p><p>and external expansion are  <emphasis>based upon psychological data</emphasis>. As</p><p>such,  regardless  of  how  these  data  are  deformed  within  the</p><p>pathocrats� personalities,  <emphasis>its cunning is vastly superior to nor-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>mal  people�s  legal  systems</emphasis>.  This  makes  pathocracy  the  social</p><p>system of the future, albeit in the shape of a caricature.</p><p>Therefore, the future for normal man belongs to social sys-</p><p>tems  which  are  based  on  an  improved  comprehension  of  man</p><p>in  all  his  psychological  variations;  evolution  in  this  direction</p><p>can, among other things, ensure greater resistance to the expan-</p><empty-line/><p>102 This is currently being done, and quite well, by alternative news sources</p><p>on the internet, bloggers, and many �ordinary� people who can easily see</p><p>what is going on. Unfortunately, to date, no ruling party in any significant</p><p>country with the power to stand against the pathocracy of the U.S. has man-</p><p>aged to think that far. [Editor�s note.]</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>213</p><p>sionary methods this macrosocial phenomenon uses in its quest</p><p>to dominate the world.</p><p>Pathocracy Imposed by Force</p><p>The  genesis  of  pathocracy  in  any  country  is  so  lengthy  a</p><p>process that it is difficult to pinpoint when it began. If we take</p><p>into  consideration  those  historical  examples  which  should  be</p><p>qualified  in  that  regard,  we  will  most  frequently  observe  the</p><p>figure  of  an  autocratic  ruler  whose  mental  mediocrity  and  in-</p><p>fantile personality finally opened the door to the ponerogenesis</p><p>of  the  phenomenon.  Wherever  a  society�s  common  sense  is</p><p>sufficiently  influential,  its  self-preservation  instinct  is  able  to</p><p>overcome  this  ponerogenic  process  rather  early.  <emphasis>Things  are </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>different when an active nucleus of this disease already exists </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>and  can  dominate  by  means  of  infection  or  the  imposition  of </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>force. </emphasis></p><p>Whenever  a  nation  experiences  a  �system  crisis�  or  a  hy-</p><p>peractivity  of  ponerogenic  processes  within,  it  becomes  the</p><p>object  of  a   <emphasis>pathocratic  penetration  whose  purpose  is to  serve </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>up  the  country  as  booty</emphasis>.  It  will  then  become  easy  to  take  ad-</p><p>vantage  of  its  internal  weaknesses  and  revolutionary  move-</p><p>ments in order to impose rule on the basis of a limited use of</p><p>force. Conditions such as a great war or a country�s temporary</p><p>weakness can sometimes cause it to submit to the violence of a</p><p>pathocratic neighbor country (against their will) whose system</p><p>did not exhibit such wide-scope infirmities earlier. After forci-</p><p>ble  imposition  of  such  a  system  the  course  of  pathologization</p><p>of  life  becomes  different;  and  such  a  pathocracy  will  be  less</p><p>stable,  its  very  existence  dependent  upon  the  factor  of  never-</p><p>ending outside force.</p><p>Let  us  now  address  the  latter  situation  first:  Brute  force</p><p>must  first  stifle  the  resistance  of  an  exhausted  nation;  people</p><p>possessing  military  or  leadership  skills  must  be  disposed  of,</p><p>and anyone appealing to moral values and legal principles must</p><p>be silenced. The new principles are never explicitly enunciated.</p><p>People  must  learn  the  new  unwritten  law  via  painful  experi-</p><p>ence.  The  stultifying  influence  of  this  deviant  world  of  con-</p><p>cepts finishes the job, and common sense demands caution and</p><p>endurance.</p><p>214</p><p>PATHOCRACY</p><p>This is followed by a shock which appears as tragic as it is</p><p>frightening.  Some  people  from  every  social  group,  whether</p><p>abused  paupers,  aristocrats,  officials,  literati,  students,  scien-</p><p>tists,  priests,  atheists,  or  nobodies  known  to  no  one,  suddenly</p><p>start changing their personality and world view. Decent Chris-</p><p>tians  and  patriots  just  yesterday,  they  now  espouse  the  new</p><p>ideology  and  behave  contemptuously  to  anyone  still  adhering</p><p>to  the  old  values.  Only  later  does  it  become  evident  that  this</p><p>ostensibly  avalanche-like  process  has  its  natural  limits.  With</p><p>time,  the  society  becomes  stratified  based  on  factors  entirely</p><p>different from the old political convictions and social links. We</p><p>already know the causes for this.</p><p>Through  direct  contact  with  the  pathocracy,  society  simul-</p><p>taneously begins to sense that its true content is different from</p><p>the ideologies disseminated earlier, while the country was still</p><p>independent. This divergence is a traumatizing factor, because</p><p>it questions the value of accepted convictions. Years must pass</p><p>before the mind has adapted to the new concepts. When those</p><p>of us who have experienced this then travel to Western Europe,</p><p>or especially to the United States, people who still believe the</p><p>original ideologies, the mask that was presented by the pathoc-</p><p>racy, strike us as being silly.</p><p>Pathocracy imposed by force arrives in a finished form, we</p><p>could  even  call  it  ripe.  People  observing  it  close  up  were  un-</p><p>able to distinguish the earlier phases of its development, when</p><p>the  schizoidals  and  characteropaths  were  in  charge.  The  need</p><p>for the existence of these phases and their character had to be</p><p>reconstructed in this work on the basis of historical data.</p><p>In  an  imposed  system,  psychopathic  material  is  already</p><p>dominant;  it  was  perceived  as  something  contrary  to  human</p><p>nature,  virtually  bereft  of  the  mask  of  ideology  rendered  ever</p><p>less  necessary  in  a  conquered  country,  but  nevertheless  still</p><p>masked by its incomprehensibility to people who are still trying</p><p>to think in the categories of a natural world view.</p><p>We  at  first  perceived  the  old  system  of  categories  and  un-</p><p>derstanding  as  painfully  inadequate  for  purposes  of  compre-</p><p>hending  the  reality  which  had  overwhelmed  us.  The  essential</p><p>objective  categories  we  needed  to  classify  what  we  observed</p><p>would  not  be  created  until  many  years  of  effort  had  passed.</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>215</p><p>Individuals  with  deviant  characteristics,  scattered  throughout</p><p>society, however, unerringly sensed that the time had come for</p><p><emphasis>their</emphasis> dreams to come true, the time to exact revenge upon those</p><p>�others�  who  had  abused  and  humiliated  them  before.  This</p><p>violent  formative  process  of  pathocracy  lasted  barely  eight</p><p>years or so, thereupon making a similarly escalated transforma-</p><p>tion into the dissimulative phase.</p><p>The system functions, psychological mechanisms, and mys-</p><p>terious causative links in a country upon which a quasi-political</p><p>structure  was  imposed  are  basically  analogous  to  those  of  the</p><p>country  which  gave  rise  to  the  phenomenon.  The  system</p><p>spreads downward until it reaches every village and every hu-</p><p>man individual. The actual contents and internal causes of this</p><p>phenomenon  also  manifest  no  essential  difference,  regardless</p><p>of whether  we make our observation in the capital or in some</p><p>outlying  small  town.  If  the  entire  organism  is sick,  diagnostic</p><p>biopsy tissue can be collected wherever this can be performed</p><p>most  expediently.  Those  who  live  in  countries  with  normal</p><p>human  systems  attempting  to  understand  this  other  system  by</p><p>means of their imagination, or by penetrating the  walls of the</p><p>Kremlin  where it is assumed that the intentions of the highest</p><p>authorities are concealed, do not realize that this is a very oner-</p><p>ous method to do something that can be done more efficiently.</p><p>In  order  to  perceive  the  essence  of  the  phenomenon,  we  can</p><p>more easily situate ourselves in a small town, where it is much</p><p>easier to peek backstage and analyze the nature of such a sys-</p><p>tem.</p><p>However,  some  of  the  differences  in  the  nature  of  the</p><p>pathocratic  phenomenon  between  the  originating  country  and</p><p>the country on which it is forcibly imposed turn out to be per-</p><p>manent. The system will always strike the society that has been</p><p>taken over as something foreign associated with the other coun-</p><p>try.  The  society�s  historical  tradition  and  culture  constitute  a</p><p>connection to those strivings aimed in the direction of normal</p><p>man�s structures.  The more mature cultural formations in par-</p><p>ticular prove the most highly resistant to the system�s destruc-</p><p>tive activities. The subjugated nation finds support and inspira-</p><p>tion for its psychological and  moral  resistance in its  own  cul-</p><p>tural,  religious,  and  moral  traditions.  These  values,  elaborated</p><p>216</p><p>PATHOCRACY</p><p>through  centuries,  cannot  easily  be  destroyed  or  co-opted  by</p><p>pathocracy; quite the contrary, they even embark upon a more</p><p>intensive  life  in  the  new  society.  These  values  progressively</p><p>cleanse themselves of patriotic buffoonery, and their  principal</p><p>contents  become  more  real  in  their  eternal  meaning.  If  forced</p><p>by necessity, the culture of the country in question is concealed</p><p>in  private  homes  or  disseminated  via  conspiracy;  however,  it</p><p>continues to survive and develop, creating values which could</p><p>not have arisen during happier times.</p><p>As a result, such a society�s opposition becomes ever more</p><p>enduring,  ever  more  skillfully  effected.  It  turns  out  that  those</p><p>who believed they could impose such a system, trusting that it</p><p>would  then  function  on  the  pathocracy�s  autonomic  mecha-</p><p>nisms,  were  overly  optimistic.  Imposed  pathocracy  always</p><p>remains an alien system to the extent that, if it should fall in the</p><p>country of its birth, its endurance within the subjugated nation</p><p>would only be a matter of weeks.</p><p>Artifically Infected Pathocracy</p><p>and Psychological Warfare</p><p>If  a  nucleus  of  this  macrosocial  pathological  phenomenon</p><p>already  exists  in  the  world,  always  cloaking  its  true  quality</p><p>behind an ideological mask of some political system, it irradi-</p><p>ates into other nations via coded news difficult for normal peo-</p><p>ple to understand, but  easy to  read for psychopathic individu-</p><p>als. �That�s the place for us,  we now have a homeland where</p><p>our dreams about ruling those �others� can come true. We can</p><p>finally  live  in  safety  and  prosperity.�  The  more  powerful  this</p><p>nucleus  and  the  pathocratic  nation,  the  wider  the  scope  of  its</p><p>inductive siren-call, heard by individuals whose nature is corre-</p><p>spondingly  deviant,  as  though  they  were  superheterodyne  re-</p><p>ceivers  naturally  attuned  to  the  same  wave-length.  Unfortu-</p><p>nately, what is being used today is real radio transmitters in the</p><p>hundreds of kilowatts, as well as loyal covert agents of pathoc-</p><p>racy networking our planet.</p><p>Whether  directly  or  indirectly,  i.e.  by  means  of  deviant</p><p>�agents�,  this  call  of  pathocracy,  once  appropriately  �decked-</p><p>out�,  reaches  a  significantly  wider  circle  of  people,  including</p><p>both  individuals  with  various  psychological  deviations  and</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>217</p><p>those who are frustrated, deprived of the opportunity to earn an</p><p>education and make use of their talents, physically or morally</p><p>injured, or simply primitive. The scope of the response to this</p><p>call  may  vary  in  proportion,  but  nowhere  will  it  represent  the</p><p>majority.  Nonetheless,  the  home-bred  spellbinders  who  arise</p><p>never take into account the fact that they are not able to enrap-</p><p>ture the majority. 103</p><p>Various nations� different degrees of resistance to this activ-</p><p>ity depend upon many factors, such as prosperity and its equi-</p><p>table  distribution,  the  society�s  educational  level  (especially</p><p>that  of  the  poorer  classes),  the  proportion  of  participation  of</p><p>individuals  who  are  primitive  or  have  various  deviations,  and</p><p>the  current  phase  of  the  hysteroidal  cycle.  Some  nations  have</p><p>developed immunity as a result of more direct contact with the</p><p>phenomenon, something we shall discuss in the next chapter.</p><p>In  countries  just  emerging  from  primeval  conditions  and</p><p>lacking  political  experience,  an  appropriately  elaborated  revo-</p><p>lutionary doctrine reaches its society�s autonomous substratum</p><p>and  finds  people  who  treat  it  like  ideational  reality.  This  also</p><p>occurs in nations where an over-egoistical ruling class defends</p><p>its  position  by  means  of  naively  moralizing  doctrines,  where</p><p>injustice is rampant, or where an intensification of the hysteria</p><p>level stifles the operation of common sense. People  who have</p><p>become  accustomed  to  revolutionary  catchwords  no  longer</p><p>watch to make sure that whoever expounds such an ideology is</p><p>a truly sincere adherent, and not just someone using the mask</p><p>of ideology to conceal other motives derived from his deviant</p><p>personality.</p><empty-line/><p>103 Noticable in any country. In the present day, when the United States is</p><p>well on the way to becoming a full-blown pathocracy, and is thus the source</p><p>of the contamination, spellbinders for the deviant reality promote �American</p><p>style� economics and �culture,� and are even viewed by their fellow coun-</p><p>trymen as �America-ophiles�. Most people do not understand that the first</p><p>step to becoming part of the Global pathocracy that America is attempting to</p><p>impose on the world is to become part of the economic system as it is formu-</p><p>lated in America. A recent example of a country rejecting this maneuver is</p><p>France�s rejection of the European Constitution, a document focusing on the</p><p>neo-liberal transformation of the European economy along the lines of the</p><p>U.S. model. [Editor�s note.]</p><p>218</p><p>PATHOCRACY</p><p>In  addition  to these  spellbinders,  we  can  find  another  kind</p><p>of  preacher  of  revolutionary  ideas,  one  whose  status  is  basi-</p><p>cally  linked  to the  money  he  receives  for  his  activities.  How-</p><p>ever, it is unlikely that its ranks include people  who  could be</p><p>characterized  as  psychologically  normal  with  no  reservations</p><p>on the basis of the above-mentioned criteria. Their indifference</p><p>to the human suffering caused by their own activities is derived</p><p>from  deficiencies  in  their  perceived  value  of  societal  links  or</p><p>their capacity to foresee the results of their activities.</p><p><emphasis>In  ponerogenic  processes,  moral  deficiencies,  intellectual </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>failings,  and  pathological  factors  intersect  in  a  time-space </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>causative network giving rise to individual and national suffer-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>ing. </emphasis></p><p>Any  war  waged  with  psychological  weapons  costs  only  a</p><p>fraction  as  much  as  classical  warfare,  but  it  does have  a  cost,</p><p>especially  when  it  is  being  waged  simultaneously  in  many</p><p>countries throughout the world.</p><p>People acting in the name of pathocracy�s interests may ef-</p><p>fect their activities in parallel, under the banner of some tradi-</p><p>tional or other ideology, or even with the assistance of a con-</p><p>tradictory  ideology  battling  the  traditional  one.  In  these  latter</p><p>cases,  the  service  must  be  performed  by  individuals  whose</p><p>response to the call of the pathocracy is sufficiently vehement</p><p>so as to prevent the self-suggestive activities of the other ideol-</p><p>ogy they are using from  weakening the links with their actual</p><p>hopes for power.</p><p>Whenever a society contains serious social problems, there</p><p>will also be some group of sensible people striving to improve</p><p>the  social  situation  by  means  of  energetic  reforms,  so  as  to</p><p>eliminate  the  cause  of  social  tension.  Others  consider  it  their</p><p>duty  to  bring  about  a  moral  rejuvenation  of  society.  Elimina-</p><p>tion of social injustice and reconstruction of the country�s mor-</p><p>als and civilization could deprive a pathocracy of any chance to</p><p>take over.  <emphasis>Such reformers and moralists must therefore be con-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>sistently neutralized by means of liberal or  conservative posi-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>tions and appropriately suggestive catchwords and paramoral-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>isms; if necessary, the best among them has to be murdered. </emphasis></p><p>Psychological  warfare  strategists  must  decide  rather  early</p><p>on which ideology would be most efficient in a particular coun-</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>219</p><p>try because of its adaptability to said nation�s traditions. After</p><p>all, the appropriately adapted ideology must perform the func-</p><p>tion of a Trojan horse, transporting pathocracy into the country.</p><p>These various ideologies are then gradually conformed to one�s</p><p>own original master plan. Finally, off comes the mask.</p><p>At the right time, local partisans are organized  and armed,</p><p>with  recruits  picked  from  dissatisfied  localities;  leadership  is</p><p>provided  by  trained  officers  familiar  with  the  secret  idea  as</p><p>well  as  the  operative  idea  concocted  for  propagation  in  the</p><p>country in question. Assistance must then be given so groups of</p><p>conspirators  adhering  to  the  concocted  ideology  can  stage  a</p><p>coup d��tat,  whereupon an iron-fisted government is installed.</p><p>Once  this  has  been  brought  about,  the  diversionary  partisans�</p><p>activities are stymied � they are made out to be patsies - so that</p><p>the  new  authorities  can  take  credit  for  bringing  about  internal</p><p>peace. Any hoodlum who cannot or will not submit to the new</p><p>decrees is �gently� invited before his former leader and shot in</p><p>the back of the head. This is the new reality.</p><p>This is how such governmental systems are born. A network</p><p>of pathological ponerogenical factors is already active, as is the</p><p>inspirational role of essential psychopathy. However, that does</p><p>not yet represent a complete picture of pathocracy. Many local</p><p>leaders  and  adherents  persist  in  their  original  convictions</p><p>which, albeit radical, strike them as serving the good of a much</p><p>larger  proportion  of  formerly  abused  persons,  not  just  a  few</p><p>percent  of  pathocrats  and  the  interests  of  a  would-be  world</p><p>wide empire.</p><p>Local  leaders  continue  to  think  along  the  lines  of  social</p><p>revolution, appealing to the political goals they truly believe in.</p><p>They demand that the �friendly power�  furnish them  not only</p><p>the  promised  assistance,  but  also  a  certain  measure  of  auton-</p><p>omy  they  consider  crucial.  They  are  not  sufficiently  familiar</p><p>with  the  mysterious  �us-and-them�  dichotomy.  At  the  same</p><p>time they are instructed and ordered to submit to the dictates of</p><p>unclear  ambassadors  whose  meaning  and  purpose  are  hard  to</p><p>understand.  Frustration  and  doubt  thus  grow;  their  nature  is</p><p>ideological, nationalistic, and practical.</p><p>Conflict progressively increases, especially  when  wide cir-</p><p>cles  of  society  begin  to  doubt  whether  those  people  allegedly</p><p>220</p><p>PATHOCRACY</p><p>acting in the name of some great ideology do in fact believe in</p><p>it.  Thanks  to  experience  and  contact  with  the  pathocratic  na-</p><p>tion, similarly wide circles simultaneously increase their prac-</p><p>tical  knowledge  about  the  reality  and  behavioral  methods  of</p><p>that system. Should such a semi-colony thus achieve too much</p><p>independence or even decide to defect, too much of this knowl-</p><p>edge could then reach the consciousness of normal man�s coun-</p><p>tries. This could represent a serious defeat for pathocracy.</p><p>Ever-increasing  control  is  thus  necessary  until  full  pathoc-</p><p>racy can be achieved. Those leaders whom the central authori-</p><p>ties  consider  to  be  effectively  transitional  can  be  eliminated</p><p>unless they indicate a sufficient degree of submission. Geopo-</p><p>litical  conditions  are  generally  decisive  in  this  area.  That  ex-</p><p>plains why it is easier for such leaders to survive on an outlying</p><p>island  than  in  countries  bordering  the  empire.  Should  such</p><p>leaders  manage  to  maintain  a  larger  degree  of  autonomy  by</p><p><emphasis>concealing</emphasis> their doubts, they  might be  able to take advantage</p><p>of their geopolitical position if the conditions are amenable.</p><p>During such a phase of crisis of trust, circumspect policy on</p><p>the part of normal man�s countries could still tip the scales in</p><p>favor of a structure which may be revolutionary and leftist, but</p><p>not pathocratic.  However, this is not the only missing consid-</p><p>eration; another primary one is the lack of objective knowledge</p><p>about  the  phenomenon,  something  which  would  make  such</p><p>policy  possible.  <emphasis>Emotional  factors,  coupled  with  a  moralizing </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>interpretation  of  pathological  phenomena,  frequently  play </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>much too great a part in political decision-making. </emphasis></p><p>No full-fledged pathocracy can develop  <emphasis>until the second up-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>heaval  and  the  purging  of  its  transitional  leadership</emphasis>,  which</p><p>was  insufficiently  loyal  thereto.  This  is  the  counterpart  of  a</p><p>showdown  with  the  true  adherents  of  the  ideology  within  the</p><p>genesis of the original pathocracy, which can then develop, due</p><p>both to the appropriately imposed leaders and to the activity of</p><p>this phenomenon�s autonomous ponerogenic mechanisms.</p><p>After  the  initial  governmental  period,  brutal,  bloody,  and</p><p>psychologically  naive,  such  a  pathocracy  thereupon  begins  its</p><p>transformation  into  its  dissimulative  form,  which  has  already</p><p>been  described  in  discussing  the  genesis  of  the  phenomenon</p><p>and the force-imposed pathocracy.  <emphasis>During this period not even </emphasis></p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>221</p><p><emphasis>the  most  skillful  outside  policy  can  possibly  undermine  the </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>existence  of  such  a  system. </emphasis>  The  period  of  weakness  is  still  to</p><p>come: when a mighty network of the society of normal people</p><p>is formed.</p><p>The  above  lapidary  description  of  an  infectious  imposition</p><p>of pathocracy indicates that this process repeats all the phases</p><p>of  independent  ponerogenesis   <emphasis>condensed  in  time  and  content</emphasis>.</p><p>Underneath  the  rulership  of  its  incompetent  administrative</p><p>predecessors, we can even discern a period of hyperactivity on</p><p>the part of schizoidal individuals mesmerized by the vision of</p><p>their own rule based on contempt for human nature, especially</p><p>if they are numerous within a given country. They do not real-</p><p>ize that pathocracy will never make their dreams come true; it</p><p>will rather shunt them into the shadows, since individuals with</p><p>whom we are already familiar will become the leaders.</p><p>A  pathocracy  thus  generated  will  be  more  strongly  im-</p><p>printed  upon  the  subjugated  country  than  one  imposed  by</p><p>force.  At the same time, however, it maintains certain charac-</p><p>teristics  of  its  divergent  content,  sometimes  referred  to  as</p><p>�ideological�  although  it  is  in  fact  a  derivate  of  the  different</p><p>ethnological  substratum  upon  which  its  scion  was  grafted.</p><p>Should conditions such as a nation�s numerical plentitude, wide</p><p>extension,  or  geographic  isolation  permit  independence  from</p><p>the primary pathocratic nation, more measured factors and the</p><p>society of normal people will thus find some way of influenc-</p><p>ing the governmental system, taking advantage of the opportu-</p><p>nities  afforded  by  the  dissimulative  phase.  In  the  presence  of</p><p>advantageous  conditions  and  skillful  outside  assistance,  this</p><p>could lead to progressive depathologization of the system.</p><p>General Considerations</p><p>The  path  to  comprehending  the  true  contents  of  the  phe-</p><p>nomenon and its internal causality can only be opened by over-</p><p>coming natural reflexes and emotions, and the tendency toward</p><p>moralizing interpretations, followed by assembling data elabo-</p><p>rated in difficult everyday clinical work and subsequent gener-</p><p>alizations in the form of theoretical ponerology. Such compre-</p><p>hension  naturally  also  encompasses  those  who  would  create</p><p>such an inhuman system.</p><p>222</p><p>PATHOCRACY</p><p>The problem of biological determination of the behavior of</p><p>deviants  is  thus  sketched  in  all  its  expressiveness,  showing</p><p>primarily  how  their  capacity  for  moral  judgments  and  their</p><p>field  of  behavior  selection  is  narrowed  well  below  the  levels</p><p>available  to  a  normal  person.  The  attitude  of  understanding</p><p>even one�s enemies is the most difficult for us humans. Moral</p><p>condemnation  proves  to  be  an  obstacle  along  the  path  toward</p><p>curing the world of this disease.</p><p>A  result  of  the  character  of  the  phenomenon  described  in</p><p>this  chapter  is  that  no  attempt  to  understand  its  nature  or  to</p><p>track its internal causative links and diachronic transformations</p><p>would be possible if all we had at our disposal were the natural</p><p>language of psychological, social, and moral concepts even in</p><p>that  partially  perfected  form  used  by  the  social  sciences.  It</p><p>would  also  be  impossible  to  predict  subsequent  phases  in  the</p><p>development  of  this  phenomenon  or  to  distinguish  its  weak</p><p>times and weak spots for purposes of counteraction.</p><p>Elaboration  of  an  appropriate  and  sufficiently  comprehen-</p><p>sive  conceptual  language  was  thus  indicated  as  essential;  it</p><p>required  more  time  and  effort  than  studying  the  phenomenon</p><p>itself. It has therefore become necessary to bore readers some-</p><p>what by introducing this conceptual language in a manner both</p><p>parsimonious and adequate,  which  would at the same time be</p><p>comprehensible to those readers not trained in the area of psy-</p><p>chopathology.</p><p>Anyone who wants to repair television sets instead of mak-</p><p>ing them worse must first familiarize himself with electronics,</p><p>which is also beyond the  ambit of our natural conceptual lan-</p><p>guage. However, upon learning to understand this macrosocial</p><p>phenomenon in the corresponding reference system, a scientist</p><p>stands  in  wonder  as  though  before  the  open  tomb  of  Tutank-</p><p>hamen  for  a  while  before  he  is  able  to  understand  the  living</p><p>laws  of  the  phenomenon  with  ever  greater  speed  and  skill,</p><p>thereupon  complementing  this  comprehension  with  a  huge</p><p>array of detailed data.</p><p>The first conclusion which suggested itself soon after meet-</p><p>ing  with  the  �professor�  introduced  at  the  beginning  of  this</p><p>volume, was that the phenomenon�s development is limited by</p><p>nature  in  terms  of  the  participation  of  susceptible  individuals</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>223</p><p>within a given society. The initial evaluation of approximately</p><p>6%  amenable  individuals  proved  realistic;  progressively  col-</p><p>lected  detailed  statistical  data  assembled  later  were  unable  to</p><p>refute it. This value varies from country to country in the mag-</p><p>nitude  of  about  one  percentage  point  upward  or  downward.</p><p>Quantitatively speaking, this number is broken down into 0.6%</p><p>essential  psychopaths,  i.e.  about  1/10  of  this  6  %.  However,</p><p>this  anomaly  plays  a  disproportionate  role  compared  to  the</p><p>numbers by saturating the phenomenon as a whole with its own</p><p>quality of thought and experience.</p><p>Other  psychopathies,  known  as  asthenic,  schizoidal,</p><p>anankastic,  hysterical,  et  al.,  definitely  play  second  fiddle  al-</p><p>though,  in  sum,  they  are  much  more  numerous.  Relatively</p><p>primitive  skirtoidal  individuals  become  fellow-travelers,</p><p>goaded by their lust for life, but their activities are limited by</p><p>considerations of their own advantage. In non-semitic nations,</p><p>schizoidia  are  somewhat  more  numerous  than  essential  psy-</p><p>chopaths;  although  highly  active  in  the  early  phases  of  the</p><p>genesis of the phenomenon, they betray an attraction to pathoc-</p><p>racy as well as the rational distance of efficient thinking; Thus</p><p>they are torn between such a system and the society of normal</p><p>people.</p><p>Persons  less  distinctly  inclined  in  the  pathocratic  direction</p><p>include  those  affected  by  some  states  caused  by  the  toxic  ac-</p><p>tivities of certain substances such as ether,  <emphasis>carbon monoxide</emphasis>,104</p><p>and  possibly  some  endotoxins,  <emphasis>under  the  condition  that  this </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>occurred in childhood</emphasis>.105</p><empty-line/><p>104 Considering the fact that the last attempt to impose a Pathocracy on the</p><p>global scale, Naziism, campaigned vigorously against smoking, and the</p><p>current U.S. pathocracy is also behind the global attempt to �stamp out smok-</p><p>ing� as a �health hazard�, all the while generously distributing depleted</p><p>uranium, a far more dangerous substance, into the environment, as well as</p><p>refusing to join any environmental preservation activities, one has to wonder</p><p>if there is not some connection here? If carbon monoxide, one of the primary</p><p>substances inhaled when smoking, actually produces a state or condition that</p><p>is a defense against the mental predations of pathocrats, no wonder they wish</p><p>to eliminate it. That also suggests that all of the so-called �data� supporting</p><p>the anti-smoking campaign is possibly �cooked�. [Editor�s note.]</p><p>105 i.e., So-called �second hand smoke�. This actually suggests that second-</p><p>hand smoke can have highly beneficial effects on children specifically in</p><p>terms of immunizing them against psychopathic take-over! [Editor�s note.]</p><p>224</p><p>PATHOCRACY</p><p>Among individuals carrying other indications of brain-tissue</p><p>damage, only two described types have a somewhat measured</p><p>inclination,  namely  frontal  and  paranoidal  characteropaths.  In</p><p>the case of frontal characteropathy, this is principally the result</p><p>of an incapacity for self-critical reflection and an incapacity for</p><p>the  abandonment  of  a  dead-end  street  into  which  one  has</p><p>thoughtlessly  stumbled.  Paranoidal  individuals  expect  uncriti-</p><p>cal support within such a system. In general however, the carri-</p><p>ers of various kinds of brain-tissue damage lean clearly toward</p><p>the  society  of  normal  people,  and  as  a  result  of  their  psycho-</p><p>logical  problems,  ultimately  suffer  even  more  than  healthy</p><p>people under pathocracy.</p><p>It  also  turned  out  that  the  carriers  of  some   <emphasis>physiological </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>anomalies</emphasis>  known  to  physicians  and  sometimes  to  psycholo-</p><p>gists,  and  which  are  primarily  hereditary  in  nature,  manifest</p><p>split tendencies similar to schizoids. In a similar manner, peo-</p><p>ple whom nature has unfortunately saddled with a short life and</p><p>an early cancer-related death frequently indicate a characteris-</p><p>tic  and  irrational  attraction  for  this  phenomenon.  These  latter</p><p>observations  were  decisive  in  my  agreeing  to  call  the  phe-</p><p>nomenon by this name,  which had originally struck me as se-</p><p>mantically  overly  loose.  An  individual�s  decreased  resistance</p><p>to the effects of pathocracy and his attraction to this phenome-</p><p>non appear to be  <emphasis>a holistic response of person�s organism</emphasis>, not</p><p>merely of his psychological makeup alone.</p><p>Approximately  6%  of  the  population  constitutes  the  active</p><p>structure  of  the  new  rulership,  which  carries  its  own  peculiar</p><p>consciousness of its own goals. Twice as many people consti-</p><p>tute  a  second  group:  those  who  have  managed  to  warp  their</p><p>personalities to meet the demands of the new reality. This leads</p><p>to attitudes which can already be interpreted within the catego-</p><p>ries of the natural psychological world view, i.e. the errors we</p><p>are committing are much smaller. It is of course not possible to</p><p>draw  an  exact  boundary  between  these  groups;  the  separation</p><p>adduced here is merely descriptive in nature.</p><p>This  second  group  consists  of  individuals  who  are,  on  the</p><p>average, weaker, more sickly, and less vital. The frequency of</p><p>known mental diseases in this group is at twice the rate of the</p><p>national average. We can thus assume that the genesis of their</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>225</p><p>submissive attitude toward the regime, their greater susceptibil-</p><p>ity  to  pathological  effects,  and  their  skittish  opportunism  in-</p><p>cludes  various  relatively  impalpable  anomalies.  We  observe</p><p>not only physiological anomalies, but also the kinds described</p><p>above  at  the  lowest  intensity,  with  the  exception  of  essential</p><p>psychopathy.</p><p>The  6%  group  constitute  the  new  nobility;  the  12%  group</p><p>gradually  forms  the  new  bourgeoisie,  whose  economic  situa-</p><p>tion is the most advantageous. Adapting to the new conditions,</p><p>not without conflicts of conscience, transforms this latter group</p><p>into both dodgers and, simultaneously, intermediaries between</p><p>the  oppositional  society  and  the  active  ponerological  group,</p><p>whom they can talk to in the appropriate language. They play</p><p>such a crucial role within this system that both sides must take</p><p>them  into  account.  Since  their  technical  capacities  and  skills</p><p>are  better  than  those  of  the  active  pathocratic  group,  they  as-</p><p>sume various managerial positions. Normal people see them as</p><p>persons  they  can  approach,  generally  without  being  subjected</p><p>to pathological arrogance.</p><p>So it is that only 18% of the country�s population is in favor</p><p>of the new system of government; but concerning the layer we</p><p>have  called  the  bourgeoisie,  we  may  even  be  doubtful  of  the</p><p>sincerity of their attitudes. This is the situation in the author�s</p><p>homeland. This proportion can be variously estimated in other</p><p>countries,  from  15%  in  Hungary  to  21%  in  Bulgaria,  but  it  is</p><p>never more than a relatively small minority.</p><p>The  great  majority  of  the  population  forms  the  society  of</p><p>normal people, gradually creating an informal communications</p><p>network. It behooves us to wonder why these people reject the</p><p>advantages  conformity  affords,  consciously  preferring  the  op-</p><p>posing  role:  poverty,  harassment,  and  curtailment  of  human</p><p>freedoms. What ideals motivate them? Is this merely a kind of</p><p>romanticism representing ties to tradition and religion? Still, so</p><p>many  people  with  a  religious  upbringing  change  their  world</p><p>view to that of the Pathocrats very quickly. The next chapter is</p><p>dedicated to this question.</p><p>For the moment, let us limit ourselves to stating that a per-</p><p>son  with  a  normal  human  instinctive  substratum,  good  basic</p><p>intelligence, and full faculties of critical thought would have a</p><p>226</p><p>PATHOCRACY</p><p>difficult time accepting such a compromise; it would devastate</p><p>his personality and engender neurosis. At the same time, such a</p><p>system  easily  distinguishes  and  separates  him  from  its  own</p><p>kind  regardless  of  his  sporadic  hesitations.  <emphasis>No  method  of </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>propaganda  can  change  the  nature  of  this  macrosocial  phe-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>nomenon or the nature of a normal human being. They remain </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>foreign to each other. </emphasis></p><p>The above-described subdivision into three sections should</p><p>not be identified with membership in any party, which is offi-</p><p>cially  ideological  but  in  fact  pathocratic.  Such  a  system  con-</p><p>tains many normal people forced to join such a party by various</p><p>circumstances, and who must pretend as best they can to repre-</p><p>sent said party�s more reasonable adherents. After a year or two</p><p>of  obtusely  executed  instructions,  they  start  becoming  inde-</p><p>pendent  and  reestablishing  their  severed  ties  to  society.  Their</p><p>former friends begin to get the gist of their double game. This</p><p>is the situation of large numbers of the adherents of the former</p><p>ideology, which is now fulfilling its changed function. They are</p><p>also the first to protest that this system does not truly represent</p><p>their  old  political  beliefs.  We  must  also  remember  that   <emphasis>spe-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>cially trusted people, whose loyalty to the pathocracy is a fore-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>gone  conclusion  due  to  their  psychological  nature  and  the </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>functions  they  perform,  have  no  need  to  belong  to  the  party; </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>they stand above it</emphasis>.</p><p>After  a  typical  pathocratic  structure  has  been  formed,  the</p><p>population  is  effectively  divided  �  polarized  -  according  to</p><p>completely  different  lines  from  what  someone  raised  outside</p><p>the purview of this phenomenon might imagine, and in a man-</p><p>ner whose actual conditions are also impossible to comprehend</p><p>for someone lacking essential specialized training. However, an</p><p>intuitive  sense  for  these  causes  gradually  forms  among  the</p><p>majority of society in a country affected by the phenomenon. A</p><p>person  raised  in  a  normal  man�s  system  is  accustomed  since</p><p>childhood to seeing economic and ideological problems in the</p><p>foreground,  possibly  also  the  results  of  social  injustice.  Such</p><p>concepts have proved illusory and ineffective in a most tragic</p><p>manner:  the  macrosocial  phenomenon  has  its  own  properties</p><p>and laws which can only be studied and comprehended within</p><p>the appropriate categories.</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>227</p><p>However, in leaving behind our old natural method of com-</p><p>prehension  and  learning  to  track  the  internal  causality  of  the</p><p>phenomenon, we marvel at the surprising exactness with which</p><p>the latter turns out to be subjected to its own regular laws. With</p><p>regard  to  individuals, there  is  always  a  greater  scope  of  some</p><p>individualism  and  environmental  influences.  In  statistical</p><p>analyses these variable factors disappear and the essential con-</p><p>stant characteristics surface. The entirety is thus clearly subject</p><p>to  causative  determination.  This  explains  the  relative  ease  of</p><p>transition from studying causation to predicting future changes</p><p>in the phenomenon. In time, the adequacy of collected knowl-</p><p>edge has been confirmed by the accuracy of these predictions.</p><p>Let us now take individual cases into consideration. For in-</p><p>stance: we meet two people whose behavior makes us suspect</p><p>they are psychopaths, but their attitudes to the pathocratic sys-</p><p>tem are quite different; the first is affirmative, the second pain-</p><p>fully critical. Studies on the basis of tests detecting brain tissue</p><p>damage will indicate such pathology in the second person, but</p><p>not in the first; in the second case we are dealing with behavior</p><p>which  may  be  strongly  reminiscent  of  psychopathy,  but  the</p><p>substratum is different.</p><p>If a carrier of an essential psychopathy gene was a member</p><p>of  the  decidedly  anti-communist  government  party  before  the</p><p>war,  he  will  be  treated  as  an  �ideological  enemy�  during  the</p><p>pathocracy�s  formative  period.  However,  he  soon  appears  to</p><p>find  a   <emphasis>modus  vivendi</emphasis>  with  the  new  authorities  and  enjoys  a</p><p>certain  amount  of  tolerance.  The  moment  when  he  becomes</p><p>transformed into an adherent of the new  �ideology� and finds</p><p>the  way  back  to  the  ruling  party  is  only  a  matter  of  time  and</p><p>circumstance.</p><p>If the family of a typical  zealous pathocrat produces  a son</p><p>who  does  not  inherit  the  appropriate  gene,  thanks  to  a  happy</p><p>genetic  coincidence,  (or  he  was  born  from  a  bio-</p><p>psychologically  normal  partner),  such  a  son  will  be  raised  in</p><p>the  corresponding  youth  organization,  faithful  to  the  ideology</p><p>and the party, which he joins early. By mature manhood, how-</p><p>ever, he will begin to list toward the society of normal people.</p><p>The  opposition,  that  world  which  feels  and  thinks  normally,</p><p>becomes ever closer to him; therein he finds himself and a set</p><p>228</p><p>PATHOCRACY</p><p>of values unknown � yet familiar - to him.  A  conflict eventu-</p><p>ally arises between himself and his family, party, and environ-</p><p>ment,  under  conditions  which  may  be  more  or  less  dramatic.</p><p>This starts out with critical statements and the writing of rather</p><p>naive appeals requesting changes in the party, in the direction</p><p>of healthy common sense, of  course.  Such people then finally</p><p>begin  to  do  battle  on  society�s  side,  enduring  sacrifices  and</p><p>suffering.  Others  decide  to  abandon  their  native  country  and</p><p>wander foreign lands, lonely among people who cannot under-</p><p>stand them or the problems under which they were raised.</p><p>With  regard  to  the  phenomenon  as  whole,  one  can  predict</p><p>its primary properties and processes of change and estimate the</p><p>time  at  which  they  will  occur.  Regardless  of  its  genesis,  no</p><p>pathocratic activation of the population of a country affected by</p><p>this  phenomenon  can  exceed  the  above  discussed  boundaries</p><p>set by biological factors.</p><p>The phenomenon will develop according to the patterns we</p><p>have already described, gnawing ever deeper into the country�s</p><p>social  fabric.  The  resulting  pathocratic  monoparty  will  bifur-</p><p>cate from the very outset: one wing is consistently pathological</p><p>and  earns  nicknames  such  as  �doctrinarian�,  �hard-headed�,</p><p>�beton�, etc. The second is considered more liberal, and in fact</p><p>this is where the reverberation of the original ideology remains</p><p>alive  for  the  longest.  The  representatives  of  this  second  wing</p><p>try as hard as their shrinking powers permit to bend this strange</p><p>reality  into  a  direction  more  amenable  to  human  reason,  and</p><p>they do not lose complete touch with society�s links. The first</p><p>internal crisis of weakness occurs some  <emphasis>ten years</emphasis> after such a</p><p>system has emerged; as  a result, the society of normal people</p><p>gains a bit more freedom. During this time frame, skillful out-</p><p>side action can already count on internal cooperation.</p><p><emphasis>Pathocracy corrodes the entire social organism, wasting its </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>skills and power. </emphasis></p><p>The effects of the more ideational wing of the party and its</p><p>enlivening  influence  upon  the  workings  of  the  entire  country</p><p>gradually weaken. Typical pathocrats take over all the manage-</p><p>rial functions in a totally destroyed structure of a nation. Such a</p><p>state  must  be  short-term,  since  no  ideology  can  vivify  it.  The</p><p>time  comes  when  the  common  masses  of  people  want  to  live</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>229</p><p>like  human  beings  again  and  the  system  can  no  longer  resist.</p><p>There  will  be  no  great  counter-revolution;  a  more  or  less</p><p>stormy process of regeneration will instead ensue.</p><p>Pathocracy  is  even  less  of  a  socioeconomic  system  than  a</p><p>social structure or political system. It is a macrosocial disease</p><p>process  affecting  entire  nations  and  running  the  course  of  its</p><p>characteristic  pathodynamic  properties.  The  phenomenon</p><p>changes too quickly in time for us to be able to comprehend it</p><p>in categories which  would imply a certain stability, not ruling</p><p>out  the  evolutionary  processes  to  which  social  systems  are</p><p>subject.  Any  way  of  comprehending  the  phenomenon  by  im-</p><p>puting certain enduring properties to it thus quickly causes us</p><p>to lose sight of its current contents. The dynamics of transfor-</p><p>mation  in  time  is  part  of  the  nature  of  the  phenomenon;  we</p><p>cannot  possibly  achieve  comprehension  from  outside  its  pa-</p><p>rameters.</p><p>As  long  as  we  keep  using  methods  of  comprehending  this</p><p>pathological  phenomenon,  which  apply  certain  political  doc-</p><p>trines whose contents are heterogeneous with regard to its true</p><p>nature, we will not be able to identify the causes and properties</p><p>of  the  disease.  A  prepared  ideology  will  be  able  to  cloak  the</p><p>essential qualities from the minds of scientists, politicians, and</p><p>common people. In such a state of affairs, we will never elabo-</p><p>rate any causatively active methods which could stifle the phe-</p><p>nomenon�s  pathological  self-reproduction  or  its  expansionist</p><p>external influences.  <emphasis>Ignota nulla curatio morbi</emphasis>!</p><p>However, once we understand a disease�s etiological factors</p><p>and their activities as well as the pathodynamics of its changes,</p><p>we  find  that  the  search  for  a  curative  method  generally  be-</p><p>comes  much  easier.  Something  similar  applies  with  regard  to</p><p>the macrosocial pathological phenomenon discussed above.</p><p><strong>CHAPTER VI </strong></p><p><strong>NORMAL PEOPLE  </strong></p><p>UNDER PATHOCRATIC RULE</p><p>As  adduced  above,  the  anomaly  distinguished  as  essential</p><p>psychopathy  inspires  the  overall  phenomenon  in  a  well-</p><p>developed  pathocracy  and  betrays  biological  analogies  to  the</p><p>well known phenomenon called Daltonism, color-blindness or</p><p>near-blindness as regard to red and green. For the purpose of an</p><p>intellectual  exercise,  let  us  thus  imagine  that  Daltonists  have</p><p>managed to take over power in some country and have forbid-</p><p>den the citizens from distinguishing these colors, thus eliminat-</p><p>ing  the  distinction  between  green  (unripe)  and  ripe  tomatoes.</p><p>Special vegetable patch inspectors armed with pistols and pick-</p><p>ets  would  patrol  the  areas  to  make  sure  the  citizens  were  not</p><p>selecting only ripe tomatoes to pick, which would indicate that</p><p>they were distinguishing between red and green. Such inspec-</p><p>tors  could  not,  of  course,  be  totally  color-blind  themselves</p><p>(otherwise  they  could  not  exercise  this  extremely  important</p><p>function),  They  could  not  suffer  more  than  near-blindness  as</p><p>regards  these  colors.  However,  they  would  have  to  belong  to</p><p>the clan of people made nervous by any discussion about col-</p><p>ors.</p><p>With  such  authorities  around,  the  citizens  might  even  be</p><p>willing to eat a green tomato and affirm quite convincingly that</p><p>it was ripe. But once the severe inspectors left for some other</p><p>garden  far  away,  there  would  be  the  shower  of  comments  it</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>231</p><p>does  not  behoove  me  to  reproduce  in  a  scientific  work.  The</p><p>citizens would than pick nicely vine-ripened tomatoes, make a</p><p>salad with cream, and add a few drops of rum for flavor.</p><p>May I suggest that all normal people whom fate has forced</p><p>to  live  under  pathocratic  rule  make  the  serving  of  a  salad  ac-</p><p>cording to the above recipe into a symbolic custom. Any guest</p><p>recognizing the symbol by its color and aroma will refrain from</p><p>making  any  comments.  Such  a  custom  might  hasten  the  rein-</p><p>stallation of a normal man�s system.</p><p>The  pathological  authorities  are  convinced  that  the  appro-</p><p>priate  pedagogical,  indoctrinational,  propaganda,  and  terrorist</p><p>means can teach a person with a normal instinctive substratum,</p><p>range  of  feelings,  and  basic  intelligence  to  think  and  feel  ac-</p><p>cording to their own different fashion. This conviction is only</p><p>slightly  less  unrealistic,  psychologically  speaking,  than  the</p><p>belief that people able to see colors normally can be broken of</p><p>this habit.</p><p>Actually, normal people cannot get rid of the characteristics</p><p>with  which  the   <emphasis>Homo  sapiens</emphasis>  species  was  endowed  by  its</p><p>phylogenetic past. Such people will thus never stop feeling and</p><p>perceiving psychological and socio-moral phenomena in much</p><p>the  same  way  their  ancestors  had  been  doing  for  hundreds  of</p><p>generations.  Any  attempt  to  make  a  society  subjugated  to  the</p><p>above  phenomenon  �learn�  this  different  experiential  manner</p><p>imposed by pathological egotism is, in principle, fated for fail-</p><p>ure regardless of how  many generations it might last. It does,</p><p>however,  call  forth  a  series  of  improper  psychological  results</p><p>which  may  give  the  pathocrats  the  appearance  of  success.</p><p>However,  it  also  provokes  society  to  elaborate  pinpointed,</p><p>well-thought-out  self-defense  measures  based  on  its  cognitive</p><p>and creative efforts.</p><p>Pathocratic  leadership  believes  that  it  can  achieve  a  state</p><p>wherein  those  �other�  people�s  minds  become  dependent  by</p><p>means of the effects of their personality, perfidious pedagogical</p><p>means,  the  means  of  mass-disinformation,  and  psychological</p><p>terror; such faith has a basic meaning for them. In their concep-</p><p>tual world, pathocrats consider it virtually self-evident that the</p><p>�others� should accept their obvious, realistic, and simple way</p><p>of  apprehending  reality.  For  some  mysterious  reason,  though,</p><p>232</p><p>NORMAL PEOPLE UNDER PATHOCRATIC RULE</p><p>the �others� wriggle out, slither away, and tell each other jokes</p><p>about  pathocrats.  Someone  must  be  responsible  for  this:  pre-</p><p>revolutionary  oldsters,  or  some  radio  stations  abroad.  It  thus</p><p>becomes necessary to improve the methodology of action, find</p><p>better �soul engineers� with a certain literary talent, and  <emphasis>isolate </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>society  from  improper  literature  and  any  foreign  influence</emphasis>.</p><p>Those experiences and intuitions whispering that this is a Sisy-</p><p>phean labor must be repressed from the field of consciousness</p><p>of the pathocrat.</p><p>The  conflict is thus dramatic  for both sides.  The  first feels</p><p>insulted in its humanity, rendered obtuse, and forced to think in</p><p>a manner contrary to healthy common sense.  The other stifles</p><p>the  premonition  that  if  this  goal  cannot  be  reached,  sooner  or</p><p>later  things  will  revert  to  normal  man�s  rule,  including  their</p><p>vengeful lack of understanding of the pathocrats� personalities.</p><p>So if it does not work, it is best not to think about the future,</p><p>just  prolong  the  status  quo  by  means  of  the  above-mentioned</p><p>efforts. Toward the end of this book, it will behoove us to con-</p><p>sider the possibilities for untying this Gordian knot.</p><p>However, such a pedagogical system, rife with pathological</p><p>egotisation  and  limitations,  produces  serious  negative  results,</p><p>especially in those generations unfamiliar with any other condi-</p><p>tions of life. Personality development is impoverished, particu-</p><p>larly regarding the more subtle values widely accepted in socie-</p><p>ties.  We  observe  the  characteristic  lack  of  respect  for  one�s</p><p>own  organism  and  the  voice  of  nature  and  instinct,  accompa-</p><p>nied by brutalization of feelings and customs, to be explained</p><p>away  by  the  excuse  of  injustice.  The  tendency  to  be  morally</p><p>judgmental  in  interpreting  the  behavior  of  those  who  caused</p><p>one�s  suffering  sometimes  leads  to  a   <emphasis>demonological</emphasis>  world</p><p>view. At the same time, adaptation and resourcefulness within</p><p>these different conditions become the object of cognition.</p><p>A person who has been the object of the egotistic behavior</p><p>of  pathological  individuals  for  a  long  time  becomes  saturated</p><p>with  their  characteristic  psychological  material  to  such  an  ex-</p><p>tent  that  we  can  frequently  discern  the  kind  of  psychological</p><p>anomalies  which  affected  him.  The  personalities  of  former</p><p>concentration-camp  inmates  were  saturated  with  generally</p><p>psychopathic  material  ingested  from  camp  commanders  and</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>233</p><p>tormentors,  creating a phenomenon so  widespread that it later</p><p>became  a  primary  motive  to  seek  psychotherapy.  Becoming</p><p>aware of this makes it easier for them to throw off this burden</p><p>and re-establish contact with the normal human world. In par-</p><p>ticular, being shown appropriate statistical data concerning the</p><p>appearance  of  psychopathy  in  a  given  population   <emphasis>facilitates</emphasis></p><p>their  search  for  understanding  of  their  nightmare  years  and  a</p><p>rebuilding of trust in their fellow man.</p><p>This  kind  of  psychotherapy  would  be  extremely  useful  for</p><p>those people who need it most, but it has unfortunately proved</p><p>too risky for a psychotherapist. Patients easily make connective</p><p>transfers,  unfortunately  all  too  often  correct,  between  the  in-</p><p>formation learned during such therapy (particularly in the area</p><p>of  psychopathy)  and  the  reality  surrounding  them  under  the</p><p>rule  of  so-called  �popular  democracy�.  Former  camp  inmates</p><p>are  unhappily  unable  to  hold  their  tongues  in  check,  which</p><p>causes intervention on the part of political authorities.</p><p>When  American  soldiers  returned  from  North  Vietnamese</p><p>prison camps, many of them proved to have been subjected to</p><p>indoctrination  and  other  methods  of influencing  by  pathologi-</p><p>cal material. A certain degree of transpersonification appeared</p><p>in many of these. In the U.S.A. this was called �programming�</p><p>and  outstanding  psychotherapists  proceeded  to  effect  therapy</p><p>for the purpose of deprogramming them. It turned out that they</p><p><emphasis>met  with  opposition  and  critical  commentary</emphasis>  concerning  their</p><p>skills, among other things. When I heard about this, I breathed</p><p>a deep sigh and thought: Dear God, what interesting work that</p><p>would make for a psychotherapist  who understands such mat-</p><p>ters well.</p><p>The  pathocratic  world,  the  world  of  pathological  egotism</p><p>and terror, is so difficult to understand for people raised outside</p><p>the scope of this phenomenon that they often manifest childlike</p><p>naivet�,  even  if  they  have  studied  psychopathology  and  are</p><p>psychologists  by  profession.  There  are  no  real  data  in  their</p><p>behavior,  advice,  rebukes,  and  psychotherapy.  That  explains</p><p>why their efforts are boring and hurtful and frequently come to</p><p>naught.  Their  egotism  transforms  their  good  will  into  bad  re-</p><p>sults.</p><p>234</p><p>NORMAL PEOPLE UNDER PATHOCRATIC RULE</p><p>If  someone  has  personally  experienced  such  a  nightmarish</p><p>reality, he considers people who have not progressed in under-</p><p>standing it within the same time frame to be simply presump-</p><p>tuous,  sometimes  even  malicious.  In  the  course  of  his  experi-</p><p>ence  and  contact  with  this  macrosocial  phenomenon,  he  has</p><p>collected  a  certain  amount  of  practical  knowledge  about  the</p><p>phenomenon and its psychology and learned to protect his own</p><p>personality.  This  experience,  unceremoniously  rejected  by</p><p>�people  who  don�t  understand  anything�,  becomes  a  psycho-</p><p>logical  burden  for  him,  forcing  him  to  live  within  a  narrow</p><p>circle of persons whose experiences have been similar. Such a</p><p>person should rather be treated as the bearer of valuable scien-</p><p>tific  data;  understanding  would  constitute  at  least  partial</p><p>psychotherapy  for  him,  and  would  simultaneously  open  the</p><p>door to a comprehension of reality.</p><p>I would here like to remind psychologists that these kinds of</p><p>experiences  and  their  destructive  effects  upon  the  human  per-</p><p>sonality are not unknown to scientific practice and experience.</p><p>We  often  meet  with  patients  requiring  appropriate  assistance:</p><p>individuals  raised  under  the  influence  of  pathological,  espe-</p><p>cially  psychopathic,  personalities  who  were  forced  with  a</p><p>pathological  egotism  to  accept  an  abnormal  way  of  thinking.</p><p>Even an approximate determination of the type of pathological</p><p>factors  which  operated  on  him  allow  us  to  pinpoint  psycho-</p><p>therapeutic  measures.  In  practice  we  most  frequently  meet</p><p>cases  wherein  such  a  pathological  situation  operated  on  a  pa-</p><p>tient�s  personality  in  early  childhood,  as  a  result  of  which  we</p><p>must utilize long term measures and work very carefully, using</p><p>various  techniques,  in  order  to  help  him  develop  his  true  per-</p><p>sonality.</p><p>Children under parental pathocratic rule are �protected� un-</p><p>til school age. Then they meet with decent, normal people who</p><p>attempt to limit the destructive influences as much as possible.</p><p>The  most  intense  effects  occur  during  adolescence  and  the</p><p>ensuing time frame of intellectual maturation which can occur</p><p>with  the  input  of  decent  people.  This  rescues  the  society  of</p><p>normal people from deeper deformations in personality devel-</p><p>opment  and  widespread  neurosis.  This  period  remains  within</p><p>persistent  memory  and  is  thus  amenable  to  insight,  reflection,</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>235</p><p>and  disillusion.  Such  people�s  psychotherapy  would  consist</p><p>almost  exclusively  of  utilizing  the  correct  knowledge  of  the</p><p>essence of the phenomenon.</p><p>Regardless  of  the  social  scale  within  which  human  indi-</p><p>viduals  were  forcibly  reared  by  pathological  persons,  whether</p><p>individual,  group,  societal,  or  macrosocial,  the  principles  of</p><p>psychotherapeutic  action  will  thus  be  similar,  and  should  be</p><p>based upon data known to us, and an understanding of the psy-</p><p>chological  situation.  Making  a  patient  aware  of  the  kind  of</p><p>pathological  factors  which  affected  him,  and  jointly  under-</p><p>standing the results of such effects, is basic to such therapy. We</p><p>do  not  utilize  this  method  if,  in  an  individual  case,  we  have</p><p>indications that the patient has  <emphasis>inherited</emphasis> this factor. However,</p><p>such limitations should not be consistent with regard to macro-</p><p>social phenomena affecting the welfare of entire nations.</p><p>From the Perspective of Time</p><p>If  a  person  with  a  normal  instinctive  substratum  and  basic</p><p>intelligence has already heard and read about such a system of</p><p>ruthless autocratic rule �based on a fanatical ideology�, he feels</p><p>he  has  already  formed  an  opinion  on  the  subject.  However,</p><p>direct confrontation  with the phenomenon  will inevitably pro-</p><p>duce  in  him  the  feeling  of  intellectual  helplessness.  All  his</p><p>prior imaginings prove to be virtually useless; they explain next</p><p>to nothing. This provokes a nagging sensation that he and the</p><p>society in which he was educated were quite naive.</p><p>Anyone capable of accepting this bitter void with an aware-</p><p>ness  of  his  own  nescience,  which  would  do  a  philosopher</p><p>proud,  can  also  find  an  orientation  path  within  this  deviant</p><p>world.  However,  egotistically  protecting  his  world  view  from</p><p>disintegrative disillusionment and attempting to combine them</p><p>with  observations  from  this  new  divergent  reality,  only  reaps</p><p>mental  chaos.  The  latter  has  produced  unnecessary  conflicts</p><p>and  disillusionment  with  the  new  rulership  in  some  people;</p><p>others have subordinated themselves to the pathological reality.</p><p>One  of  the  differences  observed  between  a  normally  resistant</p><p>person  and  somebody  who  has  undergone  a  transpersonifica-</p><p>tion is that the former is better able to survive this disintegrat-</p><p>236</p><p>NORMAL PEOPLE UNDER PATHOCRATIC RULE</p><p>ing  cognitive  void,  whereas  the  latter  fills  the  void  with  the</p><p>pathologic propaganda material without sufficient controls.</p><p>When the human mind comes into contact with this new re-</p><p>ality so different from any experiences encountered by a person</p><p>raised  in  a  society  dominated  by  normal  people,  it  releases</p><p>psychophysiological shock symptoms in the human brain with</p><p>a  higher  tonus  of  cortex  inhibition  and  a  stifling  of  feelings,</p><p>which  then  sometimes  gush  forth  uncontrollably.  The  mind</p><p>then works more slowly and less keenly because the associative</p><p>mechanisms have become inefficient. Especially when a person</p><p>has direct contact with psychopathic representatives of the new</p><p>rule,  who use their specific experience so as to traumatize the</p><p>minds  of  the  �others�  with  their  own  personalities,  his  mind</p><p>succumbs  to  a  state  of  short-term  catatonia.  Their  humiliating</p><p>and arrogant techniques, brutal paramoralizations, and so forth</p><p>deaden his thought processes and his self-defense capabilities,</p><p>and their divergent experiential method anchors in his mind. In</p><p>the  presence  of  this  kind  of  phenomenon,  any  moralizing</p><p>evaluation  of  a  person�s  behavior  in  such  a  situation  thus  be-</p><p>comes inaccurate at best.</p><p>Only  once  these  unbelievably  unpleasant  psychological</p><p>states have passed, thanks to rest in benevolent company, is it</p><p>possible to reflect, always a difficult and painful process, or to</p><p>become  aware  that  one�s  mind  and  common  sense  have  been</p><p>fooled  by   <emphasis>something  which  cannot  fit  into  the  normal  human </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>imagination</emphasis>.</p><p>Man  and  society  stand  at  the  beginning  of  a  long  road  of</p><p>unknown experiences which, after much trial and error, finally</p><p>leads to a certain hermetic knowledge of what the qualities of</p><p>the  phenomenon  are  and  how  best  to  build  up  psychological</p><p>resistance  thereto.  Especially  during  the  dissimulative  phase,</p><p>which makes it possible to adapt to life in this different world</p><p>and  thus  arrange  more  tolerable  living  conditions.  We  shall</p><p>then be able to observe psychological phenomena, knowledge,</p><p>immunization,  and  adaptation  such  as  could  not  have  been</p><p>predicted before and which cannot be understood in the world</p><p>remaining  under  the  rule  of  normal  man�s  systems.  A  normal</p><p>person, however, can never completely adapt to a pathological</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>237</p><p>system;  it  is  easy  to  be  pessimistic  about  the  final  results  of</p><p>this.</p><p>Such experiences are exchanged during evening discussions</p><p>among  a  circle  of  friends,  thereby  creating  within  people�s</p><p>minds  a  kind  of  cognitive  conglomeration  which  is  initially</p><p>incoherent  and  contains  factual  deficiencies.  The  participation</p><p>of moral categories in such a comprehension of the macrosocial</p><p>phenomenon,  and  the  manner  in  which  particular  individuals</p><p>behave,  is  proportionally  much  greater  within  such  a  new</p><p>world view than the above adduced scientific knowledge would</p><p>dictate.  The  ideology  officially  preached  by  the  pathocracy</p><p>continues to retain its ever-diminishing suggestive powers until</p><p>such time as human reason manages to localize it as something</p><p>subordinate,  which  is  not  descriptive  of  the  essence  of  phe-</p><p>nomenon.</p><p>Moral and religious values, as well as a nation�s centuries-</p><p>old cultural heritage, furnish most societies with support for the</p><p>long  road  of  both  individual  and  collective  searching  through</p><p>the  jungle  of  strange  phenomena.  This  apperceptive  capacity</p><p>possessed by people within the framework of the natural world</p><p>view contains a deficiency which hides the nucleus of the phe-</p><p>nomenon for many years. Under such conditions, both instinct</p><p>and  feelings,  and  the  resulting  basic  intelligence,  play  instru-</p><p>mental roles, stimulating man to make selections which are to a</p><p>great extent subconscious.</p><p>Under the conditions created by imposed pathocratic rule in</p><p>particular,  where  the  described  psychological  deficiencies  are</p><p>decisive in joining the activities of such a system, our natural</p><p>human instinctive substratum is an instrumental factor in join-</p><p>ing the opposition.</p><p>Similarly,  the  environmental,  economic,  and  ideological</p><p>motivations  which  influenced  the  formation  of  an  individual</p><p>personality,  including  those  political  attitudes  which  were  as-</p><p>sumed earlier, play the role of  modifying factors, though they</p><p>are not as enduring in time. The activity of these latter factors,</p><p>albeit  relatively  clear  with  relation  to  individuals,  disappear</p><p>within  the  statistical  approach  and  diminish  through  the  years</p><p>of pathocratic rule. The decisions and the choices made for the</p><p>side of the society of normal people are once again finally de-</p><p>238</p><p>NORMAL PEOPLE UNDER PATHOCRATIC RULE</p><p>cided by factors usually inherited by biological means, and thus</p><p>not  the  product  of  the  person�s  option,  and  predominantly  in</p><p>subconscious processes.</p><p>Man�s general intelligence, especially his intellectual level,</p><p>plays a relatively limited role in this process of selecting a path</p><p>of action, as expressed by statistically significant but low corre-</p><p>lation (-0.16). The higher a person�s general level of  <emphasis>talent</emphasis>, the</p><p>harder it usually is for him to reconcile himself with this differ-</p><p>ent reality and to find a  <emphasis>modus vivendi</emphasis> within it.</p><p>At the same time, there are gifted and talented people who</p><p>join the pathocracy, and harsh  words of contempt for the sys-</p><p>tem  can  be  heard  on  the  part  of  simple,  uneducated  people.</p><p>Only  those  people  with  the   <emphasis>highest</emphasis>  degree  of  intelligence,</p><p>which,  as  mentioned,  does   <emphasis>not</emphasis>  accompany  psychopathies,  are</p><p>unable to find meaning to life within such a system.106 They are</p><p>sometimes able to take advantage of their superior mentality in</p><p>order to find exceptional ways in which to be useful to others.</p><p>Wasting  the  best  talents  spells  eventual  catastrophe  for  any</p><p>social system.</p><p>Since those factors subject to the laws of genetics prove de-</p><p>cisive,  society  becomes  divided,  by  means  of  criteria  not</p><p>known before, into the adherents of the new rule, the new mid-</p><p>dle class mentioned above, and the  <emphasis>majority</emphasis> opposition. Since</p><p>the properties which cause this new division appear in more or</p><p>less equal proportions within any old social group or level, this</p><p>new division cuts right through the traditional layers of society.</p><p>If we treat the former stratification, whose formation was deci-</p><p>sively  influenced  by  the  talent  factor,  as  horizontal,  the  new</p><p>one  should  be  referred  to  as  vertical.  The  most  instrumental</p><p>factor  in  the  latter  is  good  basic  intelligence  which,  as  we  al-</p><p>ready know, is widely distributed throughout all social groups.</p><p>Even those people who were the object of social injustice in</p><p>the  former  system  and  then  bestowed  with  another  system,</p><p>which  allegedly  protected  them,  slowly  start  criticizing  the</p><p>latter.  Even  though  they  were  forced  to  join  the  pathocratic</p><p>party,  most  of  the  former  prewar  Communists  in  the  author�s</p><empty-line/><p>106 Historically, pathocracies target the intelligentsia for elimination first. As</p><p>!obaczewski points out, this wasting of the best minds and talents eventually</p><p>leads to catastrophe. [Editor�s note.]</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>239</p><p>homeland  later  gradually  became  critical,  using  the  most  em-</p><p>phatic of language. They were first to deny that the ruling sys-</p><p>tem  was  Communist  in  nature,  persuasively  pointing  out  the</p><p>actual differences between the ideology and reality. They tried</p><p>to  inform  their  comrades  in  still  independent  countries  of  this</p><p>by letters. Worried about this �treason�, these comrades trans-</p><p>mitted such letters to their local party in those other countries,</p><p>from  where  these  were  returned  to  the  security  police  of  the</p><p>country of origin. The authors of the letters paid with their lives</p><p>or with years of prison; no other social group was finally sub-</p><p>jected to such stringent police surveillance as were they.</p><p>Regardless of whatever our evaluation of Communist ideol-</p><p>ogy  or  the  parties  might  be,  we  are  presumably  justified  in</p><p>believing  that  the  old  Communists  were  quite  competent  to</p><p>distinguish what was and what was not in accordance with their</p><p>ideology and beliefs.  Their highly emphatic statements on the</p><p>subject, quite popular among Poland�s old Communists circles,</p><p>are impressive or even persuasive.107 Because of the operational</p><p>language  used  therein,  however,  we  must  designate  them  as</p><p>overly moralizing interpretations not in keeping with the char-</p><p>acter  of  this  work.  At  the  same  time,  we  must  admit  that  the</p><p>majority  of  Poland�s  prewar  Communists  were  not  psycho-</p><p>paths.</p><p>From the point of view of  economics and  reality,  any sys-</p><p>tem  wherein  most  of  the  property  and  workplaces  are  state</p><p>owned  <emphasis>de jure</emphasis> and  <emphasis>de facto</emphasis> is  <emphasis>state capitalism</emphasis> and not Commu-</p><p>nism.  Such  a  system  exhibits  the  traits  of  a  primitive  nine-</p><p>teenth-century capitalist exploiter who had an insufficient grasp</p><p>of his role in society and of how his interests were linked to his</p><p>workers� welfare. Workers are very much aware of these traits,</p><p>especially if they have collected a certain amount of knowledge</p><p>in connection with their political activities.</p><p>A  reasonable  socialist  aiming  to  replace  capitalism  with</p><p>some  system  in  conformity  with  his  idea,  which  would  be</p><p>based on worker participation in the administration of the work</p><p>place   <emphasis>and  the  profits</emphasis>,  will  reject  such  a  system  as  the  �worst</p><p>variety of capitalism�.  After all, concentrating capital and rul-</p><empty-line/><p>107 �A hoard of sons of bitches who climbed up to the feeding trough upon</p><p>the backs of the working class.�</p><p>240</p><p>NORMAL PEOPLE UNDER PATHOCRATIC RULE</p><p>ership in one place  <emphasis>always</emphasis> leads to degeneration. Capital must</p><p>be  subject  to  the  authority  of  fairness.  Eliminating  such  a  de-</p><p>generate  form  of  capitalism  should  thus  be  a  priority  task  for</p><p>any  socialist.  Nonetheless,  such  reasoning  by  means  of  social</p><p>and economic categories obviously misses the crux of the mat-</p><p>ter.</p><p>The experience of history teaches us that any attempt to re-</p><p>alize  the  Communist  idea  by  way  of  revolutionary  means,</p><p>whether  violent  or  underhanded,  leads  to  a  skewing  of  this</p><p>process  in  the  direction  of  anachronic  and  pathological  forms</p><p>whose essence and contents remain inaccessible to minds util-</p><p>izing  the  concepts  of  the  natural  world  view.  Evolution  con-</p><p>structs and transforms faster than revolution, and without such</p><p>tragic complications.</p><p>One  of  the  first  discoveries  made  by  a  society  of  normal</p><p>people is that it is superior to the new rulers in intelligence and</p><p>practical skills, no matter what geniuses they seek to appear to</p><p>be.  The  knots  stultifying  reason  are  gradually  loosened,  and</p><p>fascination with the new rulership�s non-existent secret knowl-</p><p>edge and plan of action begins to diminish, followed by famili-</p><p>arization  with  the  accurate  knowledge  about  this  new  deviant</p><p>reality.</p><p>The world of normal people is always superior to the devi-</p><p>ant one whenever constructive activity is needed, whether it be</p><p>the reconstruction of a devastated country, the area of technol-</p><p>ogy, the organization of economic life, or scientific and medi-</p><p>cal work. �They want to build things, but they can�t get much</p><p>done without us.� Qualified experts are frequently able to make</p><p>certain demands; unfortunately, they are just as often only con-</p><p>sidered  qualified  until  the  job  has  been  done,  at  which  point</p><p>they  can  be  eliminated.  Once  the  factory  has  started  up,  the</p><p>experts can leave; management will be taken over by someone</p><p>else,  incapable  of  further  progress,  under  whose  leadership</p><p>much of the effort expended will be wasted.</p><p>As we have already pointed out, every psychological anom-</p><p>aly  is  in  fact  a  kind  of  deficiency.  Psychopathies  are  based</p><p>primarily upon  <emphasis>deficiencies in the instinctive substratum</emphasis>; how-</p><p>ever,  their  influence  exerted  upon  the  mental  development  of</p><p>others also leads to deficiencies in general intelligence, as dis-</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>241</p><p>cussed above.  This deficiency of intelligence in a normal per-</p><p>son, induced by psychopathy, is  <emphasis>not</emphasis> compensated by the special</p><p>psychological  knowledge  we  observe  among  some  psycho-</p><p>paths.  Such  knowledge  loses  its  mesmerizing  power  when</p><p>normal  people  learn  to  understand  these  phenomena  as  well.</p><p>The  psychopathologist  was  thus  not  surprised  by the  fact  that</p><p>the  world  of  normal  people  is  dominant  regarding  skill  and</p><p>talent.  For  that  society,  however,  this  represented  a  discovery</p><p>which engendered hope and psychological relaxation.</p><p>Since our intelligence is superior to theirs, we  <emphasis>can</emphasis> recognize</p><p>them  and  understand  how  they  think  and  act.  This  is  what  a</p><p>person learns in such a system on his own initiative, forced by</p><p>everyday  needs.  He  learns  it  while  working  in  his  office,</p><p>school, or factory,  when he needs to deal with the authorities,</p><p>and when he is arrested, something only a few people manage</p><p>to avoid. The author and many others learned a good deal about</p><p>the  psychology  of  this  macrosocial  phenomenon  during  com-</p><p>pulsory  indoctrinational  schooling.  The  organizers  and  lectur-</p><p>ers cannot have intended such a result. Practical knowledge of</p><p>this new reality thus grows, thanks to which the society gains a</p><p>resourcefulness  of  action  which  enables  it  to  take  ever  better</p><p>advantage of the weak spots of the rulership system. This per-</p><p>mits gradual reorganization of societal links, which bears fruit</p><p>with time.</p><p>This  new  science  is  incalculably  rich  in  casuist108  detail;  I</p><p>would nevertheless characterize it as overly literary. It contains</p><p>knowledge and a description of the phenomenon in the catego-</p><p>ries  of  the  natural  world  view,  correspondingly  modified  in</p><p>accordance  with  the  need  to  understand  matters  which  are  in</p><p>fact  outside  the  scope  of  its  applicability.  This  also  opens  the</p><p>door  to  the  creation  of  certain  doctrines  which  merit  separate</p><p>study  because  they  contain  a  partial  truth,  such  as  a  de-</p><p>monologica <emphasis>l</emphasis> interpretation of the phenomenon.</p><p>The development of familiarity with the phenomenon is ac-</p><p>companied  by  development  of  communicative  language,  by</p><empty-line/><p>108  <emphasis>Casuistry</emphasis> (argument by cases) is an attempt to determine the correct re-</p><p>sponse to a moral problem, often a moral dilemma, by drawing conclusions</p><p>based on parallels with agreed responses to pure cases, also called paradigms.</p><p>Casuistry is a method of ethical case analysis. [Editor�s note.]</p><p>242</p><p>NORMAL PEOPLE UNDER PATHOCRATIC RULE</p><p>means of  which society can stay informed and issue warnings</p><p>of  danger.  A  third  language  thus  appears  alongside  the  ideo-</p><p>logical  doubletalk  described  above;  in  part,  it  borrows  names</p><p>used  by  the  official  ideology  in  their  transformed  modified</p><p>meanings. In part, this language operates with words borrowed</p><p>from still more lively circulating jokes. In spite of its strange-</p><p>ness, this language becomes a useful means of communication</p><p>and plays a part in regenerating societal links. Lo and behold,</p><p>this language can be translated and communicated in relations</p><p>with residents of other countries with analogous governmental</p><p>systems, even if the other country�s  �official ideology� is dif-</p><p>ferent.  However,  in  spite  of  efforts  on  the  part  of  literati  and</p><p>journalists,  this  language  remains  only  communicative  inside;</p><p>it  becomes  hermetic  outside  the  scope  of  the  phenomenon,</p><p>uncomprehended  by  people  lacking  the  appropriate  personal</p><p>experience.</p><p>The specific role of certain individuals during such times is</p><p>worth  pointing  out;  they  participate  in  the  discovery  of  the</p><p>nature  of  this  new  reality  and  help  others  find  the  right  path.</p><p>They  have  a  normal  nature  but  experienced  an  unfortunate</p><p>childhood,  being  subjected  very  early  to  the  domination  of</p><p>individuals  with  various  psychological  deviations,  including</p><p>pathological  egotism  and  methods  of  terrorizing  others.  The</p><p>new rulership system strikes such people as a large scale socie-</p><p>tal multiplication of what they knew from personal experience.</p><p>From  the  very  outset,  such  individuals  saw  this  reality  much</p><p>more  prosaically,  immediately  treating  the  ideology  in  accor-</p><p>dance with the paralogistic stories well known to them, whose</p><p>purpose was to cloak the bitter reality of their youthful experi-</p><p>ences. They soon reach the truth, since  <emphasis>the genesis and nature </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>of evil are analogous irrespective of the social scale in which it </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>appears</emphasis>.</p><p>Such  people  are  rarely  understood  in  happy  societies,  but</p><p>they  were  invaluable  then;  their  explanations  and  advice</p><p>proved accurate and were transmitted to others joining the net-</p><p>work of this apperceptive heritage. However, their own suffer-</p><p>ing was doubled, since this was too much of a similar kind of</p><p>abuse for one life to handle.  They therefore nursed dreams of</p><p>escaping into the freedom still existing in the outside world.</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>243</p><p>Finally, society sees the appearance of individuals who have</p><p>collected exceptional intuitive perception and practical knowl-</p><p>edge in the area of how pathocrats think and how such a system</p><p>of  rule  operates.  Some  of  them  become  so  proficient  in  their</p><p>deviant language and its idiomatics that they are able to use it,</p><p>much  like  a  foreign  language  they  have  learned  well.  Since</p><p>they are able to decipher the rulership�s intentions, such people</p><p>then  offer  advice  to  people  who  are  having  trouble  with  the</p><p>authorities.  These  advocates  of  the  society  of  normal  people</p><p>play a irreplaceable role in the life of society.</p><p>The pathocrats, however, can never learn to think in normal</p><p>human categories. At the same time, the inability to predict the</p><p>reaction of normal people to such an authority also leads to the</p><p>conclusion  that  the  system  is  rigidly  causative  and  lacking  in</p><p>the natural freedom of choice.</p><p>This new science, expressed in language derived from a de-</p><p>viant reality, is something foreign to people who wish to under-</p><p>stand this macrosocial phenomenon but think in the categories</p><p>of  the  countries  of  normal  man.  Attempts  to  understand  this</p><p>language produce a certain feeling of helplessness which gives</p><p>rise to the tendency of creating one�s own doctrines, built from</p><p>the  concepts  of  one�s  own  world  and  a  certain  amount  of  ap-</p><p>propriately  co-opted  pathocratic  propaganda  material.  Such  a</p><p>doctrine, for example, would be the American anti-Communist</p><p>propaganda. Such twisted and distorted concepts makes it even</p><p>more difficult to understand that other reality.  May the objec-</p><p>tive  description  adduced  herein  enable  them  to  overcome  the</p><p>impasse thus engendered.</p><p>In  countries  subjected  to  pathocratic  rule,  this  knowledge</p><p>and language, especially human experience, create a mediating</p><p>concatenation in such a way that most people could assimilate</p><p>this  objective  description  of  the  phenomenon  without  major</p><p>difficulties  with  the  help  of  active  apperception.  Difficulties</p><p>will only be encountered by the oldest generation and a certain</p><p>proportion  of  young  people  raised  in  the  system  from  child-</p><p>hood, and these are psychologically understandable.</p><p>I was once referred a patient  who had been an inmate in a</p><p>Nazi concentration camp. She came back from that hell in such</p><p>exceptionally  good  condition  that  she  was  able  to  marry  and</p><p>244</p><p>NORMAL PEOPLE UNDER PATHOCRATIC RULE</p><p>bear  three  children.  However,  her  child  rearing  methods  were</p><p>so extremely iron-fisted as to be reminiscent of the concentra-</p><p>tion  camp  life  so  stubbornly  persevering  in  former  prisoners.</p><p>The children�s reaction was neurotic protest and aggressiveness</p><p>against other children.</p><p>During the mother�s psychotherapy, we recalled the figures</p><p>of male and female SS officers to her mind, pointing out their</p><p>psychopathic  characteristics  (such  people  were  primary  re-</p><p>cruits). In order to help her eliminate their pathological mate-</p><p>rial from her person, I furnished her with the approximate sta-</p><p>tistical  data  regarding  the  appearance  of  such  individuals</p><p>within the population as a whole. This helped her reach a more</p><p>objective view of that reality and re-establish trust in the soci-</p><p>ety of normal people.</p><p>During the next visit, the patient showed to me a little card</p><p>on which she had written the names of local pathocratic nota-</p><p>bles and added her own diagnoses, which were largely correct.</p><p>So  I  made  a  hushing  gesture  with  my  finger  and  admonished</p><p>her  with  emphasis  that  we  were  dealing  only  with  her  prob-</p><p>lems. The patient understood and, I am sure, she did not make</p><p>her reflections on the matter known in the wrong places.</p><p>Parallel  to  the  development  of  practical  knowledge  and  a</p><p>language  of  insider  communication,  other  psychological  phe-</p><p>nomena take form; they are truly significant in the transforma-</p><p>tion of social life under pathocratic rule, and discerning them is</p><p>essential  if  one  wishes  to  understand  individuals  and  nations</p><p>fated to live under such conditions and to evaluate the situation</p><p>in  the  political  sphere.  They  include  people�s  psychological</p><p>immunization  and  their  adaptation  to  life  under  such  deviant</p><p>conditions.</p><p>The  methods  of  psychological  terror  (that  specific</p><p>pathocratic  art),  the  techniques  of  pathological  arrogance,  and</p><p>the  striding  roughshod into  other  people�s  souls initially  have</p><p>such traumatic effects that people are deprived of their capacity</p><p>for  purposeful  reaction;  I  have  already  adduced  the  psycho-</p><p>physiological aspects of such states. Ten or twenty years later,</p><p>analogous  behavior  is  already  recognized  as  well  known  buf-</p><p>foonery and does not deprive the victim of his ability to think</p><p>and  react  purposefully.  His  answers  are  usually  well-thought-</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>245</p><p>out  strategies,  issued  from  the  position  of  a  normal  person�s</p><p>superiority and often laced with ridicule.  When  Man  can look</p><p>suffering  and  even  death  in  the  eye  with  the  required  calm,  a</p><p>dangerous weapon falls out of the ruler�s hands.</p><p>We have to understand that this process of immunization is</p><p>not merely a result of the above-described increase in practical</p><p>knowledge of the macrosocial phenomenon. It is the effect of a</p><p>many-layered, gradual process of growth in knowledge, famili-</p><p>arization  with  the  phenomenon,  <emphasis>creation  of  the  appropriate </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>reactive  habits</emphasis>,  and   <emphasis>self-control</emphasis>,  with  an  overall  conception,</p><p>and moral principles, being worked out in the meantime. After</p><p>several  years,  the  same  stimuli  which  formerly  caused  chilly</p><p>spiritual impotence or mental paralysis now provoke the desire</p><p>to gargle with something strong so as to get rid of this filth.</p><p>There  was  a  time  when  many  people  dreamed  of  finding</p><p>some  pill  which  would  make  it  easier  to  endure  dealing  with</p><p>the  authorities  or  attending  the  forced  indoctrination  sessions</p><p>generally  chaired  by  a  psychopathic  character.  Some  antide-</p><p>pressants  did  in  fact  prove  to  have  the  desired  effect.  Twenty</p><p>years later, this had been forgotten entirely.</p><p>~~~</p><p><emphasis>When I was arrested for the first time in 1951, force, arro-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>gance,  and  psychopathic  methods  of  forcible  confession  de-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>prived  me  almost  entirely  of  my  self-defense  capabilities.  My </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>brain stopped functioning after only a few days without water, </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>to  such  a  point  that  I  couldn�t  even  properly  remember  the </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>incident  which  resulted  in  my  sudden  arrest.  I  was  not  even </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>aware that it had been purposely provoked and that conditions </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>permitting  self-defense  did  in  fact  exist.  They  did  almost  any-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>thing they wanted to me. </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>When  I  was  arrested  for  last  time  in  1968,  I  was  interro-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>gated by five fierce-looking security functionaries. At one par-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>ticular  moment,  after  thinking  through  their  predicted  reac-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>tions,  I  let  my  gaze  take  in  each  face  sequentially  with  great </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>attentiveness.  The  most  important  one  asked  me,  �What�s  on </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>your mind, buster, staring at us like that?� I answered without </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>any fear of consequences: �I�m just wondering why so many of </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>the gentlemen in your line of work end up in a psychiatric hos-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>pital.� They were taken aback for a while, whereupon the same </emphasis></p><p>246</p><p>NORMAL PEOPLE UNDER PATHOCRATIC RULE</p><p><emphasis>man exclaimed, �Because it�s such damned horrible work!� �I </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>am of the opinion that it�s the other way round�, I calmly re-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>sponded. Then I was taken back to my cell. </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>Three days later, I had the opportunity to talk to him again, </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>but this time he was much more respectful. Then he ordered me </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>to be taken away - outside, as it turned out. I rode the streetcar </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>home past a large park, still unable to believe my eyes. Once in </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>my room, I lay down on the bed; the world was not quite real </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>yet, but exhausted people fall asleep quickly. When I awoke, I </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>spoke  out  loud:  �Dear  God,  aren�t  you  supposed  to  be  in </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>charge here in this world?!� </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>~~~ </emphasis></p><p>At that time, I knew not only that up to 1/5 of all secret po-</p><p>lice officials wind up in psychiatric hospitals, I also knew that</p><p>their  �occupational  disease�  is  the   <emphasis>congestive  dementia</emphasis>  for-</p><p>merly  encountered  only  among  old  prostitutes.  Man  cannot</p><p>violate the natural human feelings inside him with impunity, no</p><p>matter  what  kind  of  profession  he  performs.  From  that  view-</p><p>point, Comrade Captain  was partially right. At the same time,</p><p>however,  my  reactions  had  become  resistant,  a  far  cry  from</p><p>what they had been seventeen years earlier.</p><p>All  these  transformations  of  human  consciousness  and  un-</p><p>consciousness  result in  individual  and  collective  adaptation  to</p><p>living  under  such  a  system.  Under  altered  conditions  of  both</p><p>material  and  moral  limitations,  an  existential  resourcefulness</p><p>emerges  which  is  prepared  to  overcome  many  difficulties.  A</p><p>new network of the society of normal people is also created for</p><p>self-help and mutual assistance.</p><p>This society acts in concert and is aware of the true state of</p><p>affairs;  it  begins  to  develop  ways  of  influencing  various  ele-</p><p>ments of authority and achieving goals which are socially use-</p><p>ful. Patiently instructing and convincing the rulership�s medio-</p><p>cre  representatives  takes  considerable  time  and  requires  peda-</p><p>gogical  skills.  Therefore,  the  most  even-tempered  people  are</p><p>selected  for  this  job,  people  with  sufficient  familiarity  with</p><p>their  psychology  and  a  specific  talent  for  influencing</p><p>pathocrats.  The opinion that society is totally deprived of any</p><p>influence  upon  government  in  such  a  country  is  thus  inaccu-</p><p>rate.  In  reality,  society  does  co-govern  to  a  certain  extent,</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>247</p><p>sometimes  succeeding  and  sometimes  failing  in  its  attempt  to</p><p>create more tolerable living conditions. This, however, occurs</p><p>in a manner totally different from what happens in democratic</p><p>countries.</p><p>These  cognitive  processes,  psychological  immunization,</p><p>and  adaptation,  permit  the  creation  of  new  interpersonal  and</p><p>societal links, which operate within the scope of the large ma-</p><p>jority  we  have  already  called  the  �society  of  normal  people�.</p><p>These  links  extend  discretely  into  the  world  of  the  regime�s</p><p>middle  class,  among  people  who  can  be  trusted  to  a  certain</p><p>extent.  In  time,  the  social  links  created  are  significantly   <emphasis>more</emphasis></p><p>effective  than  those  active  in  societies  governed  by  normal</p><p>human systems. Exchange of information, warnings, and assis-</p><p>tance  encompass  the  entire  society.  Whoever  is  able  to  do  so</p><p>offers aid to anyone who finds himself in trouble, often in such</p><p>a way that the person helped does not even know who rendered</p><p>the  assistance.  However,  if  he  caused  his  misfortune  by  his</p><p>own  lack  of  circumspection  with  regard  to  the  authorities,  he</p><p>meets with reproach, but never the withholding of assistance.</p><p>It is possible to create such links because this new division</p><p>of  society  gives  only  limited  consideration  to  factors  such  as</p><p>the level of talent, education or traditions attached to the former</p><p>social  layers.  Neither  do  reduced  prosperity  differences  dis-</p><p>solve these links. One side of this division contains those of the</p><p>highest  mental  culture,  simple  ordinary  people,  intellectuals,</p><p>headwork  specialists,  factory  workers,  and  peasants  joined  by</p><p>the common protest of their human nature against the domina-</p><p>tion  of  para-human  experiential  and  governmental  methods.</p><p>These  links  engender  interpersonal  understanding  and  fellow-</p><p>feeling  among  people  and  social  groups  formerly  divided  by</p><p><emphasis>economic</emphasis>  differences  and  social   <emphasis>traditions</emphasis>.  The  thought  proc-</p><p>esses serving these links are of a more psychological character,</p><p>able  to  comprehend  someone  else�s  motivations.  At  the  same</p><p>time, the ordinary folk retain respect for people who have been</p><p>educated  and  represent  intellectual  values.  Certain  social  and</p><p>moral values also appear and may prove to be permanent.</p><p>The genesis, however, of this great interpersonal solidarity</p><p>only becomes comprehensible when we know the nature of the</p><p>pathological macrosocial phenomenon which brought about the</p><p>248</p><p>NORMAL PEOPLE UNDER PATHOCRATIC RULE</p><p>liberation of such attitudes, complete with recognition of one�s</p><p>own  humanity  and  that  of  others.  Another  reflection  suggests</p><p>itself,  namely  how  very  different  these  great  links  are  from</p><p>America�s �competitive society�, for  whom the former � eco-</p><p>nomic  and  social  differences  -  represent  something  which  is</p><p>operational even though it crosses the boundaries of the imagi-</p><p>nation.</p><p>One would think that a nation�s cultural and intellectual life</p><p>would quickly degenerate when subjected to the country�s iso-</p><p>lation from the cultural and scientific links with other nations,</p><p>pathocratic limitations upon the development of one�s thought,</p><p>a censorship system, the mental level of the executives, and all</p><p>those  other  attributes  of  such  rule.  Reality  nevertheless  does</p><p>not validate such pessimistic predictions.</p><p>The necessity for constant mental effort so crucial for find-</p><p>ing some tolerable way of life, not totally bereft of moral sense</p><p>within such a deviant reality, causes the development of  <emphasis>realis-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>tic  perception</emphasis>,  especially  in  the  area  of  socio-psychological</p><p>phenomena. Protecting one�s  mind from the  effects of paralo-</p><p>gistic propaganda, as well as one�s personality from the influ-</p><p>ence  of  paramoralisms  and  the  other  techniques  already  de-</p><p>scribed,  <emphasis>sharpens controlled thinking processes</emphasis> and the ability</p><p>to discern these phenomena. Such training is also a special kind</p><p>of common man�s university.</p><p>During such times, society reaches for historical sources in</p><p>searching for the ancient causes of its misfortunes and for ways</p><p>to improve its fate in the future.  Scientific and societal minds</p><p>laboriously  review  the  national  history  in  quest  of  interpreta-</p><p>tions of the facts which would be more profound from the point</p><p>of  view  of  psychological  and  moral  realism.  We  soberly  dis-</p><p>cern  what  happened  years  and  centuries  ago,  perceiving  the</p><p>errors  of  former  generations  and  the  results  of  intolerance  or</p><p>emotionally weighted decision-making. Such a great review of</p><p>individual, social, and historical world views in this search for</p><p>meaning of life and history is a product of unhappy times and</p><p>will help along the way back to happy ones.</p><p>Another  object  of  consideration  became:  moral  problems</p><p>applicable  in  individual  life  as  well  as  in  history  and politics.</p><p>The  mind  starts  reaching  ever  deeper  in  this  area,  achieving</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>249</p><p>ever  more  subtle  understanding  of  the  matter,  because  it  is</p><p>precisely in this  world that the old oversimplifications proved</p><p>to be unsatisfactory. An understanding of other people, includ-</p><p>ing those who commit errors and crimes, appears in a problem-</p><p>solving  way  which  was  formerly  underrated.  Forgiveness  is</p><p>only one step beyond understanding. As Mme. de Stael wrote:</p><p>�Tout comprendere, c�est tout pardoner�109.</p><p>A  society�s  religion  is  affected  by  analogous  transforma-</p><p>tions.  The  proportion  of  the  people  maintaining  religious  be-</p><p>liefs  is  not  significantly  affected,  particularly  in  countries</p><p>wherein  the  pathocracy  was  imposed;  it  does,  however,  un-</p><p>dergo a modification of the contents and quality of such beliefs</p><p>in such a way that religion in time becomes more attractive to</p><p>people  raised  indifferent  to  faith.  The  old  religion,  dominated</p><p>by  tradition,  ritual,  and  insincerity,  now  becomes  transformed</p><p>into  faith,  conditioned  by  necessary  studies  and  convictions</p><p>which determine behavioral criteria.</p><p>Anyone  reading  the  Gospel  during  such  times  finds  some-</p><p>thing that is hard to understand for other Christians. So real is</p><p>the similarity between the social relations, there under the gov-</p><p>ernment of ancient pagan Rome, and these under the  atheistic</p><p>pathocracy,  that  the  reader  imagines  the  situations  described</p><p>more easily and senses the reality of occurrences more vividly.</p><p>Such  reading  also  furnishes  him  with  encouragement  and  ad-</p><p>vice  which  he  can  use  in  his  situations.  Thus,  during  brutal</p><p>times  of  confrontation  with  evil,  human  capabilities  of  dis-</p><p>criminating  phenomena  become  subtler;  apperceptive  and</p><p>moral sensibility develops. Critical faculties sometimes border</p><p>with cynicism.</p><p>~~~</p><p>�<emphasis>I  once  got  into  a  mountain-bound  bus  full  of  young  high-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>school and university students. During the trip, song filled the </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>vehicle and the neighboring hills. Old prewar songs both witty </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>and  frivolous  Le"mian�s110  poems:  �Our  ancestor  Noah  was  a </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>brave  man...�,  and  others.  The  text,  however,  had  been  cor-</emphasis></p><empty-line/><p>109 �To understand all is to forgive all.�</p><p>110 Boles"aw Le#mian (born Boles"aw Lesman; 18781-1937) was a Polish</p><p>poet, artist and member of the Polish Academy of Literature. He was one of</p><p>the most influential poets of the early 20th century in Poland.[Editor�s note.]</p><p>250</p><p>NORMAL PEOPLE UNDER PATHOCRATIC RULE</p><p><emphasis>rected  with  humor  and  literary  talent,  eliminating  whatever </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>irritated these young people raised during difficult times. Was </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>it an unintended result?� </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>~~~ </emphasis></p><p>As  a  result  of  all  these  transformations,  including  the  de-</p><p>egotization  of  thought  and  attitude  connected  thereto,  society</p><p>becomes  capable  of  a  mental  creativity  which  goes  beyond</p><p>normal conditions. This effort could be useful in any cultural,</p><p>technical,  or  economic  area  if  the  authorities  did  not  oppose</p><p>and stifle it because they feel threatened by such activity.</p><p>Human  genius  is  not  born  of  lazy  prosperity  and  among</p><p>genteel  camaraderie,  but  rather  stands  in  perpetual  confronta-</p><p>tion with a recalcitrant reality which is different from ordinary</p><p>human  imaginations.  Under  such  conditions,  wide-scale  theo-</p><p>retical approaches are found to have practical existential value.</p><p>The old system of thought which remains in use in free coun-</p><p>tries  starts  to  look  backward,  naive,  and  bereft  of  feeling  of</p><p>values.</p><p>If nations which arrived at such a state were to regain their</p><p>freedom,  many  valuable  accomplishments  of  human  thought</p><p>would mature within a short time. No excessive fears would be</p><p>in order as to whether such a nation would then be capable of</p><p>elaborating a workable socio-economic system. Quite the con-</p><p>trary: the absence of egoistical pressure groups, the conciliatory</p><p>nature of a society which has years of bitter experience behind</p><p>it,  and  the  penetrating,  morally  profound  thought  processes</p><p>would permit the way out to be found relatively rapidly. Dan-</p><p>ger and difficulty would rather come from outside pressures on</p><p>the  part  of  nations  which  do  not  adequately  understand  the</p><p>conditions in such a country. But unfortunately, the pathocracy</p><p>cannot be dosed as a bitter medicine!</p><p>The  older  generation,  raised  in  a  normal  man�s  country,</p><p>generally reacts by developing the above-mentioned skills, i.e.</p><p>by  enrichment;  the  younger  generation,  however,  was  raised</p><p>under  pathocratic  rule  and  thus  succumbs  to  a  greater  world</p><p>view  impoverishment,  reflex  rigidification  of  personality,  and</p><p>domination  by  habitual  structures,  those  typical  results  of  the</p><p>operation of pathological personalities. Paralogistic propaganda</p><p>and  its  corresponding  indoctrination  are  consciously  rejected;</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>251</p><p>however,  this  process  demands  time  and  effort  which  could</p><p>better be used for active apperception of valuable contents. The</p><p>latter are accessible only with difficulty, due both to limitations</p><p>and  to  apperceptive  problems.  There  arises  the  feeling  of  a</p><p>certain void which is hard to fill. In spite of human good will,</p><p>certain  paralogisms  and  paramoralisms,  as  well  as  cognitive</p><p>materialism, anchor and persevere in brains. The human mind</p><p>is not able to disprove every single falsity which has been sug-</p><p>gested to it.</p><p>The  emotional  life  of  people  raised  within  such  a  deviant</p><p>psychological reality is also fraught with difficulties. In spite of</p><p>critical reason, a certain saturation of a youngster�s personality</p><p>with pathological psychological material is unavoidable, as is a</p><p>degree of primitivization and rigidity of feelings. The constant</p><p>efforts  to  control  one�s  emotions,  so  as  to  avoid having  some</p><p>stormy reaction provoke repression on the part of a vindictive</p><p>and retentive regime, cause feelings to be repressed into a role</p><p>of  something  rather  problematic,  something  which  should  not</p><p>be  given  a  natural  outlet.  Suppressed  emotional  reactions  sur-</p><p>face later, when the person can afford to express them; they are</p><p>delayed  and  inappropriate  to  the  situation  at  hand.  Worries</p><p>about the future awaken egotism among people thus adapted to</p><p>life in a pathological social structure.</p><p>Neurosis is a natural response of human nature if a normal</p><p>person  is  subordinated  to  domination  of  pathological  people.</p><p>The  same  applies  to  the  subordination  of  a  society  and  its</p><p>members to a pathological system of authority. In a pathocratic</p><p>state, every person with a normal nature thus exhibits a certain</p><p>chronic neurotic state, controlled by the efforts of reason. The</p><p>intensity  of  these  states  varies  among  individuals,  depending</p><p>upon  different  circumstances,  usually  more  serious  in  direct</p><p>proportion to the individual�s intelligence. Psychotherapy upon</p><p>such  people  is  only  possible  and  effective  if  we  can  rely  on</p><p>adequate  familiarity  with  the  causes  of  these  states.  Western</p><p>educated psychologists thus prove completely impractical with</p><p>regard to such patients.</p><p>A  psychologist  working  in  such  a  country  must  develop</p><p>special  operational  techniques  unknown  and  even  unfathom-</p><p>able  to  specialists  practicing  in  the  free  world.  They  have  the</p><p>252</p><p>NORMAL PEOPLE UNDER PATHOCRATIC RULE</p><p>purpose of partially liberating the voice of instinct and feeling</p><p>from this abnormal over-control, and of rediscovering the voice</p><p>of nature�s wisdom within, but this must be done in such a way</p><p>as  to  avoid  exposing  the  patient  to  the  unfortunate  results  of</p><p><emphasis>excessive</emphasis> freedom of reaction in the conditions under which he</p><p>must  live.  A  psychotherapist  must  operate  carefully,  with  the</p><p>help of allusions, because only rarely may he openly inform the</p><p>patient  of  the  system�s  pathological  nature.  However,  even</p><p>under  such  conditions,  we  can  achieve  a  greater  experiential</p><p>freedom,  more appropriate thought processes,  and better deci-</p><p>sion making capabilities. As a result of all this, the patient sub-</p><p>sequently behaves with greater caution and feels much safer.</p><p>If  Western radio stations, unhampered by the fears of psy-</p><p>chologists  on  the  other  side,  abandoned  the  simple  counter</p><p>propaganda in  favor of a similar psychotherapeutic technique,</p><p>they  would  contribute  mightily  to  the  future  of  countries  still</p><p>under  pathocratic  rule  today.  Toward  the  end  of  this  book,  I</p><p>shall attempt to persuade the reader that psychological matters</p><p>are  as  important  to  the  future  as  grand  politics  or  powerful</p><p>weapons.</p><p>Understanding</p><p>Comprehending  those  normal  people,  whether  outstanding</p><p>or  average,  fated  to  live  under  pathocratic  rule,  their  human</p><p>nature and their responses to this basically deviant reality, their</p><p>dreams, their methods of comprehending such a reality (includ-</p><p>ing all the difficulties along the road), and their need to adapt</p><p>and become resistant (including the side-effects) is a   <emphasis>sine qua </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>non</emphasis>  precondition  for  learning  the  behavior  that  would  effec-</p><p>tively  assist  them  in  their  efforts  to  achieve  a  normal  man�s</p><p>system. It would be psychologically impossible for a politician</p><p>in  a  free  country  to  incorporate  the  practical  knowledge  such</p><p>people  acquired  over  many  years  of  day  to  day  experience.</p><p>This knowledge cannot be transmitted; no journalistic or liter-</p><p>ary efforts will ever achieve anything in this area. However, an</p><p>analogous science formulated in objective naturalistic language</p><p>can be communicated in both directions. It can be assimilated</p><p>by people who have no such specific experiences; it can also be</p><p>back transmitted over there where a great need for this science</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>253</p><p>exists as do the minds which are already prepared to receive it.</p><p>Such a science would actually act upon their battered personali-</p><p>ties  in  much  the  same  way  as  the  best  of  medicines.  Mere</p><p>awareness  that  one  was  subject  to  the  influence  of  a  mental</p><p>deviant is in and of itself a crucial part of treatment.</p><p>Whoever wants to maintain the freedom of his country and</p><p>of the world already threatened by this macrosocial pathologi-</p><p>cal phenomenon, whoever would like to heal this sick planet of</p><p>ours,  should  not  only  understand  the  nature  of  this  great  dis-</p><p>ease,  but  should  also  be  conscious  of  potentially  regenerative</p><p>healing powers.</p><p>Every  country  within  the  scope  of  this  macrosocial  phe-</p><p>nomenon contains a large majority of normal people living and</p><p>suffering there who will never accept pathocracy; their protest</p><p>against it derives from the depths of their own souls and their</p><p>human  nature  as  conditioned  by  properties  transmitted  by</p><p>means of biological heredity. The forms of this protest and the</p><p>ideologies  by  which  they  would  like  to  realize  their  natural</p><p>wishes may nevertheless change.</p><p>The ideology or societal structure via which they would like</p><p>to  regain  their  human  right  to  live  in  a  normal  man�s  system</p><p>are,  however,  of  secondary  importance  to  these  people.  There</p><p>are  of  course  differences  of  opinion  in  this  area,  but  they  are</p><p>not likely to lead to overly violent conflict among persons who</p><p>see before them a goal worthy of sacrifice.</p><p>Those  whose  attitudes  are  more  penetrating  and  balanced</p><p>see the original ideology as it was before its caricaturization by</p><p>the ponerization process, as the most practical basis for effect-</p><p>ing  society�s  aims.  Certain  modifications  would  endow  this</p><p>ideology  with  a  more  mature  form  more  in  keeping  with  the</p><p>demands of present times; it could thereupon serve as the foun-</p><p>dation for a process of evolution, or rather transformation, into</p><p>an socio-economic system capable of adequate functioning.</p><p>The author�s convictions are somewhat different. Grave dif-</p><p>ficulties could be caused by outside pressure aiming at the in-</p><p>troduction of an economic system which has lost its historically</p><p>conditioned roots in such a country.</p><p>People  who  have  long  had  to  live  in  the  strange  world  of</p><p>this  divergence  are  therefore  hard  to  understand  for  someone</p><p>254</p><p>NORMAL PEOPLE UNDER PATHOCRATIC RULE</p><p>who has fortunately avoided that fate.  Let us refrain from im-</p><p>posing  imaginings  upon  them  which  are  only  meaningful</p><p>within the  world of normal  man�s governments; let us not pi-</p><p>geonhole  them  into  any  political  doctrines  which  are  often</p><p>quite unlike the reality they are familiar with. Let us welcome</p><p>them with feelings of human solidarity, reciprocal respect, and</p><p>a greater trust in their normal human nature and their reason.</p><p><strong>CHAPTER VII </strong></p><p><strong>PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY </strong></p><p>UNDER PATHOCRATIC RULE</p><p>If there were ever such a thing as a country with a commu-</p><p>nist structure as envisaged by Karl Marx, wherein the working</p><p>people�s  leftist  ideology  would  be  the  basis  for  government,</p><p>which, I believe, would be stern, but not bereft of healthy hu-</p><p>manistic thought, the contemporary social, bio-humanistic, and</p><p>medical sciences  would be  considered valuable and be appro-</p><p>priately developed and used  for the good of the  working peo-</p><p>ple. Psychological advice for youth and for persons with vari-</p><p>ous  personal  problems  would  naturally  be  the  concern  of  the</p><p>authorities  and  of  society  as  a  whole.  Seriously  ill  patients</p><p>would have the advantage of correspondingly skillful care.</p><p>However, quite the opposite is the case within a pathocratic</p><p>structure.</p><p>When  I  came  to  the  West,  I  met  people  with  leftist  views</p><p>who unquestioningly believed that communist countries existed</p><p>in  more  or  less  the  form  expounded  by  American  versions  of</p><p>communist political doctrines. These persons were almost cer-</p><p>tain  that  psychology  and  psychiatry  must  enjoy  freedom  in</p><p>those countries referred to as communist, and that matters were</p><p>similar  to  what  was  mentioned  above.  When  I  contradicted</p><p>them,  they  refused  to  believe  me  and  kept  asking  why,  �why</p><p>256</p><p>PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY</p><p>isn�t it like that?�  <emphasis>What can politics have to do with psychiatry? </emphasis></p><p>111</p><p>My attempts to explain what that other reality looks like met</p><p>with  the  difficulties  we  are  already  familiar  with,  although</p><p>some people had previously heard about the abuse of psychia-</p><p>try.  However,  such  �whys�  kept  cropping  up  in  conversation,</p><p>and remained unanswered.</p><p>The situation in these scientific areas, of social and curative</p><p>activities, and of the people occupied in these matters, can only</p><p>be  comprehended  once  we  have  perceived  the  true  nature  of</p><p>pathocracy in the light of the ponerological approach.</p><p>Let  us  thus  imagine  something  which  is  only  possible  in</p><p>theory, namely, that a country under pathocratic rule is inadver-</p><p>tently  allowed  to  freely  develop  these  sciences,  enabling  a</p><p>normal influx of scientific literature and contacts with scientists</p><p>in other countries. Psychology, psychopathology, and psychia-</p><p>try  would  flourish  abundantly  and  produce  outstanding  repre-</p><p>sentatives.</p><p>What would the result be?</p><empty-line/><p>111 In 1950, the Russian Academy of Sciences determined everyone would</p><p>follow the theory of the Moscow professor Andrei Snezhnevsky, which held</p><p>that �anybody could suffer from �slowly progressing schizophrenia�. One</p><p>could suffer from it without knowing, but once Snezhnevsky or one of his</p><p>followers had ascertained that you were ill with it, you had to be locked up</p><p>and knocked down with sedatives immediately, or the disease would �pro-</p><p>gress�. ...dissidents are simply locked up in a psychiatric institution and said</p><p>to be insane.�</p><p>Up until his death in 1987 Snezhnevsky denied that his theory was being</p><p>abused by the Soviet regime. But his former assistants now admit, that he</p><p>knew �all too well� what was going on. The only problem is, that those assis-</p><p>tants still talk about it only on the sly. They work at the Moscow institutes</p><p>where the scientific successors of Snezhnevsky are still in charge. This clique</p><p>of about thirty or forty psychiatrists at the time controlled all the important</p><p>institutes for scientific research in Moscow and this is practically the same up</p><p>to now. The consequence of Snezhnevsky�s ideas, apart from the fact that</p><p><emphasis>they were used as a means of repression</emphasis>, is that psychiatry in the former</p><p>Soviet Union �is confronted with a gap of about fifty years�. Western litera-</p><p>ture on psychiatry was forbidden in the Soviet Union,  <emphasis>psychiatrists who stood </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>up against the political abuse of their science ended up behind bars or were </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>themselves declared to be �insidiously schizophrenic� </emphasis>. �A Mess in Psychia-</p><p>try�, an interview with Robert van Voren, General Secretary of Geneva Ini-</p><p>tiative on Psychiatry, published in the Dutch newspaper  <emphasis>De Volkskrant</emphasis> on</p><p>August 9, 1997 [Editor�s note.]</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>257</p><p>This  accumulation  of  proper  knowledge  would,  within  a</p><p>very short time, enable the undertaking of investigations whose</p><p>meaning we already understand. Missing elements and insuffi-</p><p>ciently  investigated  questions  would  be  complemented  and</p><p>deepened  by  means  of  the  appropriate  detailed  research.  The</p><p>diagnosis  of  the  pathocratic  state  of  affairs  would  then  be</p><p>elaborated within the first dozen or so years of the formation of</p><p>the pathocracy, especially if the latter is imposed. The basis of</p><p>the deductive rationale would be significantly wider than any-</p><p>thing the author can present here,  and  would be illustrated by</p><p>means of a rich body of analytical and statistical material.</p><p>Once transmitted to world opinion, such a diagnosis would</p><p>quickly become incorporated into it that opinion, forcing naive</p><p>political  and  propaganda  doctrines  out  of  societal  conscious-</p><p>ness.  It  would  reach  the  nations  that  were  the  objects  of  the</p><p>pathocratic empire�s expansionist intentions. This would render</p><p>the  usefulness  of  any  such  propagandized  ideology  as  a</p><p>pathocratic Trojan horse doubtful at best.</p><p>In  spite  of  differences  among  them,  other  countries  with</p><p>normal human systems  would be united by characteristic soli-</p><p>darity  in  the  defense  of  an  understood  danger,  similar  to  the</p><p>solidarity linking normal people living under pathocratic rule.</p><p>This consciousness, popularized in the countries affected by</p><p>this phenomenon,  would simultaneously reinforce psychologi-</p><p>cal resistance on the part of normal human societies and furnish</p><p>them with new measures of self defense.</p><p>Can any pathocratic empire risk permitting such a possibil-</p><p>ity?</p><p>In times when the above-mentioned disciplines are develop-</p><p>ing swiftly in many countries, the problem of preventing such a</p><p>psychiatric threat becomes a matter of �to be or not to be� for</p><p>pathocracy.  Any possibility of such a situation emerging must</p><p>thus  be  staved  off  prophylactically  and  skillfully,  both  within</p><p>and without the empire. At the same time, the empire is able to</p><p>find effective preventive  measures thanks to its consciousness</p><p>of being different as well as that specific psychological knowl-</p><p>edge  of  psychopaths  with  which  we  are  already  familiar,  par-</p><p>tially reinforced by academic knowledge.</p><p>258</p><p>PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY</p><p>Both inside and outside the boundaries of countries affected</p><p>by  the  above-mentioned  phenomenon,  <emphasis>a  purposeful  and  con-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>scious  system  of  control,  terror,  and  diversion  is  thus  set  to </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>work</emphasis>.</p><p>Any scientific papers published under such governments or</p><p>imported from abroad must be monitored to ascertain that they</p><p>do not contain any data which could be harmful to the pathoc-</p><p>racy.  Specialists  with  superior  talent  become  the  objects  of</p><p>blackmail  and  malicious  control.  This  of  course  causes  the</p><p>results to become inferior with reference to these areas of sci-</p><p>ence.</p><p>The  entire  operation  must  of  course  be  managed  in  such  a</p><p>way  as  to  avoid  attracting  the  attention  of  public  opinion  in</p><p>countries with normal human structures.  The effects of such a</p><p>�bad break� could be too far-reaching. This explains why peo-</p><p>ple caught doing investigative work in this area  are destroyed</p><p>without  a  sound  and  suspicious  persons  are  forced  abroad  to</p><p>become  the  objects  of  appropriately  organized  harassment</p><p>campaigns there.112</p><p>Battles are thus being fought on secret fronts which may be</p><p>reminiscent of the Second World War. The soldiers and leaders</p><p>fighting  in  various  theaters  were  not  aware  that  their  fate  de-</p><p>pended on the outcome of that other  war,  waged by scientists</p><p>and  other  soldiers,  whose  goal  was  preventing  the  Germans</p><p>from producing the atom bomb. The Allies won that battle, and</p><p>the United States became the first to possess this lethal weapon.</p><p>For the present, however, the West keeps losing scientific and</p><p>political  battles  on  this  new  secret  front.  Lone  fighters  are</p><p>looked upon as odd, denied assistance, or forced to work hard</p><p>for their bread. Meanwhile, the ideological Trojan horse keeps</p><p>invading new countries.</p><p>An examination of the methodology of such battles, both on</p><p>the  internal  and  the  external  fronts,  points  to  that  specific</p><p>pathocratic  knowledge  so  difficult  to  comprehend  in  the  light</p><p>of the natural language of concepts. In order to be able to con-</p><p>trol  people  and  those  relatively  non-popularized  areas  of  sci-</p><empty-line/><p>112 This is also why !obaczewski was deprived of the data he had assembled</p><p>over so many years that would have supported the information presented in</p><p>this book. [Editor�s note.]</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>259</p><p>ence, one must know, or be able to sense, what is going on and</p><p>which fragments of psychopathology are most dangerous. The</p><p>examiner of this methodology thus also becomes aware of the</p><p>boundaries and imperfections of this self-knowledge and prac-</p><p>tice,  i.e.  the  other  side�s  weaknesses,  errors,  and  gaffes,  and</p><p>may manage to take advantage of them.</p><p>In nations with pathocratic systems, supervision over scien-</p><p>tific and cultural organizations is assigned to a special depart-</p><p>ment  of  especially  trusted  people,  a  �Nameless  Office�  com-</p><p>posed almost entirely of relatively intelligent persons who be-</p><p>tray  characteristic  psychopathic  traits.  These  people  must  be</p><p>capable of completing their academic studies, albeit sometimes</p><p>by forcing examiners to issue generous evaluations.  Their tal-</p><p>ents are usually inferior to those of average students, especially</p><p>regarding  psychological  science.  In  spite  of  that,  they  are  re-</p><p>warded  for  their  services  by  obtaining  academic  degrees  and</p><p>positions and are allowed to represent their country�s scientific</p><p>community  abroad.  As  especially  trusted  individuals, they  are</p><p>allowed  to   <emphasis>not</emphasis>  participate  in  local  meetings  of  the  party,  and</p><p>even  to  avoid  joining  it  entirely.  In  case  of  need,  they  might</p><p>then  pass  for  non-party.  In  spite  of  that,  these  scientific  and</p><p>cultural superintendents are  well known to the society of nor-</p><p>mal people, who learn the art of differentiation rather quickly.</p><p>They are not always properly distinguished from agents of the</p><p>political  police;  although  they  consider  themselves  to  be  in  a</p><p>better  class  than  the  latter,  they  must  nevertheless  cooperate</p><p>with them.</p><p>We often meet with such people abroad, in the countries of</p><p>normal  people,  where  various  foundations  and  institutes  give</p><p>them scientific grants with the conviction that they are thereby</p><p>assisting  the  development  of  proper  knowledge  in  countries</p><p>under  �communist�  governments.  These  benefactors  do  not</p><p>realize that they are rendering a disservice to such science and</p><p>to real scientists by allowing the supervisors to attain a certain</p><p>semi-authentic  authority,  and  by  allowing  them  to  become</p><p>more  familiar  with  whatever  they  shall  later  deem  to  be  dan-</p><p>gerous.</p><p>After all, those people shall later have the power to permit</p><p>someone  to  take  a  doctorate,  embark  upon  a  scientific  career,</p><p>260</p><p>PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY</p><p>achieve  academic tenure, and become promoted.  Very medio-</p><p>cre  scientists  themselves,  they  attempt  to  knock  down  more</p><p>talented persons, governed both by self-interest and that typical</p><p>jealousy which characterizes a pathocrat�s attitude toward nor-</p><p>mal people. They will be the ones monitoring scientific papers</p><p>for  their  �proper  ideology�  and  attempting  to  ensure  that  a</p><p>good  specialist  will  be  denied  the  scientific  literature  he</p><p>needs.113</p><p>Controls are exceptionally malicious and treacherous in the</p><p>psychological  sciences  in  particular,  for  reasons  now  under-</p><p>standable  to  us.  Written  and  unwritten  lists  are  compiled  for</p><p>subjects  that  may  not  be  taught,  and  corresponding  directives</p><p>are issued to appropriately distort other subjects. This list is so</p><p>vast in the area of psychology that nothing remains of this sci-</p><p>ence  except  a  skeleton  picked  bare  of  anything  that  might  be</p><p>subtle or penetrating.</p><p>A  psychiatrist�s  required  curriculum  contains  neither  the</p><p>minimal knowledge from the areas of general, developmental,</p><p>and clinical psychology, nor the basic skills in psychotherapy.</p><p>Due to such a state of affairs, the most mediocre or privileged</p><p>of  physicians  become  a  psychiatrist  after  a  course  of  study</p><p>lasting only weeks.  This opens the door of psychiatric careers</p><p>to  individuals  who  are  by  nature  inclined  to  serving  the</p><p>pathocratic authority, and it has fateful repercussions upon the</p><p>level of the treatment. It later permits psychiatry to be abused</p><p>for purposes for which it should never be used.114</p><empty-line/><p>113 Based on many reports of the past 5 years, it seems that the United States</p><p>is well on its way to having a similar system. In fact, careful analysis indi-</p><p>cates that such a system has been in place for some time now. [Editor�s note.]</p><p>114 In Ukraine brain surgery is being performed on schizophrenics. �Ukraine</p><p>is confronted with a lack of money, which means no money to buy medi-</p><p>cines, so they look for alternative methods of treatment. Then there are psy-</p><p>chiatrists in Dnepropetrovsk who think: suppose we cut away a piece of</p><p>brain, then we can get rid of schizophrenia cheaply.� Van Voren imagines</p><p>what they might think: �Maybe we�ll even get the Nobel prize! One can never</p><p>know!.�</p><p>� �On the other hand�, he continues, �they know just as well that this kind of</p><p>operation is not really accepted. So these schizophrenics become supposedly</p><p>epileptic, since in extreme cases of epilepsy surgery might be performed.</p><p>Under this pretext they cut away pieces of brain.� The Institute of Neurosur-</p><p>gery in Kiev goes even further: there, brain tissue of aborted embryos is</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>261</p><p>Since  they  are  undereducated,  these  psychologists  then</p><p>prove helpless in the face of many human problems, especially</p><p>in cases where detailed knowledge is needed. Such knowledge</p><p>must then be acquired on one�s own, a feat not everyone is able</p><p>to manage.</p><p>Such  behavior  carries  in  its  wake  a  good  deal  of  damage</p><p>and human injustice in areas of life which have nothing what-</p><p>soever to do with politics. Unfortunately, however,  <emphasis>such behav-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>ior is necessary from the pathocrat�s point of view in order to </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>prevent  these  dangerous  sciences  from  jeopardizing  the  exis-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>tence of a system they consider the best of all possible worlds. </emphasis></p><p>Specialists in the areas of psychology and psychopathology</p><p>would find an  analysis of this system of prohibitions and rec-</p><p>ommendations to be highly interesting. This makes it possible</p><empty-line/><p>implanted in the brains of mentally disabled people. �They say they can cure</p><p>disabled people that way. Of course nothing happens or their situation even</p><p>worsens, but they ask thousands of dollars for it.�</p><p>�In Ukrainian psychiatry insulin is being used as a tranquillizer, i.e. it is</p><p>administered in such doses, that the patient lapses into a coma. �A kill or cure</p><p>remedy. It is being applied in high doses, while diabetics are dying because</p><p>there is not enough insulin. Nonsense, absolute nonsense.� He continues:</p><p>�Electroshocks, on large scale.� In the Central Psychiatric Institution in Kiev</p><p>they are given a dozen a time, without anaesthesia or muscle-relaxant drugs.</p><p>Once patients have been given a clean bill of health, they can get another</p><p>dozen of shocks on the day of departure: �something like a severance pay.</p><p>And all of this is happening now�, concludes Van Voren, �it is happening</p><p>today, at this very moment.�</p><p>�In Russian newspapers one can freely write about the political abuse of</p><p>psychiatry. But officially the doctrine of Snezhnevsky was never revoked.</p><p>Most psychiatrists in Moscow still even believe in it. �As a consequence, no</p><p>structural change is possible in Moscow. Even now people who hold a posi-</p><p>tion at one of those institutes and who want to talk in public about the abuse</p><p>of psychiatry are being told that they should better shut up or find themselves</p><p>a job elsewhere. This way much of the old power is maintained.�</p><p>�Under the pretext of �progressing schizophrenia� dissidentss are still being</p><p>locked up in the former Soviet Union, but mainly in the provinces and it is</p><p>not so �easy� to do anymore, says Van Voren.</p><p>People who are unwelcome to the local authorities might land in an institu-</p><p>tion, but nowadays there are organisations for human rights and media who</p><p>can get them out. In Turkmenistan it still happens officially. �That is a mu-</p><p>seum of the old Stalinist Soviet Union and there the theory has been re-</p><p>stored.�� �A Mess in Psychiatry�, an interview with Robert van Voren, Gen-</p><p>eral Secretary of Geneva Initiative on Psychiatry, published in the Dutch</p><p>newspaper  <emphasis>De Volkskrant</emphasis> on August 9, 1997.[Editor�s note.]</p><p>262</p><p>PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY</p><p>to realize that this may be one of the roads via  which we can</p><p>reach  the  crux  of  the  matter  or  the  nature  of  this  macrosocial</p><p>phenomenon.  The  prohibitions  engulf   <emphasis>depth  psychology</emphasis>,  the</p><p>analysis  of  the  human   <emphasis>instinctive  substratum</emphasis>,  together  with</p><p><emphasis>analysis of dreams</emphasis>.</p><p>As already pointed out in the chapter introducing some in-</p><p>dispensable  concepts,  an  understanding  of human  instinct  is  a</p><p>key  to  understanding  man;  however,  a  knowledge  of  said  in-</p><p>stinct�s  anomalies  also  represents  a  key  to  understanding</p><p>pathocracy.</p><p>Although  used  ever  more  rarely  in  psychological  practice,</p><p>dream analysis shall always remain the best school of psycho-</p><p>logical  thought;  that  makes  it  dangerous  by  nature.  Conse-</p><p>quently, even  research on the psychology of  mate selection is</p><p>frowned upon, at best.</p><p>The  essence  of  psychopathy  may  not,  of  course,  be  re-</p><p>searched  or  elucidated.  Darkness  is  cast  upon  this  matter  by</p><p>means  of  an  intentionally  devised  definition  of  psychopathy</p><p>which  includes  various  kinds  of  character  disorders,  together</p><p>with those caused by completely different and known causes.115</p><p>This definition must be memorized not only by every lecturer</p><p>in psychopathology, psychiatrist, and psychologist, but also by</p><p>some political functionaries with no education in that area.</p><p>This  definition  must  be  used  in  all  public  appearances</p><p>whenever it is for some reason impossible to avoid the subject.</p><p>However,  it  is  preferable  for  a  lecturer  in  such  areas  to  be</p><p>someone  who always believes whatever is most convenient in</p><p>his situation, and whose intelligence does not predestine him to</p><p>delve into subtle differentiations of a psychological nature.</p><p>It is also worth pointing out here that the chief doctrine of</p><p>said system reads �<emphasis>Existence defines consciousness</emphasis>�. As such,</p><p>it  belongs  to  psychology  rather  than  to  any  political  doctrine.</p><p>This doctrine actually contradicts a good deal of empirical data</p><p>indicating the role of hereditary factors in the development of</p><p>man�s personality and fate. Lecturers may refer to research on</p><p>identical twins, but only in a brief, cautious,  and formal fash-</p><empty-line/><p>115 This is also the case in the U.S. as noted in several articles by Robert</p><p>Hare. [Editor�s note.]</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>263</p><p>ion. Considerations on this subject may, however, not be pub-</p><p>lished in print.</p><p>We return once more to this system�s peculiar psychological</p><p>�genius�  and  its  self-knowledge.  One  might  admire  how  the</p><p>above mentioned definitions of psychopathy effectively blocks</p><p>the ability to comprehend phenomena covered therein. We may</p><p>investigate the relationships between these prohibitions and the</p><p>essence  of  the  macrosocial  phenomenon  they  in  fact  mirror.</p><p>We  may  also  observe  the  limits  of  these  skills  and  the  errors</p><p>committed by those who execute this strategy. These shortcom-</p><p>ings  are  skillfully  taken  advantage  of  for  purposes  of  smug-</p><p>gling through some proper knowledge on the part of the more</p><p>talented  specialists,  or  by  elderly  people  no  longer  fearful  for</p><p>their careers or even their lives.</p><p>The  �ideological�  battle  is  thus  being  waged  on  territory</p><p>completely unperceived by scientists living under governments</p><p>of  normal  human  structures  and  attempting  to  imagine  that</p><p>other  reality.  This  applies  to  all  people  denouncing  �Commu-</p><p>nism�,  as  well  as  those  for  whom  this  ideology  has  become</p><p>their faith.</p><p>Shortly after arriving in the U.S.A. , I was handed a news-</p><p>paper by a young black man on some street in Queens, N.Y. I</p><p>reached for my purse, but he waved me off; the paper was free.</p><p>The front page showed a picture of a young and handsome</p><p>Brezhnev  decorated  with  all  the  medals  he  did  not  in  fact  re-</p><p>ceive  until  much  later.  On  the  last  page,  however,  I  found  a</p><p>quite well-worked-out summary of investigations performed at</p><p>the University of Massachusetts on identical twins raised sepa-</p><p>rately. These investigations furnished empirical indications for</p><p>the important role of heredity, and the description contained a</p><p>literary  illustration of  the  similarity  of  the  fates  of  twin  pairs.</p><p>How far �ideologically disorientated� the editors of this paper</p><p>must have been to publish something which could never have</p><p>appeared  in  the  area  subjected  to  a  supposedly  Communist</p><p>system.116</p><empty-line/><p>116 The freedom that !obaczewski noted in the U.S. in the 1980 is fast being</p><p>replaced by an almost total pathocracy. It won�t be long before such articles</p><p>are censored in U.S. newspapers as well, unless, of course, the study is �de-</p><p>signed� to prove the superiority of psychopathy. [Editor�s note.]</p><p>264</p><p>PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY</p><p>In  that  other  reality,  the  battlefront  crosses  every  study  of</p><p>psychology  and  psychiatry,  every  psychiatric  hospital,  every</p><p>mental health consultation center, and the personality of every-</p><p>one  working  in  these  areas.  What  takes  place  there:  hidden</p><p>thrust-and-parry  duels,  a  smuggling  through  of  true  scientific</p><p>information and accomplishments, and harassment.</p><p>Some  people  become  morally  derailed  under  these  condi-</p><p>tions, whereas others create a solid foundation for their convic-</p><p>tions and are prepared to undertake difficulty and risk in order</p><p>to obtain honest knowledge so as to serve the sick and needy.</p><p>The initial motivation of this latter group is thus not political in</p><p>character, since it derives from their good will and professional</p><p>decency.  Their  consciousness  of  the  political  causes  of  the</p><p>limitations  and  the  political  meaning  of  this  battle  is  raised</p><p>later, in conjunction with experience and professional maturity,</p><p>especially if their experience and skills must be used in order to</p><p>save persecuted people.</p><p>In the meantime, however, the necessary scientific data and</p><p>papers must be obtained somehow, taking difficulties and other</p><p>people�s  lack  of  understanding into  account.  Students  and  be-</p><p>ginning  specialists  not  yet  aware  of  what  was  removed  from</p><p>the educational curricula attempt to gain access to the scientific</p><p>data stolen from them. Science starts to be degraded at a worri-</p><p>some rate once such awareness is missing.</p><p>~~~</p><p>We  need  to  understand  the  nature  of  the  macrosocial  phe-</p><p>nomenon  as  well  as  that  basic  relationship  and  controversy</p><p>between  the  pathological  system  and  those  areas  of  science</p><p>which describe psychological and psychopathological phenom-</p><p>ena.  Otherwise,  we  cannot become fully conscious of the rea-</p><p>sons for such a government�s long published behavior.</p><p>A  normal  person�s  actions  and  reactions,  his  ideas  and</p><p>moral criteria,  all too often strike abnormal individuals as  <emphasis>ab-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>normal</emphasis>.  For  if  a  person  with  some  psychological  deviations</p><p><emphasis>considers himself normal</emphasis>, which is of course significantly eas-</p><p>ier if he possesses authority, then he would consider a normal</p><p>person  different  and  therefore  abnormal,  whether  in  reality  or</p><p>as a result of conversive thinking. That explains why such peo-</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>265</p><p>ple�s  government  shall  always  have  the  tendency  to  treat  any</p><p>dissidents as �mentally abnormal�.</p><p>Operations  such  as  driving  a  normal  person  into  psycho-</p><p>logical  illness  and  the  use  of  psychiatric  institutions  for  this</p><p>purpose take place in many countries in which such institutions</p><p>exist.  Contemporary  legislation  binding  upon  normal  man�s</p><p>countries  is  not  based  upon  an  adequate  understanding  of  the</p><p>psychology  of  such  behavior,  and  thus  does  not  constitute  a</p><p>sufficient preventive measure against it.</p><p>Within  the  categories  of  a  normal  psychological  world</p><p>view, the motivations for such behavior were variously under-</p><p>stood  and  described:  personal  and  family  accounts,  property</p><p>matters, intent to discredit a  witness� testimony,  and  even po-</p><p>litical motivations. Such defamatory suggestions are used par-</p><p>ticularly  often  by  individuals  who  are  themselves  not  entirely</p><p>normal,  whose  behavior  has  driven  someone  to  a  nervous</p><p>breakdown or to violent protest. Among hysterics, such behav-</p><p>ior tends to be a projection onto other people of one�s own self-</p><p>critical associations.  <emphasis>A normal person strikes a psychopath as a </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>naive, smart-alecky believer in barely comprehensible theories; </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>calling him �crazy� is not all that far away. </emphasis></p><p>Therefore, when we set up a sufficient number of examples</p><p>of this kind or collect sufficient experience in this area, another</p><p>more  essential  motivational  level  for  such  behavior  becomes</p><p>apparent.  What  happens  as  a  rule  is  that  the  idea  of  driving</p><p>someone  into  mental  illness  issues  from  minds  with  various</p><p>aberrations  and  psychological  defects.  Only  rarely  does  the</p><p>component of pathological factors take part in the ponerogene-</p><p>sis of such behavior from outside its agents. Well thought out</p><p>and carefully framed legislation should therefore require testing</p><p>of individuals whose suggestions that someone else is psycho-</p><p>logically abnormal are too insistent or too doubtfully founded.</p><p>On  the  other  hand,  any  system  in  which  the  abuse  of  psy-</p><p>chiatry  for  allegedly  political  reasons  has  become  a  common</p><p>phenomenon should be examined in the light of similar psycho-</p><p>logical  criteria  extrapolated  onto  the  macrosocial  scale.  Any</p><p>person  rebelling  internally  against  a  governmental  system,</p><p>which shall always strike him as foreign and difficult to under-</p><p>stand,  and  who  is  unable  to  hide  this  well  enough,  shall  thus</p><p>266</p><p>PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY</p><p>easily be designated by the representatives of said government</p><p>as  �mentally  abnormal�,  someone  who  should  submit  to  psy-</p><p>chiatric treatment. A scientifically and morally degenerate psy-</p><p>chiatrist  becomes  a  tool  easily  used  for  this  purpose.  Thus  is</p><p>born  the  sole  method  of  terror  and  human  torture  unfamiliar</p><p>even to the secret police of Czar Alexander II.</p><p><emphasis>The abuse of psychiatry for purposes we already know thus </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>derives  from  the  very  nature  of  pathocracy  as  a  macrosocial </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>psychopathological  phenomenon. </emphasis>  After  all,  that  very  area  of</p><p>knowledge  and  treatment  must  first  be  degraded  to  prevent  it</p><p>from jeopardizing the system itself by pronouncing a dramatic</p><p>diagnosis,  and  must  then  be  used  as  an  expedient  tool  in  the</p><p>hands of the authorities. In every country, however, one meets</p><p>with people who notice this and act astutely against it.</p><p>The  pathocracy  feels  increasingly  threatened  by  this  area</p><p>whenever  the  medical  and  psychological  sciences  make  pro-</p><p>gress. After all, not only can these sciences knock the weapon</p><p>of  <emphasis>psychological conquest</emphasis> right out of its hands; they can even</p><p>strike at its very nature, and from inside the empire, at that.</p><p>A  specific  perception  of  these  matters  therefore  bids  the</p><p>pathocracy to be �ideationally alert� in this area. This also ex-</p><p>plains why anyone who is both too knowledgeable in this area</p><p>and  too  far  outside  the  immediate  reach  of  such  authorities</p><p>should be accused of anything that can be trumped up, includ-</p><p>ing psychological abnormality.</p><p><strong>CHAPTER VIII </strong></p><p><strong>PATHOCRACY AND RELIGION </strong></p><p>Monotheistic faith strikes a contemporary thinker primarily</p><p>as  an  incomplete  induction  derived  from  ontological  knowl-</p><p>edge about the laws governing microcosmic and macrocosmic</p><p>material and organic and psychological life, as well as being a</p><p>result  of  certain  encounters  accessible  by  means  of  introspec-</p><p>tion.  The  rest  complements  this  induction  by  means  of  items</p><p>man gains by other ways and accepts either individually or in</p><p>accordance with the dictates of his religion and creed. A sound-</p><p>less,  wordless  voice  unconsciously  awakens  our  associations,</p><p>reaches our awareness in the quiet of mind, and either comple-</p><p>ments  or  rebukes  our  cognition;  this  phenomenon  is  every  bit</p><p>as true as whatever has become accessible to science thanks to</p><p>modern investigative methods.</p><p>In perfecting our cognition in the psychological field and at-</p><p>taining  truths  formerly  available  only  to  mystics,  we  render</p><p>ever narrower the space of nescience which until recently sepa-</p><p>rated the realm of spiritual perception from naturalistic science.</p><p>Sometime  in  the  not  too  distant  future,  these  two  cognitions</p><p>will meet and certain divergences  will become self  evident. It</p><p>would  thus  be  better  if  we  were  prepared  for  it.  Almost  from</p><p>the  outset  of  my  deliberations  on  the  genesis  of  evil,  I  have</p><p>been  conscious  of  the  fact  that  the  investigative  results  con-</p><p>cisely  presented  in  this  work  can  be  used  to  further  complete</p><p>that space which is so hard for the human mind to enter.</p><p>268</p><p>PATHOCRACY AND RELIGION</p><p>The ponerological approach throws new light upon age-old</p><p>questions heretofore regulated by the dictates of moral systems</p><p>and must of necessity bring about a revision in thought meth-</p><p>ods.  As a  Christian, the  author  was initially apprehensive that</p><p>this  would  cause  dangerous  collisions  with  ancient  tradition.</p><p>Studying the question in the light of the Scriptures caused these</p><p>apprehensions gradually to fade away. Rather, this now appears</p><p>to  be  the  way  to  bring  our  thought  processes  closer  to  that</p><p><emphasis>original and primeval method of perceiving moral knowledge</emphasis>.</p><p>Quite characteristically, reading the Gospels can provide teach-</p><p>ings clearly convergent with the method of understanding evil</p><p>derived  from  naturalistic  investigations  on  its  origin.  At  the</p><p>same time, we must foresee that the process of correction and</p><p>conformation  will  be  laborious  and  time  consuming,  which</p><p>ultimately will probably prevent any major tumult.</p><p>Religion is an eternal phenomenon. A sometimes overly ac-</p><p>tive  imagination  would  at  first  complement  whatever  esoteric</p><p>perception could not handle.  Once  civilization and its concur-</p><p>rent  discipline  of  thought  reaches  a  certain  level  of  develop-</p><p>ment, a monotheistic idea tends to emerge, generally as a con-</p><p>viction of a certain mental elite. Such development in religious</p><p>thought can be considered a historical law rather than individ-</p><p>ual discovery by such people like Zarathustra or Socrates. The</p><p>march of religious thought through history constitutes an indis-</p><p>pensable factor of the formation of human consciousness.</p><p>Acceptance of religion�s basic truths opens to man a whole</p><p>field of possible cognition wherein his mind can search for the</p><p>truth.  At  that  point,  we  also  free  ourselves  of  certain  psycho-</p><p>logical impediments and gain a certain freedom of cognition in</p><p>areas  accessible  to  naturalistic  perception.  Rediscovering  the</p><p>true,  ancient,  religious  values  strengthens  us,  showing  us  the</p><p>meaning of life and history. It also facilitates our introspective</p><p>acceptance of phenomena within ourselves for which naturalis-</p><p>tic  perception  proves  insufficient.  Parallel  to  our  self  knowl-</p><p>edge,  we  also  develop  our  ability  to  understand  other  people,</p><p>thanks to the acceptance of the existence of an analogous real-</p><p>ity within our neighbor.</p><p>These values become priceless whenever man is forced into</p><p>maximum mental effort and profound deliberations in action so</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>269</p><p>as to avoid stumbling into evil, danger, or exceptional difficul-</p><p>ties. If there is no possibility of apprehending a situation fully,</p><p>but a way out must nevertheless be found for one�s self, family,</p><p>or  nation,  we  are  indeed  fortunate  if  we  can  hear  that  silent</p><p>voice within saying �Don�t do this� or �trust me, do this�.</p><p>We  could  thus  say  that  this  cognition  and  faith  simultane-</p><p>ously  supporting  our  mind  and  multiplying  our  spiritual</p><p>strength constitute the sole basis for survival and resistance in</p><p>situations wherein a person or nation is threatened by the prod-</p><p>ucts of ponerogenesis, which cannot be measured in the catego-</p><p>ries  of  the  natural  world  view.  That  is  the  opinion  of  many</p><p>righteous people. We cannot contradict the basic value of such</p><p>a conviction, but  <emphasis>if it leads to contemptuous treatment of objec-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>tive science in this area and reinforces the egotism of the natu-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>ral world view, people holding this conviction are unaware of </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>the fact that they are no longer acting in good faith</emphasis>.</p><p>No  major  religion  indicates  the  nature  of  the  macrosocial</p><p>pathological phenomenon; therefore  we  cannot consider relig-</p><p>ious dictates as a specific basis for overcoming this great his-</p><p>torical disease. Religion is neither a specific serum nor an ae-</p><p>tiotropically active antibiotic with regard to the phenomenon of</p><p>pathocracy. Although it constitutes a regenerative factor for the</p><p>spiritual  strength  of  individuals  and  societies,  religious  truth</p><p>does  not  contain  the  specific  naturalistic  knowledge  which  is</p><p>essential  for  understanding  the  pathology  of  the  phenomenon,</p><p>and which is simultaneously a curative and a resistance gener-</p><p>ating factor for human personalities. Rather, religious faith and</p><p>the phenomenon of pathocracy are in fact at  <emphasis>different levels of </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>reality</emphasis>,  the  latter  being  more  earthy.  That  also  explains  why</p><p>there  can  be  no  true  collision  between  religion  and  the  pone-</p><p>rological  knowledge  about  the  macrosocial  pathological  phe-</p><p>nomenon.</p><p>If  we based our societal defense and treatment  with regard</p><p>to  destructive  influences  of  pathocracy  only  upon  the  truest</p><p>religious values, this would be reminiscent of curing an insuffi-</p><p>ciently  comprehended  disease  exclusively  by  measures  which</p><p>strengthen  body  and  soul.  Such  general  therapy  may  furnish</p><p>satisfactory results in many cases, but  <emphasis>it will prove insufficient </emphasis></p><p>270</p><p>PATHOCRACY AND RELIGION</p><p><emphasis>in  others</emphasis>.  This  macrosocial  disease  belongs  to  the  latter  cate-</p><p>gory.</p><p>The  fact  that  this  pathocratic  phenomenon,  which  has</p><p>spread to the most wide-ranging scale in human history, dem-</p><p>onstrates  hostility  to  any  and  all  religion  does  not  imply  the</p><p>conclusion that it is the opposite of religion. This dependence</p><p>would be structured differently under other historical and con-</p><p>temporary conditions. In the light of historical data,  <emphasis>it appears </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>obvious that religious systems have also succumbed to ponero-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>genic processes and manifested the symptoms of a similar dis-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>ease.117</emphasis></p><p>The specific basis for healing our sick world, which is also a</p><p>curative  factor  for  restoring  full  reasoning  capabilities  to  the</p><p>human personality, must therefore be the kind of science which</p><p>renders the essence of the phenomenon evident and describes it</p><p>in sufficiently objective language. Resistance to the acceptance</p><p>of such knowledge is often justified by religious motivation; it</p><p>is largely caused by the egotism of the natural world view in its</p><p>traditional  overrating  of  its  values  and  fear  of  disintegration,</p><p>and it must be constructively overcome.</p><p>~~~</p><p>The  pathocratic  phenomenon  has  appeared  many  times  in</p><p>history,  feeding  parasitically  upon  various  social  movements,</p><p>deforming  their  structures  and  ideologies  in  a  characteristic</p><p>fashion. It must therefore have met with various religious sys-</p><p>tems and with a variety of historical and cultural backgrounds.</p><p>Two  basic  possibilities  for  a  relationship  between  this  phe-</p><p>nomenon and a religious system can thus be adduced. The first</p><p>occurs when the religious association itself succumbs to infec-</p><p>tion and the ponerogenic process, which leads to development</p><p>of the above-mentioned phenomena within it. The second pos-</p><p>sibility  emerges  if  a  pathocracy  develops  as  a  parasite  upon</p><p>some social movement whose character is secular and political,</p><p>which must inevitably lead to collision with religious organiza-</p><p>tions.</p><empty-line/><p>117 Not to mention the fact that currently, the neocon-Bush administration is</p><p>using Christianity as the ideology by which they mask pathocracy. [Editor�s</p><p>note.]</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>271</p><p>In  the  first  case,  the  religious  association  succumbs  to  de-</p><p>struction  from  within,  its  organism  becomes  subordinated  to</p><p>goals  completely  different  from  the  original  idea,  and  its  the-</p><p>osophic  and  moral  values  fall  prey  to  characteristic  deforma-</p><p>tion, thereupon serving as a disguise for domination by patho-</p><p>logical  individuals.  <emphasis>The  religious  idea  then  becomes  both  a </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>justification  for  using  force  and  sadism  against  nonbelievers, </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>heretics, and sorcerers, and a conscience drug for people who </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>put such inspirations into effect.118</emphasis></p><p>Anyone criticizing such a state of affairs is condemned with</p><p><emphasis>paramoral indignation</emphasis>, allegedly in the name of the original</p><p>idea and faith in God, but actually because he feels and thinks</p><p>within the categories of normal people. Such a system retains</p><p>the name of the original religion and many other specific</p><p>names, swearing on the prophet�s beard while using this for its</p><p>doubletalk.  <emphasis>Something which was to be originally an aid in the </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>comprehension of God�s truth now scourges nations with the </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>sword of imperialism. </emphasis></p><p>When  such  phenomena  are  long-lasting,  those  people  who</p><p>have retained their faith in religious values will condemn such</p><p>a state of affairs, thereby indicating that it diverges widely from</p><p>the truth. They will unfortunately do so without understanding</p><p>the  nature  and  causes  of  the  pathological  phenomenon,  i.e.  in</p><p>moral  categories,  thus  committing  the  malignant  error  with</p><p>which  we  are  already  familiar.  They  shall  take  advantage  of</p><p>some amenable geopolitical situation in protesting such a state</p><p>of affairs, breaking away from the original system and creating</p><p>various sects and denominations.</p><p>This  kind  of  breakdown  can  be  considered  a  characteristic</p><p>consequence of any movement�s infection by this disease, be it</p><p>religious  or  secular.  Religious  conflict  thereupon  assumes  the</p><p>character  of  political  partitions,  giving  rise  to  warfare  among</p><p>various believers in the same God.</p><p>As we know, this state evolves into the dissimulative phase</p><p>once  human  rancor  starts  to  become  exhausted;  however,  this</p><p>form will be much more long-lasting than a pathocracy feeding</p><p>on a secular movement. Human individuals cannot easily con-</p><p>tain  the  entire  process  within  their  frame  of  reference,  since</p><empty-line/><p>118 As is the case in the United States and Israel today. [Editor�s note.]</p><p>272</p><p>PATHOCRACY AND RELIGION</p><p>such a state spans many generations; their criticism will thus be</p><p>limited  to  the  questions  they  are  immediately  familiar  with.</p><p>However,  this  gives  rise  to  a  gradual  but  uncoordinated  pres-</p><p>sure front of reasonable people, thereby instigating some kind</p><p>of evolution within any group thus engendered.  <emphasis>Such evolution </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>will  aim  at  reactivating  the  original  religious  values  or  at </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>overcoming the deformations. </emphasis></p><p>Whether  this  process  achieves  its  definitive  goals  depends</p><p>upon two conditions:  <emphasis>If the original idea was contaminated by </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>some pathological factor from the outset, the goal is unreach-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>able. </emphasis>  If  it  is  attainable,  our  asymptomatic  approximation  will</p><p>place us in a position wherein the definitive elimination of the</p><p>effects of the surmounted illness requires an  <emphasis>objective view of </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>its essence and history</emphasis>. Otherwise it is impossible to eliminate</p><p>the leftover pathological deformations which would survive as</p><p>a factor opening the door to renewed contamination.</p><p>Some  religious  groups  may  have  been  started  by  persons</p><p>who were carriers of certain psychological anomalies. Particu-</p><p>lar attention should be focused upon largely paranoidal charac-</p><p>teropathies  and  their  above-discussed  role  in  instigating  new</p><p>phases of ponerogenesis. For such people, the world of normal</p><p>human  experience  (including  religious  experience)  succumbs</p><p>to  deformation;  spellbinding  of  self  and  others  easily follows,</p><p>imposed upon other people by means of pathological egotism.</p><p>We  can  observe  marginal  Christian  sects  today  whose  begin-</p><p>nings were doubtless of this nature.</p><p>If  a  religion  which  later  fell  apart  into  numerous  doctrinal</p><p>variations  had  such  a  beginning,  the  above-mentioned  regen-</p><p>erative processes effected by healthy common sense will bring</p><p>about a point of advancement that the said religion�s ministers</p><p>perceive  to  be  a  threat  to  the  religion�s  existence.  <emphasis>Protecting </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>their own faith and social position will then cause them to em-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>ploy violent means against anyone daring to criticize or bring </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>about  liberalization. </emphasis>  The  pathological  process  begins  anew.</p><p>Such  is  the  state  of  affairs  we  may  be  actually  witnessing  to-</p><p>day.</p><p>However, the mere fact that some religious association has</p><p>succumbed  to  the  ponerization  process  does  not  constitute</p><p>proof that the original gnosis or vision was contaminated from</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>273</p><p>the  outset  by  errors  which  opened  the  door  to  invasion  by</p><p>pathological factors, or that it was an effect of their influence.</p><p>In order for the doors to be opened to infection by pathological</p><p>factors and furthering progressive degeneration, it suffices for</p><p>such a religious movement to succumb to contamination  <emphasis>some-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>time later in its history</emphasis>, e.g.  as a result of excessive influence</p><p>on  the  part  of  initially  foreign  archetypes  of  secular  civiliza-</p><p>tion, or of compromises with the goals of the country�s rulers.</p><p>This  succinct  summary  repeats  my  above  adduced  causes</p><p>and laws of the course of the ponerological process, this time</p><p>with  regard  to  religious  groups.  Important  differences  should</p><p>be underscored, however. Religious associations are among the</p><p>most  enduring  and  long-lived  social  structures,  historically</p><p>speaking.  <emphasis>The  ponerological  process  in  such  a  group  runs  its </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>course in a much larger time frame. </emphasis> In effect, man needs relig-</p><p>ion  so  much  that  every  such  group,  provided  it  is  numerous</p><p>enough, will contain a large number of normal people (gener-</p><p>ally the majority) who do not become discouraged and form a</p><p>permanent  wing  inhibiting  the  process  of  ponerization.  The</p><p>equilibrium of the dissimulative phase is thus also to the advan-</p><p>tage  of  those  people  whose  human  and  religious  feelings  are</p><p>normal.  Nonetheless,  isolated  generations  may  thus  have  the</p><p>impression that the observed state represents its permanent and</p><p>essential  characteristics,  including  the  errors  they  cannot  ac-</p><p>cept.</p><p>We  must  therefore  pose  the  following  question:  Can  the</p><p>most  constant  and  sensible  action  based  on  the  natural  world</p><p>view  and  theological  and  moral  reflections  ever  completely</p><p>eliminate the effects of a ponerological process which has long</p><p>been surmounted?</p><p>Based  on  experience  gleaned  from  individual  patients,  a</p><p>psychotherapist  would  doubt  such  a  possibility.  The  conse-</p><p>quences  of  the  influence  of  pathological  factors  can  only  be</p><p>definitely liquidated if a person becomes aware that he was the</p><p>object of their activity. Such a method of careful correction of</p><p>detail  may  sound  reminiscent  of  the  work  done  by  an  art  re-</p><p>storer  who  decided  against  removing  all  later  paint-overs  and</p><p>revealing the master�s original work in toto, but rather retained</p><p>and conserved a few failed corrections for posterity.</p><p>274</p><p>PATHOCRACY AND RELIGION</p><p>Even against the conditional backdrop of time furthering the</p><p>healing  process,  such  efforts  at  step-by-step  untying  of  knots</p><p>based on the natural world view only leads toward a moralizing</p><p>interpretation  of  the  effects  of  uncomprehended  pathological</p><p>factors,  with  the  consequence  of  panic  and  the  tendency  to</p><p>retreat  to  an  apparently  safer  side.  The  organism  of  the  relig-</p><p>ious  group  thus  will  retain  some  dormant  foci  of  the  disease</p><p>which may become active under certain permitting conditions.</p><p>We should therefore realize that following the path of natu-</p><p>ralistic  apperception  of  the  process  of  the  genesis  of  evil,  at-</p><p>tributing  the  proportionate  �fault�  to  the  influence  of  various</p><p>pathological  factors,  can  ease  our  minds  of  the  burden  repre-</p><p>sented by the disturbing results of a moralizing interpretation of</p><p>their  role  in  ponerogenesis.  This  also  permits  more  detailed</p><p>identification of the results of their operation, as well as defini-</p><p>tive  elimination  thereof.  Objective  language  proves  to  be  not</p><p>only  more  accurate  and  economical  to  work  with,  but  also</p><p>much safer as a tool of action when dealing with difficult situa-</p><p>tions and delicate matters.</p><p>Such  a  more  precise  and  consistent  solution  for  the  prob-</p><p>lems  inherited  from  centuries  of  ponerological  nescience  is</p><p>possible   <emphasis>whenever  a  given  religion  represents  a  current  of </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>gnosis  and  faith  which  was  originally  authentic  enough</emphasis>.  A</p><p>courageous approach to remedying conditions caused by pres-</p><p>ently perceptible poneric processes, or by chronic perseverance</p><p>of survivals from such states far in the past, thus demands both</p><p>acceptance of this new science and a clear conviction of origi-</p><p>nal  truth  and  basic  science.  Doubts  will  otherwise  block  any</p><p>such intent by means of insufficiently objectified fear, even if</p><p>they have been repressed deep into the subconscious.  <emphasis>We must </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>be  convinced  that  the  Truth  can  endure  such  a  washing  in </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>modern  detergent;  not  only  will  it  not  lose  its  eternal  values, </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>but it will actually regain its original freshness and noble col-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>ors. </emphasis></p><p>With regard to the second above-mentioned situation, when</p><p>the  ponerogenic  process  leading  to  pathocracy  has  affected</p><p>some secular  and political movement, the situation of religion</p><p>in such a country will be completely different.  Polarization of</p><p>attitudes  with  regard  to  religion  then  becomes  inevitable.  The</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>275</p><p>social religious organization cannot help but assume  a critical</p><p>attitude,  becoming  a  support  for  opposition  on  the  part  of  the</p><p>society of normal people. This in turn provokes the movement</p><p>affected by this phenomenon to an ever more intolerant attitude</p><p>toward religion. Such a situation thus places a given society�s</p><p>religion before the specter of physical destruction.</p><p><emphasis>Whenever  pathocracy  emerges  in  an  autonomous  process, </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>this  means  that  the  religious  systems  dominating  that  country </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>were unable to prevent it in time. </emphasis></p><p>As  a rule, the religious organizations of any given country</p><p>have  sufficient  influence  upon  society  to  be  able  to  oppose</p><p>nascent evil if they act with courage and reason. If they cannot,</p><p>this is the result of either fragmentation and strife among vari-</p><p>ous denominations or of internal corruption within the religious</p><p>system. As a result, religious organizations have long tolerated</p><p>and  even  uncritically  inspired  the  development  of  pathocracy.</p><p>This weakness later becomes the cause of religion�s disasters.</p><p>In  the  case  of  an  artificially  infected  pathocracy,  the  relig-</p><p>ious system�s joint liability may be lesser, albeit still generally</p><p>concrete.  <emphasis>It  is  justified to  exonerate  a  country�s  religious  sys-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>tems for the state of affairs if the pathocracy has been imposed </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>by force. </emphasis> Specific conditions emerge in this situation: the relig-</p><p>ious  organizations  have  the  morally  stronger  defensive  posi-</p><p>tion,  are  able  to  accept  material  losses,  and  can  also  undergo</p><p>their own recuperative process.</p><p>Pathocrats may be able to use primitive and brutal means to</p><p>combat  religion,  but  it  is  very  difficult  for  them  to  attack  the</p><p>essence  of  religious  convictions.  Their  propaganda  proves</p><p>overly  primitive  and  brings  about  the  familiar  phenomena  of</p><p>immunization or resistance on the part of normal people, with</p><p><emphasis>the final result being the opposite of the intended moral reac-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>tion</emphasis>. Pathocrats can only use brute  force to destroy religion if</p><p>they  feel  the  latter�s  weakness.  The  principle  of  �divide  and</p><p>conquer� can be used if there are various denominations with a</p><p>long  history  of  enmity,  but  the  effects  of  such  measures  are</p><p>generally ephemeral and can lead to unity among the denomi-</p><p>nations.</p><p>The specific practical knowledge collected by the society of</p><p>normal  people  under  pathocratic  rule,  together  with  the  phe-</p><p>276</p><p>PATHOCRACY AND RELIGION</p><p>nomenon  of  the  psychological  immunization,  begin  to  exert</p><p>their  own  characteristic  effect  upon  the  structure  of  religious</p><p>denominations. If some religious system succumbed to ponero-</p><p>genic  infection  sometime  during  its  history,  the  effects  and</p><p>chronic  survivals  thereof  persevere  within  for  centuries.  As</p><p>already adduced, remedying this by means of philosophical and</p><p>moral reflections meets with specific psychological difficulties.</p><p>But  under  pathocratic  rule,  in  spite  of  the  abuse  suffered  by</p><p>such a religious organization, the latter organism specific anti-</p><p>bodies are transfused which cure the ponerogenic survivals.</p><p>Such a specific process aims at  ridding the religious struc-</p><p>ture of those deformations which were the effect of the opera-</p><p>tion  of  the  pathological  factors  familiar  to  us.  Insofar  as  the</p><p>appearance of pathocracy in various guises throughout human</p><p>history, always resulting from human errors which opened the</p><p>door  to  the  pathological  phenomenon,  one  must  also  look  on</p><p>the  other  side  of  the  coin.  We  should  understand  this  in  the</p><p>light  of  that  underrated  law,  when  the  effect  of  a  particular</p><p>causative  structure  has  a  teleological  meaning  of  its  own.  It</p><p>would,  however,  be  highly  advantageous  for  this  recuperative</p><p>process to be accompanied by greater awareness of the nature</p><p>of the phenomena, which also acts similarly in terms of devel-</p><p>oping  psychological  immunity  and  healing  human  personali-</p><p>ties. Such awareness could also help elaborate safer and more</p><p>effective plans of action.</p><p>If individuals and groups believing in God are able to accept</p><p>an  objective  understanding  of  macrosocial  pathological  phe-</p><p>nomena,  especially  this  most  dangerous  one,  the  natural  out-</p><p>come will thus prove to be a certain separation of religious and</p><p>ponerological problematics,  which qualitatively occupy differ-</p><p>ent levels of reality. Church attention can then revert  to ques-</p><p>tions regarding man�s relationship with God, an area for which</p><p>churches have a calling. On the other hand, resistance to pone-</p><p>rological  phenomena  and  their  worldwide  spread  should  be</p><p>largely  assumed  by  scientific  and  political  institutions  whose</p><p>actions are based on a naturalistic understanding of the nature</p><p>and  genesis  of  evil.  Such  a  separation  of  duties  can  never  be</p><p>quite consistent, since the genesis of evil includes participation</p><p>of human moral failings, and overcoming these based on relig-</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>277</p><p>ious premises has been the responsibility of religious associa-</p><p>tions since times immemorial.</p><p>Some religions and denominations subjected to pathocratic</p><p>rule  are  forced  by  such  circumstance  to  become  overly  in-</p><p>volved  in  matters  conventionally  referred  to  as  political,  or</p><p>even  in  economic  efforts.  This  is  necessary  both  in  order  to</p><p>protect the existence of the religious organization itself and in</p><p>order to help fellow believers or other citizens suffering abuse.</p><p>It is important, however, to avoid having such a state of affairs</p><p>become permanent in the shape of habit and tradition, since this</p><p>could  later  make  it  more  difficult  to  revert  to  normal  human</p><p>government.</p><p>In  spite  of  existing  differences  of  conviction  and  tradition,</p><p>the basis for cooperative effort on the part of people with good</p><p>will should contain that characteristic convergence of the con-</p><p>clusions we deduce between the precepts of the Christian Gos-</p><p>pels  (and  other  monotheistic  religions)  and  a  ponerological</p><p>view of the genesis of evil. The faithful of various religions and</p><p>denominations do in fact believe in the same God, and at pre-</p><p>sent  they  are  threatened  by  the  same  macrosocial  pathologic</p><p>phenomenon. This creates sufficient data to enable a search for</p><p>cooperation in affecting achievements whose value is so obvi-</p><p>ous.</p><p><strong>CHAPTER IX </strong></p><p><strong>THERAPY FOR THE WORLD </strong></p><p>For centuries, attempts were made to treat various diseases</p><p>based on naive understanding and upon experience transmitted</p><p>from  generation  to  generation.  This  activity  was  not  ineffec-</p><p>tive; in many cases it produced advantageous results. Supersed-</p><p>ing this traditional medicine with the newly generating modern</p><p>science  in  Europe  caused  social  health  to  deteriorate  initially.</p><p>However,  it  was  only  with  the  help  of  modern  science  that</p><p>many diseases  were vanquished,  ailments against  which tradi-</p><p>tional  medicine  had  been  helpless.  This  occurred  because  a</p><p>naturalistic  comprehension  of  disease  and  its  causes  created  a</p><p>basis for counteraction.</p><p>Regarding the phenomena discussed in this work, our situa-</p><p>tion  is similar  to  the  one  engendered  by  the  above-mentioned</p><p>crisis  with  reference  to  the  health  of  European  nations.  We</p><p>have  left  behind  the  traditional  socio-moral  organization  but</p><p>have  not  yet  elaborated  a  more  valuable  science,  one  which</p><p>would  fill  in  the  gap.  We  therefore  need  newly  established</p><p>criteria which can become the basis for an analogous discipline</p><p>with an enduring structure; simultaneously, this would fulfill a</p><p>burning need in today�s world.</p><p>According  to  contemporary  understanding,  effective  treat-</p><p>ment of a disease becomes possible once we have apprehended</p><p>its  essence,  its  etiological  factors  and  their  properties,  and  its</p><p>pathodynamic course within organisms with dissimilar biologi-</p><p>cal  properties.  Once  such  knowledge  is  available,  finding  the</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>279</p><p>proper treatment measures generally proves a less difficult and</p><p>dangerous duty. For doctors, disease represents an interesting,</p><p>even fascinating, biological phenomenon. They often accepted</p><p>the risk of contact  with the  contagious pathogenic factors and</p><p>suffered losses in order to comprehend the ailment so as to be</p><p>able to heal people. Thanks to this, they achieved the possibil-</p><p>ity  of  etiotropic  disease  treatment  and  artificial  immunization</p><p>of human organisms to disease. The doctor�s own health is thus</p><p>also better protected today; but he ought never to feel any con-</p><p>tempt for the patient or his disease.</p><p>When  we  are  faced  with  a  macrosocial  pathological  phe-</p><p>nomenon which requires us to proceed in a manner analogous</p><p>in  principle  to  that  governing  contemporary  medicine,  espe-</p><p>cially  with  reference  to  overcoming  diseases  which  quickly</p><p>propagate  among  the  populations,  the  law  demands  necessary</p><p>rigorous measures which become binding upon healthy people</p><p>as  well.  It  is  also  worth  pointing  out that  people  and political</p><p>organizations whose world view is leftist generally represent a</p><p>more  consistent  attitude  in  this  matter,  demanding  such  sacri-</p><p>fices in the name of the common good.</p><p>We  must  also  be  aware  that  the  phenomenon  facing  us  is</p><p>analogous  to  those  diseases  against  which  the  old  traditional</p><p>medicine proved inadequate. In order to overcome this state of</p><p>affairs,  we  must  therefore  utilize  new  means  based  upon  an</p><p>understanding  of  the  essence  and  causes  of  the  pathocratic</p><p>phenomenon,  i.e.  according  to  principles  analogous  to  those</p><p>governing modern medicine. The road to comprehension of the</p><p>phenomenon was also much more difficult and dangerous than</p><p>the one which should lead from such understanding to the find-</p><p>ing of naturalistically and morally justified, and properly orga-</p><p>nized,  therapeutic  activities.  These  methods  are  potentially</p><p>possible and feasible, since they derive from an understanding</p><p>of the phenomenon per se and become an extension thereof. In</p><p>this �disease�, as in many cases treated by psychotherapists, the</p><p>understanding  alone  already  begins  to  heal  human  personali-</p><p>ties. The author confirmed this in practice in individual cases.</p><p>It  will  also  appear  that  many  known  experiential  results  will</p><p>similarly become applicable.</p><p>280</p><p>THERAPY OF THE WORLD</p><p>The insufficiency of efforts based upon the best moral val-</p><p>ues has become common knowledge after years of rebounding</p><p>as  though  from  rubber  bands.  The  powerful  military  weapons</p><p>that jeopardize all humanity can, on the other hand, be consid-</p><p>ered  as  indispensable  as  a  strait-jacket,  something  whose  use</p><p>diminishes  in  proportion  to  the  improved  skills  governing  the</p><p>behavior  of  those  persons  entrusted  with  the  healing  arts.  We</p><p>need measures  which can reach all people and all nations and</p><p>which can operate upon the recognized causes of great diseases</p><p>Such  therapeutic  measures  cannot  be  limited  to  the  phe-</p><p>nomenon of pathocracy. Pathocracy will always find a positive</p><p>response  if  some  independent  country  is  infected  with  an  ad-</p><p>vanced state of hysterization, or if a small privileged caste op-</p><p>presses and exploits other citizens, keeping them backward and</p><p>in  the  dark;  anyone  willing  to  treat  the  world  can  then  be</p><p>hounded, and his moral right to act be questioned.  Evil in the</p><p>world, in fact, constitutes a continuum: one kind opens the door</p><p>to  another,  irrespective  of  its  qualitative  essence  or  the  ideo-</p><p>logical slogans cloaking it.</p><p>It also becomes impossible to find effective means of thera-</p><p>peutic operation if the minds of people undertaking such tasks</p><p>are affected by a tendency to conversive thinking like subcon-</p><p>scious  selection  and  substitution  of  data,  or  if  some  doctrine</p><p>preventing  an  objective  perception  of  reality  becomes  manda-</p><p>tory. In particular, a political doctrine, for which a macrosocial</p><p>pathological  phenomenon,  in  accordance  with  its  famous  ide-</p><p>ology, has become a dogma, blocks an understanding of its real</p><p>nature  so  well  that  purposeful  action  becomes  impossible.</p><p>Anyone administering such action should undergo an appropri-</p><p>ate prior examination, or even a kind of psychotherapy, in or-</p><p>der  to  eliminate  any  tendencies  toward  even  slightly  sloppy</p><p>thinking.</p><p>Like  every  well-managed  treatment,  therapy  of  the  world</p><p>must  contain  two  basic  demands:  strengthening  the  overall</p><p>defensive  powers  of  the  human  community  and  attacking  its</p><p>most dangerous disease, etiotropically if possible.  Taking into</p><p>account all the aspects referred to in the theoretical chapter on</p><p>ponerology, therapeutic efforts should be directed at subjecting</p><p>the  operations  of  the  known  factors  of  the  genesis  of  evil,  as</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>281</p><p>well as the processes of ponerogenesis itself, to the controls of</p><p>scientific and societal consciousness.</p><p>Present attempts at trusting moral data alone, no matter how</p><p>sincerely  perceived,  also  prove  inadequate  as  would  trying  to</p><p>operate  solely  on  the  basis  of  the  data  contained  within  this</p><p>book,  ignoring the  essential  support  of  moral  values.  A  pone-</p><p>rologist�s attitude underscores primarily the naturalistic aspects</p><p>of phenomena; nevertheless, this does not mean that the tradi-</p><p>tional ones have diminished in value. Efforts aimed at endow-</p><p>ing  the  life  of  nations  with  the  necessary  moral  order  should</p><p>therefore  constitute  a  second  wing,  working  in  parallel  and</p><p>rationally supported by naturalistic principles.</p><p>Contemporary  societies  were  pushed  into  a  state  of  moral</p><p>recession during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centu-</p><p>ries; leading them back out is the general duty of this genera-</p><p>tion  and  should  remain  an  overall  backdrop  to  activity  as  a</p><p>whole.  The  basic  position  should  be  the  intent  to  fulfill  the</p><p>commandment of loving one�s neighbor, including even those</p><p>who have committed substantial evil, and even if this love indi-</p><p>cates taking proplylactic action to protect others from that evil.</p><p>A great therapeutic endeavor can only be affected once we do</p><p>this with the honest control of moral consciousness, moderation</p><p>of  words and thoughtfulness of action.  At that point,  ponerol-</p><p>ogy  will  prove  its  practical  usefulness  in  fulfilling  this  task.</p><p>People and values mature in action. Thus, a synthesis of tradi-</p><p>tional  moral  teachings  and  this  new  naturalistic  approach  can</p><p>only occur with reasoned behavior.</p><p>Truth is a Healer</p><p>It would be difficult to summarize here the statements of the</p><p>many  famous  authors  on  the  subject  of  the  psychotherapeutic</p><p>role  of  making  a  person  aware  of  what  has  crowded  his  sub-</p><p>conscious, stifled within by constant painful effort, because he</p><p>feared to look an unpleasant truth in the eye, lacked the objec-</p><p>tive  data  to  derive  correct  conclusions,  or  was  too  proud  to</p><p>permit  the  awareness  that  he  had  behaved  in  a  preposterous</p><p>fashion. In addition to being quite well understood by special-</p><p>ists, these matters have also become common knowledge to an</p><p>adequate degree.</p><p>282</p><p>THERAPY OF THE WORLD</p><p>In any method or technique of analytical psychotherapy, or</p><p>autonomous psychotherapy, as T. Szasz119 called it, the guiding</p><p>operational motivation is exposing to the light of consciousness</p><p>whatever  material  has  been  suppressed  by  means  of  subcon-</p><p>scious selection of data, or given up in the face of intellectual</p><p>problems.  This is accompanied by a disillusionment of substi-</p><p>tutions  and  rationalizations,  whose  creation  is  usually  in  pro-</p><p>portion to the amount of repressed material.</p><p>In many cases, it turns out that the material fearfully elimi-</p><p>nated  from  the  field  of  consciousness,  and  frequently  substi-</p><p>tuted by ostensibly more comfortable associations, would never</p><p>have  had  such  dangerous  results  if  we  had  initially  mustered</p><p>the  courage  to  perceive  it  consciously.  We  would  then  have</p><p>been in the position to find an independent and often creative</p><p>way out of the situation.</p><p>In some cases, however, especially when dealing with phe-</p><p>nomena  which are hard to understand within the categories of</p><p>our natural world view, leading the patient out of his problems</p><p>demands  furnishing  him  with  crucial  objective  data,  usually</p><p>from  the  areas  of  biology,  psychology,  and  psychopathology,</p><p>and  indicating  specific  dependencies  which  he  was  unable  to</p><p>comprehend before. Instructional activity begins to dominate in</p><p>psychotherapeutic  work  at  this  point.  After  all,  the  patient</p><p>needs  this  additional  data  in  order  to  reconstruct  his  disinte-</p><p>grated personality and form a new world view more appropri-</p><p>ate  to  reality.  Only  then  can  we  go  on  to  the  more  traditional</p><p>methods. If our activities are to be for the benefit of the people</p><p>who  remained  under  the  influence  of  pathocratic  system,  this</p><p>last  pattern  of  behavior  is  the  most  appropriate;  the  objective</p><p>data furnished to the patients must derive from an understand-</p><p>ing of the nature of the phenomenon.</p><p>As already adduced, the author has been able to observe the</p><p>workings  of  such  a  process  of  making  someone  consciously</p><p>aware  of  the  essence  and  properties  of  the  macrosocial  phe-</p><p>nomenon, on the basis of individual patients rendered neurotic</p><p>by  the  influence  of  pathocratic  social  conditions.  In  countries</p><empty-line/><p>119 Thomas Szasz, an American psychiatrist who has argued since the 1950s</p><p>that compulsory psychiatry is incompatible with a free society. [Editor�s</p><p>note.]</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>283</p><p>ruled by such governments, almost every normal person carries</p><p>within him some neurotic  response of varying intensity.  After</p><p>all,  <emphasis>neurosis is human nature�s normal response to being sub-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>jugated to a pathological system</emphasis>.</p><p>In spite of the anxiety which such courageous psychothera-</p><p>peutic  operations  necessarily  engendered  on  both  sides,  my</p><p>patients  quickly  assimilated  the  objective  data  they  were  fur-</p><p>nished,  complemented  them  with  their  own  experiences,  and</p><p>required additional information and verification of their appli-</p><p>cations of this information. Spontaneous and creative reintegra-</p><p>tion of their personalities took place soon thereafter, accompa-</p><p>nied  by  a  similar  reconstruction  of  their  world  view.  Subse-</p><p>quent  psychotherapy  merely  continued  assistance  in  this  ever</p><p>more  autonomous  process  and  in  resolving  individual  prob-</p><p>lems,  i.e.  a  more  traditional  approach.  These  people  lost  their</p><p>chronic  tensions;  their  perceptive  view  of  this  deviant  reality</p><p>became  increasingly  realistic  and  laced  with  humor.  Rein-</p><p>forcement of their capacity to maintain their own psychological</p><p>hygiene, self-therapy, and self-pedagogy was much better than</p><p>expected. They became more resourceful in practical life mat-</p><p>ters and were  able to offer others good advice.  Unfortunately,</p><p>the  number  of  persons  whom  a  psychotherapist  could  trust</p><p>adequately was very limited.</p><p>A similar  effect should be attained on a macrosocial  scale,</p><p>something  technically  feasible  under  present  conditions.  At</p><p>such  an  operational  scale,  it  will liberate  spontaneous  interac-</p><p>tion among such  enlightened individuals and the social multi-</p><p>plication of therapeutic phenomena. The latter will then create</p><p>a  qualitatively  new  and  most  probably  rather  stormy  social</p><p>reaction;  we  should  be  prepared  for  this  in  order  to  calm  it</p><p>down.  Finally,  this  will  bring  an  overall  feeling  of  relaxation</p><p>and  a  triumph  of  proper  science  over  evil;  this  cannot  be  ne-</p><p>gated  by  any  verbalistic  means,  and  physical  force  also  be-</p><p>comes meaningless. Using measures so different from anything</p><p>utilized before will engender an �end of an era� feeling during</p><p>which  this  macrosocial  phenomenon  was  able  to  emerge  and</p><p>develop,  but  is  now  dying.  That  would  be  accompanied  by  a</p><p>sensation of well-being on the part of normal people.</p><p>284</p><p>THERAPY OF THE WORLD</p><p>Within this suggested global psychotherapy, additional ob-</p><p>jectified material in the form of a naturalistic understanding of</p><p>the  phenomenon  constitutes  the  keystone  material;  this  book</p><p>has  therefore  collected  the  most  essential  data  the  author  was</p><p>able to obtain and to present here in a partially simplified ap-</p><p>proach.  This  no  doubt  does  not  represent  the  entirety  of  the</p><p>knowledge needed; further supplementation will be necessary.</p><p>On  the  other  hand,  I  have  devoted  less  attention  to  methods,</p><p>since  this  would  constitute  a  manifold  duplication  of  those</p><p>kinds  of  therapies  many  specialists  already  know  and  use  in</p><p>their practice.</p><p>The purpose of this activity will be letting the world regain</p><p>its capacity to make use of healthy common sense and to rein-</p><p>tegrate world views based on scientifically objectified and ap-</p><p>propriately  popularized  data.  The  consciousness  thus  created</p><p>would be far more appropriate to the reality which was misun-</p><p>derstood until recently; as a result, man will become more sen-</p><p>sible in practical activity, more independent and resourceful in</p><p>solving life�s problems, and he will feel safer. This task is noth-</p><p>ing  new;  it  constitutes  a  good  psychotherapist�s  daily  bread.</p><p>The problem is technical rather than theoretical, namely how to</p><p>disseminate  such  sorely  needed  influences  throughout  the</p><p>globe.</p><p>~~~</p><p>Every  psychotherapist  must  be  prepared  for  difficulties</p><p>caused by the psychological resistance derived from persistent</p><p>attitudes  and  convictions  whose  lack  of  foundation  becomes</p><p>revealed  in  the  course  of  work.  Particularly  in  the  case  of  a</p><p>numerous  group  of  people,  these  resistances  become  more</p><p>demonstratively  manifest;  however,  among  the  members  of</p><p>such a group we also find allies who help us break down these</p><p>resistances. In order to visualize this, let us revert once more to</p><p>the N. family example, wherein a dozen or so persons collabo-</p><p>rated  in  abusing  a  pleasant  and  intelligent  thirteen-year-old</p><p>scapegoat.</p><p>When I explained to the uncles and aunts that they had been</p><p>under  the  influence  of  a  psychologically  abnormal  person  for</p><p>years, accepting her delusional  world as real and participating</p><p>(with  perceived  honor)  in  her  vindictiveness  to  the  boy  who</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>285</p><p>was allegedly to blame for her failures, including those which</p><p>occurred  years  before  his  birth,  the   <emphasis>shock</emphasis>  temporarily  stifled</p><p>their  indignation.  There  was  no  subsequent  attack,  probably</p><p>because this took place in my office of the public health service</p><p>and  I  was  protected  by  the  white  coat  I  would  usually  don</p><p>whenever  I  did  not  feel  completely  safe.  I  thus  suffered  only</p><p>verbal  threats.  A  week  later,  however,  they  started  returning</p><p>one  by  one,  pale  and  rueful;  albeit  with  difficulty,  they  did</p><p>offer their cooperation in helping to repair the family situation</p><p>and the future of this unfortunate boy.</p><p>Many people suffer  an inevitable  <emphasis>shock</emphasis> and  react  with op-</p><p>position, protest, and  <emphasis>disintegration</emphasis> of their human personality</p><p>when informed of such a state of affairs, namely that they have</p><p>been  under  the  spellbinding  and  traumatizing  influence  of  a</p><p>macrosocial  pathological  phenomenon,  regardless  of  whether</p><p>they  were  followers  or  opponents  thereof.  Many  people  are</p><p>awakened to anxious protest by the fact that the ideology they</p><p>either condemned or somehow accepted, but considered a guid-</p><p>ing factor, is now being treated as something secondary in im-</p><p>portance.</p><p>The  noisiest  protests  will  come  from  those  who  consider</p><p>themselves fair because they condemned this macrosocial phe-</p><p>nomenon  with  literary  talent  and  raised  voices,  utilizing  the</p><p>name derived from its most current ideology, as well as making</p><p>excessive  use  of  moralizing  interpretations  with  regard  to</p><p>pathological phenomena. Forcing them to an apperception of a</p><p>correct  understanding  of  the  pathocracy  will  be  quite  a  Sisy-</p><p>phean labor, since they would have to become conscious of the</p><p>fact that their efforts largely served goals which were the oppo-</p><p>site  of  their intentions.  Especially  if  they  engaged  in such  ac-</p><p>tivities  professionally,  it  is  more  practical  to  avoid  liberating</p><p>their aggressions; one could even consider such generally eld-</p><p>erly people too old for therapy.</p><p>Transforming  the  world  view  of  people  living  in  countries</p><p>with  normal  man�s  systems  proves  a  more  troublesome  task,</p><p>since they are much more egotistically attached to the imagin-</p><p>ings suggested to them since childhood, making it more diffi-</p><p>cult for them to reconcile themselves with the fact that there are</p><p>matters  which  their  natural  conceptual  system  cannot  assimi-</p><p>286</p><p>THERAPY OF THE WORLD</p><p>late. They also lack the specific experience available to people</p><p>who  have  lived  under  pathocratic  rule  for  years.  We  must</p><p>therefore  expect  resistance  and  attack  on  the  part  of  people</p><p>protecting their livelihoods and positions as well as defending</p><p>their  personalities  from  a  vexatious  disintegration.  Refraining</p><p>from  such  estrangement,  we  have  to  count  on  the  accordant</p><p>reactions of the majority.</p><p>The  acceptance  of  such  psychotherapy  will  be  different  in</p><p>countries  where  societies  of  normal  people  have  already  been</p><p>created,  offering  solid  resistance  to  pathocratic  rule.  Many</p><p>years of experience, practical familiarity with the phenomenon,</p><p>and  psychological  immunization  there  long  ago  produced  fer-</p><p>tile ground for sowing the seeds of objective truth and natural-</p><p>istic comprehension.  An explanation of the  essence of macro-</p><p>social phenomenon will be treated like delayed psychotherapy</p><p>which  should  regrettably  have  been  served  much  earlier  (that</p><p>would  have  enabled  the  patient  to  avoid  many  errors)  but  is</p><p>nevertheless  useful  because  it  provides  order  and  relaxation</p><p>and  permits  subsequent  reasoned  action.  Such  data,  accepted</p><p>via  a  rather  painful  process  there,  will  be  associated  with  the</p><p>experience  already possessed.  There  will be no egoistically or</p><p>egotistically  inspired  protests  in  that  world.  The  value  of  an</p><p>objective view will be appreciated much more rapidly, since it</p><p>ensures a basis for reasoned activity. Soon thereafter, the feel-</p><p>ing of realism in apprehending the surrounding world, followed</p><p>by a sense of humor, would begin to compensate these people</p><p>for  the  experience  they  have  survived,  namely  the  disintegra-</p><p>tion of their human personalities caused by such therapy.</p><p>This  disintegration  of  the  prior  world  view  structure  will</p><p>create  a  temporary  feeling  of  an  unpleasant  void.  Therapists</p><p>well know the consequent responsibility of filling this void as</p><p>quickly as possible with material more credible and trustworthy</p><p>than the contents which were disabused, thus helping to avoid</p><p>primitive methods of personality reintegration. In practice, it is</p><p>best to minimize patient anxiety by making advance  promises</p><p>that appropriately objectified  material  will be  furnished in the</p><p>form of truthful data. This promise must then be kept, partially</p><p>anticipating the appearance of disintegrative states. I have suc-</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>287</p><p>cessfully tested this technique on individual patients and would</p><p>advise its implementation on a mass scale as safe and effective.</p><p>For the people who have already developed natural psycho-</p><p>logical immunity, their increased resistance to the pathocracy�s</p><p>destructive  influence  upon  their  personalities,  gained  due  to  a</p><p>consciousness  of  pathocracy�s  essence,  may  be  of  lesser  sig-</p><p>nificance, but still not without value, since it leads to an ame-</p><p>liorated  immunization  quality  at  a  less  burdensome  cost  in</p><p>terms  of  nervous  tension.  However,  for  those  hesitant  people</p><p>who  constitute  the  part  of  well-adjusted  members  of  the  new</p><p>middle class, immunizing activities furnished by an awareness</p><p>of  the  pathological  nature  of  the  phenomenon  may  tip  their</p><p>attitudinal scale in the direction of decency.</p><p>The  second  key  aspect  of  such  operations  that  should  be</p><p>considered is the influence of such enlightening behavior upon</p><p>the personalities of the pathocrats themselves.</p><p>In the course of individual psychotherapy, we tend to avoid</p><p>making  patients  aware  of  permanent  aberrations,  especially</p><p>when  we  have  reason  to  believe  that  they  are  conditioned  by</p><p>hereditary  factors.  Psychotherapists,  however,  are  guided  by</p><p>the consciousness of this condition�s existence in their decision</p><p>making.  Only  in  the  case  of  the  results  of  slight  brain-tissue</p><p>lesions do we decide to make the patient aware of this, so as to</p><p>help  him  elaborate  a  better  tolerance  of  his  difficulties  and  to</p><p>abrogate  unnecessary  fears.  Regarding  psychopathic  individu-</p><p>als,  we  treat  their  deviations  by  means  of  tactful  allusive  lan-</p><p>guage,  bearing  in  mind  that  they  have  a  kind  of  self-</p><p>knowledge,  and  we  proceed  with  the  techniques  of  behavior</p><p>modification to correct their personalities, keeping the interests</p><p>of society in mind as well.</p><p>As  far  as  operations  on  the  macrosocial  scale,  it  will  of</p><p>course  not  be  feasible  to  retain  these  latter  cautious  tactics  of</p><p>activity.  Traumatizing  the  pathocrats  will  be  unavoidable  to  a</p><p>certain extent, and even intentional and morally justified in the</p><p>interests  of  peace  on  earth.  Similarly,  however,  our  attitude</p><p>must  be  defined  by  an  acceptance  of  biological  and  psycho-</p><p>logical  facts;  renouncing  any  morally  or  emotionally  charged</p><p>interpretation of their psychological deviations. In undertaking</p><p>such  work,  we  must  consider  the  good  of  society  to  be  para-</p><p>288</p><p>THERAPY OF THE WORLD</p><p>mount; nevertheless, we must not abandon our psychotherapeu-</p><p>tic attitude and refrain from punishing those whose guilt we are</p><p>unable  to  evaluate.  Should  we  forget  this,  we  would  increase</p><p>the risk of their uncontrolled reaction, which could bring about</p><p>a world catastrophe.</p><p>At the same time, we should not nourish exaggerated fears,</p><p>for example, that such public enlightenment activities will pro-</p><p>voke overly dramatic  reactions among pathocrats, e.g. a  wave</p><p>of cruelty or suicide. No! Those individuals described as essen-</p><p>tial  psychopaths,  in  addition  to  many  other  carriers  of  related</p><p>hereditary anomalies, have since childhood elaborated a feeling</p><p>of  being  psychologically  different  from  others.  Revealing  this</p><p>awareness to them is less traumatizing than, for instance, sug-</p><p>gesting psychological abnormality to a normal person. The ease</p><p>with which they repress uncomfortable material from their field</p><p>of consciousness will protect them from violent reactions.</p><p>What can they do if no ideology can be used as a mask any</p><p>more? Once the essence of the phenomenon has been scientifi-</p><p>cally unmasked, the psychological result is that they then feel</p><p>their  historical  role  to  have  reached  the  end.  Their  work  fur-</p><p>thermore  takes  on  some  historically  creative  meaning,  if  the</p><p>world of normal people offers them conciliation upon unprece-</p><p>dented advantageous conditions. This will cause overall demo-</p><p>bilization  of  the  pathocracy,  especially  in  those  countries</p><p>where,  practically  speaking,  the  support  of  an  ideology  has</p><p>already  been  lost.  This  internal  demobilization  they  fear  so</p><p>much constitutes the second important goal.</p><p>A  crucial  condition and a complement of therapeutic  work</p><p>must be forgiveness for the pathocrats as derived from under-</p><p>standing, both of them and of the signs of the times. This must</p><p>be  effected  by  means  of  correspondingly  amended  law  based</p><p>on comprehension of man and of the processes of the genesis</p><p>of  evil  operating  within  societies,  which  will  counteract  such</p><p>processes in a causative manner and supersede the former �pe-</p><p>nal�  law.  Forecasting  the  creation  of  such  law  must  not  be</p><p>treated merely as a psychotherapeutic promise; it must be sci-</p><p>entifically prepared and thereupon effected.</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>289</p><p>Forgiveness</p><p>The  contemporary  evolution  of  legal  concepts  and  democ-</p><p>ratic social morality is geared toward dismantling the old tradi-</p><p>tions  of  maintaining  law  and  order  by  means  of  punitive  re-</p><p>pression. Many countries have abandoned capital punishment,</p><p>disturbed  by  its  genocidal  abuses  during  the  last  world  war.</p><p>Other  punishments  and  the  methods  of  their  execution  have</p><p>also  been  mitigated,  taking  psychological  motivation  and  the</p><p>circumstances of the crime into account. The conscience of the</p><p>civilized nations protests against the Roman principle  <emphasis>Dura lex </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>sed lex</emphasis>, and, at the same time, psychologists discern the possi-</p><p>bility  that  many  presently  unbalanced  people  can  revert  to</p><p>normal social life thanks to appropriate pedagogical measures;</p><p>practice confirms it only partially, however.</p><p>The reason is that mitigating the law has not been balanced</p><p>with the corresponding methods of stifling the processes of the</p><p>genesis  of  evil  as  based  upon  its  comprehension  .  This  pro-</p><p>vokes a crisis in the area of societies� anti-crime protection and</p><p>makes  it  easier  for  pathocratic  circles  to  utilize  terrorism  in</p><p>order to realize their expansionist goals. Under such conditions,</p><p>many people feel that returning to the tradition of legal severity</p><p>is the only way to protect society from an excess of evil. Others</p><p>believe  that  such  traditional  behavior  morally  cripples  us  and</p><p>opens the door to irrevocable abuses.  They therefore  subsume</p><p>others� life and health to humanistic values.</p><p>In  order  to  emerge  from  this  crisis,  we  must  galvanize  all</p><p>our efforts in a search for a new road, one which would both be</p><p>more  humanitarian  and  would  effectively  protect  defenseless</p><p>individuals  and  societies.  Such  a  possibility  exists  and  can  be</p><p>implemented,  based  on  an  objective  comprehension  of  the</p><p>genesis of evil.</p><p>In factual essence, the unrealistic tradition of a relationship</p><p>between  a  person�s  �crime�,  which  no  other  person  is  in  the</p><p>position  to  evaluate  objectively,  and  his  �punishment�,  which</p><p>is  rarely  effective  in  reforming  him,  should  be  relegated  to</p><p>history.  The  science  of  the  causes  of  evil  should  strengthen</p><p>society�s moral discipline and have a prophylactic effect. Often</p><p>merely making a person aware that he was under the influence</p><p>of a pathological individual breaks the circle of destructiveness.</p><p>290</p><p>THERAPY OF THE WORLD</p><p>An appropriate psychotherapy should therefore be permanently</p><p>included  in  any  measures  to  counteract  evil.  Unfortunately,  if</p><p>someone is shooting at us, we must shoot back even better. At</p><p>the same time, however, we should bring back the law of for-</p><p>giveness, that old law of wise sovereigns. After all, it has pro-</p><p>found moral and psychological foundations and is more effec-</p><p>tive than punishment in some situations.</p><p>The  codices  of  penal  law  foresee  that  the  perpetrator  of  a</p><p>penal act who, at the time of his transgression, was limited in</p><p>his ability to discern the meaning of the act or to direct his own</p><p>behavior as a result of mental illness or some other psychologi-</p><p>cal  deficiency,  receives  a  lesser  sentence  to  the  appropriate</p><p>degree.  If  we  should  therefore  consider  the  responsibility  of</p><p>pathocrats in the light of such regulations and in light of what</p><p>we have already said about the motivations for their behavior,</p><p>we must then considerably mitigate the scope of justice within</p><p>the frame of existing regulations.</p><p>The  above-mentioned  legal  regulations,  which  are  more</p><p>modern in Europe than in the U.S.A., are rather outdated eve-</p><p>rywhere  and  insufficiently  congruent  with  bio-psychological</p><p>reality. They are a compromise between traditional legal think-</p><p>ing  and  medical  humanism.  Furthermore,  the  legislators  were</p><p>in no position to perceive macrosocial pathological phenomena</p><p>that dominate individuals and significantly limit their ability to</p><p>discern  the  meaning  of  their  own  behavior.  Susceptible  indi-</p><p>viduals are sucked in surreptitiously, since they are unaware of</p><p>the  pathological  quality  of  such  a  phenomenon.  The  specific</p><p>properties of these phenomena  cause the selection of  attitudes</p><p>to  be  decisively  determined  by  unconscious  factors,  followed</p><p>by  pressure  from  pathocratic  rulers,  who  are  none  too  fastidi-</p><p>ous as to their methods, not even with regard to their own ad-</p><p>herents. How should the degree of penal mitigation then judge</p><p>them fairly?</p><p>For instance, if essential psychopathy is virtually 100% pre-</p><p>dictive  concerning  attraction  to  and  inclusion  in  pathocratic</p><p>activity,  should  a  judgment  recognize  similar  mitigation  of</p><p>punishment?  This  should  also  be  applied  to  other  hereditary</p><p>anomalies to a lesser extent, since they too have proved to be</p><p>primary factors in the selection of attitudes.</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>291</p><p>We should not fault anyone for having inherited some psy-</p><p>chological anomalies from his parents any more than  we fault</p><p>someone  in  the  case  of  physical  or  physiological  anomalies</p><p>such  as  Daltonism.  We  should  also  stop  blaming  people  who</p><p>succumbed to traumas and diseases, leaving brain tissue dam-</p><p>age behind, or those who become the object of inhuman peda-</p><p>gogical methods.</p><p>In the name of their good and that of society, we should use</p><p>force  with  regard  to  such  people,  sometimes  including  forced</p><p>psychotherapy, supervision, prevention, and care. Any concept</p><p>of blame or guilt would only make it more difficult to behave</p><p>in  a  way  which  is  not  only  humanitarian  and  purposeful,  but</p><p>more effective as well.</p><p>In dealing with a macrosocial phenomenon, particularly one</p><p>whose life is longer than an individual�s active life, its perma-</p><p>nent influence forces even normal people to adapt to a certain</p><p>degree.  Are  we,  whose  instincts  and  intelligence  are  normal</p><p>and,  according  to  the  criteria  of  our  moral  world  view,  in  the</p><p>position  to  evaluate  the  guilt  of  these  others  for  actions  they</p><p>performed  within  pathocracy�s  collective  madness?  Judging</p><p>them  in  accordance  with  traditional  legal  regulations  would</p><p>constitute  reverting  to  the  imposition  of  normal  man�s  force</p><p>upon psychopathic individuals, i.e. to the initial position which</p><p>engendered  pathocracy  to  begin  with.  Is  subjecting  them  to</p><p>vindictive justice worth prolonging the duration of pathocracy</p><p>for  even  a  single  year,  let  alone  an  unspecified  time?  Would</p><p>eliminating  a  certain  number  of  psychopaths  significantly  di-</p><p>minish  these  anomalies�  burden  upon  society�s  gene pool  and</p><p>contribute toward a solution to this problem?</p><p>Unfortunately, the answer is no!</p><p>People  with  various  psychological  deviations  have  always</p><p>existed  in  every  society  on  earth.  Their  way  of  life  is  always</p><p>some  form  of   <emphasis>predation</emphasis>  upon  society�s  economic  creativity,</p><p>since their own creative capabilities are generally substandard.</p><p>Whoever plugs into this system of organized parasitism gradu-</p><p>ally  loses  whatever  limited  capacity  for  legal  work  he  might</p><p>have had.</p><p>This  phenomenon  and  its  brutality  are  actually  maintained</p><p>by the threat of legal  retaliation or,  even  worse, of  retribution</p><p>292</p><p>THERAPY OF THE WORLD</p><p>on the part of the enraged masses. Dreams of revenge distract a</p><p>society�s  attention  from  understanding  the  bio-psychological</p><p>essence of the phenomenon and stimulate the moralizing inter-</p><p>pretations  whose  results  we  are  already  familiar  with.  This</p><p>would  make  it  more  difficult  to  find  a  solution  to  the  present</p><p>dangerous situation and would similarly complicate any possi-</p><p>bilities of solving the problem of burdening society�s gene pool</p><p>with  psychological  anomalies  with  a  view  to  future  genera-</p><p>tions.  These  problems,  however,  both  present  and  future,  can</p><p>be solved if we approach them  with an understanding of their</p><p>naturalistic essence and a comprehension of the nature of those</p><p>people who commit substantial evil.</p><p>Legal retribution would be a repetition of the Nuremberg er-</p><p>ror.  That  judgment  upon  war  criminals  could  have  been  a</p><p>never-to-be  repeated  opportunity  to  show  the  world  the  entire</p><p>psychopathology of the Hitlerian system, with the person of the</p><p>�Fuehrer�  at  the  head.  That  would  have  led  to  a  faster  and</p><p>deeper  disabusement  of  the  Nazi  tradition  in  Germany.  Such</p><p>conscious exposure of the operations of pathological factors on</p><p>a macrosocial scale would have reinforced the process of psy-</p><p>chological rehabilitation for Germans and the world as a whole</p><p>by means of the naturalistic categories  applicable to that state</p><p>of affairs. That would also have constituted a healthy precedent</p><p>for illuminating and stifling other pathocracies� operations.</p><p>What actually happened is that psychiatrists and psycholo-</p><p>gists  succumbed  all  too  easily  to  the  pressures  of  their  own</p><p>emotions  and  political  factors,  their  judgments  giving  short</p><p>shrift to the actual pathological properties of both the majority</p><p>of  the  defendants  and  of  Nazism  as  a  whole.  Several  famous</p><p>individuals with psychopathic features or other deviations were</p><p>hanged  or  sentenced  to  prison  terms.  Many  facts  and  data</p><p>which  could  have  served  the  purposes  adduced  in  this  work</p><p>were hanged and imprisoned along with these individuals. We</p><p>can  thus  easily  understand  why  pathocrats  were  so  eager  to</p><p>achieve  this  precise  result.  We  are  not  allowed  to  repeat  such</p><p>errors,  since  the  results  make  it  more  difficult  to  comprehend</p><p>the  essence  of  macrosocial  pathological  phenomena,  and  they</p><p>thereby limit the possibilities of stifling their internal causation.</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>293</p><p>In  today�s  real  world  situation,  there  is  only  one  scientifi-</p><p>cally  and  morally  justified  solution  which  could  remedy  our</p><p>current plight of nations and also furnish a proper beginning for</p><p>solving the problem of societies� genetic burden with a view to</p><p>the  future.  That  would  be  an  appropriate  law  based  upon  the</p><p>best  possible  understanding  of  macrosocial  pathological  phe-</p><p>nomena  and  their  causes,  which  would  limit  pathocrats�  re-</p><p>sponsibility to those cases alone (usually of a criminal sadistic</p><p>nature) in which it is hard to accept the inability to discern the</p><p>meaning of such an act. Nothing else could enable the societies</p><p>of  normal  people  to  take  over  power  and  liberate  the  internal</p><p>talents which could ensure a nation�s return to normal life.</p><p>Such  an  act  of  forgiveness  is  in  fact  justified  by  nature,</p><p>since it is derived from a recognition of the psychological cau-</p><p>sation  governing  a  person  while  committing  evil,  both  within</p><p>the scope of our cognition and outside the area  we have been</p><p>able to understand. This scope accessible to scientific cognition</p><p>increases  along  with  progress  in  general  knowledge;  in  a</p><p>pathocracy,  however,  the  image  of  the  phenomenon  is  so</p><p>dominated by causality that there is not much room left for free</p><p>choice.</p><p>We  shall  in  fact  never  be  in  the  position  to  evaluate  the</p><p>scope of free choice with which an individual person has been</p><p>endowed. In forgiving, we subordinate our minds to the laws of</p><p>nature, to a basic extent.  <emphasis>When we withhold judgment regard-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>ing the scope of the remainder unknown to us, we subject our </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>mind  to  the  discipline  of  refraining  from  entering  a  domain </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>barely accessible to our mind. </emphasis></p><p>Forgiveness thus leads our reason into a state of intellectual</p><p>discipline  and  order,  thereby  permitting  us  to  discern  life�s</p><p>realia  and  their  causative  links  more  clearly.  This  makes  it</p><p>easier  for  us  to  control  our  instinct�s  vindictive  reflexes  and</p><p>protect  our  minds  from  the  tendency  to  impose  moralizing</p><p>interpretations upon psychopathological phenomena. This is of</p><p>course to the advantage of both individuals and of societies.</p><p>Simultaneously,  and  in  accordance  with  the  precepts  of</p><p>great  religions,  forgiveness  helps  us  enjoy  supernatural  order</p><p>and thereby gain the right to self forgiveness. It makes us better</p><p>able to perceive the voice within saying �do this� or �don�t do</p><p>294</p><p>THERAPY OF THE WORLD</p><p>that�. This improves our capacity for proper decision making in</p><p>thorny situations when we are lacking some necessary data. In</p><p>this extremely difficult battle, we may not renounce this assis-</p><p>tance and privilege; they may be decisive in tipping the scales</p><p>toward victory.</p><p>Nations which have long had to endure pathocratic rule are</p><p>now  close  to  accepting  such  a  proposition  as  a  result  of  their</p><p>practical knowledge of that other reality and the characteristic</p><p>evolution of their  world view.  However, their  motivations are</p><p>dominated by practical data which are also derived from adap-</p><p>tation  to  life  in  that  divergent  reality.  Religious  motivations</p><p>also  appear;  comprehension  and  affirmation  thereof  mature</p><p>under  such  specific  conditions.  Their  thought  process  and  so-</p><p>cial ethics also evidence a feel for a certain teleological mean-</p><p>ing to phenomena, in the sense of a historical watershed.</p><p>Such  an  act  of  renunciation  of  judicial  and  emotional  re-</p><p>venge  with  regard  to  people  whose  behavior  was  conditioned</p><p>by  psychological  causation,  especially  certain  specific  heredi-</p><p>tary  factors,  is  justified  by  naturalism  to  a  significant  degree.</p><p>Therefore, such naturalistic and rational principles should per-</p><p>mit  the  definitive  decisions  to  mature.  The  intellectual  effort</p><p>involved in cutting the links to a natural comprehending of the</p><p>problems  of  evil  and  a  confrontation  thereof  with  moral  pre-</p><p>cepts shall bear fruit in many products of human thought.</p><p>People who have lost their ability to adapt to sensible work</p><p>for  hire  will  have  to  be  guaranteed  tolerable  living  conditions</p><p>and assistance in their efforts to readapt. The costs incurred by</p><p>society  with  regard  thereto  will  probably  be  less  than  those</p><p>involved with any other solution. All this will require appropri-</p><p>ate organizational efforts based on this manner of understand-</p><p>ing  such  matters,  which  will  be  far  removed  from  traditional</p><p>legal practice. The promises should be made to the pathocrats,</p><p>and then kept  with the honesty  worthy of a society of normal</p><p>people. Such an act and its execution should therefore be pre-</p><p>pared  ahead  of  time  from  the  moral,  legal  and  organizational</p><p>points of view.</p><p>Just  as  the  idea  adduced  herein  finds  a  lively  response</p><p>among  people  familiar  with  the  above-described  macrosocial</p><p>phenomenon  from  experience,  it  insults  the  vengeful  feelings</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>295</p><p>of  numerous  political  �migr�s  who  retain  the  old  experiential</p><p>methods regarding social and moral problems. We should thus</p><p>expect  more  opposition  from  this  quarter,  justified  by  moral</p><p>indignation. Persuasive efforts should therefore be made in that</p><p>direction.</p><p>It  would  also  be  advantageous  if  the  solution  to this prob-</p><p>lem  could  be  prepared  with  a  view  to  the  contemporary  heri-</p><p>tage of the bio-humanistic sciences, a heritage which aims at a</p><p>similar evolution of law even though it continues to hide in the</p><p>academic  world,  too  immature  for  practical  realization.  The</p><p>value of scientific studies in this area tends to be underrated by</p><p>conservative-minded societies. The work may be facilitated by</p><p>means of using such information with a view toward the need</p><p>for rapid preparation or updating of the law.</p><p>Our  civilization�s  legislations  arose  first  from  the  tradition</p><p>of  Roman  law,  then  from  the  rights  of  sovereigns  ruling  by</p><p>�divine right�, a system which predictably defended their posi-</p><p>tion, and though they were commanding the law of grace, they</p><p>proved almost completely soulless and vengeful within today�s</p><p>conception of codified regulations. Such a state of affairs abet-</p><p>ted  rather  than  prevented  the  emergence  of  pathological  sys-</p><p>tems of force.</p><p>This  explains  the  actual  need  to  effect  an  essential  break-</p><p>through  and  formulation  of   <emphasis>new  principles  derived  from  an </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>understanding of man</emphasis>, including enemies and evildoers.</p><p>Having emerged from great suffering and a comprehension</p><p>of its causes, such legislation will be more modern and humani-</p><p>tarian as well as more effective in the area of protecting socie-</p><p>ties from the products of ponerogenesis. The great decision to</p><p>forgive  similarly  derives  from  the  most  credible  precepts  of</p><p>eternal  moral  teachings,  something  also  in  accordance  with</p><p>contemporary evolution in societal thought. It expresses practi-</p><p>cal  concerns  as  well  as  a  naturalistic  comprehension  of  the</p><p>genesis  of  evil.  Only  such  an  act  of  mercy,  unprecedented  in</p><p>history, can break the age-old chain of the ponerogenic cycles</p><p>and open the door both to new solutions for perennial problems</p><p>and to a new legislative method based on an understanding of</p><p>the causes of evil.</p><p>296</p><p>THERAPY OF THE WORLD</p><p>Such a difficult decisions therefore appear in keeping with</p><p>the signs of the times. The author believes that this precise kind</p><p>of  breakthrough  in  the  methodology  of  thought  and  action  is</p><p>within the Divine Plan for this generation.</p><p>Ideologies</p><p>Just as a psychiatrist is mainly interested in disease, paying</p><p>less  attention  to  the  patient�s  delusional  system  deforming</p><p>whatever individual reality he has, the object of global therapy</p><p>should be the world�s diseases. The deformed ideological sys-</p><p>tems which grew from historical conditions and a given civili-</p><p>zation�s weaknesses should be understood insofar as they are a</p><p>disguise,  operational  instrument,  or  Trojan  horse  for</p><p>pathocratic infection.</p><p>Societal  consciousness  should  first  separate  these  two  het-</p><p>erogeneous layers of the phenomenon by means of analysis and</p><p>scientific  evaluation  effected  upon  them.  Such  a  correct  and</p><p>selective  understanding  should  become  part  and  parcel  of  all</p><p>nations�  consciousness  in  some  appropriately  accessible  form.</p><p>This  would  correspondingly  reinforce  their  capacity  for  inde-</p><p>pendent  orientation  within  today�s  complicated  reality  by</p><p>means  of  discriminating  such  phenomena  in  keeping  with  its</p><p>nature.  This  will  bring  about  a  correction  in  moral  and  world</p><p>view attitudes. Concentrating our efforts upon the pathological</p><p>phenomenon shall then produce proper understanding and suf-</p><p>ficiently complete results.</p><p>The  absence of this basic discrimination in political opera-</p><p>tions  is  an  error  leading  to  wasted  effort.  We  may  not  agree</p><p>with  ideologies,  since  all  nineteenth-century  political  ideolo-</p><p>gies  oversimplified  social  reality  to  the  point  of  crippling  it,</p><p>even in their original form, not to mention their pathologically</p><p>deformed  versions.  The  foreground  should  nevertheless  be</p><p>occupied by an identification of their role within the macroso-</p><p>cial  phenomenon;  analysis,  criticism,  and  even,  more  particu-</p><p>larly,  combating  them  can  be  placed  in  the  background.  Any</p><p>discussions regarding directions needed to change social struc-</p><p>tures may be held concurrently as long as they take this basic</p><p>separation  of  phenomena  into  account.  Thus  corrected,  social</p><p>consciousness  can  effect  a  solution  to  these  problems  more</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>297</p><p>easily, and social groups which are intransigent today will be-</p><p>come more amenable to compromise.</p><p>Once  a  mentally  ill  person  has  been  successfully  cured  of</p><p>his  illness,  we  often  try  to  restore  the  former  patient  to  the</p><p>world  of  his  more  real  convictions.  The  psychotherapist  then</p><p>searches  the  delusionally  caricaturized  world  for  the  primeval</p><p>and always more sensible contents, thereupon building a bridge</p><p>right over the period of madness to a now healthy reality. Such</p><p>an operation of course requires the necessary skills in the do-</p><p>main of psychopathology, since every disease has its own style</p><p>of  deforming  the  patient�s  original  world  of  experiences  and</p><p>convictions.  The  deformed  ideological  system  created  by</p><p>pathocracy  should  be  subjected  to  analogous  analysis,  fishing</p><p>out the primeval and certainly more sensible values. This must</p><p>utilize  knowledge  of  the  specific  style  whereby  a  pathocracy</p><p>caricaturizes the ideology of a movement upon  which it feeds</p><p>parasitically.</p><p>This great disease of Pathocracy accommodates various so-</p><p>cial ideologies to its own properties and the pathocrats� inten-</p><p>tions, thereby depriving them of  any possibility of natural de-</p><p>velopment  and  maturation  in  the  light  of  man�s  healthy  com-</p><p>mon  sense  and  scientific  reflection.  This  process  also  trans-</p><p>forms these ideologies into destructive factors, preventing them</p><p>from participating in the constructive evolution of social struc-</p><p>tures and condemning their adherents to frustration. Along with</p><p>its degenerate growth, such an ideology is rejected by all those</p><p>social groups governed by healthy common sense.  The activi-</p><p>ties of such an ideology thus induce nations to stick to their old</p><p>tried-and-true  basics  in  terms  of  structural  forms,  providing</p><p>hard-line  conservatives  with  the  best  weapon  possible.  This</p><p>causes stagnation of the evolutionary processes, which is con-</p><p>trary  to  the  overall laws  of  social  life,  and  brings  about  a  po-</p><p>larization of attitudes among various social groups, resulting in</p><p>revolutionary  moods.  The  operations  of  the  pathologically  al-</p><p>tered  ideology  thus  facilitate  the  pathocracy�s  penetration  and</p><p>expansion.</p><p>Only by means of retrospective psychological analysis upon</p><p>the ideology, reverting to the time which preceded ponerogenic</p><p>infection, and taking into account the pathological quality and</p><p>298</p><p>THERAPY OF THE WORLD</p><p>the causes for its deformation, can the original creative values</p><p>be  discovered  and  bridges  built  right  over  the  time  frame  of</p><p>morbid phenomena.</p><p>Such  skillful unhusking  of  the  original  ideology, including</p><p>some  reasonable  elements  which  emerged  after  the  ponero-</p><p>genic infection appeared, may be enriched by values elaborated</p><p>in the meantime and become capable of further creative evolu-</p><p>tion. It will thus be in the position to activate transformations in</p><p>accordance  with  the  evolutionary  nature  of  social  structures,</p><p>which will in turn render these societies more resistant to pene-</p><p>tration by pathocratic influences.</p><p>Such  analysis  presents  us  with  problems  which  must  be</p><p>skillfully overcome, namely finding the proper semantic desig-</p><p>nates.  Thanks  to  characteristic  creativity  in  this  area,  pathoc-</p><p>racy produces  a  mass of suggestive names prepared in such a</p><p>way as to divert attention from a phenomenon�s essential quali-</p><p>ties.  Whoever  has  been  ensnared  in  this  semantic  trap  even</p><p>once  loses  not  only  the  capacity  for  objective  analysis  of  that</p><p>type  of  phenomenon;  he  also  partially  loses  his  ability  to  use</p><p>his common sense. Producing such effects within human minds</p><p>is  the  specific  purpose  of  this  patho-semantics;  one  must  first</p><p>protect  one�s  own  person  against  them  and  then  proceed  to</p><p>protect social consciousness.</p><p>The  only  names  we  can  accept  are  those  with  a  historical</p><p>tradition  contemporary  to  the  facts  and  reaching  back  to  pre-</p><p>infection  times.  For  instance,  if  we  call  pre-Marxist  socialism</p><p>�Utopian  socialism�,  it  will  be  difficult  for  us  to  understand</p><p>that  it  was  much  more  realistic  and  socially  creative  than  the</p><p>later movements already laced with pathological material.</p><p>However, such caution does not suffice  when  we  are  deal-</p><p>ing  with  phenomena  which  cannot  be  measured  within  the</p><p>natural structure of concepts because they were produced by a</p><p>macrosocial  pathological  process.  We  must  thus  again  under-</p><p>score that the light of natural healthy common sense is insuffi-</p><p>cient for effecting such retrospective refinement of ideological</p><p>values later deformed by such a process. Psychological objec-</p><p>tivity, adequate knowledge in the area of psychopathology, and</p><p>the data contained in the prior chapters of this book are indis-</p><p>pensable for this purpose.</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>299</p><p>Thus  equipped,  we  also  become  qualified  to  create  indis-</p><p>pensable new names which would elucidate the actual proper-</p><p>ties  of  phenomena,  providing  we  pay  sufficient  attention  to</p><p>precepts  of  semantics  with  all  the  probity  and  economy,  as</p><p>would demand William of Ockham. After all, these names will</p><p>spread throughout the earth and help many people correct their</p><p>world  view  and  social  attitude.  Such  activity,  albeit  legalistic,</p><p>actually  aims  at  depriving  pathocratic  circles  of  their  name</p><p>controlling  monopoly;  their  predicable  protests  will  merely</p><p>prove that we are on the right track.</p><p>Ideology thus regenerated regains the natural life and evolu-</p><p>tionary capacity which pathologization has stifled. At the same</p><p>time,  however,  it  loses  its  ability  to  fulfill  imposed  functions</p><p>such as feeding a pathocracy and cloaking it from both healthy</p><p>common sense criticism and something even more dangerous,</p><p>namely  a  feel  for  psychological  reality  and  its  humorous  as-</p><p>pects.</p><p>Condemning an ideology because of its errors, whether con-</p><p>tained from the outset or absorbed later, will never deprive it of</p><p>this  imputed  function,  especially  not  in  the  minds  of  people</p><p>who failed to condemn it for similar reasons. If we further at-</p><p>tempt  to  analyze  such  a  condemned  ideology,  we  will  never</p><p>achieve the effect which has a curative influence upon the hu-</p><p>man  personality;  we  will  simply  miss  the truly  important  fac-</p><p>tors  and  be  unable  to  fill  a  certain  space  with  contents.  Our</p><p>thoughts  will  then  be  forced  to  evade  whatever  blocks  their</p><p>freedom,  thereby  erring  among  ostensible  truths.  Once  some-</p><p>thing  succumbs  to  psychopathological  factors,  it  cannot  be</p><p>understood unless the proper categories are utilized.</p><p>Immunization</p><p>Many infectious diseases give an organism a natural immu-</p><p>nity for a period between a few years and many. Medicine imi-</p><p>tates this biological mechanism by introducing vaccines which</p><p>enable  an  organism  to  become  immune  without  passing</p><p>through  the  disease.  More  and  more  frequently,  psychothera-</p><p>pists attempt to immunize a patient�s psyche to various trauma-</p><p>tizing factors which are too difficult to eliminate from his life.</p><p>In practice, we use this most often with people subjected to the</p><p>300</p><p>THERAPY OF THE WORLD</p><p>destructive influence of characteropathic individuals. Immuniz-</p><p>ing  someone  against  the  destructive  effects  of  psychopathic</p><p>personalities is somewhat more difficult; however, it represents</p><p>a  closer  analogy  to  the  task  which  should  be  performed  with</p><p>regard  to  nations  succumbing  to  the  influence  of  pathocratic</p><p>psychological diversion.</p><p>Societies governed by a pathocratic system for many years</p><p>develop the above-described natural immunization, along with</p><p>the  characteristic  detachment  from  the  phenomenon  and  sar-</p><p>donic  humor.  In  combination  with  the  growth  of  practical</p><p>knowledge, this state should be taken into account every time</p><p>we  wish  to  evaluate  a  given  country�s  political  situation.  We</p><p>should also underscore that this immunity refers to the patho-</p><p>logical  phenomenon  per  se,  not  its  ideology,  which  explains</p><p>why it is also effective against any other pathocracy, no matter</p><p>the  ideological  mask.  The  psychological  experience  gained</p><p>permits the same phenomenon to be recognized according to its</p><p>actual properties; the ideology is treated in accordance with its</p><p>true role.</p><p>Psychotherapy  properly  run  upon  an  individual  who  suc-</p><p>cumbed to the destructive influence of the life conditions under</p><p>pathocratic rule, always brings about a significant improvement</p><p>in psychological immunization. In making a patient conscious</p><p>of the pathological qualities of such influences, we facilitate his</p><p>development  of  that  critical  detachment  and  spiritual  serenity</p><p>which natural immunization could not have produced. We thus</p><p>do not merely imitate nature; we actually achieve a better-than-</p><p>natural quality of immunity, which is more effective in protect-</p><p>ing a patient from neurotic tensions and reinforcing his practi-</p><p>cal  everyday  resourcefulness.  An  awareness  of  the  biological</p><p>essence  of  the  phenomenon  provides  them  with  a  preponder-</p><p>ance  both  over  the  phenomenon  and  those  people  who  lack</p><p>such awareness.</p><p>This type of psychological immunity also proves more per-</p><p>manent.  If  natural  immunity  lasts  the  life  of  the  generation</p><p>wherein it was produced, scientifically-based immunity can be</p><p>transmitted further. Similarly, natural immunity plus the practi-</p><p>cal knowledge upon which it is based may be very difficult to</p><p>transmit to nations which have not had such immediate experi-</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>301</p><p>ence, but the kind which is based on generally accessible scien-</p><p>tific data can be transmitted to other nations without superhu-</p><p>man efforts.</p><p>We  are  faced  with  two  related  goals.  In  countries  affected</p><p>by  the  above-discussed  phenomenon,  we  should  attempt  to</p><p>transform the existing natural immunity into that better-quality</p><p>immunity,  thus  making  it  possible  to  increase  operative  ease</p><p>while  lowering  psychological  tensions.  With  regard  to  those</p><p>individuals and societies which indicate an obvious immunode-</p><p>ficiency  and  are  threatened  by  pathocratic  expansion,  we</p><p>should facilitate the development of artificial immunity.</p><p><emphasis>This  immunity  is  generated  mainly  as  a  natural  result  of </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>understanding  the  real  contents  of  the  macrosocial  phenome-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>non. </emphasis></p><p>This awareness causes a stormy experiential period not be-</p><p>reft of protest, but this substitute disease process is short-lived.</p><p>Stripping  the  naturalistic  reality  heretofore  protected  by  an</p><p>ideological  mask  is  an  effective  and  necessary  assistance  for</p><p>individuals  and  societies.  Within  a  short  period  of  time,  this</p><p>begins to protect them from the ponerogenic activities of patho-</p><p>logical  factors  mobilized  within  the  pathocracy�s  monolithic</p><p>front.  Appropriate  indications  of  the  practical  means  for  pro-</p><p>tecting one�s own mental hygiene will facilitate and accelerate</p><p>the  creation  of  such  valuable  psychological  immunity  in  a</p><p>manner similar to the results of a vaccine activity.</p><p>Such  individual  and  collective  psychological  immunity,</p><p>based  on  a  naturalistically  objectified  understanding  of  this</p><p>other  reality,  is  colored  by  a  feeling  of  proper  knowledge,</p><p>which thus creates a new human network; achieving such im-</p><p>munity appears a necessary precondition for success regarding</p><p>any efforts and actions of a political nature which would aim at</p><p>having governments taken over by a society of normal people.</p><p>Without  such  consciousness  and  immunization,  it  will  always</p><p>be difficult to achieve cooperation between free countries and</p><p>nations suffering under pathocratic rule.  No language  of com-</p><p>mon  communication  can  be  guaranteed  by  any  political  doc-</p><p>trines based on the natural imagination of people lacking both</p><p>the practical experience and a naturalistic understanding of the</p><p>phenomenon.</p><p>302</p><p>THERAPY OF THE WORLD</p><p>~~~</p><p>The  most  modern  and  expensive  weapons  threatening  hu-</p><p>manity with global catastrophe are presently obsolete the very</p><p>day they are produced.</p><p>Why?</p><p>They are the weapons of a war which must never take place,</p><p>and the nations of the world pray that it never does.</p><p>The  history  of  mankind  has  been  a  history  of  wars,  which</p><p>makes  it  lack  eternal  meaning  in  our  eyes.  A  new  great  war</p><p>would represent the triumph of madness over the nations� will</p><p>to live.</p><p>International  reason  must  therefore  prevail,  reinforced  by</p><p>the  newly  discovered  moral  values  and  naturalistic  science</p><p>concerning the causes and genesis of evil.</p><p>The �new weapon� suggested herein kills no one; it is nev-</p><p>ertheless  capable  of  stifling  the  process  of  the  genesis  of  evil</p><p>within a person and activating his own curative powers. If so-</p><p>cieties  are  furnished  an  understanding  of  the  pathological  na-</p><p>ture of evil, they  will be able to effect concerted action based</p><p>on moral and naturalistic criteria.</p><p>This  new  method  of  solving  eternal  problems  will  be  the</p><p>most humanitarian weapon ever used in human history, as well</p><p>as the only one  which can be used safely  and effectively.  We</p><p>may also hope that using such a weapon will help end centuries</p><p>of warfare among nations.</p><p><strong>CHAPTER X </strong></p><p><strong>A VISION OF THE FUTURE </strong></p><p>If it is to bear ripe fruit, every human activity must take root</p><p>in  the  soil  of  two  time  frames:  past  and  future.  The  past  pro-</p><p>vides  us  knowledge  and  experience  which  teach  us  to  solve</p><p>problems  and  warn  us  when  we  are  about  to  commit  errors</p><p>reminiscent  of  past  mistakes.  A  realistic  apperception  of  the</p><p>past  and  a  sometimes  painful  understanding  of  its  errors  and</p><p>evils thus become necessary preconditions for building a hap-</p><p>pier future.</p><p>A similarly realistic vision of the future, complemented by</p><p>well  thought  out  detailed  data,  endows  our  contemporary  ac-</p><p>tivities with a direction and renders their goals more concrete.</p><p>Mental  effort  aimed  at  forming  such  a  vision  enables  us  to</p><p>overcome  psychological  barriers  to  free  reason  and  imagina-</p><p>tion, barriers caused by egotism and survival of habits from the</p><p>past.  People  fixated  upon  the  past  gradually  lose  contact  with</p><p>the present and are thus incapable of doing much good for the</p><p>future.  Let  us  therefore  direct  our  minds  toward  the  future,</p><p>beyond the ostensibly insuperable realities of present age.</p><p>There are many advantages to be gained from constructively</p><p>planning  the  future,  including  the  more  distant  time  perspec-</p><p>tive, if we can foresee its shape and facilitate pinpointed solu-</p><p>tions. This requires that we properly analyze reality and make</p><p>correct  predictions,  i.e.  discipline  of  thought  so  as  to  exclude</p><p>any  subconscious  data  manipulation  and  any  excessive  influ-</p><p>ence  from  our  emotions  and  preferences.  Elaborating  such  an</p><p>304</p><p>A VISION OF THE FUTURE</p><p>original  vision  so  as  to  make  it  a  reified  blueprint  for  a  new</p><p>reality is the best way to educate human minds for other simi-</p><p>larly difficult tasks in the concrete future.</p><p>This  would  also  permit  timely  elimination  of  many  differ-</p><p>ences  of  opinion  which  could  later  lead  to  violent  conflicts;</p><p>these  sometimes  result  from  an  insufficiently  realistic  apper-</p><p>ception of the present state of affairs, various pipe-dream atti-</p><p>tudes, or propaganda activities. If it is logically developed and</p><p>avoids collisions with an adequately objective understanding of</p><p>phenomena  which have already been discussed in part, such a</p><p>constructive vision can come true in future reality.</p><p>Such  planning  should  be  reminiscent  of  a  well-organized</p><p>technical  project,  wherein  the  designers�  work  is  preceded  by</p><p>an  examination  of  conditions  and  possibilities.  Executing  the</p><p>work also requires time-frame planning in accordance with the</p><p>appropriate  technical  data  and  the  human  safety  factor.  We</p><p>know  from  experience  that  increasing  the  scope  and  accuracy</p><p>of design activities makes their execution and utility more prof-</p><p>itable. Similarly, the more modern and inventive constructions</p><p>generally prove more effective than tradition-bound ones.</p><p>The design and construction of a new social system should</p><p>also  be  based  upon  proper  distinctions  of  reality  and  should</p><p>receive  appropriate  elaboration  in  many  details  in  order  to</p><p>prove effective in execution and action. This will require aban-</p><p>doning some traditional customs of political life which allowed</p><p>human emotions and egoism to play too great a role. Creative</p><p>reasoning has become the sole and necessary solution, since it</p><p>determines  real  data  and  finds  novel  solutions  without  losing</p><p>the ability to act under real-life conditions.</p><p>The  absence  of  such  prior  constructive  effort  would  lead</p><p>both to knowledge gaps about the reality to be operated in and</p><p>to a shortage of people with the crucial preparation needed for</p><p>creating new systems. Particularly for a nation now affected by</p><p>pathocracy, when regaining the right to decide one�s own fate,</p><p>would  be  improvisation  which  is  expensive  and  dangerous.</p><p>Violent  disputes  among  the  adherents  of  various  structural</p><p>concepts which may often be unrealistic, immature, or outdated</p><p>because they have lost their historical significance in the mean-</p><p>time, may even cause a civil war.</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>305</p><p>Wherever old social systems created by historical processes</p><p>have been almost totally destroyed by the introduction of state</p><p>capitalism  and  the  development  of  pathocracy,  that  nation�s</p><p>social  and  psychological  structure  has  been  obliterated.  The</p><p>replacement  is  a  pathological  structure  reaching  into  every</p><p>corner of a country, causing all areas of life to degenerate and</p><p>become unproductive. Under such conditions, it proves unfea-</p><p>sible to reconstruct a social system based on outdated traditions</p><p>and the unrealistic expectations that such a structure does exist.</p><p>What is needed is a design of action which will first permit the</p><p>fastest possible reconstruction of this basic socio-psychological</p><p>structure  and  then  allow  it  to  participate  in  social  life�s</p><p>autonomization process.</p><p>The past has furnished us virtually no pattern for this indis-</p><p>pensable activity, which can thus be based only upon the more</p><p>general  kind  of  data  described  at  the  beginning  of  this  work.</p><p>We are therefore immediately faced with the need to rely upon</p><p>modern  science.  At  least  one  generation�s  worth  of  time  has</p><p>also  been  lost,  and  with  it  the  evolution  which  should  have</p><p>creatively transformed the old structural forms. We should thus</p><p>be  guided  by  imaginings  of  what   <emphasis>should</emphasis>  have  happened  if  a</p><p>given society had had the right to free development during this</p><p>time,  rather  than  by  data  from  the  past,  presently  outdated,</p><p>albeit historically real.</p><p>In  the  meantime,  many  divergent  ways  of  thinking  have</p><p>taken  root  in  those  countries.  Private  capitalism�s  world  of</p><p>social  institutions  has  become  distant  and  hard  to  understand.</p><p>There is no longer anybody left who could be a capitalist or act</p><p>independently within such a system. Democracy has become an</p><p>imperfectly  comprehended  slogan  for  communicating  within</p><p>the society of normal people. The workers cannot imagine the</p><p>reprivatization of great industrial plants and oppose any efforts</p><p>in that direction. They believe that rendering the country inde-</p><p>pendent  would  bring  them  participation  in  both  management</p><p>and profits. Those societies have accepted some social institu-</p><p>tions,  such  as  a  public  health  service  and  free  education</p><p>through university level. They want the operation of such insti-</p><p>tutions  reformed  by  subordinating  them  to  healthy  common</p><p>sense  and  appropriate  scientific  criteria  as  well  as  tried  �and</p><p>306</p><p>A VISION OF THE FUTURE</p><p>true elements of valid traditions. What should be restored is the</p><p>general laws of nature which should govern societies; the struc-</p><p>tural forms should be reconstructed in a more modern manner,</p><p>which will facilitate their acceptance.</p><p>Some  transformations  already  made  are  historically  irre-</p><p>versible. Regaining the right to shape one�s own future would</p><p>thus create a dangerous and even tragic �system void�. A pre-</p><p>monition of such a  critical situation already  worries people in</p><p>those countries, stifling their will to act; this situation should be</p><p>prevented immediately.  The only way is well-organized effort</p><p>in analytical and constructive thought directed toward a socie-</p><p>tal system with highly modern economic and political founda-</p><p>tions.</p><p>Nations suffering under pathocratic governments would also</p><p>participate in such a constructive effort, which would represent</p><p>excellent input to the above-mentioned general task of treating</p><p>our sick world. Undeterred in our hope that the time will soon</p><p>come when such nations will revert to normal human systems,</p><p>we should build a social system with a view to what will hap-</p><p>pen after pathocracy.</p><p>This  social  system  will  be  different  from  and  better  than</p><p>anything  which  existed  earlier.  A  realistic  vision  of  a  better</p><p>future and participation in creating it will heal battered human</p><p>souls and bring order into thought processes. This constructive</p><p>work  trains  people  to  govern  themselves  under  such  different</p><p>conditions and knocks the weapon out of the hands of anyone</p><p>who  serves  evil,  increasing  the  latter�s  feeling  of  frustration</p><p>and an awareness that his pathological work is nearing an end.</p><p>A careful reading of this book may cause us to discern the</p><p>outlines of a creative vision of such a future societal system so</p><p>sorely needed by nations suffering under pathocratic rule; if so,</p><p>this  represents  a  reward  for  the  author�s  effort  rather  than  re-</p><p>sults  of  pure  chance.  Just  such  a  vision  accompanied  me</p><p>throughout  the  period  of  my  work  on  this  book  (although  the</p><p>latter  nowhere  indicates  a  name  nor  any  more  precise  details</p><p>for it), rendering assistance and proving a useful support in the</p><p>future.  In  some  way,  it  is  thus  present  on  the  pages  and  be-</p><p>tween the lines of this work.</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>307</p><p>Such a social system of the future would have to guarantee</p><p>its  citizens  wide  scope  personal  freedom  and  an  open  door  to</p><p>utilizing their creative possibilities in both individual and col-</p><p>lective efforts. At the same time, however, it must not indicate</p><p>the  well  known  weaknesses  manifested  by  a  democracy  in  its</p><p>domestic and foreign policy. Not only should individuals� per-</p><p>sonal interest and the common good be appropriately balanced</p><p>in  such  a  system;  they  should be  woven  right  into  the  overall</p><p>picture of social life at the level where an understanding of its</p><p>laws  causes  any  discrepancy  between  them  to  disappear.  The</p><p>opinion of the wide mass of the citizenry, dictated primarily by</p><p>the voices of basic intelligence and dependent upon the natural</p><p>world  view,  should  be  balanced  by  the  skills  of  people  who</p><p>utilize an objective cognition of reality and possess the appro-</p><p>priate  training  in  their  special  areas.  Appropriate  and  well</p><p>thought out system solutions should be used for this purpose.</p><p>The  foundations  for  practical  solutions  within  such  an  im-</p><p>proved system would contain criteria such as creating the right</p><p>conditions  for  enriched  development  of  human  personalities</p><p>including  the  psychological  world  view,  whose  societal  role</p><p>has already been adduced.  Individual socio-professional adap-</p><p>tation, the creation of an interpersonal network, and  a healthy</p><p>active socio-psychological structure should be facilitated to the</p><p>maximum possible extent.</p><p>Structural, legal, and economic solutions should be consid-</p><p>ered in such a way that fulfilling these criteria would also open</p><p>the door for an individual�s optimal self-realization within so-</p><p>cial  life,  which  would  simultaneously  be  for  the  good  of  the</p><p>community.  Other  traditional  criteria  such  as  the  dynamics  of</p><p>economic development will thereupon prove secondary to these</p><p>more  general  values.  The  result  of  this  would  be  the  nation�s</p><p>economic development, political skill, and creative role in the</p><p>international sphere.</p><p>The  priorities  in  terms  of  value  criteria  would  thus  shift</p><p>consistently in the direction of psychological, social, and moral</p><p>data. This is in keeping with the spirit of the times, but actual</p><p>execution thereof demands imaginative effort and constructive</p><p>thought  in  order  to  achieve  the  above-mentioned  practical</p><p>308</p><p>A VISION OF THE FUTURE</p><p>goals. After all,  everything begins and ends within the human</p><p>psyche.</p><p>Such a system would have to be evolutionary by nature, as</p><p>it would be based upon an acceptance of evolution as a law of</p><p>nature.  Natural  evolutionary  factors  would  play  an  important</p><p>role therein, such  as the  course of cognition continually proc-</p><p>essing from more primitive and easily accessible data to more</p><p>actual, intrinsic, and subtle matters. The principle of evolution</p><p>would have to be imprinted firmly enough upon the basic phi-</p><p>losophical foundations of such a system so as to protect it con-</p><p>sistently from future revolution.</p><p>Such a social system  would by nature be more resistant to</p><p>the  danger  of  having  macrosocial  pathological  phenomena</p><p>develop  within.  Its  foundations  would  be  an  improved  devel-</p><p>opment  of  the  psychological  world  view  and  society�s  links</p><p>structure coupled with a scientific and social consciousness of</p><p>the essence of such phenomena.  This should furnish the foun-</p><p>dation for mature methods of education. Such a system should</p><p>also have built-in permanent institutions which were heretofore</p><p>unknown  and  whose  task  will  be  preventing  the  development</p><p>of  ponerogenic  processes  within  society,  particularly  among</p><p>governing authorities.</p><p>A  �Council  of  Wise  Men�  would  be  an  institution  com-</p><p>posed of several people with extremely high general, medical,</p><p>and  psychological  qualifications;  it  would  have  the  right  to</p><p>examine  the  physical  and  psychological  health  of  candidates</p><p>before  the  latter  are  elected  to  the  highest  government  posi-</p><p>tions. A negative council opinion should be hard to challenge.</p><p>That same council would serve the head of state, the legislative</p><p>authorities,  and  the  executives  regarding  counsel  in  matters</p><p>entering  its  scope  of  scientific  competence.  It  would  also  ad-</p><p>dress the public in important matters of biological and psycho-</p><p>logical life, indicating essential moral aspects. Such a council�s</p><p>duties would also include maintaining contact and discussions</p><p>with the religious authorities in such matters.</p><p>The security system for persons with various psychological</p><p>deviations would be in charge of making their life easier while</p><p>skillfully  limiting  their  participation  in  the  processes  of  the</p><p>genesis  of  evil.  After  all,  such  persons  are  not  impervious  to</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>309</p><p>persuasion provided it is based upon proper knowledge of the</p><p>matter. Such an approach would also help progressively dimin-</p><p>ish societies� gene pool burdens of hereditary aberrations. The</p><p>Council of  Wise Men  would furnish the scientific supervision</p><p>for such activities.</p><p>The legal system would be subjected to wide ranging trans-</p><p>formations  in  virtually  every  area,  progressing  from  formulae</p><p>whose  establishment  was  based  on  a  society�s  natural  world</p><p>view  and  ancient  tradition  to  legal  solutions  based  upon  an</p><p>objective apperception of reality, particularly the psychological</p><p>one. As a result, law studies would have to undergo true mod-</p><p>ernization,  since  the  law  would  become  a  scientific  discipline</p><p>sharing  the  same  epistemological  principles  as  all  the  other</p><p>sciences.</p><p>What  is  now  called  �penal�  law  would  be  superseded  by</p><p>another kind of law with a completely modernized foundation</p><p>based  on  an  understanding  of  the  genesis  of  evil  and  of  the</p><p>personalities  of  people  who  commit  evil.  Such  law  would  be</p><p>significantly  more  humanitarian  while  furnishing  individuals</p><p>and societies more effective protection from undeserved abuse.</p><p>Of  course,  the  operational  measures  would  be  much  more</p><p>complex  and  more  dependent  upon  a  better  understanding  of</p><p>causation  than  could  ever  possibly  be  the  case  in  a  punitive</p><p>system. A trend toward transformations in this direction is evi-</p><p>dent  in  the  legislation  of  civilized  nations.  The  social  system</p><p>proposed herein would have to break through traditions in this</p><p>area in a more effective way.</p><p>No government whose system is based on an understanding</p><p>of the laws of nature, whether concerning physical and biologi-</p><p>cal phenomena or the nature of man, can lay a claim to sover-</p><p>eignty  in  the  meaning  we  have  inherited  from  the  nineteenth</p><p>century and subsequent nationalistic or totalitarian systems. We</p><p>share  the  same  air  and  water  throughout  our  planet. Common</p><p>cultural  values  and  basic  moral  criteria  are  becoming  wide</p><p>spread. The world is interlinked in transportation, communica-</p><p>tion, and trade and has become Our Planet. Under such condi-</p><p>tions, interdependence and cooperation  with other nations and</p><p>supranational  institutions,  as  well  as  moral  responsibility  for</p><p>overall  fate,  become  a  law  of  nature.  The  national  organism</p><p>310</p><p>A VISION OF THE FUTURE</p><p>becomes autonomous but not independent. This must be regu-</p><p>lated by means of the appropriate treaties and incorporated into</p><p>national constitutions.</p><p>A system thus envisaged would be superior to all its prede-</p><p>cessors, being based upon an understanding of the laws of na-</p><p>ture  operating  within  individuals  and  societies,  with  objective</p><p>knowledge  progressively  superceding  opinions  based  upon</p><p>natural  responses  to  phenomena.  We  should  call  it  a</p><p>�LOGOCRACY�.</p><p>Due to their properties and conformity to the laws of nature</p><p>and  evolution,  logocratic  systems  could  guarantee  social  and</p><p>international order on a long-term basis. In keeping  with their</p><p>nature, they would then become transformed into more perfect</p><p>forms, a vague and faraway vision of which may beckon to us</p><p>in the present.</p><p>The author has survived many dangerous situations and be-</p><p>come  disappointed  with  many  people  and  institutions.  How-</p><p>ever,  the  Great  Providence  has  never  disappointed  him  under</p><p>the  most  difficult  circumstances.  This  condition  suffices  to</p><p>permit him to promise that elaborating a more detailed draft for</p><p>such a necessary better system will also be possible.</p><p>BIBLIOGRAPHY</p><p>Adler, Alfred:  <emphasis>�ber den nerv�sen Charakter</emphasis> ( <emphasis>The Neurotic </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>Character</emphasis>) 1912</p><p>Allilueva, Svetlana :  <emphasis>Twenty Letters To A Friend</emphasis>, Harper &amp; Row,</p><p>London 1967</p><p>Assagiolli, Roberto:  <emphasis>Dynamic Psychology and Psychosynthesis</emphasis>, New</p><p>York Research Foundation 1959</p><p>Becker, Ernest:  <emphasis>The Structure of Evil</emphasis>, The Free Press, New York1968</p><p>Bilikiewicz, Adam (ed.):  <emphasis>Psychiatria</emphasis>, PZWL, Warszawa 1998</p><p>Buhler, Charlotte Malachowski:  <emphasis>The Course of Human Life: A Study </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>of Goals in the Humanistic Perspective</emphasis>, Springer Pub Co (June 1,</p><p>1968)</p><p>Campbell, Philip: �The nature of belief systems in mass publics.� in</p><p>David Apter, ed.,  <emphasis> Ideology and Discontent</emphasis>, Free Press, New York,</p><p>1964</p><p>Chirot, Daniel:  <emphasis>Modern Tyrants</emphasis>, Princeton University Press, Prince-</p><p>ton, New Jersey 1994</p><p>Cleckley, Hervey:  <emphasis>The Mask of Sanity</emphasis>, (4th Edition) Mosby, St. Louis</p><p>1983</p><p>Dabrowski, Kazimierz:  <emphasis>Psychoneurosis is Not an Illness</emphasis>, Gryf Publi-</p><p>cations Ltd;, London 1972</p><p>DeMause, Lloyd:  <emphasis>Foundations of Psychohistory</emphasis>, Creative Roots,</p><p>New York,  1982</p><p>Doren, Denis M.:  <emphasis>Understanding and Treating the Psychopath</emphasis>, J.</p><p>Wiley &amp; Sons, New York 1987</p><p>Drewa, Gerard (ed.):  <emphasis>Podstawy genetyki</emphasis>, Volumed, Wroclaw 1995</p><p>Edwards, Paul, Editor-in-Chief:  <emphasis>Encyclopedia of Philosophy</emphasis>, Mac-</p><p>Millan Publishing Co., Inc &amp; Free Press, New York 1972</p><p>Ehrlich, S. K. and R.P. Keogh: �The psychopath in a mental institu-</p><p>tion� � Archiv neurol.  <emphasis>Psychiatr</emphasis>. vol 76 pp. 286 � 95. 1956</p><p>Ferrari, Giuseppe:  <emphasis>Teoria dei Periodi Politici</emphasis>. 1872</p><p>Freud, Sigmund:  <emphasis>Basic Writings</emphasis>, Modern Library, New York 1955</p><p>312</p><p>BIBLIOGRAPHY</p><p>Freud, Sigmund:  <emphasis>Studies in Hysteria</emphasis>, Basic Books, New York 1957</p><p>Goertzel, Ted: �Generational Conflict and Social Change�,  <emphasis>Youth and </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>Society</emphasis>. 1972</p><p>Goleman, Daniel:  <emphasis>Inteligencja emocjonolna</emphasis>, Media Rodzina of</p><p>Posna$ 1997</p><p>Gordon, Thomas and Max Morgan-Witts:  <emphasis>Pontif</emphasis>, New American</p><p>Library, New York 1964</p><p>Granovetter, Mark: �Threshold Models of Collective Behavior�,</p><p><emphasis>American Journal of Sociology</emphasis> 83: 1420-1443. 1978</p><p>Gray, K.C. and H.C. Hutchinson: �The psychopathic personality � a</p><p>survey of Canadian psychiatrists� opinions�.  <emphasis>Canadian Psychiat-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>ric Association</emphasis>. J. vol. 9, pp. 452-61. 1964</p><p>Greenfield, Susan (ed.):  <emphasis>The Human Mind Explained: An Owner's </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>Guide to the Mysteries of the Mind</emphasis>, Holt, New York 1996</p><p>Hartau, Frederyk:  <emphasis>Wilhelm II</emphasis>, Median s.c., Lublin 1992</p><p>Herling-Grudzinski, Gustav:  <emphasis>A World Apart</emphasis>, Penguin, New York</p><p>1996</p><p>Hoess, Rudolf:  <emphasis>Commandant of Auschwitz: The Autobiography of </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>Rudolph Hoess</emphasis>, World Pub. Co, 1960.</p><p>Horney, Karen:  <emphasis>Neurosis and Human Growth</emphasis>, W. W. Norton &amp;</p><p>Company, New York 1950</p><p>Horney, Karen:  <emphasis>The Neurotic Personality of Our Time</emphasis>, W. W. Norton</p><p>&amp; Company, New York 1959</p><p>Irving, David:  <emphasis>Secret Diaries of Hitler's Doctor</emphasis>, Grafton Books,</p><p>London 1991</p><p>Jenkins, Richard:  <emphasis>Social Identity</emphasis>, Routledge, 1996</p><p>Jenkins, Richard: �The psychopathic or antisocial personality, J. nerv.</p><p>Ment�.  <emphasis>Disease</emphasis>, vol 131, pp318-32. 1960</p><p>Keller, Morton: �Reflections on Politics and Generations in Amer-</p><p>ica.� Pp. 123-135 in Stephen Graubard, ed.,  <emphasis>Generations</emphasis>, Norton,</p><p>New York, 1979</p><p>K%pi$ski, Antoni:  <emphasis>Psychopatie</emphasis>, PZWL, Warszawa 1977</p><p>Koestler, Arthur:  <emphasis>Darkness at Noon</emphasis>, Bantam Books, 1966.</p><p>Klinberg, Frank: �The historical alternation of moods in American</p><p>foreign policy�.  <emphasis>World Politics</emphasis> 4: 239-273. 1952</p><p>Konorski, Jerzy:  <emphasis>Integracyjna dzia#alno"$ m�sgu</emphasis>, PWN, Warszawa</p><p>1969</p><p>Kraupl Taylor, Frederick:  <emphasis>Psychopathy: Its Causes and Symptoms</emphasis>,</p><p>The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1979</p><p>Kretshmer, E.:  <emphasis>Physique and Character</emphasis>, Routledge, reprinted 1999</p><p>Klinberg, Frank: �The historical alternation of moods in American</p><p>foreign policy�.  <emphasis>World Politics</emphasis> 4: 239-273. 1952</p><p>!obaczewski, Andrew M.:  <emphasis>Political Ponerology</emphasis>, New York 1984</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>313</p><p>!obaczewski, Andzrej:  <emphasis>Ponerologia polityczna � Nauka o naturze z#a </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>w zastosowaniu do zagadnie% politycznych</emphasis>, Rzesz�w 1997</p><p>!obaczewski, Andzrej:  <emphasis>Chirurgia s#owa</emphasis>, Mitel, Rzesz�w 1997</p><p>!uria, Aleksander R.:  <emphasis>Zaburzenia wy&amp;szych czynno"ci korowych na </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>skutek ogniskowych uszkodze%</emphasis><emphasis>m�sgu</emphasis>, PWN, Warszawa 1967</p><p>Maher, Brendan, selected by:  <emphasis>Contemporary Abnormal Psychology</emphasis>,</p><p>Penguin Books Ltd. Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England 1974</p><p>Mannheim, Karl:  <emphasis>Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge</emphasis>, Routledge</p><p>and Kegan Paul, London. 1952</p><p>Marias, Julian:  <emphasis>Generations: A Historical Method</emphasis>. University of</p><p>Alabama Press, translation, 1970</p><p>McCord, W. and J.:  <emphasis>Psychopathy and Delinquency</emphasis>, Grune &amp; Stratton,</p><p>1956</p><p>Merz, Ferdinand und I. Stelz:  <emphasis>Einf�hrung in die Erbpsychologie</emphasis>,</p><p>Verlag W. Kohlhammer, Stuttgard und Berlin 1977</p><p>Miller, Alice:  <emphasis>Am Anfang war Erziehung</emphasis>, Surkamp Verlag, Frankfurt</p><p>am Main 1951</p><p>Neumayr, Anton:  <emphasis>Dictators in the Mirror of Medicine: Napoleon, </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>Hitler, Stalin</emphasis>, Trans. by David J. Parent. Bloomington, Ill.: Medi-</p><p>Ed Press 1995</p><p>Poradowski, Ks. Michal:  <emphasis>Dziedzictwo rewolucji francukiej</emphasis>, Civitas,</p><p>Warszawa 1992</p><p><emphasis>Psychotherapy</emphasis> � Journal of the Division of Psychotherapy of the</p><p>American Psychological Association</p><p>Russell, E.S.: <emphasis> Form and Function: A Contribution to the History of </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>Animal Morphology</emphasis>, Univ of Chicago Press, 1982 <emphasis/></p><p>Schlesinger, Arthur M., Sr:  <emphasis>Paths to the Present</emphasis>, MacMillan, New</p><p>York, 1949</p><p>Simonton, Dean Keith.: �Does Sorokin's data support his theory?: A</p><p>study of generational fluctuations in philosophical beliefs.�  <emphasis>Jour-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>nal for the Scientific Study of Religion</emphasis> 15: 187-198. 1976</p><p>Sommerhoff, G.,  <emphasis>Analytical biology</emphasis>, Oxford University Press, 1950</p><p>Sorokin, Pitirim:  <emphasis>Social and Cultural Dynamics, Volume Four: Basic </emphasis></p><p><emphasis>Problems, Principles and Methods</emphasis>, American Book Company,</p><p>New York. 1941</p><p>Sorokin, Pitirim:  <emphasis>Social and Cultural Dynamics, One Volume Revi-</emphasis></p><p><emphasis>sion</emphasis>. Boston: Porter Sargent. 1957</p><p>Stycze$, Tadeusz SDS:  <emphasis>Wprowadzenie do etyki</emphasis>, Towarzystwo Nauk-</p><p>owe KUL, Lublin 1995</p><p>Stout, Martha:  <emphasis>The Sociopath Next Door</emphasis>, Broadway, 2005</p><p>Taylor, Frederick K.:  <emphasis>Psychopathology in Causes and Symptoms</emphasis>, The</p><p>Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London, 1979</p><p>314</p><p>BIBLIOGRAPHY</p><p>Ziskind E, Somerfield-Ziskind E. Peter Jacob FROSTIG, 1896-1959.</p><p><emphasis>Am J Psychiatry</emphasis>. 1960 Nov;117:479-80</p><empty-line/><p><strong>About the Author </strong></p><p>Andrew M. !obaczewski was born in 1921 and grew up on</p><p>a rural estate in the beautiful piedmountain vicinity of Poland.</p><p>Under  the  Nazi  occupation  he  worked  on  the  farm,  was  an</p><p>apiarist, and then a soldier of the Home Army, an underground</p><p>Polish  resistance  organisation.  After  the  Soviet  invasion  of</p><p>Poland,  the  family  estate  was  confiscated  and  the  owners</p><p>driven out from their old house.</p><p>Working hard for living, he studied psychology at Yagiello-</p><p>nian University in Cracow. The conditons under �Communist�</p><p>rule  turned  his  attention  to  the  matters  of  psychopathology,</p><p>especially  to  the  role  of  psychopathic  persons  in  such  a  gov-</p><p>ernmental  system.  He  was  not  the  first  such  researcher  who</p><p>followed  a  similar  path.  The  work  was  begun  by  a  secret  un-</p><p>derstanding  of  scientists  of  the  older  generation,  which  was</p><p>destroyed  shortly  after  by  the  Red  security  authorities.</p><p>!obaczewski then later became the one  who succeeded in ac-</p><p>complishing the work and putting it down on paper.</p><p>Working in a mental hospital, than a general hospital, and in</p><p>open  mental  health  service,  the  author  improved  his  skills  in</p><p>clinical diagnosis and psychotherapy.  Finally,  when suspected</p><p>by the political authorities of knowing too much in the matter</p><p>of the pathological nature of the system, he was forced to emi-</p><p>grate in 1977. In the USA he became engulfed by the activity</p><p>of the long paws of the Red diversion. Instead of his very hard</p><p>times,  the  work  presented  now  was  written  in  New  York  in</p><p>1984. All attempts to publish this book at this time failed.</p><p>With broken health, he returned in 1990 to Poland and went</p><p>under  the  care  of  doctors,  his  old  friends.  His  condition  im-</p><p>proved  gradually,  and  he  became  able  to  work  and  to  publish</p><empty-line/><p>another  of  his  works  in  matters  of  psychotherapy  and  socio-</p><p>psychology. He is still living in his homeland.</p><p>INDEX</p><p>Acquired deviations, 105</p><p>Braithwaite, R.B., 87</p><p>Adler�s Rhombus, 184</p><p>Brzezicki, Eug., 135</p><p>Alexander II, 266</p><p>Bulgaria, 225</p><p>Alliluieva, Svetlana, 117</p><p>Bush, George W., 8, 24, 109,</p><p>America, 91.  <emphasis>See</emphasis> United</p><p>207</p><p>States of America.  <emphasis>See</emphasis></p><p>Caesar, Julius, 105</p><p>United States of America</p><p>Canup, Robert, 20</p><p>Anti-Smoking Campaign, 223</p><p>Capitalism, 239, 305</p><p>Asperger�s Syndrome, 133</p><p>Communist societies as</p><p>Association, 157, 158, 161,</p><p>state capitalist, 239</p><p>164, 168, 169, 170, 172,</p><p>Catholic Church, 8, 27, 58,</p><p>312, 313</p><p>134</p><p>Asthenic psychopathy, 133,</p><p>Censorship, 49, 177, 248</p><p>134, 223</p><p>Characteropathy, 106, 111,</p><p>Auschwitz, 38, 312</p><p>113, 116, 117, 120, 137,</p><p>Bad Times, 88</p><p>148, 154, 155, 188, 189,</p><p>Psychological Value of, 85,</p><p>214</p><p>87</p><p>and religious groups, 272</p><p>Behaviorists, 49</p><p>And social movements, 189</p><p>Beria, L., 116</p><p>Effects on Normal People,</p><p>Biological factors, 55, 186,</p><p>107, 109</p><p>228</p><p>Elimination of from social</p><p>Blocking out, 152</p><p>movements, 192</p><p>Bonaparte, Napoleon, 105</p><p>Relation to schizoids in</p><p>Borman, Martin, 163</p><p>ponerogenesis, 188</p><p>Brain Cortex Damage, 114</p><p>Role in Ponerogenesis, 106</p><p>Brain Tissue Lesions, 89, 100,</p><p>Characteropathy, 110</p><p>105, 106, 111, 113, 118,</p><p>Charcot, Jean-Martin, 90, 176</p><p>132, 227, 291</p><p>Cheney, Dick, 191</p><p>Acquired deviations and,</p><p>Christianity, 45, 46, 47, 167</p><p>105</p><p>and Greek Heritage, 47</p><p>318</p><p>INDEX</p><empty-line/><p>and Roman Influence, 48</p><p>112, 131, 145, 146, 147,</p><p>Appropriates Roman forms,</p><p>148, 155, 177, 181, 185,</p><p>47</p><p>189, 196, 231, 233, 234,</p><p>Appropriates Roman forms,</p><p>242, 251, 269, 270, 272,</p><p>48</p><p>303</p><p>Church, 276</p><p>Ehrlich, S.K., 122, 311</p><p>Circumcision, 150</p><p>Eliade, Mircea, 8</p><p>Cleckley, 15</p><p>Emotion, 53, 63, 81, 89, 91</p><p>Cleckley, Hervey, 17, 22,</p><p>Emotional life, 251</p><p>122, 128, 132, 148, 311</p><p>Engels, Frederick, 186</p><p>Cognition, 47, 48, 49, 51, 58,</p><p>Essential Pathocracy</p><p>121, 267, 269, 293, 307,</p><p>Former opponents integrate</p><p>308</p><p>into new regime, 227</p><p>and acceptance of religious</p><p>Essential Psychopathy, 29, 43,</p><p>truths, 268</p><p>125, 132, 133, 136, 137,</p><p>Communism, 25, 37, 112,</p><p>138, 140, 162, 189, 193,</p><p>116, 160, 166, 239, 240,</p><p>195, 219, 225, 230, 288,</p><p>263, 315</p><p>290</p><p><emphasis>Communist Manifesto</emphasis>, 166</p><p>And social movements,</p><p>Comte, Auguste, 57</p><p>190, 191</p><p>law of three phases, 57</p><p>Desire to change world,</p><p>Conscience, 133, 143, 151,</p><p>190</p><p>164, 181, 199, 289</p><p>Conscious of their</p><p>in new pathocratic</p><p>difference, 204</p><p>bourgeoisie, 225</p><p>Inspirational role in social</p><p><emphasis>Religion as drug on</emphasis>, 271</p><p>movements, 193</p><p>Conversive thinking, 63, 91,</p><p>Involved in pathocratic</p><p>151, 152, 153, 177, 211,</p><p>activity, 194</p><p>264, 280</p><p>Percentage of population,</p><p>Dabrowski, Kasimir, 311</p><p>223</p><p>Dabrowski, Kazimierz, 126,</p><p>Role in pathocracy, 198</p><p>146</p><p>special knowledge of, 35</p><p>Dabrowski, Kazimierz, 126</p><p>Europe, 8, 90, 91, 92, 93, 108,</p><p>Daltonists, 121</p><p>115, 135, 136, 175, 177,</p><p>Analogy to pathocratic</p><p>214, 278, 290</p><p>system, 230</p><p>Evil, 30, 38, 39, 40, 42, 43,</p><p><emphasis>Darkness at Noon</emphasis>, 38</p><p>48, 55, 62, 69, 70, 78, 86,</p><p>Doubletalk, 165, 205, 242</p><p>87, 88, 93, 95, 96, 97, 98,</p><p>and religion, 271</p><p>99, 101, 102, 103, 104,</p><p>Drury, Shadia, 192</p><p>106, 109, 116, 117, 120,</p><p>Dzerzhinsky, Felix, 134, 135</p><p>122, 126, 129, 132, 134,</p><p>Egotism, 41, 43, 54, 55, 56,</p><p>135, 141, 142, 143, 144,</p><p>82, 88, 89, 91, 95, 106,</p><p>148, 149, 150, 157, 164,</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>319</p><p>172, 173, 178, 179, 180,</p><p>Freudian Psychology, 91</p><p>181, 182, 188, 242, 249,</p><p>Frontal Characteropathy, 113,</p><p>267, 269, 274, 275, 276,</p><p>140, 162, 189, 224</p><p>277, 280, 281, 283, 288,</p><p>Frostig, Peter Jacob, 186</p><p>289, 292, 293, 294, 295,</p><p>Germany, 38, 107, 109, 258,</p><p>302, 306, 308, 309, 311</p><p>292</p><p>as a continuum, 280</p><p>Psychiatry and praise of</p><p>Christian civilizations loses</p><p>pathological types, 69</p><p>immunity to, 48</p><p>Gray, K.C., 122, 312</p><p>Deficiencies in instinct and,</p><p>Greece, 45</p><p>62</p><p>Greek philosophy, 45</p><p>Genesis of, 30, 38, 40, 42,</p><p>Grossman, Arthur, 112</p><p>43, 69, 96, 97, 98, 99,</p><p>Grossman, Vassily, 112</p><p>101, 102, 103, 104, 106,</p><p>Guilt, 109, 128, 129, 131,</p><p>109, 120, 122, 126, 132,</p><p>132, 180, 288, 291</p><p>134, 141, 142, 143, 144,</p><p>Happy times, 84, 89, 154, 176</p><p>148, 173, 178, 179, 180,</p><p>Hare, 15</p><p>267, 274, 276, 277, 280,</p><p>Hare, Robert, 15, 126, 131,</p><p>288, 289, 295, 302, 308,</p><p>262</p><p>309</p><p>Harrington, Alan, 18</p><p>Macrosocial, 7</p><p>Herder, J.S., 86</p><p>Moral, 42</p><p>Herling-Grudzinsk, Gustav,</p><p>Moral interpretation of, 100</p><p>38</p><p>Moralistic interpretation of,</p><p>History, 9</p><p>149</p><p>Hitler, Adolf, 163</p><p>Moralistic interpretaton of,</p><p>Hitlerism, 91, 200</p><p>102</p><p>Hungary, 28, 225</p><p>Psychobiological, 42</p><p>Hutchison, H.C., 122</p><p>Relationship of</p><p>Hysteria, 90, 114, 115, 147,</p><p>pathological types to, 99</p><p>154, 175, 176, 177, 183,</p><p>Religion, 268</p><p>217, 280, 312</p><p>Study of using model of</p><p>Europe, 108</p><p>medicine, 98</p><p>Social, 89</p><p>Extraordinary Rendition, 205</p><p>Hysteriodal Cycle</p><p>Family, 37, 52, 58, 90, 114,</p><p>European, 90</p><p>115, 137, 142, 150, 151,</p><p>Length of, 90</p><p>155, 265, 269, 284, 285,</p><p>Hysteroidal Cycle, 84, 183,</p><p>315</p><p>203</p><p>and society, 70</p><p>Hysteroidal Cycle</p><p>Children of pathocrats, 227</p><p>America, 91, 92, 94</p><p>Fascism, 91, 166</p><p>European, 92</p><p>Forgiveness, 47, 182, 249,</p><p>Ideology, 30, 37, 68, 74, 145,</p><p>288, 289, 290, 293</p><p>155, 156, 157, 158, 160,</p><p>320</p><p>INDEX</p><empty-line/><p>162, 164, 165, 166, 167,</p><p>Individual, 28, 32, 34, 35, 36,</p><p>171, 172, 185, 188, 189,</p><p>38, 42, 46, 48, 49, 54, 57,</p><p>190, 191, 193, 195, 199,</p><p>59, 62, 65, 71, 72, 73, 79,</p><p>200, 201, 202, 203, 204,</p><p>82, 83, 85, 89, 91, 92, 96,</p><p>205, 209, 214, 217, 218,</p><p>101, 102, 106, 108, 110,</p><p>219, 220, 226, 227, 228,</p><p>114, 120, 123, 137, 140,</p><p>229, 235, 237, 239, 242,</p><p>141, 145, 153, 156, 160,</p><p>253, 255, 257, 260, 263,</p><p>162, 163, 165, 175, 176,</p><p>270, 280, 285, 288, 296,</p><p>178, 180, 181, 182, 189,</p><p>297, 299, 300</p><p>215, 218, 224, 235, 237,</p><p>And Pathocracy, 200, 205</p><p>242, 251, 268, 273, 279,</p><p>and pedagogues, 74</p><p>282, 283, 287, 289, 291,</p><p>And psychological warfare,</p><p>293, 296, 300, 301, 307</p><p>218</p><p>Ability to intuit</p><p>As camouflage for</p><p>psychological states in</p><p>pathocracy, 200</p><p>others, 60</p><p>Confrontation with original</p><p>Adaptation to pathocratic</p><p>adherents, 200</p><p>system, 246</p><p>Contamination of, 201</p><p>and place in society, 75</p><p>Pathological, 86</p><p>and practical knowledge of</p><p>Pathological ideas hide</p><p>pathocracy, 93</p><p>within, 184</p><p>and society, 70</p><p>Primitive character of 19th</p><p><emphasis>As fundamental unit of </emphasis></p><p>century, 71</p><p><emphasis>analysis</emphasis>, 59</p><p>Split in social movements</p><p>Healing, 44</p><p>between founders and</p><p>Hysteroidal Cycle, 86</p><p>pathological types, 192</p><p>Overpowered by schizoids,</p><p><emphasis>Ignota</emphasis><emphasis>nulla curatio morbi</emphasis>,</p><p>185</p><p>30, 44, 229</p><p>Pathologizing of, 195</p><p>Immunity, 36, 47, 48, 82, 88,</p><p>vs. collective interests, 81</p><p>120, 140, 141, 154, 156,</p><p>World view as basis for</p><p>160, 179, 206, 217, 234,</p><p>decision-making, 53</p><p>236, 244, 245, 247, 275,</p><p>Individual and place in</p><p>276, 277, 279, 286, 287,</p><p>society, 75</p><p>288, 289, 293, 298, 299,</p><p>Individual freedom, 81</p><p>300, 301, 308</p><p>Individual psychological</p><p><emphasis>as holistic factor of </emphasis></p><p>anomalies, 43</p><p><emphasis>organism</emphasis>, 224</p><p>Indoctrination, 33, 34, 195,</p><p>From psychopathy, 34</p><p>197, 245, 250</p><p>of human reason, 88</p><p>Failure of, 196</p><p>Of normal people against</p><p>Of American soldiers by</p><p>pathocracy, 196</p><p>North Vietnamese, 233</p><p>of society, 78</p><p>Induction, 36, 147, 267</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>321</p><p>Pathological, 142</p><p>Level of and understanding</p><p>Information selection, 152</p><p>of pathocracy, 238</p><p>Innate traits, 52</p><p>Normal people�s superior,</p><p>Instinct, 53, 60, 61, 62, 63,</p><p>240, 241</p><p>71, 80, 81, 82, 127, 148,</p><p>Percentage of gifted, 64</p><p>213, 232, 237, 252, 262,</p><p>Specific of pathocracy, 211</p><p>293</p><p>Introspection, 49, 63, 85, 267</p><p>Inability to distinguish</p><p>Israel, 271</p><p>pathological aberrations,</p><p>Jackals, 136</p><p>61</p><p>Jenkins, R., 122, 312</p><p>Pathological aberrations, 61</p><p>Jung, C.G., 49</p><p>sthenic, 62</p><p>Knowledge, 28, 31, 42, 44,</p><p>Instinctive endowment, 59,</p><p>47, 48, 49, 57, 68, 69, 70,</p><p>60, 150</p><p>77, 83, 85, 88, 93, 94, 95,</p><p>Instinctive substratum, 60,</p><p>102, 103, 104, 110, 127,</p><p>118, 124, 126, 145, 225,</p><p>129, 134, 135, 137, 143,</p><p>240, 262</p><p>148, 152, 172, 173, 179,</p><p>Deficits in allow</p><p>227, 235, 239, 241, 243,</p><p>pathological influence</p><p>257, 259, 260, 261, 262,</p><p>of, 36</p><p>263, 264, 266, 267, 269,</p><p>Factor in joining the</p><p>278, 280, 281, 284, 293,</p><p>opposition, 237</p><p>294, 297, 298, 300, 301,</p><p>Human difference from</p><p>303, 304, 309, 310</p><p>animals, 60</p><p>Acquired, 62</p><p>Normal, 235</p><p>and religion, 268</p><p>Pathocratic belief they can</p><p>Emergence of individuals</p><p>change others, 231</p><p>who understand the</p><p>Intelligence, 64, 77, 78, 102,</p><p>pathocracy, 243</p><p>113, 114, 115, 121, 124,</p><p>Illusory, 158</p><p>127, 157, 202, 210, 225,</p><p>Incorporating practical</p><p>231, 235, 237, 238, 251,</p><p>knowledge, 252</p><p>262, 291, 307</p><p>Misformed through</p><p>and instinctual substratum,</p><p>characteropathy, 107</p><p>64</p><p>Moral knowledge, 268</p><p>Collective, 73</p><p>Natural, 185</p><p>Correlation with internal</p><p>Objective, 220</p><p>projection, 64</p><p>Objective Nautral, 30</p><p>Deficiencies in pathological</p><p>of psychological resistance</p><p>types, 240</p><p>to pathocracy, 236</p><p>Individual differences in,</p><p>Practical k. about</p><p>64</p><p>pathocracy, 234</p><p>Judgments by people on, 77</p><p>322</p><p>INDEX</p><empty-line/><p>Practical knowledge of</p><p>Influence of Greek on</p><p>pathocracy, 196, 220,</p><p>Christianity, 47</p><p>241, 244, 245, 275</p><p>Limits in describing</p><p>Religious justification to</p><p>psychopathy, 39</p><p>reject, 270</p><p>Moralizing, 104</p><p>Scientific, 237</p><p>Natural, 39, 42, 55, 68, 72,</p><p>Secret, 34</p><p>73, 89, 127, 206, 222,</p><p>Special knowledge of</p><p>258</p><p>pasychopaths, 211</p><p>Inability to explain</p><p>Special knowledge of</p><p>world, 53</p><p>psychopath, 36</p><p>Natural conceptual, 158</p><p>Special knowledge of</p><p>Need for objective</p><p>psychopaths, 127, 128,</p><p>language to understand</p><p>145, 171, 240, 241</p><p>pathocracy, 222</p><p>Special knowledge of the</p><p>Objective, 42, 51, 53, 55,</p><p>psychopath, 36</p><p>66, 70, 72, 270, 274</p><p>Specific knowledge of</p><p>Elaboration of, 55</p><p>psychopaths, 257</p><p>Psychological, 50, 51, 59,</p><p>Koestler, Arthur, 38</p><p>74</p><p>Kraepelin, Emil, 123</p><p>Scientific, 40, 41</p><p>Kraul Taylor, F., 122, 312</p><p>Semiotics, 72</p><p>Kretschmer, E., 135, 136</p><p>Social Science, 41</p><p>Kretschmer, Ernst, 135</p><p>Using pathocratic language,</p><p>Language, 27, 39, 41, 42, 45,</p><p>243</p><p>51, 55, 58, 70, 97, 128,</p><p>Law, 45, 47, 85, 87, 121, 142,</p><p>165, 173, 188, 225, 239,</p><p>143, 148, 157, 168, 193,</p><p>243, 244, 252, 274, 287,</p><p>207, 213, 276, 279, 288,</p><p>301</p><p>289, 290, 293, 295, 308,</p><p>Common among</p><p>309</p><p>pathcracies, 200</p><p>Beyond moralizing, 309</p><p>Conceptual, 50</p><p>Botany, 103</p><p>Content Plane, 72</p><p>Emergence of monotheistic</p><p>Description of psychopathy</p><p>idea, 268</p><p>through natural</p><p>Incapable of counteracting</p><p>language, 38</p><p>pathocractic phenomena,</p><p>Expression Plane, 72</p><p>212</p><p>Formation of new language</p><p>Moral, 151</p><p>of normal people, 241</p><p>Natural, 138, 139</p><p>Formulated for this work,</p><p>Roman, 46</p><p>57</p><p>Simplified notion of a</p><p>Inability to deal with</p><p>being, 48</p><p>analysis of psychopathy,</p><p>Laws of social life, 71, 94,</p><p>56</p><p>297</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>323</p><p>Lecter, Hannibal, 10</p><p>Moralizing interpretation, 42,</p><p>Legal Argument, 20</p><p>53, 148, 151, 157, 181,</p><p>Lenin, V.I., 112</p><p>184, 207, 220, 221, 239,</p><p>Le#mian, Boles"aw, 249</p><p>274, 285, 292, 293</p><p><emphasis>Life and Fate</emphasis>, 112</p><p>Of schizoidal declaration,</p><p>!obaczewski, 7</p><p>187</p><p>!obaczewski, Andrew, 15,</p><p>Mumps, 119, 159</p><p>16, 19, 25, 72, 73, 144,</p><p>Munthe, Axel, 89</p><p>238, 258, 263</p><p>Mythological imagination, 46</p><p>Biography, 315</p><p>Neoconservatives, 8, 24, 109,</p><p>Lorenz, Konrad, 60</p><p>186, 207</p><p>Luria, 113</p><p>Neoconsevratives, 206</p><p>Macropathy, 79, 80</p><p>Neurosis, 139, 226, 234, 283,</p><p>Macrosocial pathological</p><p>312</p><p>phenomenon, 82, 128, 203,</p><p>Natural reaction to</p><p>206, 216, 229, 253, 279,</p><p>subordination to</p><p>280, 285</p><p>pathocrats, 251</p><p>and religion, 269</p><p><emphasis>Ontogeny</emphasis>, 52</p><p>Macrosocial Phenomena, 42,</p><p>Opinion Polls, 77</p><p>43</p><p>Paralogism, 90, 154, 205,</p><p>Macrosocial Phenomenon, 28,</p><p>211, 251</p><p>29, 55, 91, 203, 204, 213,</p><p>Paralogistics, 155</p><p>226, 241, 243, 245, 247,</p><p>Paramoralism, 110, 149, 150,</p><p>253, 262, 263, 264, 282,</p><p>151, 155, 205, 211, 218,</p><p>283, 285, 291, 294, 301</p><p>236, 248, 251, 271</p><p>Magid, Ken, 18</p><p>Paramoralism, 170, 171</p><p>Marx, Karl, 125, 188, 255</p><p>Paranoid Character Disorders,</p><p>As example of schizoidal</p><p>110</p><p>personality, 186</p><p>Paranoid Disorder</p><p>Schizoidia, 188</p><p>Effects on Normal People,</p><p>Marxism, 166</p><p>110</p><p><emphasis>Mask of Sanity, The</emphasis></p><p>Pathcracy</p><p>(Cleckley), 128, 311</p><p>Imposed by force, 220</p><p>McKelvey, Caroline, 18</p><p>Pathocracy, 36, 43, 175, 177,</p><p>Mill, J.S., 58</p><p>180, 183, 184, 195, 196,</p><p>Mill, John Stuart, 58</p><p>197, 199, 200, 201, 202,</p><p>Moral judgment, 54, 180, 181</p><p>204, 208, 212, 213, 214,</p><p>and pathocrats, 222</p><p>216, 218, 219, 220, 221,</p><p>As result of natural world</p><p>223, 224, 227, 228, 230,</p><p>view, 53</p><p>237, 238, 249, 250, 253,</p><p>Moral reason, 64, 78, 150</p><p>256, 257, 266, 269, 270,</p><p>Moralizing interpretation, 39</p><p>271, 275, 276, 280, 285,</p><p>287, 288, 291, 293, 297,</p><p>324</p><p>INDEX</p><empty-line/><p>298, 299, 300, 301, 304,</p><p>imposed by force, 203, 213,</p><p>305, 306</p><p>214, 221, 275</p><p>Affecting susceptible</p><p>Incapable of management,</p><p>personalities, 211</p><p>210</p><p>and Children, 234</p><p>Inherent economic</p><p>And conquest, 210</p><p>weakness, 210</p><p>And Ideology, 200</p><p>Key roles filled by</p><p><emphasis>And morals</emphasis>, 205</p><p>pathological types, 194</p><p>and Religion, 267, 269</p><p>Lack of creative skills, 198</p><p>Art of psychological terror,</p><p>Legalistic thinking, 212</p><p>244</p><p>Limited by military of</p><p>artificially infected, 203,</p><p>others, 210</p><p>216</p><p>Need for expansionism,</p><p>and religion, 275</p><p>209</p><p>As disease, 44</p><p>New bourgeoisie of, 225</p><p>as macrosocial disease, 229</p><p>Percentage of population,</p><p>Control over psychology,</p><p>223</p><p>257</p><p>Period of maturation, 195</p><p>Control over scientific</p><p>Psychophysiological shock</p><p>organizations, 259</p><p>of, 236</p><p>Definition of, 193</p><p>Purging of transitional</p><p><emphasis>Destruction of normal </emphasis></p><p>leadership, 220</p><p><emphasis>people as biological </emphasis></p><p>Religion under, 274</p><p><emphasis>necessity</emphasis>, 208</p><p>Revenge upon normal</p><p>Dissimulative form, 220</p><p>people, 215</p><p>Double game of new</p><p>Role of characteropathy in,</p><p>bourgeoisie, 226</p><p>188</p><p>Effects on normal people,</p><p>Role of instincts in, 262</p><p>244</p><p>Role of liberal pathocrats,</p><p>Eliminating books from</p><p>197</p><p>libraries, 35</p><p>Role of schizoids in</p><p>Essential factors in genesis</p><p>formation of, 185</p><p>of, 183</p><p>Science a danger to, 258</p><p>Etiological factors of, 203</p><p>Second group of influence,</p><p>Expansion of, 206</p><p>224</p><p>Expansionism derived from</p><p>Structure of, 226</p><p>very nature of, 209</p><p>Susceptible individuals,</p><p><emphasis>Feels threatened by society </emphasis></p><p>225</p><p><emphasis>of normal people</emphasis>, 207</p><p>Percentage of</p><p>Found in all societies and</p><p>population, 223</p><p>social movements, 199</p><p>Terror, 233</p><p>Immunity by effects of</p><p>toxic substances, 223</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>325</p><p>War as means of</p><p>Destructive effects upon,</p><p>eliminating normal</p><p>234</p><p>people, 208</p><p>Development of, 94</p><p>Weakness of, 198, 199</p><p>Disintegrative states, 67,</p><p>Pathological conspiracies, 78</p><p>145, 153, 286</p><p>Pathological factors, 42, 69,</p><p>Effects of pathocracy upon,</p><p>87, 101, 102, 104, 105,</p><p>231</p><p>109, 111, 116, 119, 122,</p><p>Effects of pathological</p><p>137, 141, 143, 145, 149,</p><p>types on, 140</p><p>151, 154, 155, 157, 160,</p><p>Egotization of, 67</p><p>163, 167, 168, 169, 177,</p><p>Emotional factors affect</p><p>180, 181, 188, 218, 234,</p><p>perception, 53</p><p>235, 265, 273, 274, 276,</p><p>Formation of, 70</p><p>292, 301</p><p>how influenced by</p><p>And final transformation of</p><p>characteropathy, 106</p><p>social movments, 189</p><p>In the face of psychopathy,</p><p>And ideology, 201</p><p>34</p><p>Monitoring of, 103</p><p>Instability of, 66</p><p>Pathological thought, 74</p><p>Judeo-Christian Notion, 46</p><p>Pathological types</p><p>Oversimplifications by</p><p>Inherited deviations, 162</p><p>Church, 58</p><p>Paranoid, 189</p><p>Pathocracy and children,</p><p>Pavlov, Ivan, 49, 111</p><p>251</p><p>Perinatal damage, 105, 113,</p><p>Psychological causation of,</p><p>114, 116, 142</p><p>65</p><p>Personality, 34, 42, 48, 51,</p><p>Psychological differences</p><p>59, 62, 63, 67, 71, 72, 85,</p><p>in, 65</p><p>87, 94, 102, 103, 110, 111,</p><p>Psychological View, 49, 50</p><p>112, 114, 115, 117, 139,</p><p>Recession of in happy</p><p>140, 145, 146, 147, 152,</p><p>times, 89</p><p>155, 157, 176, 182, 185,</p><p>Reconstruction of, 282</p><p>187, 211, 213, 217, 226,</p><p>Reintegrative state, 67</p><p>232, 234, 237, 248, 250,</p><p>Roman notion, 46</p><p>262, 264, 270, 285, 286,</p><p>Supra-sensory causation</p><p>299, 312</p><p>and, 66</p><p>6% succomb to pathocratic</p><p>PersonalityEffects of</p><p>influences, 35</p><p>pathological factors upon,</p><p>Causality of, 51</p><p>142</p><p>Changes of due to shock,</p><p>Poland, 28, 32, 37, 99, 124,</p><p>214</p><p>136, 239, 249, 315</p><p>Characteropathic influence</p><p>Ponerization process, 160,</p><p>of Wilhelm II, 106</p><p>161, 165, 167, 168, 169,</p><p>253, 272</p><p>326</p><p>INDEX</p><empty-line/><p>Ponerogenesis, 40, 42, 43, 99,</p><p>Attacking religious</p><p>158, 173, 178, 180, 184,</p><p>convictions, 275</p><p>203, 213, 221, 265, 269,</p><p>Ineffectual propaganda</p><p>274, 281, 295</p><p>against pathocracy, 243</p><p>Dissimulative phase, 172,</p><p>To hide true character of</p><p>197, 198, 215, 221, 236,</p><p>pathocracy from world,</p><p>273</p><p>197</p><p>in a religious movement,</p><p>Psychiatry, 123, 135, 256</p><p>271</p><p><emphasis>Abuse of</emphasis>, 266</p><p>in religious groups, 272</p><p>Abuse of for political</p><p>Transitional phase, 193</p><p>purposes, 265</p><p>Ponerogenic Association</p><p>Disease and delusions, 202</p><p>and Religion, 271, 272</p><p>in Soviet Union, 256</p><p>Ponerogenic associations,</p><p>in the Ukraine, 260</p><p>158, 160</p><p>Under Communism, 255</p><p>Primary and secondary,</p><p>Under pathocracy, 260</p><p>160, 161</p><p>Under pthocracy, 264</p><p>Secondary, 161, 162, 164</p><p>Psychology, 31, 35, 42, 50,</p><p>Ponerogenic process, 101,</p><p>58, 59, 62, 66, 91, 95, 98,</p><p>103</p><p>104, 132, 136, 137, 142,</p><p>Ponerogenic process, 164</p><p>144, 154, 172, 176, 178,</p><p>Ponerogenic processes, 144,</p><p>234, 241, 246, 256, 260,</p><p>145, 149, 154</p><p>261, 262, 265, 282, 311,</p><p><emphasis>and Religion</emphasis>, 270</p><p>313, 315</p><p>Ponerology</p><p>Association, 63</p><p>Monitoring of pathological</p><p>Barren under Roman rule,</p><p>factors, 103</p><p>46</p><p>Ponerology, 29, 32, 42, 43,</p><p>Behaviorists, 49</p><p>99, 122, 149, 157, 170,</p><p>Common substratum, 61</p><p>176, 178, 179, 180, 181,</p><p>Consequences of repressed</p><p>221, 280, 281, 312</p><p>attitudes, 66</p><p>first criterion of, 158, 170,</p><p>Historical overview, 49</p><p>176</p><p>Need for solitude, 63</p><p>Powell, Colin, 198</p><p>Possibility of subjective</p><p>Project For A New American</p><p>error, 49</p><p>Century, 186</p><p>Progress depends upon</p><p>Propaganda, 33, 43, 71, 163,</p><p>practitioners, 49</p><p>164, 165, 193, 197, 201,</p><p>Study of personality, 49</p><p>211, 226, 231, 236, 248,</p><p>Suffers censorship, 49</p><p>250, 252, 257, 304</p><p>Under Communism, 255</p><p>Activation of pathological</p><p>Under pathocracy, 260</p><p>ideas in society, 189</p><p>Under pthocracy, 264</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>327</p><p>Universal law on</p><p>Succombs to</p><p>psychological</p><p>ponerogenesis, 270</p><p>differences in a</p><p>Reverse blocking, 211</p><p>population, 65</p><p>Reversion blockades, 155</p><p>Used to study moral</p><p>Reversive blockade, 151</p><p>problems, 98</p><p>Rice, Condoleeza, 198</p><p>Psychopathology, 27, 28, 31,</p><p>Roman civilization, 45, 168</p><p>35, 41, 42, 43, 69, 101,</p><p>Rome, 47, 249</p><p>122, 145, 154, 178, 212,</p><p>Philosophy in, 46</p><p>222, 233, 256, 259, 261,</p><p>Roosevelt, F.D., 119</p><p>262, 282, 292, 297, 298,</p><p>Rove, Karl, 191</p><p>313, 315</p><p>Rumsfeld, Donald, 191</p><p>Frozen evolution of</p><p>Russell, E.S., 87, 313</p><p>personality, 66</p><p>Saint Augustine, 7</p><p>Psychopathy, 29, 43, 123,</p><p>Salekin, Trobst, and</p><p>125, 129, 131, 133, 134,</p><p>Krioukova, 129</p><p>136, 137, 140, 154, 227,</p><p>Salekin, Trobst, Krioukova,</p><p>233, 240, 263, 312, 313</p><p>126</p><p>Awareness of as healer,</p><p>Schizoid declaration, 124,</p><p>233</p><p>125, 186</p><p>Characteristics of, 130</p><p>Correction of, 187</p><p>Imitating feelings, 21</p><p>How interpreted by normal</p><p><emphasis>Psychopathy and Delinquency</emphasis></p><p>person, 186</p><p>(W. and J. McCord), 131,</p><p><emphasis>Pathological acceptance of</emphasis>,</p><p>313</p><p>187</p><p>PsychopathyStudy of under</p><p>Three reactions to, 187</p><p>pathocracy, 262</p><p>Schizoida, 214, 223</p><p>Purusha, 51</p><p>Schizoidia, 123, 137, 186, 188</p><p>Quantum Future Group, 30</p><p>And Jews, 186</p><p>Rasputin, 87</p><p>Impose conceptual views</p><p>Reasoning, 49, 60, 68, 87, 90,</p><p>on others, 185</p><p>102, 110, 116, 117, 122,</p><p>Schizophrenia, 123, 124, 165,</p><p>124, 133, 146, 150, 152,</p><p>167</p><p>154, 175, 176, 188, 203,</p><p>Search for Truth, 85</p><p>240, 270, 304</p><p>See  <emphasis>Stalin, Josef</emphasis>, 116</p><p>and Moralists, 103</p><p>Selection of premises, 152</p><p>Deterioration of, 75</p><p>Semiotics, 72</p><p>Examples of objective, 72</p><p>September 11, 2001, 209</p><p>in Hysteroidal Cycle, 91</p><p>Shah of Iran, 118</p><p>Ongoing development of,</p><p>Silberman, Steve, 133</p><p>63</p><p><emphasis>Silence of the Lambs</emphasis>, 10</p><p>Religion, 150</p><p>Skirtoidal, 223</p><p>Skirtoids, 135, 136</p><p>328</p><p>INDEX</p><empty-line/><p><emphasis>Smoke over Birkenau</emphasis>, 38</p><p>Creative potential of, 65</p><p>Snezhnevsky, Andrei, 256</p><p>Democracy, 305</p><p>Social hysteria, 89</p><p>Deviants in, 74</p><p>Social order indicator, 76</p><p>Division of under</p><p>Social Science, 41, 55, 87,</p><p>pathocracy, 238</p><p>222</p><p>Dreams of obtaining power</p><p>and psychological</p><p>in, 78</p><p>complexity, 68</p><p>Effects of upward and</p><p>Reaction to Psychology, 59</p><p>downward social</p><p><emphasis>Socially Adept Psychopath</emphasis>, 20</p><p>adjustment, 76</p><p>Society, 35, 48, 49, 51, 52,</p><p>Eugenics, 143</p><p>59, 64, 70, 72, 73, 74, 75,</p><p>European study of, 45</p><p>77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 83, 85,</p><p>Expansion of pathocracy</p><p>86, 89, 108, 120, 124, 131,</p><p>within, 207</p><p>133, 135, 136, 138, 140,</p><p>Family as unit (Comte), 58</p><p>141, 154, 156, 159, 160,</p><p>Foreign character of</p><p>161, 168, 169, 172, 173,</p><p>imposed pathocracy, 215</p><p>174, 176, 177, 179, 181,</p><p>Hysteroidal Cycle, 86</p><p>183, 184, 190, 193, 194,</p><p>Man as basic unit of, 59</p><p>195, 196, 197, 203, 207,</p><p>Network of normal people,</p><p>208, 209, 213, 214, 216,</p><p>246</p><p>217, 218, 219, 221, 224,</p><p>Normal people majority in</p><p>225, 226, 227, 228, 231,</p><p>pathocratic, 225</p><p>232, 234, 235, 236, 237,</p><p>of normal people under</p><p>239, 240, 241, 242, 243,</p><p>pathocracy, 246</p><p>244, 247, 248, 250, 253,</p><p>Pathocracy potentially</p><p>255, 259, 275, 287, 289,</p><p>present in all, 183</p><p>291, 292, 294, 301, 305,</p><p>Pathologizing of, 195</p><p>308, 309</p><p>Poisoned by schizoid ideas,</p><p>Ability to progress, 71</p><p>186</p><p>Ability to understand</p><p>Psychologist�s view of, 72</p><p>psychological</p><p>Psychopath�s view of, 141</p><p>phenomena, 74</p><p>Quality of psychological</p><p>and Deviants, 78</p><p>world view in, 73</p><p>and neurosis, 251</p><p>Role of instinctual</p><p>And pathocracy, 193</p><p>substratum in, 62</p><p>and pathological members,</p><p><emphasis>Role of intelligence in</emphasis>, 65</p><p>68</p><p>Science useful for, 50</p><p>and religion, 249</p><p>Stratification of under</p><p>and self-involved</p><p>pathocracy, 214</p><p>pedagogues, 73</p><p>vs. individual survival, 61</p><p>Apiary, 71</p><p>with non-homogeneous</p><p>Consequences of large, 79</p><p>populations, 79</p><empty-line/><p>POLITICAL PONEROLOGY</p><p>329</p><p>Socrates, 88, 268</p><p>Inability of pathocrat to</p><p>Solzhenitsyn, A, 38</p><p>think like normal people,</p><p>Solzhenitsyn, Alexander, 112</p><p>243</p><p>Sommerhoff, G., 87, 313</p><p>Man�s ability for abstract,</p><p>Soviet system, 59</p><p>63</p><p>Spellbinders, 145, 155, 156,</p><p>Mental effort develops</p><p>157, 162, 163, 166, 171,</p><p>understanding, 248</p><p>178, 188, 217, 218</p><p>Pathological anomalies in,</p><p>Spiritual crisis, 169, 174, 183</p><p>86</p><p>Stalin, Josef, 116, 117, 313</p><p>Pathologizing of, 195</p><p>Stout, Martha, 12, 17, 24, 126</p><p>Philosophical, 98</p><p>Strauss, Leo, 191</p><p>Psychological, 51</p><p>Subconscious Selection, 91,</p><p>Tillier, William, 146</p><p>108, 115, 176, 280, 282</p><p>Transpersonification, 36, 233,</p><p>Szasz, Thomas, 282</p><p>235</p><p>Szmaglewska, Severina, 38</p><p>At university, 35</p><p>Szmaglewska, Seweryna, 38</p><p>Pathological nature of, 35</p><p><emphasis>Teleology</emphasis>, 87</p><p>United States of America, 26,</p><p><emphasis>The Mask of Sanity</emphasis>, 17</p><p>80, 202, 260, 263, 271</p><p><emphasis>The Other World</emphasis>, 38</p><p>and atomic bomb, 258</p><p>Thought, 47, 49, 53, 57, 66,</p><p>and ignorance of pathcracy,</p><p>70, 75, 86, 90, 104, 108,</p><p>263</p><p>109, 111, 114, 115, 124,</p><p>On way to pathocracy, 217</p><p>130, 132, 153, 154, 167,</p><p>Upward social adjustment, 76</p><p>177, 179, 181, 223, 225,</p><p>van Voren, Robert, 59, 256,</p><p>247, 250, 252, 262, 268,</p><p>260, 261</p><p>294, 295, 296, 306, 307</p><p>Vatican, 27</p><p>Ability for complex</p><p>War on Terror, The, 211</p><p>operations of, 64</p><p>Wikipedia, 123</p><p>Characteropathic defects</p><p>Wilhelm II of Germany, 107</p><p>of, 188</p><p>William of Ockham, 299</p><p>Deadened by contact with</p><p>World View, 51, 52, 102, 248</p><p>psychopathy, 236</p><p>Causative conditioning of,</p><p>De-Criterialization of, 140</p><p>51</p><p>Discipline of, 303</p><p>Deviant, 55, 74</p><p>Early Christian, 47</p><p>Natural, 41, 43, 53, 54, 57,</p><p>Gap between thought and</p><p>82, 106, 127, 140, 142,</p><p>psychological reality, 48</p><p>144, 145, 160, 214, 237,</p><p>In a truly Communist</p><p>240, 241, 269, 270, 273,</p><p>society, 255</p><p>274, 282, 307, 309</p><p>in Hysteroidal Cycle, 85</p><p>Egotism of, 54</p><p>Errors of, 52</p><p>330</p><p>INDEX</p><empty-line/><p>Mirrors reality or</p><p>Objective, 73</p><p>perception, 53</p><p>Psychopathic, 54</p><p>Moralistic categories of,</p><p>World View</p><p>83</p><p>Objective, 41</p><p>Tendencies towards</p><p>XYY Karyotype, 121, 137</p><p>deformation, 53</p><p>Zarathustra, 268</p><empty-line/></section></body><binary id="0" content-type="image/jpeg">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</binary>
</FictionBook>